Hi Cesar
I hope I did not destroy Cotty's sweet and understandable links with
Minolta Girl...
thanks for showing her, *I* really enjoy looking at such beautiful and smart
women ;-)
greetings
Markus
take - I went into my photo store, where she used to work, and still had a
couple of shots to
See below from Boz's site. Does the aperture ring and 35mm coverage mean that Pentax
is planning a 'full frame' pro-ish digital, why else would the new lenses have such
coverage?
'According to DPreview, Pentax has announced two new and exiting lenses: smc Pentax-D
FA Macro 100mm F2.8 and smc
The problem is K mount was designed for 24x36mm in the 1st place. There is a
limit on how small they can make the DA lenses because of that.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Yes, but what would be the point of supporting two different sensor formats
in the same SLR body design?
Sigma's newer caps for Sigma/PKA covers the entire
mount. This is one thing Sigma does well.
Jens Bladt wrote:
I often had a hard time finding rear caps with a collar/flare for A, F, FA
lenses. Now I found some at ebay.
I'll try to put PKA caps (with a collar/flare) on all my Pentax lenses. When
Good point, my money is on FF only in the end. APS sensors in PS
A.
On 12/8/04 12:05 pm, Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is K mount was designed for 24x36mm in the 1st place. There is a
limit on how small they can make the DA lenses because of that.
Alan Chan
sounds like your composition options are limited. how about sighting along
the length of the dam or tightening on the right corner with a longer lens?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 9:14 PM
i have never seen my *istD do this under similar conditions. also, if it is
a critical exposure, i check the histogram and bracket 1 or 1.5 stops for
later blending. i always shoot evaluative mode for these types of scenes.
the only other mode i use is spot metering and that is only when i am
Antonio wrote on 12.08.04 12:02:
Yes, but what would be the point of supporting two different sensor formats
in the same SLR body design?
Price. If APS DSLR will be let's say 500$ less than FF one in future, then
it will sell much better and will bring more profits to company. This is not
it also gives them a way to drop the film body line without losing their
users completely. film camera sales in Japan are down 50% from last year
with a larger drop in PS cameras than SLR, but that's still over 40% for
SLR film bodies. Pentax's market share dropped 2% down to about 7% of film
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think either of us had ever run into another member by pure chance
before!
Other PDML'ers just cover their faces and walk the other way when they
see me.
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12.08.04 7:01:
Here's an example of what I'm complaining about:
http://members.aol.com/ernreed/2bright.jpg
The only thing I did to this image was resize it in Photoshop Elements. Much
of
the EXIF data seems to have survived this.
Ern,
check customs functions
On 12/8/04, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, offered:
I don't think either of us had ever run into another member by pure chance
before!
Other PDML'ers just cover their faces and walk the other way when they
see me.
;-)
You mean their ears Graywolf GRIN
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Interesting read, thanks for sharing Butch.
Digital is a disrupting technology. Interesting to see is the decrease of digital
camera sales between 1 and 3 MP.
I wonder how long film will be available everywhere, together with processing.
On Thursday 12 August 2004 03:46, Butch Black wrote:
FJW
Ok, guys. I don't mind contributing in spreading some joy to the list.
I guess I made an error in saying in a similar vein. Maybe I should have said in a
similar style/genre then.
Would anyone care to enlighten me on this?
Thanks,
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: David Madsen [EMAIL
You are overlooking the fact that once they BOTH
get cheap enough then the savings of APS sensor
gets smaller and smaller to the point that no one
will want it if the FF is only a little more in
absolute dollars.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. C. O'Connell wrote on 12.08.04 13:31:
You are overlooking the fact that once they BOTH
get cheap enough then the savings of APS sensor
gets smaller and smaller to the point that no one
will want it if the FF is only a little more in
absolute dollars.
You are right, but when will it
At this point I doubt that Pentax has specific plans to build a FF DSLR,
but I'm sure they are trying to make sure they don't paint themselves
into a corner, so to speak, and leave themselves unable to do so in the
future.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
If Pentax can sell new lenses to both Film and Computer users for a mere $10 per
pro-grade lens, why the heck not?
If film is going to be around for a few more years, esp. bw, then it seems a small
investment to maintain a marketshare that the others have completely abandoned.
Pentax getting
Hi Pentax lovers
Wave 4 shows (slightly) technical better photos than wave 3 and some very
romantic ones...
Please take into account the age of the photos and that the scans are from
the negatives at 1200dpi only.
