From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[skip]
> I think he's an idiot,
It's one thing to preach this nonsense to your party zealots for which you
no doubt receive much acclaim, but believing their own propaganda is what
cost your party power, especially in the last congressional elections. I
g
This one time, at band camp,
Arnold Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This war will have effects on all of us
What 'war'?
America will blow the place to rubble with thier weapons
of mass destruction and then 'find' some weapons cache
and say 'we yall told ya so'.
No one will be killed because t
William,
Since I don't drink coffee, well almost don't, I think it will be
quite difficult to accomplish. I may present several ounces of good
Darjeeling tea instead. But usually coffee drinkers don't drink tea
and vice versa.
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser
I've been reading this thread. There is no question in my mind - that raving
idiot Bush is going to attack Iraq about oil - nothing else. Why not do
something about North Korea? Those buggers are busy as bees making Nuclear
Weapons? Why? ... because they don't have oil fields the US needs to
contro
Very nice shots. My favorites are No. 1 and No. 7. Approximately how far
away from the birds were you when you took the shots?
Kathy L.
- Original Message -
>
> What do you all think of the image quality and
> which is the "best" shot? ( I like #01 myself ).
>
> JCO
>
> J.C. O'Connell ma
Hi Ann, I am interested in a NYC gathering, has any thing been set up?
Bob Kelly
Well reasoned and fairly said, Bob.
keith whaley
Bob Blakely wrote:
>
> From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [skip]
> > I think he's an idiot,
>
> It's one thing to preach this nonsense to your party zealots for which you
> no doubt receive much acclaim, but believing their own propag
Thanks Mike.
I'll keep an eye out for it.I have not run across this paper in the
smaller stores,but a friend usues Epson so i can aske him were it
might be located.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 11:01:58 -0600
To: <[EMAIL PR
Begin Original Message
>From: Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 08:50 AM, David Brooks wrote:
> http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/index.html
> Added some B&W's to my site.
>
> Dave
>
>
>Dave,
>I really like the iris.
Thanks,its a favorite of mine(fr
I think so too .I use the auto feature in PS6 to do these.
Is there any way to make the images larger through the PS "web
gallery" or do i have to manually edeit the html code to add a
specific dimension(s).
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Saw the images on Aarons ibook Saturday.Zoomed in very
tight.Grain,what grain:)
I'm impressed.
Dave
> well they're obviously to large to put up the whole
> full size so soon, but I have the samples up,
> including actualy pixel crops.
> first scan
>
> tech n
heard that it was better than the 100mm 2.8 pentax macro. is this true? what
is a good price for such a lens and a source?
thanks
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Rob wrote:
> Its like many things in life, its all about building a relationship with
> a supplier. You can entice them with promises of what you offer, you
> can demonstrate that you are up to the job by showing published work or
> you can be famout enough that they approach you and try to butt
Doug wrote:
> Read my post again. It's a complaint that that kind of incendiary trolling has no
>place on the PDML. If I want a reminder >that many people don't like America or
>Americans, I have plenty other places to find it.
I do agree that this has nothing to do on this list. However, I do
No, cat fur is for covering black sweaters.
-frank (owner of Patches, the white cat)
Dan Scott wrote:
> Cat fur is not for camera covers. Cat fur is for fuzzy toilet seat
> covers.
>
> Dan Scott
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J
>Someday, somebody will invent a dynamic dedicated hood for zooms, so
>that the length and shape changes as you zoom :-)
Andre wrote: There are two brands that make "zoom" rubber hoods, Hoya and
Hama.
--
Tamron made an ingenious rigid-plastic telescoping hood for its SP
70-210/3.5. The lens rec
I have this lens that I bought new in 81 on an MV. I now keep it on my
ZX-7, and it makes a very small package for an SLR. It is a pretty
sharp lens, although the focusing ring is like the edge of bread knife.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 08:59 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
jc,
You should try dealing with this store:
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore/
(Hee hee!)
Mike, I bought my PowerMac G4 at an Apple Store. :-)
--jc
If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
talk to my wife.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Peter,
It's a spreadsheet. It opened fine on my Mac using Microshaft Office. I
can't see why it shouldn't open in Appleworks, although it may need
translating first...
Cotty
>Sorry, that couldn't be opened on my MAC.
