On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
> The M lenses and older K lenses have no electronics, the A lenses allow
> aperture control from the
> camera, which allows program mode on any Pentax body and full aperture
> metering on the *ist-D and Ds.
> Which is the most important difference. Befo
On Feb 10, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Lately I've been taking advantage of my access to an Epson 7500 inkjet
at the store where I work and made some big prints.
I'm going to be ordering a decent-size print off a medium format scan
soon. I found a place locally that does fine-art print
On Feb 10, 2005, at 6:54 AM, Christian wrote:
Now you're being just silly. Of course it has a depth rating they just
have a very poor website. And you'd be surprised at how many people
are
willing to put their precious tools into a box and dunk it under water.
I know a guy who wrapped his Super-A
Looks like there is indeed someone who has a virus - it got one such
mail, too - but there´s no way of telling from whom or where it came
from. I got it to my other address and it looked like it had come from
this list but it probably did not.
All the best!
Raimo K
personal photography homepage at:
This appeared in front of the local library...
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_replicator.html
Technical:
Pentax *ist-D iso 200 1/350sec
smc PENTAX-F 70-210mmF4-5.6
smc PENTAX-F 70-210mmF4-5.6 @ 70mm f4.0
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to driv
Mark Roberts wrote:
The originating IP was 204.127.198.39 (comcast.net)
I've searched my most recent pdml emails, and the only comcast.net
address comes from Paul Stenquist. But the IP address does not match,
not even close.
rg
Dog shots don't typically do anything for me. I do like the look of the
shot however and must say that between yout processing and the lens, I'm
impressed.
I've only recently become an appreciator of dogs with the two cattle dogs we
have. A Blue Heeler/Australian Shepherd mix and a Border Col
Thanks to Rick, Frank, Cotty and all that enjoyed Old Cyclops. Obviously
not my typical kind of shot.
This made me think that a neat PUG theme would be "Dream Car" or "In Love
with the Automobile". Dream Car could be one where everyone shoots the
picture of their ideal auto regardless of pric
Nice idea but 2 negatives stand out.
First, The woman doing the braiding is too dark. I'm not sure that much
could be done about that as it looks like she is more in the shadows then
the light skinned woman getting the braiding done. Perhaps some fill flash
may have helped if that was an option.
> I find that I use the Vivitar S1 35-85 2.8 Varifocal as a walking around
> lens in the "normal" to "portrait" lens. Results are very good. I'd be
> happier if it had A contacts, but we work with what we have.
Well, I guess if you don't mind putting up with the "varifocal" focusing,
pressing th
> 20-30 years ago someone made a battery compartment adapter, which allowed
> the user to keep the battery in the pocket, connected to the camera with
> a power cord. I haven't seen these in a long time. Have you?
Here's the Pentax one for the LX -
http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/lxrmtcrd.jpg
Fre
Hi Bruce ... Thanks. It was a fun afternoon listening to the music,
photographing, and chatting with the trombonist's wife and friend.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton
> I like the framing and selective focus on this. The Bell jumps right
> out at you and makes the scene much m
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:10:05 +1300, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just mowed my lawn with an old steel push-mower. One that doesn't
> have a motor.
That's a good thing. Lawnmowers and other two stroke gas engines are
significant polluters, as for the most part, they have no polluti
> On the Super Program,
> Get a remote battery pack, a small thing on the end of a cable.
> In real cold weather the LCD's start to fade.
> Then it's time to slip the camera back into your jacket to warm-up.
[Hi, Bob.] I'd just add to this that it's worth slipping the camera first
into a plastic
You guys are SO active that I need to UnSub for the weekend whilst away in
New York City :)
B&H ... here I come :D
Play nice,
Dave
> I tried Mark's 43 Limited on my MX a while back, and there may be no
> better SLR/lens combo (aesthetically, that is) anywhere, ever.
I dunno 'bout that - I'd vote for a K 85/1.8 on an LX.
Fred
> the L teleconverters work on a very limited number of lenses. the 2X-L
> protrudes almost an inch in front of the mount and the 1.4X-L a little more.
