Hi,
frank theriault wrote:
I get pissed off if I step ankle deep into a puddle. That's enough
aggravation for me, thank you very much!
Understandable in downtown Toronto but an entirely different experience
in the middle of some good scenery and fresh air. You should try it
sometime - you
Hi William/Paul,
I ready your comments with interest and wonder if you'd care to comment
on my the position I now find myself in.
I have the opportunity to pick up a Minolta Flashmeter IV for a good
price, but now the comments you both have made have given me pause. I
currently have a very basic
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Cotty wrote:
How about buying a hundred 32 MB CF and SD cards (using GFM proceeds) and
issuing those to digi contestants - and asking for them back with the
(max) three entries on. This kills several bears er birds with one stone.
Maybe it's a good idea, but it doesn't
´
graywolf wrote:
I once paid $22 for a steak dinner. It was lousy. I once went into a
restaurant that charged $250 for a steak dinner. They tossed me out
because I was not dressed to their satisfaction. Just as well, I did not
have $250 in the bank much less on me.
Just because it happened
Hi, Bill.
I will.
Jostein
Quoting Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How many of you are bringing an *ist D to GFM, or other DSLR for that
matter. We may ask some of you for suggestions on how to set up a contest
using digital photos.
Bill
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
http://www.tanyamayer.com/weddinggalleriesprivate/bean/images/Bean0259.jpg
My favourite (and difficult to make).
Why difficult?
Honest question,
Kostas
Asahi Pentax 400mm F5.6 Tele-Takumar Lens, Pentax screwmount (M42)
Real nice shape, Ends in 18 hours:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=3807989806
Later,
JCO
J.C. O'Connell
One way to solve that is to specify a standard resolution for the judges to view
it at. For example, if they are going to view it with a projector, a 1024x768
pixel resolution is reasonable. This will pretty much remove all the
differences between cameras.
What's more interesting is how to relate
After a very very rainy week, spring has arrived at last:)
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/paw/blossom.jpg
In print there is some texture detail visible on the branch, which
I can't get to appear on the scan... maybe it's too dark for my
scanner.
Comments are wellcome.
Attila
I wouldn't count Four Seasons or Palm, because they're displaced NY
restaurants. And, quite frankly, I find the Palm very ordinary, in NY,
LA, Chicago, Detroit, Mexico City, and everywhere else it's been
franchised. But I agree with the rest of your list. I would certainly
add Ivy, Chinois,
You're right about the prices. But it's not the kind of place you visit
on a regular basis. It's a rare treat. I'm a lifelong cook and my wife
was a professional pastry chef. If you're really fascinated by food, an
extravagant meal can be as much a treat as a new lens. And it costs
almost as
I have enjoyed only one meal at French Laundry, but it was a meal I'll
never forget. Fortunately, it was paid for by a company I was doing
business with. However, next time I'm up that way I intend to treat
myself to another meal. (Unless, of course, I can find another sponsor
:-)
On Apr 13,
Kostas, it was Malcolm Smith who wrote that, and not I. However... despite
its seemingly simple nature, it was indeed a difficult shot to make, but
probably not for reasons that Malcolm even realises. Firstly, I was on the
other side of a busy highway when I shot it, with big cattle trains
Who said Pentaxes weren't tough? The picture shows a Z1p with what I
think is a 250 - 600 attached being used armpit deep in water. I saw
the poster in an Australian Geographic shop.
http://www.museum.vic.gov.au/whatson/show.asp?ID=561442
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
Subject: Pentax monocular converter WANTED
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:45:22 +0200
From: Waldemar Krasowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: rec.photo.marketplace
I look for this small adaptor - when attached to the
PK (Pentax bajonett) tele-lens it converts a lens to
a spotting scope.
What is a reasonable price for a right angle finder on eBay?
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apologies in advance for the very late notice and the lack of concrete
plans. I will be in Trieste from tomorrow until Friday and would be
keen to meet with PDMLers. Please mail me back if interested; I can
bring equipment you might like to try too.
Kostas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. And what Cotty said, jpeg only. (To nix post processing.)
How would that nix post processing?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hi!
Attila, I think it works but with some modifications that I'd like to
suggest. You see, the building on the background is very fascinating.
At first I thought it was distracting, but then I took a mental step
back g and realized I was wrong. However to let the image really
shine I thing
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One way to solve that is to specify a standard resolution for the judges to view
it at. For example, if they are going to view it with a projector, a 1024x768
pixel resolution is reasonable. This will pretty much remove all the
differences between cameras.