>Peter
>
>>It's simple trig. I wrote an excel spreadsheet
>>to calculate th
Cotty and JCO,
I managed to open it now. (You never should do certain things early on a
Sunday morning.)
Seems to be a very usefull calculator!
Thanks!
Peter
>Peter,
>
>It's a spreadsheet. It opened fine on my Mac using Microshaft Office. I
>can't see why it shouldn't open in Appleworks, although
J.C.
WONDERFUL pictures. My personal favorites are 10 and 4. I'm amazed
at the pictures you got out of handholding with the 500/4.5! I'm going
to have to try this really soon!
Il Bill
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I burned a roll of TMAX 400 today shooting more birds
with the 500mm F4.5 SMC Tak
Well, Doug, I for one find it interesting to know what people in other
countries think of what our politicians seem to be doing. What Bill has said
is far from the "You got what you deserved that many posted after 9-11".
On 9/11 we were attacked by rabid nuts. We were within our rights to
retaliat
You are right. Sorry about the wasted bandwidth.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 02. helmikuuta 2003 14:27
Aihe: R
- Original Message -
From: "David Brooks"
Subject: Re: RE: Up loaded some pictures(on topic,using Pentax gear)
> I think so too .I use the auto feature in PS6 to do these.
> Is there any way to make the images larger through the PS "web
> gallery" or do i have to manually edeit the html
Me too. I just wanted to change the Subject line.
keith
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
>
> If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
> talk to my wife.
>
> BR
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
> >arguments somep
I'll say it again, guys. Come on over to the wwwac-politics list. You
can discuss anything you want ad nauseum over there.
http://email.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=politics
Amita
I'll say it again, guys. Come on over to the wwwac-politics list. You
can discuss anything you want ad nauseum over there.
http://email.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=politics
Amita
Dan Scott wrote: I want to put a hood on my FA 100/2.8 macro, 58mm filter
thread.
John Mustarde replied:
The only other Pentax hood I know about which might work is the nicely made
metal hood for the Takumar-Zoom 1:4.5 85-210. It actually looks great on my
FA 100/2.8 Macro, and does not vignette l
It opened okay with my Mac, on which I have Office 98 Excel, but it
requires JC's password for 'writing to' privileges or manipulating the
data blocks - or - you can "Read Only" which only gives you an eyeball
on what the spreadsheet looks like to JC.
keith whaley
Cotty wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
>
Does anyone have any experience of this lens? Is it a good lens?
It seems to be an ideal lens to make a camera fit in any pocket (!) and
provide less excuses for not carrying a camera.
Malcolm
I went into my camera closet yesterday. This is a very large closet,
about twenty feet long and four feet wide, deep underground next to my
computer room. One wall is lined with shelves - and most of the shelf
space is covered with Pentax equipment.
Oh, the LXen, the PZippers, even the little MZ-
It's my favorite walkaround lens. I use it most often with an MX. The
camera will then fit in a pocket. That can be handy when travelling in
unfamiliar territory. Here's a pic that I shot with the MX and the
pancake lens in Mexico. http://home.earthlink.net/~pnstenquist/_uimages/sunandmoon.JPG
Mal
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Smith"
Subject: 40mm 'Pancake' lens.
> Does anyone have any experience of this lens? Is it a good lens?
>
> It seems to be an ideal lens to make a camera fit in any pocket (!) and
> provide less excuses for not carrying a camera.
I have denigrated th
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Dan Scott wrote:
> Regardless of it redeeming features, the ZX-60 was definitely whupped
> with the fugly stick.
The -60 has redeeming features? You mean besides the broken K mount?
> I haven't used the MZ-S, but I have held one. It is quite lovely and
> gives the impression o
People used to wonder if Pentax monitored this list or not. Maybe the right question
should be - why should they?
Pat Temmerman
[MZ3_fella]
___
GO.com Mail
Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com
At 11:02 AM 02/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Does anyone have any experience of this lens? Is it a good lens?
It seems to be an ideal lens to make a camera fit in any pocket (!) and
provide less excuses for not carrying a camera.
Malcolm
It's an ideal lens for making a camera fit in the scanner t
They might be interested in the rather diverse political views expressed
here.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: "P Temmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EM
Paul, Bill and Wendy,
Thanks for the feedback. It really is a useful lens to have then. I think it
would go down well attached to my ME-Super!
I will acquire one now.