A little lifeboat exercise is also shown and the second view of my cabin :-)
Again,
Silver 77 #0003088 - bought second hand in Australia
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
Well you could easily have different prifce points within a FF line of
sensors/cameras. It could be argued in fact that price to the manufacturer
or supporting two very similar chip formats would be a point against this.
As to APS not being a diffferent medium - we have already seen that you need
Plus, you have to look at the price of lenses for APS sensors v the price of
FF lenses. APS doesnt look so cheap when you can pick up nice K mount lenses
on ebay for a steal. Not to mention all the existing Pentax K-mount owners
who will find a very easy upgrade path to ditital with FF.
Antonio
Antonio wrote on 12.08.04 14:13:
Plus, you have to look at the price of lenses for APS sensors v the price of
FF lenses. APS doesnt look so cheap when you can pick up nice K mount lenses
on ebay for a steal. Not to mention all the existing Pentax K-mount owners
who will find a very easy
Wow, I am really sorry to hear about that. For me you just ended the
discussion of to skylight or not to skylight, when walking with a camera.
John Power
Racehorse in the desert.
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 11:34 AM
They might have had it for a while. My 77 (silver) is serial no.
0003051, and was bought in Dublin (Ireland) in December 2001. Sixty-two
lenses in three years seems to be taking the Limited concept a bit
far :-)
For the record, my 43mm (silver) is numbered 0004035 and was bought
second-hand
Hi Cesar
that motto originated out of a Minolta-girl chat with Frank who sadly left
the Pentax bar for a while
At least your bite snakeskin LX does, If the owner is not wild but young,
I am 44 :-)
A wild one from my past, photographed by some Keystone press guy in case
you missed it:
We
the 14/n is 13Mpixel, none of the APS are even close to that
so the 3K difference is more than just FF, its much higher
image quality too.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On 12 Aug 2004 at 14:26, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Right, as long as price difference between FF and APS sensor cameras is
lower than price of wide angle lens(es) dedicated for smaller CCD. So far
price difference between the cheapest FF camera (Kodak 14/N) and based on
the same analog body
On 12 Aug 2004 at 5:32, John Power wrote:
Wow, I am really sorry to hear about that. For me you just ended the
discussion of to skylight or not to skylight, when walking with a camera. John
Power Racehorse in the desert.
Metal hoods rule :-)
They've saved my glASS more than once.
Rob
J. C. O'Connell wrote on 12.08.04 14:46:
the 14/n is 13Mpixel, none of the APS are even close to that
so the 3K difference is more than just FF, its much higher
image quality too.
Yes and no :-) Most people can't afford this and will choose something much
cheaper with quality satisfying for
Rob Studdert wrote on 12.08.04 14:57:
I've got pretty much all the glass I need, I have cash to spend on a new high
spec body (FF preferably) to use my glass on. I've promised myself not to get
sucked into buying APS format only lenses (unless of course they produced
something I couldn't live
I like my SMC-F 70-210 and the results seem nicer than other similar
zooms I have tried in the past ... but a couple of these comments
bring up an issue I have wondered about:
After mounting an AF Pentax lens to an AF Pentax body, I always
rotate the focus ring slightly so that I hear and feel
Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2004.08.12 13:32:49:
Sigma's newer caps for Sigma/PKA covers the entire
mount. This is one thing Sigma does well.
Are you kidding? Those Sigma PKA/S universal caps are a real PITA to use.
they must be correctly aligned even to mount and are a bit
I doubt the MZ-D design will be resurrected. I would expect a whole new
design. There are always advances in manufacturing techniques which the
older design won't accommodate.
Tom C wrote:
Finally Pentax makes some sense... at least on paper... I've thought
the DA APS-sized lenses were in
These have been Pentax's standard instructions ever since the SF1/SFX
flash that had the infrared focusing beam built in -- if you want to
use it for focusing but not for flash, push the flash back down after
focusing but while still pressing the shutter release halfway.
A better method is via
- Original Message -
From: Steve Jolly
Subject: Re: What's up with the P30t?
My take: it's a cheap consumer SLR with few non-essential
features;
Pentax sold a whole bunch of them back in the late eighties and now
there's a glut. :-)
They were marketed to compete against the low
No error, just a bunch of wise a**es.
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Ok, guys. I don't mind contributing in spreading some joy to the list.
I guess I made an error in saying in a similar vein. Maybe I should have said in a
similar style/genre then.
Would anyone care to enlighten me on this?
Thanks,
Lasse
Probably they were following this list and the hunderds of posts saying that no
one would ever pay that much for a camera. Those were the days when I had to
preach the benefits of digital, just as I now have to do for film now. Such is life.
