Hello Joe,
/lurker mode off/
I am in Hungary/Budapest.
If do you need any help or info while in Hun, contact me any time off list.
You can get unlimited bandwidth on my ADSL or CDRW/PC, and I can take a closer look at
your D*ist...:)
7 mb CF is not enough, for sure..:)))
/lurker mode on/
Hi,
Can you recommend some tutorials/books about postprocessing photos in
Photoshop?
Yes, here:
http://tinyurl.com/3hqf7
I would not really describe Evening's book as a tutorial. One that I
think is good as a 'my first Photoshop book' is 'Photoshop for
Photography' by Tom Ang -
I am not the one who professes to know it all about image quality. Looking
at JCOs images he is all talk, no walk! The quality of my own work is nether
here nor there. JCO constantly rants about image quality yet his images
suck! LOL
A.
On 29/8/04 10:12 pm, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A nice image, but where is the image quality he constantly talks about?
On 29/8/04 11:08 pm, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally, sunset/sunrise pictures convey the moods of something
happening in a scenery, and with half the sky included to point at the
event on the horizon. This pic
http://www.digitalretouch.org/
I like Katrin's book more than Martin Evening's tome mainly because she
doesn't waste a lot of time on the basics and offers greater depth in
retouching and adjusting photos in Photoshop. For example, Katrin has
about eight examples of ways to convert color to BW,
http://www.dantestella.com/technical/digital.html
Shel
What an awful image. You really have no taste JCO.
I would stick to talking about photography rather than practicing it if *I
were you.
A.
On 29/8/04 11:28 pm, John C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I just said it is impossible to display
a LF image on a PC screen but here is a
Hi Ryan,
Glad to hear you're so happy - you really do sound like a kid on
Christmas morning.
:-)
Cheers,
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August 2004 6:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ENABLED limited ist
After seeing the item, I don't ~get~ what the mystery is. The camera
description is ambiguous but I figure the seller has just grabbed a shot of
a similar camera (stolen from another auction I presume) rather than
photographing the actual camera. Most non-photo enthusiasts think all
cameras look
On 30/8/04, Joseph Tainter, discombobulated, unleashed:
I expect to have about 4 days for photography -- 2 for
Budapest, 1 for Lake Balaton region, 1 for the Danube Bend region. The
last has a skansen (park where examples of peasant architecture are
collected), so the shooting should be fun.
If you all email them to me, I'll happily stick them on the
www.ihaveyourviewfinderrighthere.com page...
Tanya Mayer Photography
Qld, Australia
www.tanyamayer.com
Ph +61 (07) 49831247
Mobile +61 0429831247
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Caveman wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
And no matter which way you look at it, you cannot extend the
bandwidth. Which is why I say interpolation doesn't change the
resolution.
Depends what your definition for resolution is. If you define it as
the size of the smallest details that can be recorded,
An odd view, if you don't mind me saying so. A properly-functioning
market economy requires lots of buyers, lots of sellers, and perfect
knowledge so that buyers can make informed decisions. All of which
should lead to low prices. Of course that is why the market is full of
people
Thank you to all ho replied. I would love to have all the books
suggested, but I have to narrow down the list to no more than 3 books
for now.
I have tried out VueScan last night. Impressive, but it will take some
experimentation to use it at it's best capabilities. I scanned some
frames from a
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, James wrote:
I have an MZ-60. it refuses to talk to my A lenses. only FA lenses with apture ring
set to A will work.
No, A lenses and F lenses with the aperture ring set to A will work
too.
I have taped over some of the contacts on camera body and camera
works with
Don't know if this is true.
http://www.zeiss.de/C12567A8003B58B9/ContentsWWWIntern/B97501AEF3869B76C1256E910023D1E3#Unbenannter%20Abschnitt_1
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Nobody can answer this question for you. The two cameras are very different
beast. Forget using the 645 lenses on a
Your friend is misinformed.
For some time now (2 years?), Irfanview has offered lossless rotation
which it DOES save. You need the plugins to do it.
A very useful feature.
John
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:23:59 +1000, Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for what was probably quite
That is 35mm you fool, read the technical details before you
run your idiotic mouth
The image quality I have been talking about is from LF film,
not 35mm.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Antonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:)!
Absolutely right! I've got the kid part nailed, at least. Now to warm up
that oatmeal for dinner. When I next write to Santa it'll be a suggestion
that Rudolph make the quarter-yearly rounds as well- just think of all those
people out there who don't eat leftovers..