Malcolm
Doug Franklin wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 03:12:02 -0500, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> > Well he is using a different printer, Doug. MIght matter.
>
> That's why I mentioned which printer I have. :-)
ann sez
O? :) I mentioned that for the benefit of others,actually, I knew you
knew but
I think it
At 10:28 AM +01002/2/03, Arnold Stark wrote, or at least typed:
>Hello Doug,
>
>>I'm not inconsistent. My position has been and will continue to be that politics has
>no place here on the PDML.
>>
>Would you say the same if we had PDML members in Bagdad?
I do not keep up with where members li
No thanks. I don't like talking politics. I'd rather talk cameras!
keith
Amita Guha wrote:
>
> I'll say it again, guys. Come on over to the wwwac-politics list. You
> can discuss anything you want ad nauseum over there.
>
> http://email.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=politics
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
>If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would go
>talk to my wife.
>
>BR
>
Geez, BR, you need to get a Pentax wife. Sweet, amenable, easy to get
along with - and not too expensive. Not as fast as other brands,
maybe, but darn eas
Okay, I had a casual conversation with my source at Pentax today, and
pounded and pummeled him for something I can actually reveal on the list.
About the P-DSLR, nobody in the USA knows much about it yet. It's possible
that it will be shown "under glass" at PMA. If there are pre-production
samples
I believe Epson has changed the name of this paper, although I'm not
quite sure what they're calling it now. Perhaps someone else can provide
that. I know you can find it at inkjetgoodies.com. They're a great
source for ink and paper. You can also get the Hannemuhle Digital Fine
Art paper at that s
Hi there,
Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but I'm
not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus?
I'm thinking about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL. Is the Pentax
lens significantly better?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Łukasz
===
John M. wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
go
> >talk to my wife.
> >
> >BR
> >
> Geez, BR, you need to get a Pentax wife. Sweet, amenable, easy to
get
> along with - and not too expensive. Not as fast as o
I don't agree with all these statements by any means, but it's interesting
nonetheless. Crystal-ball stuff from a Nikonophile:
http://www.bythom.com/2003predictions.htm
--Mike
Mike J. wrote:
> However, how about this: there will be MORE NEW PENTAX PRODUCTS at
PMA this
> year than at any show during the past ten years or so. Both new
digital and
> new film products. Multiple new cameras.
This would be the best Pentax news I heard in years and years.
Rhetorically: Now, w
I would like to get a copy but cannot find one. Can anybody help?
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: Pentax List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 02. helmikuuta 2003 2
Auto Chinon 45/2.8 (18mm long, all metal)
Cosinon 40/2.5 (20mm long)
Pentax M 40/2.8 (18mm long)
Pentax 43/1.9 FA Limited(28mm long)
Porst Color Reflect 40/2.5 (a rebadged Cosinon)
Rikenon 28/2.8 (20mm deep)
Rikenon 45/2.8 (a plastic version of the Cosina)
Paul, I guess you meant Chinon?
Vivita
FWIW
FWIW?
I have to learn all these. Any list of current abreviations of this type?
Andre
--
>Someday, somebody will invent a dynamic dedicated hood for zooms, so
that the length and shape changes as you zoom :-)
Andre wrote: There are two brands that make "zoom" rubber hoods, Hoya and
Hama.
--
Tamron made an ingenious rigid-plastic telescoping hood for its SP
70-210/3.5. The lens rece
For What It's Worth.
Andre Langevin wrote:
>
> >FWIW
>
> FWIW?
>
> I have to learn all these. Any list of current abreviations of this type?
>
> Andre
> --
keith
First I have heard of this. AFAIK Asahi and Sigmas parent company have had
quite a bit of technical exchange over the years. Also Pentax is very open
about sharing its mount, as I recall the licensing fee used to be a buck.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Mes
This "joke" is not at all funny. It is quite simply disgusting. We should
all have nothing but contempt for a mentality that could produce a comment
of this type.
John Poirier
Father of a 13-year-old girl.
