I'm headed out hiking in the countryside this weekend so I should be able to
try this.,...
thanks..
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: Zone System for Color?
> Mike,
>
> I was thinking of starting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] commented:
> > > The best part is that you don't have to dig for special batteries. It
> > > uses regular 9V batteries.
ERNReed asked:
> > What does a selenium meter need a 9v battery for?
Jeff explained:
> I compared it to other Gossen meters that do require the now discontinu
.
>
> Many have to switch to 6x7 system to reinvigorate enabling behaviour...
>
> Many cheers from here.
> Sid
>
Good choice
JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gall
Hi all,
Just a touch of new lense acquisition giddiness--
got a SMC A 70-210 f 4
anna SMC A 50/2.8 macro
anna SMC M 40/2.8 "pancake"
all 3 for about $375 total. not a steal, but definitely better than
KEH prices for mint minus
I'm running out of acquisition material..
Many have
hi,
f*f/t=E*18%*S/K/PI
'f' is Av, 't' is exposure time in second, E is lux, K is a constant, equals 15.4 in
documents of Kodak.
So, if E=500lux, S=ASA100, then f*f/t=500*0.18*100/15.4/3.14159=186, equals 1/6s,F5.6
or 1/90,F1.4 .
ÔÚ 2002-06-04 23:06:00 ÄúдµÀ£º
>Hi.
>
>Does anyone know if th
On 4 Jun 2002 at 23:06, Butch Black wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Does anyone know if there is some reasonably simple formula to take a
> regular meter reading (i.e. F4 @ 1/60) and convert it into lux? The Frontier
> shouldn't be put in an area with more then 500 lux lighting, and where we are
> putting it i
Hi Team,
I have assembled a page of pic from my week away late June. The images were all
shot with my Oly E-10, I did shoot 67 chromes and Pentax 35mm but unfortunately
I don't have a film scanner available to me at the moment.
In any case if interested please see:
http://www.home.aone.net.au
Hi all,
I know discussing P&S is inviting the fury of brotherhood :), but I need
to help a friend in office who wants to buy a P&S with zoom ability.
My only experience with a P&S is a Olympus Epic that had a 28mm lens.
It was quite good.
Would somebody know about Pentax or other brands? A mid-
It is a nice lens. (i.e., the power zoom 28-105.) I just wish it weren't so
dark . . . It is one of 2 lenses I own which is newer than A-series, (I own
a lot of lenses). the other new lens I have is the FA* 24mm /2.0.
Stan
> From: Ken Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Da
Well, I don't know much about the Canon line up of
cameras, but somebody told me the other day that they
make a camera that can shoot both digital & 35mm film.
If that's true (maybe that's true for all DSLR's?),
than that's what I want from Pentax! I would probably
sell everything to get my hand
Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences. I'll let you all know how it
goes.
-Scott
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Took a special effects photo class a couple of years ago where the
instructor talked about the Holga. Never heard of one with a Polaroid back.
Jim A.
> From: Evan Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:06:28 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: O
I thought about visiting the Palouse country again. I have visited the
falls and rode the ferry. Also visited Starbuck, which I thought was an
unusual name for a town. Got myself a VW Eurovan Weekender so I can't wait
to begin my visit to the area. Thanks for the motivation.
Jim A.
> From: "
There's something to what you say. In fact, no matter how precise or strong
or appointed, a camera cannot bestow talent upon it's user. Nevertheless,
there ARE toy tools, hobbyist tools, amateur tools (often excellent, but not
beefy) and professional tools. Professional tools are tools chosen by
p
>If you had a ZX-5N with a cranky "kit lens," which
>Pentax (or other?) zoom lens (in the vicinity of
>35-90) would you choose and why?
Perhaps the FA24-90 for it's useful zoom range and optical performance. But
I have not tried this lens so do not know for certain. The Tamron SP 24-135
could b
>Bruce-
>Thanks, I didn't know that they've been able to make the rewind
>mechanisms quiet,
>just not Pentax, eh? :-)
I could be wrong. I think Canon solved the problem by employing the belt
drives. However, the belts might not be as long lasting as conventional
mechanisms.
regards,
Alan Chan
>These are the lenses. They seem extremely light weight:
>
>SMCP-FA ZOOM 28-105MM F/3.2-4.5 AL [IF] 9.0 oz
>SMCP-FA ZOOM 28-90MM F/3.5-5.6 6.9 oz
>
>Has anyone had a chance to try them and care to share the experience?