--
Tom C wrote:
Based on the current prices of FF
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: 35mm coverage of new lenses
Probably they were following this list and the hunderds of posts
saying that no
one would ever pay that much for a camera. Those were the days when
I had to
preach the benefits of digital, just as I now
Great stuff Markus, thanks again for sharing.
Norm
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Pentax lovers
Wave 4 shows (slightly) technical better photos than wave 3 and some very
romantic ones...
Please take into account the age of the photos and that the scans are from
the negatives at 1200dpi only.
A little
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Joe Wilensky wrote:
After mounting an AF Pentax lens to an AF Pentax body, I always
rotate the focus ring slightly so that I hear and feel the AF drive
pin click into place. How many people do this, as opposed to
waiting until the next time the camera tries to autofocus,
These don't fall off.
Do they? :)
The Hama front caps I get from Adorama stay on pretty well. :)
Amita
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Stan Halpin wrote:
Enjoy what you have, don't get too caught up in what you might like to
buy sometime later, and you will do just fine with a 28/50/135 set of
lenses.
...and perhaps a converter, as Stan said (or possibly the 1.7 AF,
which will turn a cheap but good K or
Wow! Did not realize that my shots had made a second round on the list.
I guess one good thing about sitting out the tropical storm at home -
allowed me to catch up with the list.
It was a blast. I am definitely looking forward to next year, especially as
I will have to miss this years Camera
On 12/8/04, Cesar Matamoros II, discombobulated, offered:
Lets see what Hurrican Charley will bring in the next day or two,
looks like a good one Cesar, batten down!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Antonio wrote:
Yes, but what would be the point of supporting two different sensor formats
in the same SLR body design?
For those who shoot a lot of telephoto but little wide angle the APS sized
chip has an advantage with it's smaller AOV. 6 MP is proving adequate for
many consumers. Assuming
LOL!
Consider it practice for the real job, Sid. It will be easier the second time
around. Might even check out the possibility of putting a plug-in connector in
this time around. That will guarantee you will never have to do it again (see
Murphy's Law).
--
Sid Barras wrote:
Hi all,
When you
Mark wrote:
This is being watched with interest by everyone. Eckerd pharmacies last
year pledged to eventually put a Fuji Frontier lab in each one of their
stores. Eckerd has since been bought (by J.C. Penney, IIRC) and it'll be
interesting to see if they hold to this plan. I'm betting they cut
The Hama front caps I get from Adorama stay on pretty well. :)
Amita
Hama, huh?
Mustn't be surprized that high-quality German engineering! :O
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
---
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the
Try, try again.!
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:41:33 -0400, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL!
Consider it practice for the real job, Sid. It will be easier the second time
around. Might even check out the possibility of putting a plug-in connector in
this time around. That will guarantee you
YES! Try it again! this time you might get it to
work.
--- Andrew Bingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try, try again.!
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:41:33 -0400, graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL!
Consider it practice for the real job, Sid. It
will be easier the second time
around.
Me three! Both Sigma and Tamron caps are hard to put on - have to be
lined up. Pentax and Tokina caps are easy to put on. My Tamron and
Sigma caps go on the lenses used the least and I sometimes buy extra
Pentax caps from KEH to replace the clumsy ones.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 7:08 AM
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 3:33 AM
Credits goes to César Matamoros
I think they have done that with C class? Here in Vancouver, they are
everywhere... (Chinese always have a thing for Mercedes ) :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
And that's the problem. How to make it go mass market ;-) That's the same
as
you would like Mercedes cars to go mass
Hi Bruce,
The reduced contrast image is more to my personal liking.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Old Man Tree
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:11:59 -0700
For those few of you who want to take a look, I reconverted from
Because only Pentaxans speak the truth. ;-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Pushing the rtf down works fine, also remember the
*ISTD will focus lower than most other cameras with
out aid. Now why don't they complain about this with
the rebel!
Me too. Looks great, but simply doesn't stay in place.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Are you kidding? Those Sigma PKA/S universal caps are a real PITA to use.
they must be correctly aligned even to mount and are a bit loose. I'd
take
the old Pentax caps over the new Sigmas anytime.
I'm
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Ok, guys. I don't mind contributing in spreading some joy to the list.
I guess I made an error in saying in a similar vein. Maybe I should have said in
a similar style/genre then.
Would anyone care to enlighten me on this?
Thanks,
Lasse
you're so _vein_ - you
Joe,
Where did you get the information that it exposes for shadows when in
multi-segment metering? I'm not trying to be argumentative. It would seem
to me they should just call it expose for shadow mode, not a multi-segment
metering mode.
