Don Sanderson wrote:
I'm in the process of evaluating my equipment and trying to decide which to
keep and which to sell.
I have 16-20 Pentax bodies that I will be selling and I'm trying to decide
if the *ist should be among them.
It has 3 features that none of my other bodies have.
1.) Wireless fla
There an image calculator at www.shortcourses.com
whuich can be downloaded here: http://www.shortcourses.com/pixels/index.htm
This will explain, not only about pixels etc., but it can calculatet the
file size (Mb) as well.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Op
Pixels do not have a size! It's just a number or code in the computer. The
size depends on how you see it. On a screen or a print. A good print is 300
ppi. That is app. 12 pixel/mm, making one pixel app. 0,08mm. On a screen (72
ppi) the same photograph will show one pixel app. 4,16 times larger, wh
High end architectural magazines are still demanding 4x5 chromes.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Robert Woerner wrote:
How about 6x4.5 or 6x7 chromes?
You know, join "The Brotherhood". I'm going to as soon as I finish nursing
school next May.
Robert
These days they are converting those to digital,
t
There should be some foams inside the camera as well, but might just leave
them untouched. Last time I ordered the kit from Fargo, the thickness of
their foams were thinner than they claimed. And that made them useless. For
instance, you need exactly 3mm foam as mirror bumper, but theirs was lik
Pretty much my opinion too. The FA43 is very sharp stopped down, but better
avoid f1.9. Barrel distortion is a little more than I expected as well.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
* Beautiful to look at and to hold - eenough said.
* Handles a bit better than the 50mm. The focusing ring is
frank theriault wrote:
--- David Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank:
Thank you very much! I really appreciate the
feedback.
Today for me is cloudy and overcast, a touch on the
cool side, and I
think, overall, I would prefer to be back at the
marina. Perhaps next
year
Take care
Dav
frank theriault wrote:
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2629172
Yuk! It's in focus.
Sorry, wrong url. It should have been this one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=
Depending what you mean by character I guess, f
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP4381.jpg
Proof that there is life out there.
William Robb
Ain't no more hippies, Jerry's dead man
Cotty wrote:
On 21/8/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, offered:
San Francisco has a lot of old street cars and cable cars. Sometimes the
street cars are called trolleys here, but mostly not. Anyway, every now
and then the older cars come out for so
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: PAW: The Roncesvalles Car
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2629172
Comments always welcome! Thanks.
Yuk! It's in focus.
William Robb
I was so shocked that it looked like a current Boston Sub
I've only shot a few rolls with the 43mm Ltd but here are my experiences
with it (compared with the still-lovely FA50mm)
* Beautiful to look at and to hold - eenough said.
* Handles a bit better than the 50mm. The focusing ring isn't much
wider, but with the serrated ring, the focus is easier to
Mirror prism vs Glass Pentaprism on the MZ-5n.
Toralf Lund wrote:
What are you people's opinion on the MZ-6? I found a new one with a
much-reduced price, so I'm a bit tempted... Seems to me that it's
rather similar to the MZ-5n, but its list price is lower, so there
must be something "missing",
I don't know what this means exactly but it does look a lot like a
Boston Metropolitan
Railway car.
frank theriault wrote:
I haven't been submitting PAWs of late, as my current
state of unemployedness doesn't really give me much
money for such luxuries as getting prints made. So,
I've dug into t
I have an ME SE that's having a light leak. I ordered a "universal"
seal kit from Micro-Tools to attempt the repair myself. I've made
similar repairs on microfilm cameras, so I'm pretty familiar with the
process (remove ALL the old gunk, cut to fit and install). However,
other than the seals
Sorry but forgot something there, with a 100Mpixel
image the magnification in a given print is about
1/4 as much as it would be from a 6.7 Mixel image
so the grain if any is about 1/16 the size! That's
the whole point of LF, less enlargement means sharper image
and way less grain often to the poin
100 Mpixel from 20 square inches is the same as 6.7 Mpixel
from a 35mm frame (which each work out to around 2200ppi).