Relatively fast and light weight, sounds like a good idea,
>Maybe the first and last one. I don't know about 44-88mm, as most of that
>is covered by the 43, various 50s and the 77. Standard-length zooms don't
>really grab me anyway.
That zoom range is not that attractive anyway no matter who made it.
regards,
Alan Chan
__
>questions are
>is this a good lens optically
>I have the tamron 90mm macro and it is sharp and distortion free
>i do sell some of my work
>i donot want distorted images or pin cushions or bending badly like the
>28-200 zoom
>i like the focal range it seems what i would use
I can only find good r
>Since someone hinted that it's a tele longer than the 77mm, I'd like to see
>a reincarnated SMC 135/1.8 PKA*. Just think how that might depress the
>price of the original! But the new one should offer close focus, like the
>135/2.8 F and FA's 0.7 m.
Oh boy! This lens would be so big it's hardly
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Lauder's Scotch Whiskey comes in green plastic 1/2 gallon bottles. And
> it's priced at just twenty bucks for the half gallon. It's actually
> quite good: tastes a lot like Dewars White Label. And the bottles are
I'm still nursing a bottle of Laphroig s
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, wendy beard wrote:
> It's probably just the overexposure that caused the light to spill over the
> edges of the frame.
> I have some like that on the last roll I took and I used an MX
When I realized just how incredibly overexposed they were while trying to
pull an image off t
Hello Aric!
First, what sort of shooting does your wife do? This may influence your choice.
I have the tokina atx-pro 80-200/f2.8 and it's a little belter! Actually,
not so little. I wouldn't like to hand-hold it for any length of time, but
I am rather weak and feeble. I have always used mine o
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, tom wrote:
> Amen, you really should come down to GFM next year.
I would've enjoyed this year, and someone kept trying to tempt me with
tales of their 645 and Arstat 30mm fisheye. :)
Alas, I have no driver's lisence, and I don't think I'd have been able to
hitchhike that far.
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
what paper did you use ?
how much per sheet in 8X10 and 11X14?
Yes I agree, $500 for a top quality
printer is well worth it.
JCO<
don't use anything other than Epson paper unless you want to spend money on
fine art paper by a good 3rd party. E
i aggree, looks like I'm going to buy a
epson 1280 sooner than I think.
Color printing without the darkroom must be a joy.
Thanks for the print, i may frame and hang it.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Tue
Taka,
Just wanted to make sure you understood it to be a Pentax problem, not
a problem with all autowind cameras. At least the MZ-S has a function
where you can tell it to not rewind when a roll is complete. Then you
can wait or muffle the sound and then start the rewind process.
Bruce
Tue
If you had a ZX-5N with a cranky "kit lens," which
Pentax (or other?) zoom lens (in the vicinity of
35-90) would you choose and why?
I've seen two SMCP-FA 28-105mm f/4-5.6 lenses (one is
IF (??) one is not IF) and a 28-70mm f/4.0 AL. Need
to know which ones will REALLY hold up mechanically
(not c
Ron wrote:
> If you want to check for the KLEZ virus, go to www.symantec.com , you'll
> find a small program called "fixklez" (about 136 kb unzipped)
>
> Good luck,
>
> Ron
>
This looks like a pain to do - but I THINK actually, I am not infected - here is
what I read at the
symantec site:
Emai
I agree. I would have dialed out a little more saturation on the third
try. As you said, the film seems highly saturated, much like Velvia. But
I was quite pleased with the sharpness and grain. It would be
interesting to compare it to a good lab print. I think that even though
it's not scanned at
Bruce-
I was mainly talking about Pentax, as I don't feel like switching
systems and
having to buy/sell lenses and the like.
Taka
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:31 PM
To: TM
Subject: Re[2]: Bi
I compared it to other Gossen meters that do require the now discontinued
mercury cells.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: Selenium handheld meters: are worth it?
> In a message dated 6/4/2002 2
On 4 Jun 2002 at 15:52, Jeff wrote:
> Albano, I just picked up a Gossen Lunalite SBC for $50 CDN. It's in mint
> condition and the accuracy is quite good.
> I don't have the spec sheet, but I think it will go to -4 EV.