In case anyone is interested in fitting an "L" TC to his/her favorite lens,
and would like to know it it has a chance of working before buying, h
> From the description of the "problem" I don't think it needs to be
> fixed, my 85mm M had the stiffest focusing of any lens I've owned when I
> acquired it, (a like new in a box used lens that has subsequently lost
> much of it's collectors item status, in other words I've beat it to
> hell). O
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
$60.00 for an M85/2, I think I hate you... A lot.
I also have an M85/2 that I bought for $60 or so, but has a
somewhat stiff focusing ring. The optics are perfect and it
works well, I like its rendering qualities too. I asked about
having it cleaned and lubed, they quoted 1
Well, yes that is very silly, very silly indeed.
William Robb wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=12155191
William Robb
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners -
The M lenses and older K lenses have no electronics, the A lenses allow
aperture control from the
camera, which allows program mode on any Pentax body and full aperture
metering on the *ist-D and Ds.
Which is the most important difference. Before I bought a *ist-D I
really didn't care about tha
From the description of the "problem" I don't think it needs to be
fixed, my 85mm M had the stiffest focusing of
any lens I've owned when I acquired it, (a like new in a box used lens
that has subsequently lost much of it's collectors
item status, in other words I've beat it to hell). Over the l
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: PESO - hair braiding
And what is in that bag hanging to the left of the braider?
Yeah, that was MY question, too...but I couldn't imagine a scenario to
require "just one!"
Maybe I'd rather not know?
Maybe it's in
A friend emailed to ask me if I know anything about this enlarger. I
don't. She refers to it as an antique, says she has all (?) of the
parts.
Can any of you enlighten me?
The second part of her question is:
" Is there anyone or anyplace that might be
interested in something like this or should
well it's a mannequin wearing the red hat alright :)
and there are two posters tacked up on the cloth below the mannequin,
which also seem to be advertisements for the braided-hair look.. I
guess that makes it three?
Thanks for the comments!
Badri
> > Yeah, that was MY question, too...but I coul
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: PESO - hair braiding
And what is in that bag hanging to the left of the braider?
Yeah, that was MY question, too...but I couldn't imagine a scenario
to require "just one!"
Maybe I'd rather not know?
Maybe it's in case you need thre
Neat!
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
They sound pretty good - and it's clear that they're having fun. Sometimes
I'll take my digicam and record notes for a scene or a short movie. Had I
done that this time I could have put the movie up and you could have heard
them.
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
Thanks Joe,
I sharpened it based on downsizing from the original. I didn't do any
more sharpening for it than any other pic I take. I think f5.6 isn't
too bad for that lens.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 6:18:21 PM, you wrote:
JT> So that's what f5.6 looks like on the
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Badri A"
Subject: PESO - hair braiding
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3106149
A street shot from Curacao, a small island in the Caribbean I had been
to last week. This is a stall in the weekend market (a completely
touristy
They sound pretty good - and it's clear that they're having fun. Sometimes
I'll take my digicam and record notes for a scene or a short movie. Had I
done that this time I could have put the movie up and you could have heard
them.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Keith Whaley
> The heck with
"Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Not sure it's my iffy connection, but I couldn't load the page Mark..
Try again but be advised that some Australian networks are blocked from
accessing my web site because my host was subject to a DOS attack from
Australia and the admins at whatever network
All I can say is Awww.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Change of pace for me. When I got the new Tokina ATX 400/5.6 AF lens
in, I was doing some tests. I thought I would see how the AF works
and so went outside with the family dog. He was walking along the
sidewalk (not too fast) and it seemed like a good t
- Original Message -
From: "Badri A"
Subject: PESO - hair braiding
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3106149
A street shot from Curacao, a small island in the Caribbean I had
been
to last week. This is a stall in the weekend market (a completely
touristy affair) in Willem
Fair enough. However, I was wondering what the differences in general
between the two lines is. I see both of them for sale, but I have no clue
why one would be preferable. Any insight would be appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
Image size tracking is about the only feature that I think is worth
anything, and it doesn't work particularly
well from my small experience with it.
John Whittingham wrote:
What do you mean by "fully" supported? Power zoom appears to work on
my MZ-S. Are there some features I'm missing
FW
There is no A 135mm f3.5
Isaac wrote:
I've thought about it, but I'm not sure about the extra weight. It may be a
good trade off though. You say a M. What is the difference between that and
the A?
