Hi,
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 01:14:49 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just don't hand Frank a shotgun while there are any geese around, enough
said...
I've never hunted. Never pointed a gun at an animal, nor do I have a
desire to do so.
However, were I handed
Similar ones here are called, colloquially, stick phones.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel said, among many other things:
... the phone booths (they're not booths, really,
but what ARE they called)
pay phones?
:-D
ER
On 28/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
The phone itself is a pay phone, but the whole assembly, phone and the
shroud/canopy/shell around the phone is what?
Five'll get you ten that there is a blueprint somewhere whose title reads:
Telecommunication Interface Erect Stance
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=309526
Comments appreciated!
Cheers,
Ryan
Hi Don,
Just a word of caution, if you're planning to mate this lens with an ist D,
don't. After my personal experience with it, and heck of a lot of probing, I
more or less confirmed that Pentax and Sigma Japan are currently resolving
an autofocus issue concerning the Sigma EX 28-70 2.8 DF and
Hi,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 6:55:53 AM, Shel wrote:
I don't think so. I thought it might be it, and looked up the word kiosk
in a couple of places, and the definition in each instance described a more
substantial structure.
it's a some-weathers static telephonic communicational device
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Jerome Reyes wrote:
The RHS is a bit busy, perhaps? Too much jumble, and to my eye it
distracts from the subject.
I had the same first impression, actually. Maybe an angle more on the
obtuse side would've helped out with this. Otherwise, a decent candid.
Are you
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=309526
Comments appreciated!
That's more of a WBOPAAO (Whole Bunch Of Photos All At Once) :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2755889 is very cool indeed.
As are many of the others, but that one in particular caught my
Hi Cotty
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tits up for a couple of days!!!
John
--
Carmel College Webmail
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
--
-- Original Message ---
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This isn't just about a boy playing an accordion, it's also about where
he's playing the accordion, and, perhaps even why he's playing the
instrument. You could, however, lose some off the bottom of the pic, which
adds nothing to the impact of the
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, frank theriault wrote:
I like this a lot! I love the composition, the boy looks small (which
he no doubt is, but in that large doorway, with the big steps he's
sitting on, he looks even smaller). Love the MAC sign - lets us know
we're in maybe an upscale touristy
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Well, let me amend that comment. As it stands, if you don't have more
frames of this shot, then yes, it might be well served to crop a bit off
the right side, and from the bottom as well. Other comments stand ...
How much Shel? Just the 1/4 person
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Doug Franklin wrote:
Well, it could be that story, but I like the story it tells framed as
it is. I have to admit to disliking the MAC sign hanging from the
lamppost, though.
I am with Frank on this one :-) Many thanks for the comments (off-list
too).
Kostas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of us lacking stereoscopic vision, what would be the point?
Increasing the profits of camera manufacturers, of course. :-)
S
William Robb wrote:
More amazing, is that the Italians bothered occupying the place.
To be fair, they thought better of it...
S
Rob Studdert wrote:
I just did another one which is a good example of where I feel the camera is a
little weak (though I've not had the opportunity to see how others handle the
same type of situation either), if you look at the a crop below you can see
edge artifacts caused buy the abrupt
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
Hi Cotty
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tits up for a couple of days!!!
Are you
Are you allowed to say tits on College webmail?
Yes if you're an Network Admin...
Or on PDML? Let's
see if the spam filter pick it up
Not sure about that...
John
-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 29
Thanks Ryan, I will be using it on the ist D.
Was yours the EX or the EX DG?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 EX Aspherical DF vs 28-70 F2.8 Tokina
ATX Pro
Thanks Ryan, I will be using it on the ist D.
Was yours the EX or the EX DG?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 EX Aspherical DF vs 28-70 F2.8 Tokina
ATX Pro
try it. the difference can be substantial and DOF doesn't cover up for it.
why do you think the slack is at the infinity end and not at the short end?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:41 PM
Subject:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, wendy beard wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/35618348
I discovered that I'm useless when it comes to manual
focusing. It was cold out too so the camera was
probably shivering :-s
I think the Earth moved for you ;-)
Kostas (maybe the moon too :-)
Hi folks,
I have an MX with a stuck shutter (the mirror does not cock) and a
desperate need for a mirror bumper. I also see some fringing around
the viewfinder that I cannot evaluate (but perhaps you can). The meter
works fine. Let me know if you are interested.