Good
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to see a digital competition, that would be really interesting!
Make sure that they have the RAW plug-ins for the various brands though...
Easier for the judges to shoot Jpeg. More skill required in shooting :-)
Unless you shoot RAW and convert to JPEG
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/04, IN THE LOUPE discumbobulated:
Currently, participants are allowed THREE entries!
I'm trying to figure some way for contestants to turn in a memory card with
only 3 entries on it.
Hey, can I be the one to collect the cards?!
Oh...wait...they'll be
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A good Cotes du Rhone is just about the nicest thing that can be made
from a grape.
I concur! (And not too terribly expensive in many instances.)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
BOGGLE 36 images per participant???
Doug and I wouldn't get home until July!
I hear the weather at GFM is nice throughout June.
I know the D1 is fast,and the D2H seems a 'bit' faster,but only by ear,not a scientific
test.My SF-1 and
PZ-1 seem just a tad slower but not by much i would quess.
To be honest with you,i prefer the Pentax to the Nikon,in that the Pentax seems to
lock on
and stay
on.The Nikon sometimes focus a
Duh. Yeah, of course that's true. I hear the complaint all the time
but being a loyal Pentax type I've never actually used them.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, thanks. So that means, when I combine your and my remarks, that auto
on the *ist D works better then P-TTL and TTL.
I got the impression for a while it was only TTL that didn't work to
well, but also P-TTL doesn't work very well. I really would like to see
a firmware upgrade to address this
It helps that he is cute.
LOL. Always a piece of good photographic technique. Nice shot.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now I wish I had kept the source of my mis-information. I have no idea
who it was.
Oh well. That's disconcerting, because if it had been true, it would
have exposed something about the M bayo lens of which I was unaware, and
#2, possibly impact any decision to purchase a *ist.
I just visited
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Andre Langevin wrote:
??? From a bayonet point of view, K-series and M-series are the
same. I doubt it very much that the ist is compatible with K-series
while not with the M-series.
I am very confused myself with this thread, but I think that by M they
mean M42.
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich
Subject: Re: PENTAX *ist D : Things to improve
I got the impression for a while it was only TTL that didn't work
to
well, but also P-TTL doesn't work very well. I really would like to
see
a firmware upgrade to address this shortcoming.
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is compatible with both K and M.
I thought it wouldn't meter with K and M lenses (like the first firmware
version of the ist-D)?
Andre Langevin wrote:
It is compatible with K's, not the M-series which followed, but it
is with the A-series that
At 09:04 AM 4/11/2004 -0400, you wrote:
---
Totally cool. Congrats!
Marnie aka Doe You ought to kick back a photo (or two) to Boris. ;-)
Thanks, Marnie - good idea!
- MCC
-
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-
Another great shot, Ken! Looks excellent.
- MCC
At 03:17 PM 4/12/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Taken last fall, on a very frosty morning, in the U P of Michigan.
Comments - likes/dislikes - what would you have done differently
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Thanks in
Nie shot, Jostein - must of been a beautiful morning!
- MCC
At 05:17 PM 4/11/2004 +0200, you wrote:
In June last year I had a really great photo week-end at Rjukan, a small
town about as far inland as you can get in Norway. I decided to stay up
until sunrise to get the first light on the
Nice montage, Tanya - I like the progression of the images, with your son
basically turning around in the course of the series. The background looks
just as you intended it on my monitor - not totally high key, but some
texture left in it. The BW conversion looks excellent. Nice job!
- MCC
So if I exchange my digital SCA unit for an analogue one, I get better
results in TTL (at ISO400)?
What SCA unit are you using, a SCA371? (If that exists, its just a
guess)
I use a SCA3701.
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 17:19, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich
In a message dated 4/13/2004 5:18:34 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. And what Cotty said, jpeg only. (To nix post processing.)
How would that nix post processing?
--
Mark Roberts
Well, if you shoot RAW then you HAVE to post
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I wouldn't count Four Seasons or Palm, because they're displaced NY
restaurants.
If a restaurant is located on Los Angeles, I have located it and like
it, I don't really much care who it's Mama was...
And, quite frankly, I find the Palm very ordinary, in NY,
LA,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
You're right about the prices. But it's not the kind of place you visit
on a regular basis. It's a rare treat. I'm a lifelong cook and my wife
was a professional pastry chef. If you're really fascinated by food, an
extravagant meal can be as much a treat as a new lens.