-Original Message-
From: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2
It's almost impossible to use a lens and not get some dust onto the
internal elements.
Isaac wrote:
I do plan to get a 28mm eventually. The reason I want a telephoto first is
there are some pictures that I would like to take from the side of the road.
I would really hate to get arrested for tres
I didn't say it wasn't supported I said it wasn't fully supported. I
think power zoom itself is a gimmicky feature.
John Whittingham wrote:
It's missing some of the more advanced (gimmicky) features, power zoom EVEN
works on the MZ-3/-5n
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Mark
> They had an SMC Pentax-A 50mm f/2.8 Macro. External finish a little rough
> (KEH would likely call it "ugly", "bargain" at least) but the optics are
> perfectly clean, no dust, the aperture mechanism worked perfectly, the
> focusing mount is smooth as a new lens. I recalled seeing several M50/4
>
> I also have an M85/2 that I bought for $60 or so, but has a somewhat
> stiff focusing ring. The optics are perfect and it works well, I like its
> rendering qualities too. I asked about having it cleaned and lubed, they
> quoted 1.5 hours (about $120 at their rates). Do you think it's worth it,
>
It showed up.
Bob Blakely wrote:
I've sent two posts to the list well before this "test". They still
haven't shown up.
Hell, this post may not show up. (Who'd I write THAT too?)
Regards,
Bob...
From: "David Zaninovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fail
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
test
--
I
Autofocus only? Keep in mind the poor low-light autofocus of the D and
DS. Is there an external flash that could give autofocus assist?
My introduction to 35 mm. photography was a Nikonos II, received for
Christmas in 1966 when I was 16. I still have it somewhere.
Joe
On 9 Feb 2005 at 17:33, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
> It seems that the problems related to the edge sharpening
> artifacts are almost completely gone.
It definitely looks better, I would have liked to do a comparison with the PS
CS RAW convertor however I can't use Pentax PhotoLab to convert RAW
> Very, nice the shot in the air is spectacular, but the one on the
ground has "personality".
> >
Well put, Peter!
Both are wonderful photos.
cheers,
frank
---
Thanks, Frank, Peter, and Rob (who contacted me personally).
Joe
It's not the "lens lust" virus, is it?
So that's where I got it.
Joe
So that's what f5.6 looks like on the Tokina. Not bad. I'd been scared
off from trying it. Perhaps I should. Did you sharpen it any, Bruce?
Oh, nice picture too.
Joe
"OH - HOW JUVENILE AND SOPHOMORIC!"
Yes. Don't you love it?
His self portrait is the best part.
Way ta go, Wheatfield.
Joe
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3106149
A street shot from Curacao, a small island in the Caribbean I had been
to last week. This is a stall in the weekend market (a completely
touristy affair) in Willemstad, the capital.
Since this is my first PESO I'd really appreciate your i
OH - HOW JUVENILE AND SOPHOMORIC!
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: "Pentax Discuss"
Subject: Just so you don't think we are the only silly ones.
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:43:04 -0600
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&mess
Hi everybody,
I've just posted a rough test comparing the old version (1.11)
to the recent update 2.1:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3106108
(the 2.1 conversion is on the right, of course...)
Both pictures - from the same PEF file - have the same
sharpening (+3), other settings may
It's possibly the lighting. It was a fairly overcast day and was in late
afternoon. The color version is a little more lustrous.
Tom C.
From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: PESO - Old Cyclops
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:14:58 +1000
I somehow fe
Nice portrait of a very interesting tree Thibs. I'm always looking for new
ways to look at trees, and this one seems refreshing despite how obvious it
is. I do, however, feel the the bokeh is particularly ugly in the top left
corner. Nice shot, keep the tree shots coming!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Orig
I somehow feel the chrome seems to lack some lustre. Thoughts?