Just how much that shows up grain depends on the film; if
you're shooting Tri-X you'll definitely see grain, while
scans from Velvia will look fairly smooth.
> How big is one of
Buy a paperback dictionary and get some sleep, and you had better do that
withing a couple of weeks.
--
Norm Baugher wrote:
I spent a tortuous night asking myself how long is a fortnight.
Norm
Malcolm Smith wrote:
I have spent a torturous fortnight asking myself
--
graywolf
http://graywol
Worse than that it is tightly cropped, and damn if the horizon doesn't seem
level. This job hunting thing is turning Frank into a dull boy (sorry, rabbit).
--
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: PAW: The Roncesvalles Car
http://www.photo.net/phot
www.mycroft.de/e_tests.html
These lens tests are worth looking at and the A15 is one of the lens tested.
Nick Clark wrote:
> I've been trying out the 645 with the AF360FGZ flash and have come across
a possible
> problem. The manual for the flash says it will work in TTL mode on the
645, but it
> won't let me set that mode. It just goes from P-TTL to A.
I asked the same question about my *istD and AF
Welcome Pat!
Here's a "Mini FAQ" made up by Graywolf:
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
It'll help you figure out some of the stuff that goes on here.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Pat Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 7:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL
"Nick Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've just enabled myself with a manual focus Pentax 645 and
>75mm f/2.8 from eBay.
Outstanding! I have the MF 645 and love working with it!
>I've also got a manual focus 120mm macro on it's way, but
>that hasn't arrived yet.
I don't have that one (I h
> On Topic is not required.
Oh! You mean this is supposed to be a central theme here?
david
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.736 / Virus Database: 490 - Release Date: 8/9/2004
William Robb is getting his Megapixels mixed up with his
MegaBYTEs. Original question was referring to MPIXELS.
Interpolated Upsizing does not hurt an image but it doesn't make
make it the same quality as one captured at the larger resolution.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [
- Original Message -
From: "Pat Curran"
Subject: New Member
> Hi All,
> I have just joined the list so this is my first post to
let you
> know who I am.
>
> My name is Pat Curran and I hail from County Kilkenny in Ireland.
Welcome aboard.
>
> My main interest lies in the area
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
Subject: Re: sad stuff about stock photography and up-to-date
technology
> Just a quick question. Are there some photogs really using 50 MP
Foveon
> digital backs or is everybody just wildly interpolating in
> Photosomething ? Or are they supposed to
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Clark"
Subject: 645 and AF140C Ringflash
>
> So the question: will it be OK with the 120mm macro, which seems
the obvious lens to use? I know a 67-58mm step-down adaptor will be
required, but this is no greater than that for the AF80C and the
75mm. Will
Hi All,
I have just joined the list so this is my first post to let you
know who I am.
My name is Pat Curran and I hail from County Kilkenny in Ireland.
My main interest lies in the area of landscape photography but will seek to
take good pictures in all situations. Having recently chang
The major issue is that all scans require some degree of enhancement using
photo editing softwares. Straight scans are almost always disappointing.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know if there is a film scanner that
will operate without a PC connection
(Japanese only)
http://www.ucatv.ne.jp/~tweety/Report/Comparison15mm/Comparison15mm.htm
According to these pictures, the back of the AL lens looks different from
non-AL. Mine is "SMC PENTAX 1:3.5 15mm" serial #736, which is non-AL,
and looks the same as #1. Maybe this is a good way to tell if
The photos kinda look soft to me Alan, but I have no experience with the
15mm at all
Cheers
Shaun
Alan Chan wrote:
Just had my first roll of 15/3.5 pictures back. The first thing I have
noticed is, they aren't very sharp (maybe I should redo the test on
cloudy day). Okay, I knew the Pentax
Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know if there is a film scanner that
will operate without a PC connection - and save the data on
CompactFlash, SD card or whatever? I know HP makes a flatbed for 10x15
prints, but I'm assuming that scanning the film would be better.