- Original Message -
From: "Lasse Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
I found that to be true with my Universa Press and the 100/2.8 lens. I still
have the hood in the hopes of someday replacing the camera.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BTW as good as the Mamiya 7 lens
Mike wrote:
> About the P-DSLR, nobody in the USA knows much about it yet. It's possible
> that it will be shown "under glass" at PMA. If there are pre-production
> samples at the booth, they're not likely to be "out front" for all the world
> to touch. I have also heard that one of our PDML'ers w
Get you're facts straight. But don't do it here. I could point out ever
incorrect fact but I wouldn't have any fun. I've already insulted some
people I like on this list, and I refuse to apologize because they should
know better. If you wish to excuse everything that some tin-pot
dictatoria
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> The specified density range for UC is different that the
> other Portra
> films according to the data sheet. Just a thought.
> (I assume
> that you are
> referring to the large, well respect Miller's wedding lab.
John P. wrote:
[Sorry, for some odd reason the message text won't appear as I hit
reply. (It also disappeared from my preview window on a second
highlight.) Never encountered this before. If anyone can explain,
please do.]
My apologies to everyone on the list if my message was as
inappropriate as
about 30-40 ft i would guess.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: Kathy L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 10 bird pix with 500mm F4.5 SMCT
>
>
> Very nice shots. My favorites are No. 1 and No. 7. Approximately how f
For What It's Worth.
FWIW, there is a page (in fact several) that list these abbreviations. I
didn't bookmark it (them), but I'd imagine that if you looked up
"abbreviations" on Google...
cheers,
frank
Andre Langevin wrote:
> >FWIW
>
> FWIW?
>
> I have to learn all these. Any list of current a
> In my opinion Mr. Johnson is being a useful
> idiot, not
> my words but those of Mao, (and Lenin before him). It is one thing to
> support peace
> but do any of the protesters actually _think_ of what their support for
> peace implies,
> obviously not.
Oh, screw you, Peter. You don't know ANYT
just remember to use 1/500 or 1/1000 and
try to be a steady as possible.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: William Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 10 bird pix with 500mm F4.5 SMCT
>
>
> J.C.
>
>WONDERFU
you can do a "save as" to another name.
You dont need a password to use it.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: lens hood and vignetting
>
>
> It opened okay with my Mac
Well, I like to think PDML is about people who like cameras, rather than
about cameras. I can understand that you may like to keep your pegs in neat
little round holes. Can you understand that some of us like to keep them in
a cigar box and rattle them around now and then?
However, I will agree wi
My previous reply appears completely blank in my reader. Just in case
and to make sure I resend it (shortening the subject line, if that had
anything to do with it):
John P. wrote
"This "joke" is not at all funny. It is quite simply disgusting. We
should
all have nothing but contempt for a menta
Oh, yes, I believe you're right, Paul. I forgot about that. I'll see if I
can find out what the new name is and get back to the list.
--Mike
> I believe Epson has changed the name of this paper, although I'm not
> quite sure what they're calling it now. Perhaps someone else can provide
> that. I
Lasse wrote:
> This would be the best Pentax news I heard in years and years.
>
> Rhetorically: Now, will there be image stabilizing lenses, or not?
> That's what I'd want to know.
At leat the chanses are bigger than ever. Pentax will almost certainly release a new
generation of cameras. If the
Mike wrote:
> I don't agree with all these statements by any means, but it's interesting
> nonetheless. Crystal-ball stuff from a Nikonophile:
>
> http://www.bythom.com/2003predictions.htm
Interesting and probably pretty close to the truth. Anyway, the makers of the "camera"
parts of a digita
>> However, how about this: there will be MORE NEW PENTAX PRODUCTS at
> PMA this
>> year than at any show during the past ten years or so. Both new
> digital and
>> new film products. Multiple new cameras.
>
> This would be the best Pentax news I heard in years and years.
>
> Rhetorically: Now, w
Mike I have at this time only one thing to say, Shut Up.
At 11:42 PM 2/1/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> It was long. It was about your political opinions. You wrote it.
>
> That you felt that you were viciously attacked and had the right to defend
> yourself doesn't change those facts above.
>
> What y
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tantalizing news
> This is pretty much my impression for awhile now picking up bits and
pieces here and there. I suspect a new generation of SLR's. It wouldn't
surprise me if they replace the whole current line-up. A
John Poirier wrote:
>
> This "joke" is not at all funny. It is quite simply disgusting. We should
> all have nothing but contempt for a mentality that could produce a comment
> of this type.
>
> John Poirier
> Father of a 13-year-old girl.