The promo material says ''The *ist Ds sophisticated
Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark wrote:
This is being watched with interest by everyone. Eckerd pharmacies last
year pledged to eventually put a Fuji Frontier lab in each one of their
stores. Eckerd has since been bought (by J.C. Penney, IIRC) and it'll be
interesting to see if they
Mine (from ebay/americaneagle) are not Sigma, I think. It just says PK on
the back side. And, I can turn them anyway I like. They are simply perfect.
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL
Sigh...
In the middle of the night I was wakeful and
turned on my bedside radio to
NPR - the replay of Leonard Lopate's inerview with
Clifford Ross was on.
This morning, a friend sends me the link to the
site showing the photo.
It pisses me off.
This guy took a year to make this kinda pretty but
Additionally I can see the Full frame sensor 35mm replacing med format
digital in the short term. I still think there's some
chance that Pentax will build a 35mm full frame sensor camera with the
ability to mount either 67 or 645 lenses as well as
Ka mount lenses nativly.
Butch Black wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Alan Chan wrote:
And that's the problem. How to make it go mass market ;-) That's the same
as
you would like Mercedes cars to go mass market, hoping that then their
price
will drop to acceptable levels ;-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
I think they have done that with C
Well, the original post told a story that reminded me of the story in
the movie/novella Secret Window, where an author is approached by a
man who claims that the author stole his story. A photographer claimed
I stole a photo of his - same pose, same lighting, same toning, and even
the same model.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Tom C wrote:
The promo material says ''The *ist Ds sophisticated 16-segment
multi-pattern metering system solves even the most complicated lighting
conditions efficiently and instantly to produce beautifully exposed images
frame after frame.'
And Canon's uses the term
Where did you get the information that it exposes for shadows when in multi-segment
metering? I'm not trying to be argumentative. It would seem to me they should just
call it expose for shadow mode, not a multi-segment metering mode.
They will call it what the marketing department says to call
(2) surely the mountain has a name. Couldn't he
tell us what it is and where
the photo was taken? (my first guess, not
doing and research really
was Mt. Shasta.
Most artist websites suck. They focus more on look and mood than on
conveying information, which drives me nuts, and Ross'
Ditto. Also, I got mine cheap. $65 or so I think on Ebay a couple of years
ago.
Robert
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: SMC F70-210
My luck was a lot better when looking for this
http://www.robertstech.com/mid02004.htm
A select dozen from my gig at Mid-Ohio a couple of weeks ago.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
The mountain is Colorado's Mt. Sopris. All that is revealed on the web site
whose URL you posted...
The camera, of his own design, places an image on a 9 x 18 piece of color
negative.
Impressive enough. An absolute ton of money must have gone into all that,
from inception thru competion!
In
When photographer Clifford Ross first saw Colorado's Mt. Sopris, he
was so taken with the beauty of the mammoth formation that he jumped
on the roof of his brother-in-law's car denting it to photograph
the landscape.
The detail reminds me of the mosaic panoramas from the Mars Rovers,
although
All I really miss on this camera is the maunal ASA-setting. And of course
TTL flash.
The same goes for the P50.
Both cameras have a very smoothe shutte release, which is extremly nice.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra:
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me three! Both Sigma and Tamron caps are hard to put on - have to be
lined up. Pentax and Tokina caps are easy to put on. My Tamron and
Sigma caps go on the lenses used the least and I sometimes buy extra
Pentax caps from KEH to replace the clumsy ones.
Interesting that 35 mm. SLRs are 25% of unit volume, but 54% of dollar value. Perhaps
we have been too pessimistic about the future of film SLRs, and film to put in them.
It's possible that 35 mm. SLRs and 35 mm. film may be among the last to go.
Joe
Keith Whaley wrote:
The mountain is Colorado's Mt. Sopris. All that is revealed on the web site
whose URL you posted...
Ooops - guess I didnt read far enough...
The camera, of his own design, places an image on a 9 x 18 piece of color
negative.
That I got from the interview on line -
To
I have driven in the back roads really close to this mountain, in CO. I
know what he means by 35mm pics do not do it justice. It is
extraordinarily beautiful, and something ethereal about it. I don't
think resolution has anything to do with it, and his pics prove this.
Its more than that,
Amita Guha wrote:
(2) surely the mountain has a name. Couldn't he
tell us what it is and where
the photo was taken? (my first guess, not
doing and research really
was Mt. Shasta.
Most artist websites suck. They focus more on look and mood than on
conveying information,
Mark Roberts posted:
If anyone wants a free Tamron 77mm lens cap, go to Grandfather Mountain,
climb out the steps and walkway to Linville Bluffs and look around the
bottom of that house-sized boulder you're standing on. There's one down
there somewhere...