> The american version of this meter is the Luna-Lux. They go on eBay for $30
Hi,
Like Timothy said, the ZX/MZ-M works fine with Kodak HIE... and I've
even been daring enough not to use the black tape for a couple of
rolls. Worked fine for me.
William in Utah.
Timothy Sherburne wrote:
>
> Hi Kristian...
>
> 30 euro? Yikes. The ZX-M will work fine with Kodak HIE, which
NIck thanks _ I'll do it.
annsan
Nick Wright wrote:
> Ann,
>
> It looks like a mail sent by the Klez virus, very very nasty thing. Get rid
> of it.
>
> Nick Wright
>
> --
> >From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: is this person
Cotty, mine is even smaller... 50 KB
annsan
Cotty wrote:
> There's loads of spam at the moment for me too, Anne. Lots of 'Mail
> delivery failed' messages, each about 75k in size - I've set me email app
> not to accept anything over 60k insize unless I okay it. everything else
> is deleted on th
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Ann ...
>
> I got a message like that yesterday, I believe. I checked it using
> mail2web.com and found that it was nothing that I'd sent, and checking
> further it looked suspicious, so I deleted it from the server. Be
> smart, delete it without opening it.
>
Shel, don
Nice job harald. The Palouse has been on my list of places to visit and
shoot. A well done report. What time of the year were the photos taken?
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: harald_nancy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:47 AM
Subject: Photo
Hi,
that must rank as one of the worst designed, most badly written,
most off-putting sites on the entire web. How that person expects
anybody to read his book when he can't even design a readable advert
is entirely beyond me.
I'd expect somebody involved with photography to have at least a
modi
Taka,
You haven't checked out enough new cameras. Granted, Pentax rewind is
noisy, however, Canon and others offer models that have an almost
silent rewind mode.
Bruce
Tuesday, June 04, 2002, 2:38:33 PM, you wrote:
T> I have the Motor Drive A (as you may have seen w/ my posts
T> regarding
Yada, yada, yadaall this wasted bandwidh on what is or is not a pro
camera, Pentax or otherwise. I think alot of it is just sour grapes and envy
of the success of Canon, Nikon, Minolta, and others. The hardware does not
make a proit is the creative mind of the user that makes a pro.
In a message dated 6/4/2002 2:55:07 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The best part is that you don't have to dig for special batteries. It uses
> regular 9V batteries.
>
What does a selenium meter need a 9v battery for?
ERNR
My photographs hang on the virtual walls at ht
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What would be a suitable flash for this camera? The Pentax web site
suggests
> the AF201SA, but gives no details about this flash's capabilities. I think
> what Mike needs is a small flash with auto (ie aperture-set thyristo
In a message dated 6/4/2002 3:37:24 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> despite what you've been told, at least one company still makes a
> selenium cell meter. The Sekonic L-398M Studio Deluxe has been around
> since the earth was void and without form. I suspect God may have
Since someone hinted that it's a tele longer than the 77mm, I'd like to see
a reincarnated SMC 135/1.8 PKA*. Just think how that might depress the
price of the original! But the new one should offer close focus, like the
135/2.8 F and FA's 0.7 m.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from
questions are
is this a good lens optically
I have the tamron 90mm macro and it is sharp and distortion free
i do sell some of my work
i donot want distorted images or pin cushions or bending badly like the
28-200 zoom
i like the focal range it seems what i would use
wayne
-
This message is from
Hi Kristian...
30 euro? Yikes. The ZX-M will work fine with Kodak HIE, which, from what I
understand, is the most picky when it comes to loading and light leak
problems. I haven't tried films from Konica or Agfa or Ilford.
I did take the extra step of putting a piece of black electrical tape ove
or you can take a look at:
http://www.photonaturalist.com/chromozone/index.asp
Cao, Matjaz
> Check out
>
> http://www.simplifiedzonesystem.com/
>
>
> --
> Nick Wright
> http://www.wrightfoto.com/
>
> --
> >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject:
Check out
http://www.simplifiedzonesystem.com/
--
Nick Wright
http://www.wrightfoto.com/
--
>From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Zone System for Color?
>Date: Tue, Jun 4, 2002, 12:47 PM
>
> If you think about how colors translate to grey scal
There's loads of spam at the moment for me too, Anne. Lots of 'Mail
delivery failed' messages, each about 75k in size - I've set me email app
not to accept anything over 60k insize unless I okay it. everything else
is deleted on the mail server.