Merry September,
Ryan
Take a look at this Antonio,
http://www.jcoconnell.com/temp/barge12mp.jpg
or even better, print it at 8x10 or 11x14
on high quality glossy paper.
I think you will find it quite different than
those old 35mm photos posted in the PUG.
As far as knowing it all, no one does but
I do not post on
A. wrote:
I would stick to talking about photography rather than practicing it if *I
were you.
It's only those people who don't show anything that are in that category. What are
_you_ going to do about that?
I suggest you start talking about photography... LOL...
Jostein
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
adapter). The manual *ist D says, that AF-assist should work with the
AF500FTZ - but I fear this is just annother white pre-flash, which I don't
enjoy much? I'll have to try this tomorrow.
My bet is it will just be a red light as usual.
Kostas
Some strange observations. For example, in his cost analysis, he
assumes you only use A CF card once. So he compares the cost of a CF
card to what he pays for 4 rolls of film LOL.. I'd also like to know
where he gets four rolls of film for ten bucks. And once again, it all
comes from someone
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:17:33 +0200, Jens Bladt wrote:
sell (I don't want too much money tied up i photographic equipment. Should I
sell my 6x6 equipment? Will I ever want to use my MZ-S or other 35mm camera
I'll have your MZ-S :)
James
http://www.dantestella.com/technical/digital.html
Interesting article, if rather long. It makes many points pro film that Toralf
Lund and others have been saying here. A few things that I think are not
completely right:
Smaller, faster cheaper lenses? Where are these? I think is out of date
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:40:47 -0400, you wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 30/8/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
(I can't be a wise a** all the time).
Yes you can.
(Hey we shoulda been a TV double act - very dry and bouncing off each
other - sorta like The Odd Couple but with two
I've worked as an advertising writer for 22 years. My job is to create
illusions based on truth. It's about fueling desire and presenting a
product in the best possible light. As you say, there are regulations,
many very strict regulations, that limit how far one can go. But the
most skilled
John Coyle returned from the Outback long enough to write:
Hi guys: some friends are going to Washington and New York late September
on
holidays/vacation - any suggestions for must-see sights and restaurants?
Any advice gratefully received, passed on and acknowledged!
John,
Washington D.C. or
Thanks Peter for the reference to that web site. I
looked thru most of it, and it was very helpful.
I still wish I could hear more feedback about some of
the other M42 lenses, such as Zeiss. There's just
something about that name that makes me think they are
better than the Pentax brand.
Bottom line here: Some of us would rather work on a computer than in a
darkroom. I'm one of them. I sincerely hope that both film and digital
prosper for many years because I know the pleasure of pursing a favorite
pastime. There will always be a certain satisfaction of using film and
making
http://www.pbase.com/image/33249054
Believe it or not, this is Bon Jovi :-)
(name written on the ear tab)
The link:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/paw11.jpg
The tech stuff:
*ist D, DA16-45mm @ 16mm (24mm equiv.), 1/350 sec, f/8, 200 ISO.
Dario
Paul --
Was it even a little bit weird seing an Enzo at what is
obviously a celebration of the American auto industry?
Kinda like showing up on your Yamaha sport bike at the
local Hell's Angels bar? ;-)
Stephen
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Enzo Ferarris are, well, really expensive. I was surprised to see
Peter J. Alling wrote:
http://www.aohc.it/indexe.htm
Then Steve Pearson wrote:
Thanks Peter for the reference to that web site. I
looked thru most of it, and it was very helpful.
Glad you liked that web site :-)
(and thanks Peter for your appreciation too)
Dario Bonazza
They have a reputation, which in my experience inflates their price
beyond their capabilities, no matter how good they are.
Steve Pearson wrote:
Thanks Peter for the reference to that web site. I
looked thru most of it, and it was very helpful.
I still wish I could hear more feedback about
Peter J. Alling wrote:
William Robb wrote:
snip lots of stuff for clarity
Photography was so much easier when it was about photography.
William Robb
Photography was never about photography...
--
Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is a virtue. Fleas are interested
in dogs.
Valentin,
Excellent idea and picture! I believe you expressed the point very very
well.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:07 PM
Subject: PESO: Film vs. Digital
http://www.pbase.com/image/33249054
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Caveman wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/33249054
What happened to the cross at the top? It looks to me far less sharp
than the clock.
Kostas
I suspect the windows are not perfectly flat. Some warping probably.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
What happened to the cross at the top? It looks to me far less sharp
than the clock.