Regards,
Kostas (UK)
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:35:07 -0700, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's see..[-40º is] about the same, F or C, isn't it.
Either way, I'll back out of any commitments in that kind of weather.
You could freeze your bippy without knowing it!
Nope. I'll stay in So.Cal,
Hi Mark,
I'm interested in a couple of those- was trying to send a note to you
offlist, but for some reason I just kept gettings a 'mail delivery failure,
connection not authorised'. Is it a mail filter or is something wrong on my
end?
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Mark
Generic (I forgot the brand) 35/2.8 M-class wide angle.
Good used condition. Clean and working properly. $30
Sigma 28/2.8 A-class lens. Clean and working properly. $30
+ shpg. PayPal. Thanks.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
'Politics is supposed to be the
Nice to meet you to Boris.
Thats a nice sharp photo. You seem to get the most out of your 2450. We both have the
same
scanner,so it must be somrthing i'm doing.gPossibly not scanning at high enough
res.??
Dave Brooks
Hi!
Hi!
I just received my DA-14 and would like to attack an UV filter to it for
lens protection.
With a lens this wide I'm unsure if a normal filter would dim out the edges
of the lens and am considering buying a 'slim' filter - the con of the slim
is it is more expensive and not on stock at my
Pat White wrote:
So, Paul, looks like you were/are a Twisted Sister fan. Back in the late
70s, my hair reached down to about six inches above my belt. If I was
driving in short sleeves and got chilly, I could cover my elbows. I'd
post
a picture, but I've got no website.
Here are those
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQgotopageZ1QQsassZdpconsultQ2ecomQQsorecordsperpageZ50QQsosortorderZ1QQsosortpropertyZ1
Quantum battery pack. Used but in good condition.
HP SketchPad Ex. cond.
Canon grid screen Ed NIB NOS
WebWay 12x12 album pages. New, cheap.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
sorry -- i had no idea it had sounds, i usualy keep my PC speakers off.
but the quote was about Yankees. and a pretty obvious one :)
best,
mishka
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:55:17 -0400, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miska I am most definitely a Red sox fan...
There was a certain poetry
OK folks, a night has passed but I don't feel so much better.
When the effort exceeds the enjoyment it's time to stop, isn't it?
So I'm very tired I have to explain again and again my arguments and being
misunderstood most of the time.
Maybe I'm not able to express my thoughts well, after all
And think of long focal length (so much prone to thermal focus shift) on
small format film (so much demanding about proper focus). The Graphic is
another thing: not enough long focus and not enough small format to show the
problem, I guess.
I can assure you that precise focus at infinity is a
Are you allowed to say tits on College webmail? Or on PDML? Let's see if
the spam filter
pick it up
mike
Isn't it a kind of bird?
(or some kinds of bird?)
ER
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:50:37 -0600, William Robb wrote:
With weather like that, why didn't you become Italians several
centuries ago. :-)
More amazing, is that the Italians bothered occupying the place.
That I can almost understand. The yen for someplace different, and all
that.
TTYL,
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=309526
Comments appreciated!
Nice work!
Bruce Woodturning, Kaz, and Abandon Tree are
my favorites. Woodturning would make a heckuva good
stock shot.
Best,
Stephen Moore
I don't have the $5000.
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Tokina AT-X 80-200 2.8 manual focus with 2X teleconverter
you haven't compared the output.
Herb...
- Original Message
Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already have a 24-90mm and rarely go to 90mm so performance
from
24mm to 75mm is what interests me. Portability is not a key
feature.
Only optical performance (including flare control).
Thanks,
Hi Andre,
I own both and a couple of weeks ago I
Hi Dario,
The list can be a frustrating place sometime.
Good luck and chat to you soon.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
The
Tamron performs really well for a non SMC lens, but shows a
strange kind of reflections, as it sometimes duplicates small,
strong lights on the scene (and it is not predictable in the
finder, so I guess it is a problem of reflections of light
hitting the sensor
Hi Dario,
You haven't disturbed any normal people. Please reconsider.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 5:00 AM
Subject: Bye...