HTH
Cotty
Lauder's Scotch Whiskey comes in green plastic 1/2 gallon bottles. And
it's priced at just twenty bucks for the half gallon. It's actually
quite good: tastes a lot like Dewars White Label. And the bottles are
great for darkroom chemicals. Of course, the accordian chemical bottles
that you can buy
got it today, looks great. very accurate to the scan.
If I was to print it myself I think I would cut
the saturation a bit, the film (Fujichrome ms 100/1000)
seems a little to saturated at ISO 100 which is what I shot
it at. Lack of grain and sharpness is excellent, which
is much better than 35mm
RE: ZX-L:
That's what I thought, but was confused. Actually, I thought it did have
those metering
features? The Shutterbug review mentions that you lose these and it goes
to a center-weighted
metering w/ MF lenses. Of course, that's not to say that they are always
right.
Taka
-
This message is fr
If you think about how colors translate to grey scale, the zone system
can be helpful in color photography. Of course slide film is less
tolerant of incorrect exposure than any negative film, BW or color.
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've shot B&W exclusively for so long I'm gun shy of tryi
Personally, I don't need power zoom, I don't know what the big
deal is about that- I prefer to turn a ring on the lens barrel,
I guess.
How about upgrading the MZ-S to 4.5-5.0 fps drive? Does this camera
show all exposure info in the viewfinder- aperture, shutter speed,
mode? How about selectable
Maybe the first and last one. I don't know about 44-88mm, as most of
that is covered by the 43, various 50s and the 77. Standard-length zooms
don't really grab me anyway.
I'd consider buying the 88-176, although only until I saw the price ;-)
--
Kristian
On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 09:57
I have the Motor Drive A (as you may have seen w/ my posts
regarding some problems I've had w/ it) and actually, the camera
feels really nice in my hands w/ the drive. I actually prefer
handling the camera this way- the camera w/o the drive feels a
bit too small and unwieldy with a telephoto on it
To jump in here...
Has anyone definitively got IR film to work on an MZ-S without fogging?
How about an MZ-M/ZX-M?
I'd love to try some mono IR, but if the camera is just going to fog the
roll on me, I might as well drink the thirty euro and look at my
existing B&W prints instead ;-)
--
Kris
Amen,
Bob Rapp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> despite what you've been told, at least one company still makes a
> selenium cell meter. The Sekonic L-398M Studio Deluxe has been around
> since the earth was void and without for
I think the MZ-6/ZX/L is a MZ-7 replacement (??) Doesn't have the MZ-5n
features (e.g. spot & CW metering)
Yes I would imagine that the MZ-5n will be replaced soon (new flash
functions, cable release socket, etc)
>From: "TM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTE
Excellent! We haven't had the "what's a professional camera" discussion in at least
two weeks. I was beginning to think something was wrong...
-frank the amateur
Artur Ledóchowski wrote:
> IMHO "professional level camera" means "the camera used mostly by professional
>photographers". And
Speaking of the MZ-S and Z-1P, how does the ZX-L (aka MZ-6) fit into the
picture? This month's Shutterbug mentions that the ZX-L is the
replacement
for the ZX-5n?!? At $400 MSRP, it's not a bad deal, but then again, I
have
never seen the MZ-S or Z-1P in person. I have not seriously considered
the
Mike,
I was thinking of starting with 1/2 stop steps instead of the B&W normal
whole stop steps. Also, if I recall correctly, with slides you emphasize the
highlights as opposed to emphasizing the shadows in B&W negative film.
Whatever happens it should prove an interesting experiment. And g
http://www.postkoets.btinternet.co.uk/AF280T.pdf
On Tuesday 04 June 2002 20:46, Jeff Post wrote:
> Does anyone have a PDF of the Pentax Flash AF280T manual that they can
> Email me or that I can download?
>
> Also, is there any advantage to using the new high powered alkaline
> batteries as oppos
Since Photokina is only a few weeks (ok months) away, here is my dream list
of Limited lenses I'd like to see:
SMC Pentax-FA 22-44mm f/2.8 AL Limited zoom lens
SMC Pentax-FA 44-88mm f/2.8 AL Limited zoom lens
SMC Pentax-FA 88-176mm f/2.8 ED IF Limited zoom lens
I'm basing these optics on the be
At 03:55 PM 6/4/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Here are the "big announcements" I'd like to see:
>
>FA*17-35mm f2.8 or f3.5
>(with 77mm filter thread like Canon/Nikon/Minolta, not 82mm like Sigma)
The new Contax N-mount 17-35mm f2.8 zoom has a 95mm filter!