I've been wondering about
Frank Wrote:
Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
The digest is skipping numbers again also :(
Butch
I have a ZX-7 and just bought the *ist film camera to replace it believe
it or not. Not that I wasn't happy with the ZX-7 but the *ist has some
features that I want that the ZX-7 doesn't have. I'm slowly moving up
the "food chain" with my lenses and recently ordered FGZ 360 flash and
eventual
Roland could have done with that.
John
On Aug 21, 2004, at 9:41 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I haven't been submitting PAWs of late, as my current
state of unemployedness doesn't really give me much
money for such luxuries as getting prints made. So,
I've dug into the archives, as it were.
I may ha
ISNT! not "is"!
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 7:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sad stuff about stock photography and up-to-date technology
645 is going to look nearly as good as 4x5 no matter
who many Mpixels
645 is going to look nearly as good as 4x5 no matter
who many Mpixels you squeeze out of it with a hi-res
scanner because all you are doing is magnifying the
film grain and lens flaws when you scan over about
2400 ppi.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Nick Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
depends on film used. But with 100 Mpixel images
from 4x5 unless you print over 16x20 prints you
will not be able to see grain in the print yet
it is still very sharp.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 7:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
I'm estimating 85+ Mpixels from 645 slides with the Epson 4870 scanner. I'll let you
know when I get it all set up.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "J. C. O'Connell"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 21/08/04 23:53:08
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: sad stu
I've been experimenting and have found the AF140C ringflash seems to work fine with
the 645. The only ringflash mentioned in the manual is the AF80C, presumably because
this was the current model at the time. It does say that the only lens it will work
with is the 75mm (with a 58-49mm step-down
I've been trying out the 645 with the AF360FGZ flash and have come across a possible
problem. The manual for the flash says it will work in TTL mode on the 645, but it
won't let me set that mode. It just goes from P-TTL to A.
Even worse, the flash sets the shutter speed to 1/60th but fixes the
Antonio wrote:
Im holding off on a DSLR for a while, a bit too pricey for me still and do
really enjoy using film. When I do buy a DSLR though I willl be looking at a
FF system (or at least a 1.3x crop) where I can use MF and AF lenses on both
film and digital bodies. I believe Nikon currently offe
Robert Woerner wrote:
>
> How about 6x4.5 or 6x7 chromes?
>
> You know, join "The Brotherhood". I'm going to as soon as I finish nursing
> school next May.
>
> Robert
These days they are converting those to digital,
too.
ann
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> We need to enable you with an *istD. It's just fine for stock. Shoot in
> RAW and convert to 50 meg files in PhotoShop CS. They're sharp and
> virtually noise free when shot at iso 200 or 400.
> Paul
I'd love to enabled with an *isdD - however I
either need a rich
sugar
Those Penta-mirrors are terrible or so I've been told, the MZ-5/5n/3 are
reasonable but not brilliant with the prism. I guess I was spoilt with the
MX. The viewfinder glass on my MZ-3 is positively awfull to view through, I
use manual focus mainly despite having several AF lenses. The MZ-6 is on
Bob W wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > "I got my rabbit ears on and I want to get
> > chummy-chummy"
>
> > So (1) has anyone commented on this before on list
> > and I missed it?
>
> I don't know
>
> >(2) what is the song, who is singing and what
> > decade is it from?
>
> The internet knows everythi
the typical P&S digicam doesn't have a user-replaceable backup battery.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Stupid digicam question
> Geeze, look at the bottom of the *istD camera
I love my 6x7, but medium format isn't a very good option for stock.
You still have to process film and scan. The best bet is digital. You
shoot RAW, process your files and upload them to the stock house
server.
Paul
On Aug 21, 2004, at 2:54 PM, Robert Woerner wrote:
How about 6x4.5 or 6x7 chro
John Whittingham wrote:
Maybe it's like the IT industry, it just gets better and cheaper but I doubt
it. Chassis may not be the only area where the quality differs, I've never
handled a MZ-6 so I'm not in a position to say.