NOW you tell me.
ERN
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sigh...
In the middle of the night I was wakeful and
turned on my bedside radio to
NPR - the replay of Leonard Lopate's inerview with
Clifford Ross was on.
This morning, a friend sends me the link to the
site showing the photo.
It pisses me
ALas - no clear skies here last night. (NYC)
TOm, missed replying to your PESO on Mt. Hood --
forced to pick one, I take the first. I like the
peeking through
the bushes look for sheer postcard style. It was,
as you say, too bad
some clouds were not around - or that you could
have hung out
Thanks Joe. I'll try it for a couple of weeks and see what happens. It's
easy enough to adjust the EV in what could be difficult circumstances.
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD overexposure
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/mid02004.htm
A select dozen from my gig at Mid-Ohio a couple of
weeks ago.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
As I just said in another post, I've been back to
lurking for the last day or
Very nice!
The dog's expression is just priceless! Perhaps he knew just where he
was going? grin
david
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 3:49 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: PESO - Chinese Take-away
On 12/8/04, frank theriault,
Good shot, sir. I feel like I am there, about to get licked by the dog.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 3:18 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: PESO - Chinese Take-away
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/reportage/images/pic27.html
Mutley
Wonderful Cotty.
The dogs look is so intense it's hard to look away!
Great shot.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 4:16 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: FINALLY... superbike racing photos on line
On 12/8/04, frank
Not much of a picture, really, but it's part of my
People and their Bikes thing that I'm trying to put
together:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2597403size=lg
Feel free to comment.
cheers,
frank
=
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
--- Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
I think you better sue for that. Were'nt you a
lawyer in a previous life?
No comment.
cheers,
frank
ps: seriously, yes, but not a very good one...
=
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it
is
OOPS! I'm so confused! Help Me!
OK, I meant to comment on the bikes next but here goes:
The closeup of #98 blows me away, almost makes me want to jump out on the
way!
There all great Mark, 100% pro work.
Don (The confused)
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL
On 12 Aug 2004 at 9:45, Jan van Wijk wrote:
The 31 + 77 are a very nice combo on a 35mm film,
but are a bit long on the istdD in many situations ...
I agree and I'm surprised that they still haven't plugged the hole in the fixed
FL lens line up they've created. We have new zooms and now
Jeez Frank, I think it's a great shot!
All kinds of details and yet the man and his bike are still the center of
interest.
The man came out a little too dark on my monitor to see detail but that
could be just the monitor.
Wonderful and very interesting shot.
(Glad to see you're back)
Don
--- Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeez Frank, I think it's a great shot!
All kinds of details and yet the man and his bike
are still the center of
interest.
The man came out a little too dark on my monitor to
see detail but that
could be just the monitor.
Wonderful and very
Most interesting bike.
To these ol' eyes, it doesn't look like it's got but one speed, and no
coaster rear hub, either...
Since you know his name, this shot probably has a story too... g
keith
frank theriault wrote:
Not much of a picture, really, but it's part of my
People and their Bikes thing
On 12 Aug 2004 at 8:57, Sid Barras wrote:
When I finished, it looked great! It even all packed back in the case
nice and easy.
Until I realized I'd just spent the last few hours resoldering the same
bottom half to its original top half.
Sigh... I'm gonna look at some flash units on
Nonsense, of course it will get cheaper. Mass production.
A/.
On 12/8/04 10:54 pm, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
think the chip will cost at least $1500 for a long time (very long).
Last week my wife and I spent a few days in Ottawa and Hull (Hull is
just across the Ottawa river in Quebec). I took along my MZ-7
FA 2-90mm, together with my 1927 Zeiss-Ikon Cocarette and my 1937
Rolleicord II.
I've loaded up some images to my webpage. If you'd like to see
them please go to
- Original Message -
From: Antonio
Subject: Re: 35mm coverage of new lenses
Nonsense, of course it will get cheaper. Mass production.
Are they not already mass producing the things?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Fred Widall
Subject: OT: Ottawa trip
I hope he's happy in his new location, although instead
of a beautiful view of Parliament Hill he's now surrounded by
drug dealers in the park.
Apropos, don't you think?
No political correctness here.
William Robb
Pouring rain last night :~(
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:48:33 -0600, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ann... I hope to do some Perseid shots tonight. Should be clear skies
maybe 10 an hour or so.
Thanks for the comments on Mt. Hood... I stopped liking #1 as much, but it's
growing on me again.
Okay, I'll bite. What's a Mutley snigger?
Joe
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