How about:
MZ-S available in black AND silver o
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of gfen
>
>
> Fumble fingered? Debatable. Unfortuantly, I just threw out
> a collection of
> old Kahula and Skyy vokdabottles (you've got to buy in bulk
> when swilling
> white russians like water...)
>
>
>Exactly. Still, people more frequently chose EOS300 instead of MZ-5n. Why?
I don't really know. But I would imagine they didn't compared the EOS with
MZ/ZX bodies side-by-side. By the truth is, I do not know. :(
>IMHO "professional level camera" means "the camera used mostly by
>professional
I'm used to thinking in B&W Zones , too in fact it's more difficult for me
thinking "in colors". In my opinion it's impossible to use this approach for
a color previsualization.
How can you manage it?
ciao
Laura
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://ww
>Ah, yes:) They probably thought the same way... "Why should we do anything
>to convince the customers to buy our cameras if they don't want to? OUR
>market position wasn't APPRECIATED! We are offended" Other producers,
>however, weren't offended and exploited the chance... Pentax don't do
>came
I've got a Holga 120s sitting on top of my fridge at home. I should really use up the
Tmax 400 film I have in it.
They're fun toy cameras - plastic, all plastic, wonderful beautiful black plastic -
1/100 fixed shutter speed. f8 fixed aperture.
The 120s has a hot shoe that actually fires off my
Mark Wrote:
"Here are the "big announcements" I'd like to see: FA*17-35mm f2.8 or
f3.5 (with 77mm filter thread like Canon/Nikon/Minolta, not 82mm like
Sigma) AF500FGZ (I have an AF400FTZ and that isn't powerful enough for me
at times; buying the AF360FGZ, getting lower power and losing head
swiv
here ya go:
http://photography.skofteland.net/documents.htm
Not sure about the battery thing...
Christian
On Tuesday 04 June 2002 15:46, Jeff Post wrote:
> Does anyone have a PDF of the Pentax Flash AF280T manual that they can
> Email me or that I can download?
>
> Also, is there any advantage
Some how i think the 6x7 will get a good work out
for landscapes in Utah.
Have a good trip.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:47:00 -0600
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dear John, I'm gone
I am on my way for a trip to the
Selenium meters were obsolete quite a few years ago. Probably twenty years
ago, or more. I know of no lightmeter manufacturer that still makes or
repairs them. They are cheap because nobody wants them anymore. You may
find one that still works well enough for your purposes but there are
econom
Albano, I just picked up a Gossen Lunalite SBC for $50 CDN. It's in mint
condition and the accuracy is quite good.
I don't have the spec sheet, but I think it will go to -4 EV.
The american version of this meter is the Luna-Lux. They go on eBay for $30
to $50 US.
The best part is that you don't ha
Here are the "big announcements" I'd like to see:
FA*17-35mm f2.8 or f3.5
(with 77mm filter thread like Canon/Nikon/Minolta, not 82mm like Sigma)
AF500FGZ
(I have an AF400FTZ and that isn't powerful enough for me at times; buying
the AF360FGZ, getting lower power and losing head swivel, is *no
Does anyone have a PDF of the Pentax Flash AF280T manual that they can
Email me or that I can download?
Also, is there any advantage to using the new high powered alkaline
batteries as opposed to normal alkaline batteries in the flash unit?
>All right, the Z-1p wasn't that succesful, but why? Wasn't it because of a
>poor marketing strategy? Wasn't it because of strange (IMHO stupid)
>strategy of abandoning the idea of upgrading the Z-1p in any way? I'm a
>great Pentax fan and I think its amateur level products are among the best
I can't critizise your photos - I simply like them because of their
composition.
Regards
Bernd
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Thanks for your nice comment Butch.
Regards
AG
Butch wrote:
"Miguel On Stage" by Albano Garcia
Spectacular use of rim lighting, strong composition, great use of high
contrast. I love that type of B&W photography.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://
Albano wrote:
> I want a small, inexpensive handheld meter. A selenium ...
> ... but I've heard they are not reliable enough, not worth
> buying used because they are probably exhausted, etc.