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 4:24 AM
Subject: PESO - Old Cyclops
> I was looking for something to include in the upcoming B&W PUG and have
been
Not sure it's my iffy connection, but I couldn't load the page Mark..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:45 AM
Subject: Makin' some BIG prints
> Lately I've been taking advantage of my access to an Epson
I like the tired body language with her cheek resting on the bed. I
like the feet tangled together trying to unwind. I like the stuffed
animal next to her on the bed. And the lighting is very nice. Looks
like a good end to a 2.5 hour trip.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:07:31 +1000,
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:17:10 +0100, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, that's my first neg scan with my Epson 2480 Photo so please be indulgent.
> Taken with my KX and SMC 55mm 1.8 on FP4+.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3105252
>
> Any comments welcome.
> ---
I think you should send that M85 my way. ;)
-Jon Myers.
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I happened by the camera shop at lunch time to pick
> up the
> replacement strap I'd ordered for one of my Domke
> bags (buggers
> screwed up and sent the wrong one.. ) so I took a
> browse
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:53:37 -0800, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:46:40 -0500, frank theriault
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Link won't work for me. It just says, "coming soon"...
>
> Sorry--I broke the link today while playing with some settings.
>
> The pic
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:46:40 -0500, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Link won't work for me. It just says, "coming soon"...
Sorry--I broke the link today while playing with some settings.
The pic is here:
http://www.jbuhler.com/photoblog/index.php?showimage=12
j
--
Juan Buhler
ht
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:16:51 -0500 (EST), John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suspect you are thinking of a Dave Berg "The Lighter Side Of ..."
> strip - it sounds far more like his style than like Don Martin.
>
You are correct, Sir!!
Thanks, John, it was "The Lighter Side of..." and
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:52:11 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Change of pace for me. When I got the new Tokina ATX 400/5.6 AF lens
> in, I was doing some tests. I thought I would see how the AF works
> and so went outside with the family dog. He was walking along the
> sidewalk (n
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:23:21 -0800, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if I'm posting pics too often; feel free to ignore.
>
> I wanted to post a link to this one, because it was taken with the
> 1959 Industar 50/3.5 on the istD, via 39mm-42mm and 42mm-K adapters:
>
> http://jbuhler.co
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:24:32 -0700, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking for something to include in the upcoming B&W PUG and have been
> longing to show this photo for around 11 years. Decided to make this one a
> PESO.
>
> This was originally taken on Velvia and was a very monochrom
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=12155191
William Robb
I happened by the camera shop at lunch time to pick up the
replacement strap I'd ordered for one of my Domke bags (buggers
screwed up and sent the wrong one.. ) so I took a browse past
the used equipment counter.
They had an SMC Pentax-A 50mm f/2.8 Macro. External finish a
little rough (KEH would
Quoting Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I tried all of those advanced power zoom features when
> I got my PZ-1 11 or 12 years ago, and none of them was
> worth it. The image size tracking was the biggest
> disappointment--I thought it would be useful when
> shooting (maybe I should say "photogr
I do hope they get to it someday, but I chose to give up access
to Canon's excellent IS lenses because I found the size/weight
and rendering quality of Pentax' lenses and the *istDS body to
be more useful to my photography than the IS was.
Which is not to say anything against IS ... It's extremel
Isaac,
I've got a very nice Pentax-brand 75-150 that you can have pretty reasonably.
Contact me directly if you're interested.
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact."
Howard Hendricks
Christopher Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I noticed that also shortly after my first post to PDML, I started to
>get a lot of spam bounces to my virtual domain but prefixed with a random
>recipient. I've no idea if this is a mere coincidence or a virus which
>sends mortgage spam.
How is yo
there should be no relation.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Feroze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: How is grain related to the sharpness of the lens used.
Using films of an ISO 400 to 80, I'm trying to figure out if there would
be more
Those are really cool Fred. I'd be happy too for my first attempt. Poor #5
just couldn't take the heat, eh? The next round will probably be even
better. I'm still working up the courage to look at Mark's updated
website... the snowflake shots I first saw years ago were so good... I need
to
i expect at least one and a small chance of two DSLR announcements from
Pentax this year. i hope that one of them is a $4-5K list body with specs
similar to the Nikon D2X.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Trautmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005
right now, there a little over 100 yen to the US dollar. that means 60K yen
(Bwill be a list price of around $650US.
(B
(BHerb...