In a message dated 4/13/2004 6:05:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to point out, Marnie, it's fairly easy (with a DSLR) to cheat and
get extended DoF. Using a tripod, take a picture with focus at infinity
and then another with the closer object in focus. These can
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Andre Langevin wrote:
??? From a bayonet point of view, K-series and M-series are the
same. I doubt it very much that the ist is compatible with K-series
while not with the M-series.
I am very confused myself with this thread, but I think
-Original Message-
From: Techbargains.com
Posted At: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:52 AM
Posted To: Inbox
Conversation: Muvo2 4GB $$180 - Apr 13
Subject: Muvo2 4GB $$180 - Apr 13
http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/30037
At 09:14 PM 4/12/2004 -0400, you wrote:
see inline.
well, i am mostly shooting small birds right now more or less because that's
what is handy to try and haven't had much opportunity to shoot anything very
large except with tame ones. last weekend was the first time i could really
try to take
Kevin Thornsberry a écrit :
Tanja wrote
Shot with *istD (of course!), FAJ 18-35mm @ 35mm, AF360fgz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/32), AV @
f5.6.
I have the darndest time with this. I can only put my AF360fgz in manual mode
or A mode if my *ist-D is turned off or if I wait long enough after
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/13/2004 6:05:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to point out, Marnie, it's fairly easy (with a DSLR) to cheat and
get extended DoF. Using a tripod, take a picture with focus at infinity
and then another with the closer
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is compatible with both K and M.
I thought it wouldn't meter with K and M lenses (like the first firmware
version of the ist-D)?
Yes, I confirm that. The *ist features no diaphragm simulator, just like the
*ist D, hence with pre-A lenses it will
Well, supposedly there is this Japanese whiskey - Suntory? - which has on
it´s label: beware of imitations.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http:\\www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 4/12/2004 9:17:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I once paid $22 for a steak dinner. It was lousy. I once went into a
restaurant
that charged $250 for a steak dinner. They tossed me out because I was not
dressed to their satisfaction. Just as well, I did
- Original Message -
From: Dag T [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here it is:
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/04apr/
We´ll se how far I get.
Christian Skofteland - USS Constellation
Nice and colourful detail, but in my view there is something missing.
I´m, just not sure what.
Dag;
Thanks for
Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The *ist features no diaphragm simulator, just like the
*ist D, hence with pre-A lenses it will meter and shoot at full aperture
only (aperture priority) or not meter at all (manual).
Can you call this compatibility? Pentax says it depends on how you define
It's actually a nice shot with great detail and the frog is in an
interesting pose.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: David Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a piccy I took a few months ago when I was still learning the
ins and outs of the *ist D (and, for that matter, SLR
My list of 10 most urgent improvements:
1. Faster AF.
I think it's mostly a matter of power of in-camera AF motor, not so related
to sensors, their layout and algorithm. Just use the PZ-1/MZ-S AF motor and
you'll get a very fast AF.
2. Faster AF.
3. Release a decent RAW converting software.
At 11:50 AM 4/13/04, throwing caution to the wind, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you shoot RAW then you HAVE to post process to turn it into JPEG. I
am still talking the honor system here. Allow only shooting in JPEG and allow
no post processing.
People will really cheat? I doubt it. I think
Congrats on both accounts - that portrait is excellent!
- MCC
At 09:07 AM 4/12/2004 -0600, you wrote:
After a totally nightmare-ish 2003, 2004 is finally starting to look up. ...
-
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-
In a message dated 4/13/2004 10:14:17 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks to everyone who has contribute to this discussion thus far and to
anyone who cares to continue it. It has given me some things to consider.
Doug
---
Ban laptops from the mountain?
For M42 bodies, $30, refconverter M, $100, ref A, $115.
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:48 AM
Subject: right angle finder
What is a reasonable price for a right angle finder on eBay?
--
The main problem with the PZ1P apart from the size (IMO) is that it can't do depth of
field preview on the A setting, or at all with the new aperture-ringless lenses. So
it's not as forward compatible as some say.
The MZ-S can do this, but can't set the aperture except indirectly.