Often they have "worn out" and lost accuracy, though
sometimes not. Even so - they are
Well, not to be carrying on so much, Pål is right that the Z1p wasn't
marketed as a pro camera. It was more an "advanced" users camera. The
MZ-S is clearly marketed as a pro camera (just read every article written
on it and the "few' Pentax ads that they were motivated to put out).
Notice that
Hi, gang.
I want a small, inexpensive handheld meter. A selenium one seems what I
seek. But I've heard they are not reliable enough, not worth buy used
because they are probably exhausted and a large etcetera.
It's true, or they are usable and accurate enough?
All income welcome
AG
-
This message
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > However, I didn't think DOF would be an issue with the 16mm.
> Uh, yeah, I guess it wouldn't be an issue with that. Yow.
What better way to get those sweeping vistas with funny looking trees? :)
> Ah -- found it: http://pug.komkon.org/01/jan/ir1
FWIW,
I've used Microphen with T-max 100 and it worked just fine - exactly as I expected it
to - no problems with respect to rating of the film.
By rating the film lower (i.e. overexposing by one stop) , if developed "normally", it
should increase contrast in the film. However, different deve
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, tom wrote:
> I bought some of the cheap brown plastic jugs at a camera store. They
> work ok, but I go through the chems pretty quick, so if there were a
> problem I probably wouldn't know it.
This is probably wiser than my planned attempt to just buy bottles with
hydrogen per
Plain glass bottles will work if you store the stuff in the dark until
you're ready to use it.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: gfen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Home developing -- details, details
On Wed, 29 May 20
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of gfen
>
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2002, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> > >From everything I'm reading on the NGs, HC-110(b)
> > seems to be the general-purpose developer of choice.
>
> (nothing like ressurecting a
If you want to check for the KLEZ virus, go to www.symantec.com , you'll
find a small program called "fixklez" (about 136 kb unzipped)
Good luck,
Ron
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:52 PM
Subject: Re:
Make sure you avoid MID-DAY in Utah - 100 degree weather is not particularly
pleasant for us brits.
Plenty of water, and carry as little as gear as possible while doing any desert
walking! Maps VERY important for lone walking.
Enjoy (and should you happen to pass by NY drop in for a beer!)
On Wed, 29 May 2002, William Robb wrote:
> Hi Glen, I have pretty much settled on HC:110 for the Jobo, and
> Ilford ID-11 for inversion.
As I said in the message I just sent, I picked up some HC-110. I've been
previously using Sprint Systems Developer, which they say is a match for
D76 1+1 or ID-
Religious pilgrimage?
Hope you have a good trip.
Len (in southern Illinois)
---
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dear John, I'm gone
I am on my way for a trip to the US of A.
Unschedul
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> >From everything I'm reading on the NGs, HC-110(b)
> seems to be the general-purpose developer of choice.
(nothing like ressurecting a week old thread...)
Anyways, I ended up picking up some HC-110 concentrate, but haven't
actually used it yet. I
Pulling the battery is the surest way to disable it.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: gfen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Re: Re: ZX-50 and IR film.
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Paris, Leonard wrote:
> The date/time feature
gfen wrote:
> I grabbed an A50 f2 with the mark, and a Zenitar 16mm that did not.
> However, I didn't think DOF would be an issue with the 16mm.
Uh, yeah, I guess it wouldn't be an issue with that. Yow.
> What sort of filter do you use for [EIR]?
Yellow, Orange, or Green. Unfortunately I didn
Hey, Bill,
Have fun!!
-frank
William Robb wrote:
> I am on my way for a trip to the US of A.
> Unscheduled stops wherever I see something I like.
> Scheduled stops in the Grand Tetons, parts of Utah, and with any
> luck, California.
> I have agonized for days over what camera gear to take, and
I have a Pentax ZX-7 with a AF500ftz flash. I want to take pictures ouside and use
fill flash. I would like to use the camera in portrait mode and set the flash to one
of the reduced powers settings. I tried it and it didn't work, at least the flash
didn't fire. Do I have to be in shutter prior
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Paris, Leonard wrote:
> The date/time feature probably is at fault but it's easy enough to turn off,
> or disable.
I did have it off, but wasn't sure if perhaps I should pull the battery?
--
http://www.infotainment.org
"The destructive character is cheerful." - Wal
Have a good time, Bill.
I'm sure paring it down further means leaving the 35mm behind.
MF and Utah seem to go well.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:47 PM
Subject: Dear John, I'm gone
> I am on
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