You've got me curious now, OH NO! NOT ANOTHER CAMERA
Go out and get
I think something must be wong - I was expecting a whole load of abuse from
Peter and Co. and it just hasn¹t materialised. Very strange.
Antonio.
On 21/8/04 10:11 pm, "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
>> the list (checked the archi
Wow!
11x17 prints at 300 ppi means something like 17 MP (app. 5078x3308 pixel).
That's a lot. But I guess a 6MP camera can do that if you run the files
through Photoshop.
Anyway, a good scanner can pull this much out of a high definition film -
35mm or MF.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Maybe it's like the IT industry, it just gets better and cheaper but I doubt
it. Chassis may not be the only area where the quality differs, I've never
handled a MZ-6 so I'm not in a position to say.
You've got me curious now, OH NO! NOT ANOTHER CAMERA
John
-- Original Message ---
--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, happens every so often. Antonio and Doug are
> working on it...
It's not that [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*-ing Windows ME again, is it?
&#$@ that &%#%-ing crap!!
Thanks, Norm,
frank
=
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst"
"Of
> Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
> the list (checked the archives, just in case).
>
> Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
> quite a few posts aren't coming through.
>
> Anyone else in the same boat? I wonder if it's my
> e-mail?
I'm finding that only abou
What method are you using for the file size increase?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sad stuff about stock photography and up-to-date technology
My stock house wants 50 meg fil
Hello Annsan
Interesting, thanks for sharing.
What is "the full blast"?
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 21. august 2004 17:40
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: sad stuff about sto
I've just enabled myself with a manual focus Pentax 645 and 75mm f/2.8 from eBay. It
appears to be in very good condition, and the seller said it had a service from Pentax
3 years ago. I've also got a manual focus 120mm macro on it's way, but that hasn't
arrived yet.
First impressions - I love
LOL!
Norm
William Robb wrote:
JC, you are confusing detail with sharpness.
The istD images are sharper than 120 format film wet prints, minus
about 75% of the fine detail.
Im holding off on a DSLR for a while, a bit too pricey for me still and do
really enjoy using film. When I do buy a DSLR though I willl be looking at a
FF system (or at least a 1.3x crop) where I can use MF and AF lenses on both
film and digital bodies. I believe Nikon currently offer this, not sur
Yep. I know the feeling. I have too much money invested in phoptographic
equipment. So, in order to buy the *ist D, I have decided to sell as much as
I need to finance the new camera. Enough is enough. I will not be spending
money at all - just re-arranging a little. And honestly, it's kind of
st
LOL!
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Norm Baugher wrote:
I spent a tortuous night asking myself how long is a fortnight.
Sorry Norm, hope I haven't left you too weak...
Malcolm
I knew the SLR wides are compromised, but I would like to know if my
pictures look okay as a P15/3.5.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Super wide angle lenses aren't as sharp as lenses where the rear
nodal point is closer to or still within the lens. It's one of the
compromises we have to p
The lens has a fixed hood, though not very effective. No doubt I'll have to
shade my lens with my own hand in the future.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Your shots look kind of similar to some of my shots, made with the
A2.8/20mm. I guess a lot has to do with choise of film - as well as t
How about 6x4.5 or 6x7 chromes?
You know, join "The Brotherhood". I'm going to as soon as I finish nursing
school next May.
Robert
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: sad stuff about stoc
Very nice photgraphs. I do a little theatre work myself - it's not ecactly
easy.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: fra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. august 2004 02:06
Til: PDML
Emne: PESO: theater photographs
Hi,
las
My stock house wants 50 meg files, which are about the equivelant of
11x17 at 300. But they prefer generic rgb colorspace, which is great
because that's what you need to run ColorSynch on a Mac. So I can use
the same file for printing as I use for stock. However, I generally
print from 72 meg
On 21/8/04, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, offered:
>> I spent a tortuous night asking myself how long is a fortnight.