OK folks, a night has passed but I
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Tamron performs really well for a non SMC lens, but shows a
strange kind of reflections, as it sometimes duplicates small,
strong lights on the scene (and it is not predictable in the
finder, so I guess it is a problem of reflections of light
hitting the sensor and
On 28/10/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I do tend to be pretty confrontational.
Mr. Sensitivity I am decidedly not.
William Robb
And that's just his wife speaking
Graywolf Grin
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I've used a normal SMC Pentax UV-filter since I got the lens, and haven't seen any
problems.
Some sample pictures are here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=408620
DagT
fra: Sam Jost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dato: 2004/10/29 fr PM 01:58:46 CEST
til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
emne: Slim or
Steve Larson wrote:
Hi Dario,
You haven't disturbed any normal people.
I suspected that, but sometimes a confirmation helps. Thanks.
Please reconsider.
Sorry, not at this time. Maybe one next day (week, month, year...) I'll
strike back :-)
Dario
On 29/10/04, John Whittingham, discombobulated, unleashed:
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tits up for a couple of days!!!
Oh bloody hell that explains it then mate ;-)
The weather up there is a lada sheeyite.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
On 29/10/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's more of a WBOPAAO (Whole Bunch Of Photos All At Once) :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2755889 is very cool indeed.
As are many of the others, but that one in particular caught my eye.
S
Hey join the queue
Well, I don't follow the *istD threads, but It appears that some folks have
driven off another venerated old-timer and valuable resource.
Congratulations to the lot of ya for your dubious accomplishment.
Regards,
Bob...
---
No man's life, liberty or property is safe while
Dario Bonazza wrote:
OK folks, a night has passed but I don't feel so much better.
Hey Dario; best wishes for a PDML-free period, and I shall hope to see
you return at some point in the future. I know how annoying it can get
when the same old misconceptions keep rearing their heads on this list
Cotty wrote:
Hey join the queue Jolly
Whoops - have I offended the Sekrit PDML Cabal of Acronym Authorisers
(SPCAA) or something?
S
AF200T
In generally good condition but has had a minor battery leak.
One spring has corrosion. A good cleaning of the top of it
will give you a fully functional flash @ a reasonable price.
With case.
The T model flashes are analog have the TTL setting.
A perfect compact flash
It's those silent people that should speak up more often. Their views are
important and valuable contributions, even if they're expressed only as a
short me too or I agree note.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please bear in mind that a
significant minority
Although i dont make a habit to find and watch the show my self,i do tune in once and a
while for a
few minuites and have noticed the same thing Pat.
I see quite a few use the 6x7. :-)
I saw a show ,maybe the first or second annual Naked in the House and was fasinated by
the
idea.
A local
Steve Jolly wrote:
Get out there and take some fantastic photos. :-)
There are a few among the many I took last month in Cologne that I planned
to post for PAW/PESO, but still haven't had the time to choose.
Some of them will probably show up in my website sooner or later.
Thanks,
Dario
On 29 Oct 2004 at 9:46, Steve Jolly wrote:
I would just mention
that JPEG compression also introduces artefacts that look very similar
to the ones you mention here - did you check the web versions to make
sure that nothing extra was introduced?
Hi Steve,
A very fair question, I did try
Does the name Oswego, N.Y. ring a bell. Growing up in N.J. in the late 50's, we'd hear
about the massive amounts of snowfall in around Oswego, phenominal amounts. A good
winter in NJ would yield 20 to 40 inches of snow, while Oswego regularily got that
much in a single dump.
No, I don't want
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29 Oct 2004 at 9:46, Steve Jolly wrote:
I would just mention
that JPEG compression also introduces artefacts that look very similar
to the ones you mention here - did you check the web versions to make
sure that nothing extra was introduced?
Hi Steve,
A very fair
This one is surplus to my requirements because I do not have any AF bodies.
The flash has no external sensor, TTL only, works with the current
generation of AF Pentaxes.
Would 30 euros be a good price? Mail me off-list.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
It wasn't the DG- just the EX DF (the first incarnation wasn't DF, i.e. no
focus 'clutch'- think those float about the used market quite often..) Have
they released the DG 28-70 2.8 already? Guess I haven't been keeping up to
date. When I purchased mine 3 years ago, it was just before the 24-70
Still available for sale:
SMC-FA 28mm f/2.8, LN- condition. Includes caps, original
box/packaging, and I'll throw in the proper Pentax soft lens case.