Take a look at this Antonio,
http://www.jcoconnell.com/temp/barge12mp.jpg
or even better, print it at 8x10 or 11x14
on high quality glossy paper.
I think you will find it quite different than
those old 35mm photos posted in the PUG.
As far as knowing it all, no one does but
I do not post on
A friend and I did a comparison between a K24/2.8 and a Zeiss (Flektagon?)
25mm (forget what the aperture was, maybe 2.5) and the Pentax lens was
superior in contrast, light falloff, and observable sharpness. The Zeiss
lens was bigger and heavier though.
YMMV
Shel
From: Steve Pearson [EMAIL
When counting on the reflective surface to make your image, you are somewhat
at the mercy of that surface. I think the glass panes are slightly
distorted, and the lens and camera are doing an excellent job of picking it
up. You'll notice other distortions as you look down the steeple.
t
On
A few years ago it would have been weird to see an Enzo at the dream cruise, but the
event has evolved to the point where it's more of a celebration of all things
automotive. Of course, the vast majority of the cruisers are muscle cars, hot rods,
and American classics, but there's a wide range
Very clever! I think you would've aced the Juxaposition or Reflections PUGs
from 2002.
t
On 8/31/04 8:07, Caveman wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/33249054
Except that the rodders on Woodward Ave aren't likely to tear your head off
and urinate down the stump of your neck, for polluting their environment
with foreign sh*t.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
Kinda like showing up on
lol! Nice capture Dario. If anything, I'm not a big fan of that shadow, but
other than that, I think it's great. Did you happen to see any of the other
cow names?
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004
This is probably a silly question which has been discussed to bits, but I
was wondering if someone could give me the quick answer as to why it was too
hard to put a 100% viewfinder in the ist D (as opposed to the 90something
percent..)
Thanks,
Ryan
I do from time to time. Of course I use one as a flash meter in the studio.
And
ocationally I use one outside the studio too - that's when light/subjects
are difficult, incident metering will produce better results. Go photograph
a black door and a white door (two seperate shots) using the
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
It's not that the hand held meter is better. It isn't. It's just that
incident metering is indifferent to the properties of the subject - because
only the light that's hitting the subject, is measured. Not the reflected
light.
Thanks for the tutorial; I
Thanks Tim, unfortunately at that time I was living in a place where I
was only able to take about this kind of photos:
http://pug.komkon.org/00febr/block1b.htm
Tim wrote:
Very clever! I think you would've aced the Juxaposition or Reflections PUGs
from 2002.
On 31/8/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I fear that we'll first see some very tempting 20D on the shelves.
Ar, yoyu are tempted by the Dark Side, Luke?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
James.
I will probably be putting it up for auction (ebay) during the next couple
of days. It's sad to let it go ('cause it's SO beautiful and has suchj a
nice feel to it - and it's actually a very well built and well designed
camera), but it's better that it is serving some one else, than just
On 31/8/04, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
Jorge was trying climbing for the second time ever, hence you can understand
he could be puzzled a bit.
The link:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/paw10.jpg
Yeah nice shot Dario. It captures the moment well. Thanks.
Cheers,
Cotty
On 31/8/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.pbase.com/image/33249054
Not crazy about the wacky angle but nice pic, Cavo. Thanks.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On 31/8/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
European advertising is generally just more obtuse rather than more
sophisticated.
Hang on tosh, let's not lump us all into the melting pot on this one!
Have you seen some of those German TV ads? And the French - let's not
talk about the
I really like this one. Great framing. Wonderful capture of an apparently difficult
moment.
On 31/8/04, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
Jorge was trying climbing for the second time ever, hence you can understand
he could be puzzled a bit.
The link:
On 31/8/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I really like this one. Great framing. Wonderful capture of an apparently
difficult moment.
On 31/8/04, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
Jorge was trying climbing for the second time ever, hence you can
understand
he
French television is a strong argument for being an English speaking nation
;-)
(duck cover)
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 31/8/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
European advertising is generally just more obtuse rather
Cotty wrote:
I just looked at it again and have upgraded it ;-) It is excellent. I
could do with a slightly looser crop on the left, but it does not
detract. It is a superb study of a climber - all the ingredients are
there - the face, the ropes, the hand, the rock, the anticipation. That's
I like the energy of the tight crop. It just sort of squeezes more raw emotion into
the frame, and it makes for a nice comosition as well. At least to my eye.
Cotty wrote:
I just looked at it again and have upgraded it ;-) It is excellent. I
could do with a slightly looser crop on the
Hi folks,
The September PUG is available on my website AND on the komkon server.