>
>Sorry Norm, hope I haven't left you too weak...
too weaks
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
We need to enable you with an *istD. It's just fine for stock. Shoot in
RAW and convert to 50 meg files in PhotoShop CS. They're sharp and
virtually noise free when shot at iso 200 or 400.
Paul
On Aug 21, 2004, at 11:40 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Well...
after a long talk with my stock agency gal
Norm Baugher wrote:
> I spent a tortuous night asking myself how long is a fortnight.
Sorry Norm, hope I haven't left you too weak...
Malcolm
It is cool. Nice shot Frank. I like the way you can see through to the
interior. I remember riding street cars like this in Chicago in the
1950s. I would make one small adjustment if it were my photo. I'd
rotate it about half a degree clockwise and crop or fill as necessary.
Paul
On Aug 21, 2004
I spent a tortuous night asking myself how long is a fortnight.
Norm
Malcolm Smith wrote:
I have spent a torturous fortnight asking myself
Yep, happens every so often. Antonio and Doug are working on it...
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
quite a few posts aren't coming through.
Anyone els
David Madsen wrote:
>
> How much "digital power" do they want?
More than I can supply :)
Minimum requirement - something that will print 11
x 17 at 300 dpi.
Adobe photosphop 1998 colorspace.
I told her that my digicam's largest file and leas
compression netted
8 1/2 x 11 - not good enough.
Frank Theriault wrote:
"Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
quite a few posts aren't coming through.
Anyone else in the same boat? I wonder if it's my
e-mail?
Sigh..."
Maybe it
Hi,
> "I got my rabbit ears on and I want to get
> chummy-chummy"
> So (1) has anyone commented on this before on list
> and I missed it?
I don't know
>(2) what is the song, who is singing and what
> decade is it from?
The internet knows everything:
http://www.cockadoodledont.com/music.h
Don Sanderson wrote:
> I'm in the process of evaluating my equipment and trying to
> decide which to keep and which to sell.
> I have 16-20 Pentax bodies that I will be selling and I'm
> trying to decide if the *ist should be among them.
I wish you well with this. I have spent a torturous fortn
--- David Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank:
>
> Thank you very much! I really appreciate the
> feedback.
>
> Today for me is cloudy and overcast, a touch on the
> cool side, and I
> think, overall, I would prefer to be back at the
> marina. Perhaps next
> year
>
> Take care
David
Several of my posts from yesterday didn't make it onto
the list (checked the archives, just in case).
Same thing this morning. Several hours later, and
quite a few posts aren't coming through.
Anyone else in the same boat? I wonder if it's my
e-mail?
Sigh...
thanks,
frank
=
"Your first
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Manual focus lenses cannot "talk" to the camera. If the mechanical
linkage to read the lens aperture isn't
present then the lens isn't really usable on the camera.
Like someone else mentioned briefly, that's not quite true; the lenses
would require extra work, but aren't e
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greywolf has a handy dandy little FAQ that I though
> I'd bookmarked but haven't, that may cover a few
> more
> "new" things around here.
Found it! (and now it's bookmarked):
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
-frank
=
"Truth sp
On 21/8/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, offered:
>San Francisco has a lot of old street cars and cable cars. Sometimes the
>street cars are called trolleys here, but mostly not. Anyway, every now
>and then the older cars come out for some exercise, and your photo reminded
>me of this pic of
Build quality?!
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pdml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:23:40 +0200
Subject: MZ-6?
> What are you people's opinion on the MZ-6? I found a new one with a
> much-reduced price, so I'm a bit tempted...
Hi Alan,
on 21 Aug 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
>Just had my first roll of 15/3.5 pictures back. The first thing I have
>noticed is, they aren't very sharp (maybe I should redo the test on cloudy
>day).
Hm, I would agree, that they are not as sharp as you could expect. But I
couldn't say if it w
Hi Frank ...
Not too many PAW submissions here lately, so it's nice to see yours even
though it's been posted before.