$140.
SMC-F 70-210mm f/4-5.6, bargain+ condition. Heavy-duty and well-made
body shows some wear on sharp edges, but glass is beautiful.
Also FS (non-Pentax items):
A 67mm Quantaray circular polarizer, LN condition, with plastic case. $20.
A Polaroid SX-70 kit with separate third-party (Focal) electronic
flash. This is the original SX-70, sleek and well-engineered, made of
aluminum and that leather-type material. It's not the
lol! If only!
He's referring to the imaginary buy-a-kiss queue :-)
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: PESO Found some time to put some shots together
Cotty wrote:
Hey
Thanks Stephen! I'm not sure how often a stock agency gets a request for a
woodturning picture, but seeing how I've never submitted anything to a stock
agency, I'll take your word for it! How does one get involved with a stock
agency anyway?
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From:
Having been recently introduced to the pleasures of the KM, KX cameras, and
knowing that a split image focusing screen was available, I wonder if a
standard screen can be replaced by a split image screen. If so, I'd
suppose finding a split image screen may be a bit of a challenge. Are
screens
I bought the 16-45 with the D, with the rebate the lens was only about
$200.00 US.
Don't really use it much but it is a very fine piece of glass.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On 29/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's those silent people that should speak up more often. Their views are
important and valuable contributions, even if they're expressed only as a
short me too or I agree note.
I agree.
D'OH!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 29/10/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hey join the queue Jolly
Whoops - have I offended the Sekrit PDML Cabal of Acronym Authorisers
(SPCAA) or something?
No no no no no. Ryan's pic of the lass - swon.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Me too.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 October 2004 17:13
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Bye...
On 29/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's those silent people that should speak up more often.
Their views
are important
I think that you just ran into the my new toy syndrome. Folks do not want to
hear that their new toy is not perfect. They will defend their toy to the death.
All of that is just basic human psychology. No need to get upset.
However, I can understand the aggravation you feel when you are wanting
Hi all,
I'm giving some serious thought to purchasing
Adorama's Flashpoint II 620 strobe kit. They were
written up in this month's Pop Photo magazine. I'm
thinking of starting with this one-light kit (w/ a
more powerful 300 w/s), as opposed to say a SP Studio
Systems 2-light kit. My reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
Hi Cotty
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tits
Good to see you stepping out learning.
With the more powerful lights you can always turn the power down as needed.
But having one or two depends on what you're shooting. Having units with modeling
lamps is important, imnsho. You can see more of what is going on.
With one light, get a large
*exactly*.
:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:56:07 +0200, Jostein wrote:
Honestly, I'd be more worried if EVERYONE looked strange...
In that case, you're still the strange one ... normal has just been
redefined. :-)
Why not take the camera and lens into your dealers and ask them to let you try
the filter. Nice thing about digital is you don't even have to waste a roll of film.
--
Sam Jost wrote:
Hi!
I just received my DA-14 and would like to attack an UV filter to it for
lens protection.
With a lens this
For those that might want a bigger card, PC Mall -pcmall.com- offers 1GB Sandisk High
Speed Ultra II CF card for $87 with a $15 mail in rebate, offer good till the end of
OCT.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 29, 2004 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Somewhere around here I have a skyline photo taken with the Tokina and a plain
jane Vivitar 2x. I will try and find it an put up a scan.
--
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:48:15 -0600, William Robb wrote:
I've used it with the 2X-S and found it to be surprisingly good.
The lens is
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
So, who of us had the longest hair, then?
Pictures, please...
Well, in 70s I only got what I was boprn with and not much more, but
here's a pic from the late 90's:
http://www.kajko.wdb.pl/to_sem_ja.jpg
Cheers,
Maciej
Thanks for posting the pictures, Dario! Now I'm wondering, what did you
look like in the 70s?
Pat White
Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in a couple of those- was trying to send a note to you
offlist, but for some reason I just kept gettings a 'mail delivery failure,
connection not authorised'. Is it a mail filter or is something wrong on my
end?