The MZ-6 can
The lighting, exposure, and color are all excellent. The model seems to be
uncomfortable - not so much because of her expression, more because of the
position of her arms and shoulders. I'm not sure if she is laying down or
stooped over a counter or tabletop. The cropped elbow seems to
Something for the folks with a more technical bent -
When the ISO setting is changed on the *ist-D, does that change the data
recorded in the RAW file by actually changing the sensor sensitivity, or
does it only affect how the recorded data is processed, post exposure.
Let's say I'm shooting
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Kostas, it was Malcolm Smith who wrote that, and not I.
However... despite its seemingly simple nature, it was indeed
a difficult shot to make, but probably not for reasons that
Malcolm even realises. Firstly, I was on the other side of a
busy highway
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
http://www.tanyamayer.com/weddinggalleriesprivate/bean/images/Bean02
59.jpg
My favourite (and difficult to make).
Why difficult?
Honest question,
A question for Tanja I suspect, but for my part I liked them all, this one
above the others - just.
I thought the question was in regard to the *ist D. My mistake.
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is compatible with both K and M.
I thought it wouldn't meter with K and M lenses (like the first firmware
version of the ist-D)?
Yes, I confirm that. The *ist features no
No, in fact I've never been to Zurich, save as a stopover. Someday I hope to make it.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
You're right about the prices. But it's not the kind of place you visit
on a regular basis. It's a rare treat. I'm a lifelong cook and my wife
was a professional pastry chef.
I am sure the data recorded is different. I think this is because the
analog signal is subject to more gain 'pre-digitisation'(!). I cant
think of a tehnical reason, but I am sure that this results in a
better/cleaner picture than if you shot at a lower ISO and just
lightened it in PS for
Yes, and yes.
John
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:51:20 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It shouldn't ... I was just wondering aloud and asking a
couple of questions (note the question marks), which, thus
far, have gone unanswered.
Stan Halpin wrote:
So, how does that change Mark's
Great work again Mark. I like the moon shot.
Dave
Yesterday I went to a nearby park and decided
to try the *ist-D with some
serious bird photography. Comments are appreciated -
the link is:
http://www.markcassino.com/paw/040410/
- MCC
It would be useful if there were one of those auto-print machines nearby.
Just put in the card, and out come the prints. No laptops allowed.
John
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:18:55 -0400, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. And what Cotty said, jpeg only. (To nix
Cheating this way can just as easily be done with scanned negatives.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. april 2004 18:25
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Zone Focus - what is
On 13/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
How about buying a hundred 32 MB CF and SD cards (using GFM proceeds) and
issuing those to digi contestants - and asking for them back with the
(max) three entries on. This kills several bears er birds with one stone.
Maybe it's a good idea, but
On 13/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
Make sure that they have the RAW plug-ins for the various brands though...
Easier for the judges to shoot Jpeg. More skill required in shooting :-)
Unless you shoot RAW and convert to JPEG before submitting the image...
Nope - no computers
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The point is, it's an honour system through and through. What
gain from cheating?
First place gets a foot massage from Doug, so the competition gets pretty
fierce.
tv
On 13/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
(using GFM proceeds) and issuing those to digi contestants - and
asking for them back with the (max) three entries on. This kills
several bears er birds with one stone. Digital photographers would
have to be very studious in shooting (as a slide
On 13/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
Ban laptops from the mountain? Won't help, of course, if they are staying
elsewhere.
Well, good luck! Tricky stuff.
Marnie aka Doe Check all their laptops for file manipulation?
Marnie, I carry my PowerBook everywhere. I carried one everywhere
On 13/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
It would be useful if there were one of those auto-print machines nearby.
Just put in the card, and out come the prints. No laptops allowed.
So suddenly it's a print competition? I don't think so.
Laptops are allowed. It's post-processing that
Since digital manipulation is a key part of digital photography why not
allow it? No rules, other than the photo had to be taken at GFM. That
would seem to make sense.
Paul
Ha! Take the bull by the horns! The man has a point.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
You're now quoting that Jewish poet, Rabbi Burns!
John
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:01:20 -0700, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
Thurber. I sometimes fear he had me in mind when he created Walter
Mitty. That quotation, though, is very well-known, and has spawned
many
e.) Can't refrain for artistic framing even when a-d are invoked.
That's quite a bit better than the usual family snap.
frank theriault wrote:
This isn't really new, but I haven't had a chance to get anything new
printed up this week - I'm getting back a pile of contacts tomorrow,
but won't
Now that's the Frank we know and err ah ehh. love, I guess.
frank theriault wrote:
Distracting? From what?
vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
PS
That's a lovely shot. The color of the sky is perfect for a silhouetted
bird photo.