San Francisco has a lot of old street cars and cable cars. Sometimes the
street cars are called trolleys here, but mostly not. Anyway, every now
and then the older cars come out
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
Subject: Re: CF cards and readers question
>
> I got a SanDIsk 512mb flash card. and a USB 2.0
> SanDisk card reader, but it
> was pointed out to me that I don't really need the
> card reader - I can just
> use the cord that came with the came
- Original Message -
From: "Mick Maguire"
Subject: Long time away, back again
> Hi all,
> My first posts for about 2 years. I have lurked on and off
in-between and
> also turned my attention to Triumph motorcycles some.
Ah, those Triumph motorcycles.
I had a 1972 Trident for a while.
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan"
Subject: 15/3.5 sharpness?
> Just had my first roll of 15/3.5 pictures back. The first thing I
have
> noticed is, they aren't very sharp (maybe I should redo the test on
cloudy
> day). Okay, I knew the Pentax one is the least sharp of all 15mm
(Zei
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: PAW: The Roncesvalles Car
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2629172
>
> Comments always welcome! Thanks.
Yuk! It's in focus.
William Robb
What are you people's opinion on the MZ-6? I found a new one with a
much-reduced price, so I'm a bit tempted... Seems to me that it's rather
similar to the MZ-5n, but its list price is lower, so there must be
something "missing", but what exactly is it? Actually, based on the
specs, it looks li
In the past there were Super 8 SLR movie cameras. Mostly using a beam
splitter inside the lens, thus not having as potentially bright an image as
a mirror-reflex camera, but nobody seemed to complain of viewfinder
darkness. I'm feeling too lazy to check up on the relative sizes of Super 8
and 1/
--- Mick Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> My first posts for about 2 years. I have lurked on
> and off in-between and
> also turned my attention to Triumph motorcycles
> some. However I recently
> "enabled" myself into buying a long desired 645nII.
> I found an excellent
> deal on
I haven't been submitting PAWs of late, as my current
state of unemployedness doesn't really give me much
money for such luxuries as getting prints made. So,
I've dug into the archives, as it were.
I may have shown this to the list about 18 months ago,
but if I did, it was a rough scan from a con
> Paul Stregevsky wrote, in part:
> > Does anyone just punch out the glass in a second (cheap) filter and use the
> > remaining metal ring as a hood?
Yes.
ERN
On 21/8/04, Mick Maguire, discombobulated, offered:
>Hi all,
> My first posts for about 2 years. I have lurked on and off in-between and
>also turned my attention to Triumph motorcycles some. However I recently
>"enabled" myself into buying a long desired 645nII. I found an excellent
>deal on one
Tom,
Pentax only has two speeds, rush and slow.
You pay for expedited service, otherwise it's slow.
Figure 3 days to get out of the mail room (yes!!).
Figure another week to get a camera tech to look at it.
If you see an estimate in two weeks, you'll be happy.
Get the name and number of your
Hi all,
My first posts for about 2 years. I have lurked on and off in-between and
also turned my attention to Triumph motorcycles some. However I recently
"enabled" myself into buying a long desired 645nII. I found an excellent
deal on one on ebay just one year old, came complete with flash, inse
Cotty wrote: "It is superb. And not beige."
Ah... those Mac people! ;o)
Regards,
/\/\ick...
++
||
__/) Mick Maguire |
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(_/) www.triumphrat.net |
\/
I saw the report, read some lines and decided not to buy the magazin. No
really new information, more of that sort of speculation that can be read on
this list, too. So what will you expect from the photo?
Best, Bernd
a.. From: Joseph Tainter
b.. Subject: Photo of *ist Djr. Maybe
c.. Date:
Your shots look kind of similar to some of my shots, made with the
A2.8/20mm. I guess a lot has to do with choise of film - as well as the
scanner (I guess yours may be fine - mine is not good enough for 35mm negs -
it's an Epson perfection 3200 photo). I personally believe, that in order to
get ph
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