My hosting service has some major
Some people have lives of comfort and luxury, and can be entertained by
breakfast in a warm, comfortable bed: juice, toast, coffee, the morning
paper, all delivered and presented by someone who cares for them. Others
don't have quite the same luxuries, but still can enjoy a simpler, and
perhaps
Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:50:37 -0600, William Robb wrote:
With weather like that, why didn't you become Italians several
centuries ago. :-)
More amazing, is that the Italians bothered occupying the place.
That I can almost understand. The yen for
I do not agree. The volume of this list is so big - overwhelming - so it
would be really good if only those who have something to contribute
contributed.
I´m not sure if I have something to contribute but you get my point... do
you?
Not good to see Dario go because he has made his share of
No more...
Kingston has run out of the cards for this special and so have I.
So far Paul Setnquist has paid for the ones he requested. I have 5 left
at this point. There are 5 or 6 other people who expressed varying
levels of interest so I'm going to go on a first-come-first serve basis.
Limit
I just ordered yesterday, a Lexar 1GB 40x High Speed Compact Flash Card,
from tigerdirect.com for $89.99 w/$30 rebate. Shipping was about $10 which
is outrageous. Still compared to my first 1GB card purchased in Febrauary,
it was a great deal.
I think they also have a Sandisk 4 GB card for
Hi,
John Francis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
Hi Cotty
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tits
Hi,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/b-in-b.html
That's weird. If I was in that social position, I would not be
comfortable making my pitch in the middle of the pavement. It looks
almost posed.
BTW, did you ever manage to resend the cheque? I can't get through to
you
Maciej Marchlewski wrote:
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
So, who of us had the longest hair, then?
Pictures, please...
Well, in 70s I only got what I was boprn with and not much more, but
here's a pic from the late 90's:
http://www.kajko.wdb.pl/to_sem_ja.jpg
We have a definite winner! That's about
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Tamron performs really well for a non SMC lens, but shows a
strange kind of reflections, as it sometimes duplicates small,
strong lights on the scene (and it is not predictable in the
finder, so I guess it is a problem of reflections of light
hitting the sensor and
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
OK, nothing spectacular, especially in digital era :-) But I couldn't resist
and bought nice KX Still great camera, with enough features for good
photography in its pure form... Beautiful body finishing quality, nice
shutter sound. True pleasure to use, despite I
Pat White wrote:
Thanks for posting the pictures, Dario! Now I'm wondering, what did you
look like in the 70s?
Pat White
Pat, I think you tied me for longest hair...
pretty impressive!
annsan
You will be greatly missed, you are one of my favorite contributors to this
list.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 6:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bye...
OK folks, a night has passed but I don't feel so much
Me, too!
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:13 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Bye...
On 29/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's those silent people that should speak up more often. Their views are
important
Dario,
I've enjoyed your contributions and insights into things Pentax over
the years. I still don't own a *istD but am glad to have your
recommendations. Hurry back...
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:29:06 -0600, David Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will be greatly missed, you
These are very valid points - I love my istD even though I am not blind to
it's weaknesses. I love all of my cameras and each one of them has some
weakness or another, that's the way it goes. That said, it is hard to
listen to people bash on your decisions based on their own, probably very
Good photo, Shel - your photos are often a wake-up call to those of us more
fortunate.
Maris
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Some people have lives of comfort and luxury, and can be entertained
by breakfast in a warm, comfortable bed: juice, toast, coffee, the
morning paper, all delivered and presented
That's good to know about the curved filters. I usually just take filters
off when doing such shooting. I'll have to look into getting some of those.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Francis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/29 Fri AM 09:14:15 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - English Summer (was: Re: Zoom vs Prime)
Hi Cotty
Up in the Great North West LOl, sorry for delayed replies my webmail went
tits up
Isn't it amazing how one's perspective is influenced by one's situation.
For instance, when I first looked at the photo I saw dispair and felt lucky
that I was not in that situation. Upon closer inspection I noticed that the
woman is smiling. Even in her situation she still has something to
Absolutely boring. No novel subject, no interesting framing, point of
view, lighting or postprocessing whatsoever.
The only interesting part is that you are attracted to do this every so
often.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/b-in-b.html
Portraits of the Less Fortunate, as Shel calls them, can be
interesting. With Shel's intro it seems like we're supposed to feel
sorry for this lady, for all the obvious social reasons.This photo
fails to provoke such emotions with me. She's just an obese woman,
smoking and munching junk food on
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