What's a 13-year-old girl got to do with anything, J
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>This is pretty much my impression for awhile now picking up bits and
pieces here and there. I suspect a new generation of SLR's. It wouldn't
surprise me if they replace the whole current line-up. Anyway, it will be
an exciting show it seems!
Pål<
William, you started this, If I were you I'd just fold my tent and let this
thread and all related threads die the ignominious deaths they deserve.
At 12:28 PM 2/1/2003 -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer"
Subject: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit
Hi folks -
Last month's cold snap brought some really nice snow to west Michigan, and
the opportunity for more snow crystal photography. I just updated my
website with 30 new snow crystal photographs. These were shot with an
Mz-S, AF360 flash, various extension tubes, bellows, and either a r
Thanks to Mike Wilson and ERNReed's responses to this topic. As usual, very
useful information and makes me put it on my "want list", financial situation
allowing. I must admit, this list does a stupendous job in "enabling" oneself.
Pat in SF
__
Do
Sigma has received the news very late and they have to delay the launch of
the Nikon/Canon version of the OS lens to make final adjustment for suiting
the specification of 4 mounts.
Regards,
Henry Chu
2/2/2002
Or just that the pentax version doesn't have the OS?
Seriously, I doubt that Sigma
The list was going all day - maybe you have an anti-flame protector...
You've missed nothing but crap - no worries.
regards,
frank
Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
> testing
>
> testing.
>
> today i did not receive any e-mail.
>
> is list down ?
>
> testing...
>
> _
> This is pretty much my impression for awhile now picking up bits and pieces
> here and there. I suspect a new generation of SLR's. It wouldn't surprise me
> if they replace the whole current line-up. Anyway, it will be an exciting show
> it seems!
I very much hope so. If for no other reason tha
Stunning! Thanks, Mark, for taking and sharing them with us.
I'm sure that I saw two of them that were the same though - nah, can't be true
thanks,
frank
Mark Cassino wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> Last month's cold snap brought some really nice snow to west Michigan, and
> the opportunity for more
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Herb, go for it and get the MZ-S! You're the first person to say it has
more features than you need. It's a sturdy, high-quality camera, and a
cheap "MZ-S minus" would just be a wannabe built to a price. Get the real
thing!<
i'm not interested
Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
>
> testing
>
> testing.
>
> today i did not receive any e-mail.
>
Consider yourself fortunate.
Wow! Awesome work, Mark. Did you shoot it on glass? How did you light
the background.
Paul Stenquist
Mark Cassino wrote:
>
> Hi folks -
>
> Last month's cold snap brought some really nice snow to west Michigan, and
> the opportunity for more snow crystal photography. I just updated my
> website
Love the snowflakes and the other snow scenes on your site. Also like the
lighthouse photos.
Jim A.
> From: Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 20:32:54 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Snow Crystal Photographs
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PRO
HI, Lasse.
Thanks for the explanation. Cheerfully accepted.
John Poirier
- Original Message -
From: "Lasse Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 2, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife
> Regarding my "joke" on Pentax cameras regarded as a wife, there
> You know it's been a very long time since I had to read this so I'm not
> sure of the authorship. I think it was either TS Eliot or George Orwell, who
> wrote an essay during WWII, using impeccable logic to prove that English
> pacifists supported Adolf Hitler and all he stood for.
And this prov
In about a month I am going to Hawaii for a short vacation. Most
likely I will take the 67II and leave home the 35mm gear. Still
deciding on that one.
Anyway, I am wondering what the current state of film going through
the detectors is. Is there any noticeable damage coming from the
x-ray machi
An interesting angle for me is that the 120 roll film is spooled on
plastic cores so theoretically I could walk through the metal detector
with them on my person. Has anyone tried this?
Hey Bruce, try it and tell us when you are back!! :)
regards,
Alan Chan
___
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 2, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car
shit,not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that
isallowed without rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
No what it proves is that I can claim moral superiority with the best of them.
To stand on a hill and claim I'm morally superior and therefor my facts are
unassailable is not an argument.
To ascribe the worst motives to others and make your case with 'secret'
knowledge
is dishonest.
If someone
Mark Cassino wrote:
>
> Hi folks -
>
> Last month's cold snap brought some really nice snow to west Michigan, and
> the opportunity for more snow crystal photography. I just updated my
> website with 30 new snow crystal photographs. These were shot with an
> Mz-S, AF360 flash, various extens
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