Christian Skofteland wrote:
Long story short: I live next to a 500+ acre reservoir in Maryland.
Everyday I drive past an old tree only a few hundred feet from my house that
is frequented by cormorants and
i'm looking for one too, but i have little hope of seeing one any time soon.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 7:21 AM
Subject: NG Posting
Subject: Pentax monocular converter WANTED
Date:
the signal from the sensor is amplified before being converted to digital.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 1:43 PM
Subject: Digital ISO And Raw Files
When the ISO setting is changed on the *ist-D,
Can't find your photo! Is this big brother watching?
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Interesting Cloud Photo on APOD
Sorry, I cut off part of the link:
someone who really wanted to cheat with film could do so pretty easily too.
shoot as much as they want during the week before and process their slides
at the same place. at what point do you trust people to follow the rules?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL
see inline.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: PAW- Bird and Moon Shots
The real challenge is to get close enough. With small warblers etc you
have to get within 20 feet or so,
Paul, I was thinking just that myself!
Also, in regards to cheating - what's to stop someone from shooting a whole
heap of other slide film on the day, or even bringing slides with them and
submitting those to the judges?
If people wanna cheat, they will - defeats the purpose of the entire
You just missed one guys:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3807094041category=15240
Funny, it's labelled as a Telescope converter rather than Monocular
converter (if indeed it is the same thing?).
David
Herb Chong wrote:
i'm looking for one too, but i have little hope of
Yeah, but I don't think that them not having as many PS skills than others
is in fact a disadvantage or makes an unlevel playing field. To me, it is
no different than somebody entering the contest who has more photographic
technical knowledge than the guy next to him. Or for that matter, the
I think our main concern is the logistics of dealing with changing the
format of the contest from film to digital and less on the possibility of
cheating. We're hoping to change from film to digital next year (2005).
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
Nah. The experienced digital guys would just shoot thousands of pictures
using their own memory cards, edit out their best shots on their laptops
and transfer the best three onto the card that they would turn in for
I wonder if pin sharp result are possible with setup like this. Last time I
tried, my Z-1p was hopeless with 300/4.5+2X due to mirror/shutter vibration
even though the shutter was 1/250s on tripod. :-(
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Who said Pentaxes weren't tough? The
On Apr 13, 2004, at 3:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or allow PhotoShop manipulation as Paul suggested. Though I think that
distinctly makes an unlevel playing field. As some are a lot better at
it.
Isn't manipulation part of being a good digital photographer?
Manipulation is the future of
- Original Message -
From: Gonz
Subject: Re: GFM and *ist D (now veering OT)
But some of us still prefer Cabs and Bordeaux style blends. :)
I've never been able to figure you guys out.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich
Subject: Re: PENTAX *ist D : Things to improve
So if I exchange my digital SCA unit for an analogue one, I get
better
results in TTL (at ISO400)?
What SCA unit are you using, a SCA371? (If that exists, its just a
guess)
I use a SCA3701.
- Original Message -
From: Raimo K
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
Well, supposedly there is this Japanese whiskey - Suntory? - which
has on
it´s label: beware of imitations.
I have tried their pseudo Scotch.
I can't imagine wanting to imitate it.
The only malt whisky I have
Even in manual mode mine forces P-TTL or SB mode.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Michel Carrère-Gée
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist-D and AF360fgz (was RE: Fairygirl's first ever PAW...)
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: GFM and *ist D
Isn't manipulation part of being a good digital photographer?
Manipulation is the future of photography. It's time to recognize
it as
part of the process.
Paul
Manipulation of some sort has always been part
On 13 Apr 2004 at 18:48, William Robb wrote:
Think dog shows, where each breed is judged seperately, with the best
of breed advancing to a class contest, and best of class advancing to
the best of show contest.
I think that's a bad analogy given that the final output on which judgement is
Frits,
Prices for the Spotmatic/K1000 finders are cheap ($30-$50?).
For an M or A finder (the ones with the 1X-2X switch),
I'd say anything under $70 is cheap and over $150 expensive.
$110 to $130 is a real bargain on the new price of $200+.
Regards, Bob S.
What is a reasonable price for a
In a message dated 4/13/2004 1:02:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Going to digital for the contest will at least enable the staff to have a
lot more time to sort and judge the photos. My current thoughts are to have
each contestant still submit a memory card with 3 photos
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