This means:
The archives are NOT!!! working on both pages. At least not for the last 5
months.
But you have at least a link to Josteins page and you can look at the
pictures of July.
I don't have much space on my
Thanks Adelheid !
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Seen on dpreview
(anyone else I can insult?)
The WOGS start at Calais.
That should just about cover it.
WW
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: My Dog's Alive
THE PAGE CANNOT BE FOUND: 404 ERROR
Has she run off?
Bastard probably starved her to death.
HAR!!!
WW
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee
Subject: viewfinder magnification
This is probably a silly question which has been discussed to bits,
but I
was wondering if someone could give me the quick answer as to why
it was too
hard to put a 100% viewfinder in the ist D (as opposed to the
I will second that!
The nice tight crop focused my attention on exactly, I think, where you
wanted it. And, as a consequence, I paid good attention to the face, and
the expression.
Also, I did notice the depth of field, but after pondering it a bit,
decided that you did great on it.
Well done!
Hi Everyone.
I've heard of the lower priced Pentax digital SLR coming out next year,
has anybody heard if Pentax is planning to release a digital SLR that
would be above the ISD ?
Thanks,
Greg Cooper
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada
I noticed the September PUG was up on the komkon website, but the
individual pictures can't be see in thumbnail or full size.
Did I happen to catch it in the process of uploading?
From the US Pentax site:
DREAMS CAN COME TRUE!
PENTAX has reduced the price of the *ist D digital SLR and is offering a
cash rebate on the combined purchase of the *ist D and DA 16-45mm
digital lens. Plus, PENTAX has extended a variety of product rebates
until December 31, 2004! Visit
It's no harder (and no easier) to put a 100% viewfinder in the *ist-D
than to put one in the MZ-S; in both cameras the viewfinder is optical.
100% viewfinders are expensive - far more expensive than 9x% finders.
This is probably a silly question which has been discussed to bits, but I
was
Thanks Adelheid.
Just had a quick look. Another supurb set of submissions again this month. Sometimes i
wonder why i
bother.vbg
Comments to follow.
Dave
Hi folks,
The September PUG is available on my website AND on the komkon server.
This means:
Try it again, it should work now.
Adelheid
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 31. August 2004 20:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: September PUG
I noticed the September PUG was up on the komkon website, but the individual
pictures can't
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote on 31.08.04 16:24:
Jorge was trying climbing for the second time ever, hence you can
understand
he could be puzzled a bit.
The link:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/paw10.jpg
Very good! I like shallow and nice DOF. Did you try to climb
Ryan Lee wrote:
lol! Nice capture Dario. If anything, I'm not a big fan of that shadow,
but
other than that, I think it's great. Did you happen to see any of the
other
cow names?
Nothing so special: Eilig, Romi...
Dario
Believe it or not, this is Bon Jovi :-)
(name written on the ear tab)
Hi,
It's not that the hand held meter is better. It isn't. It's just that
incident metering is indifferent to the properties of the subject - because
only the light that's hitting the subject, is measured. Not the reflected
light.
Thanks for the tutorial; I knew about the grey 18% but not
Toralf Lund:
They give decent results on prints, though. I have twice ordered prints
from digital cameras, transfered them via the Internet and gotten them
in the mail.
Do you know anything about their film development service?
Nope. The only contact I have had with them is remote printing of
There's a company that keeps putting 6 14mm DAs on eBay on 3 day auctions at GBP
299.99. What's the chances of them being ex-stock? They are based in Canada.
They don't seem to be selling, so I'll post the URL:
There are a lot of photos in the September PUG that I find first-rate.
My favorite is Spokes buy Timothy Sherbourne. The patterns are very
striking and the subject is indeed a mystery.
I also really like Petr Pazour's Mystery. It acurately and
effectively conveys the feeling of being under
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder.
That is 35mm you fool, read the technical details before you
run your idiotic mouth
John, He'd read the technical details, then run his idiotic mouth.
He can't help himself, he is both
Thanks Nick, I appreciate the warning.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Nick Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Future of Film
I'd avoid the Minolta Scan Dual II. Mine was a real dog, failing
to line up
The detail is amazing JCO. Nice pic.
What are those swirls in the sky portion? Are they some type of
artifact of scanning?
rg
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Take a look at this Antonio,
http://www.jcoconnell.com/temp/barge12mp.jpg
or even better, print it at 8x10 or 11x14
on high quality glossy paper.
That makes two SMC Pentax 18/3.5 sold on eBay in August - I bought the other
one. It cost less than this one (3835670112), but not a lot less...
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
You were right, Kostas. The *ist D supports the red light focus assistance -
but only with the built-in flash poped up (g).
(BTW - only if there's a RAM card in the camera).
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Kostas
That's a tricky shot!
Don't forget to point the spotmeter at something, that you want i the
middle of the grey-wedge (18%).
I don't understand why the histogram from shooting a white or black wall
does not show a peak in the middle? AN average metering should result in a
photograph that in
I've been using Nikon scanners for a couple of years now - the high end
4000 and the 8000, for a total of four different scanners, and I bought a
5000 recently. Because I was not very knowledgeable, I thought these were
good scanners, and in many respects they are. Still, they have their
faults,
? Strange, it works fine with my Metz 40MZ-2 and sca3702 adapter on my *ist D. The red
light helps the AF system of the camera, and without the RTF 'poped up'
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 23:49, Jens Bladt wrote:
FJW You were right, Kostas. The *ist D supports the red light focus assistance -
FJW
OK, OK,
Back by popular demand - These were not shot on Pentax gear!
http://www.iol.ie/~pkcurran/Pippi/Pippi.htm
Pat
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: My Dog's Alive
- Original
Nice PUG guys and as usual I was looking at Dag's photo trying to guess
how he did that.
Then I realized that I don't know of any digicam with multiple
exposure capability. Yes, you can do that in Photoshop, but usually it
requires some cropping / resizing whatever.
I was thinking how nice it
Does anyone on the list use the Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400? I am now
very worried about this focusing problem, especially since I plan to submit
some of my 35mm slides to picture libraries via CD.
I am only getting to grips with film scanning so I cannot comment on the
5400's abilities or
Thanks Tom - yes, it will be DC! They have a fourteen year old son, so the
Air Space Museum should be a good choice.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: OT:
I believe the manufacturing tolerance of a 100% viewfinder is way too
difficult and expensive. It is not difficult to understand why once you have
seen how the viewfinder is assemlbed. Every piece has to be 100% accurate
(mirror, screen, pentaprism, eyepiece). Besides, even if the factory could
It finally showed up in my email the next message after this.
Is kind of funny, considering the content, heh?
--
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 28 Aug 2004 at 0:48, graywolf wrote:
Now, couldn't we discuss this for a while? GRIN!
Most folks seem to think they are directly connected to the list server.
Nick Clark posted:
I'd avoid the Minolta Scan Dual II. Mine was a real dog ...
As was mine. RUFF!!
I bought it to replace my HP PhotoSmart S20 when the latter appeared to have
died. However, I gave the PhotoSmart one more chance and was delighted to find
it working, so I didn't have to
Thanks William,
I am learning from every reply - this list is one
hell of a knowlege pool!
Pat
. Just curious about
the type of photography 6x7 format people are into, especially
landscape
work and the ability of the format to sell pictures when compared
with other
Probably just some artifacts of my quick and dirty
dust removal. If I were to print this I would go in
and clean it up a bit more. But even as it is a 8x10
wouldn't show any of that stuff, too small.
I forgot to mention, while your monitor size and screen
resolution will cause your milage to
Nice PUG guys and as usual I was looking at Dag's photo trying to guess
how he did that.
Then I realized that I don't know of any digicam with multiple
exposure capability.
All three digital cameras I have owned to date -- Fujifilm FinePix 6900Z,
Pentax Optio 550 and Pentax *istD --
Why not a 150% viewfinder and thus make the image the same size as a full frame
35mm. Wouldn't you farsighted folks have fun trying to focus on that?
--
Ryan Lee wrote:
This is probably a silly question which has been discussed to bits, but I
was wondering if someone could give me the quick
Hum? Read the subject line, Bill
HAR!
--
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee
Subject: viewfinder magnification
This is probably a silly question which has been discussed to bits,
but I
was wondering if someone could give me the quick answer as to why
it was too
Simon, you're dead right, Ryan rang me and was so fired up he had to come
and show me it! Wish he hadn't, I've now bought two!
Seriously, although I had seen Tanja's *ist-D before, I hadn't really played
with it, but I had a couple of hours with Ryan's yesterday, in which I got
to use several of
- Original Message -
From: Caveman
Subject: PUG, Dag and multiple exposure
Then I realized that I don't know of any digicam with multiple
exposure capability. Yes, you can do that in Photoshop, but
usually it
requires some cropping / resizing whatever.
The Pentax istD will do up
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