(B- Original Message -
(BFrom: "Takehiko Ueda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo:
(BSent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:06 AM
(BSubject: Nikkei Article(long)
It was my first piece of non-consumer glass (or, as my wife likes
to put it, my first step on the road to spending way too much).
Seeing the difference in results from that lens as opposed to
the original FA 100-300 (or even the surprisingly good M 80-200)
persuaded me (and, more importantly, her
On 10 Feb 2005 at 0:21, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> And that will most likely not get any better with the latest electronic
> toys (read: digital SLRs).
Well my *ist D has a cable tie holding on the new eye-cup (thanks Bill) and
missing covers plus some pretty glossy wear in areas. They seem to be pr
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:40:23PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote..
> I gotta jump in and say "What a load of crap." Leica owners have really
> gotten associated with this business of fondling their gear, collecting
> cameras rather than using them, and being just a bunch of image-craving
> dilettant
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure that (although they may fit) they also retain IS
> capability? Is Canon's IS purely mechanical, or was the EOS
> system so advanced when introduced?
Of course Canon's lenses retain all their capabilities
throughout the EOS line. Ca
Far too late. Anyone who thinks they need IS will have migrated or chosen a
different system by then. Unless Pentax make a concrete announcement well in
advance, but that doesn't sound like them.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Shel Belinkoff"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It will be i
That is one beautiful shot of a beautifully kept old
car! The styling of that period was... uhhh...
remarkable, no?
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking for something to include in the
> upcoming B&W PUG and have been
> longing to show this photo for around 11 years.
> Decided
After reading Mark Cassino's recent posting explaining how he takes
his amazing snowflake photographs I've been itching to give it
a try... so of course we get a thaw and no snow falls !!
Today the snow returned and the temperatures were moderate so as soon
as I got home from work I hooked up my o
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark, how would an *ist D image stand up at 36X24 ? Any tests?
I think that would be too big for a 6 megapixel image, no matter how
good. However, later in the spring I'm going to try shooting some
landscapes consisting of two ist-D images stitched together. Hope
I tried all of those advanced power zoom features when
I got my PZ-1 11 or 12 years ago, and none of them was
worth it. The image size tracking was the biggest
disappointment--I thought it would be useful when
shooting (maybe I should say "photographing"!) my
fast-moving children, or a ski race.
Shel,
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm rereading my post I can see that I should have
chosen
> my words more carefully. Perhaps "mask" was not the best
choice.
> Mitigate, reduce, soften, temper, obscure, veil, might have
been
> better choices. In any case, I'd ~think~
Change of pace for me. When I got the new Tokina ATX 400/5.6 AF lens
in, I was doing some tests. I thought I would see how the AF works
and so went outside with the family dog. He was walking along the
sidewalk (not too fast) and it seemed like a good target to test with.
Pentax *istD, Tokina A
"Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Years ago before I knew how big 35mm could be printed I made some quite large
>photo prints from 25ISO 35mm film and I was well pleased, now of course I know
>it's not possible :-)
"If you've done six impossible things this morning, why not round it of
On 9 Feb 2005 at 14:10, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> OK, that's nice to know wrt wide open. But how about with the lens stopped
> down
> a bit? Is the DOF still about the same? What about with a different plane of
> focus? If you're getting these figures from a chart or calculator, which
> one?
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:13:18PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Just got an email with a virus sent to me. Because these things
> automatically forge their headers there's no way of knowing who it came
> from but the "From" line had one PDML member,
I noticed that also shortly after my first post
Cotty wrote on 2/9/2005, 5:22 PM:
>
> Mark, how would an *ist D image stand up at 36X24 ? Any tests?
I've got a few 20x30s at home that look pretty darn good.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I gotta jump in and say "What a load of crap." Leica owners have really
gotten associated with this business of fondling their gear, collecting
cameras rather than using them, and being just a bunch of image-craving
dilettantes. This image goes contrary to the Leica owners I know. Every
one of t
On 9 Feb 2005 at 17:45, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Imperfections that
> don't show up at 12 x 18 are obvious when you get to double those
> dimensions! Obviously, only the best, sharpest images have any hope of
> standing up to this amount of magnification and ideally you'd want to be
> shooting medium
On 9/2/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Lately I've been taking advantage of my access to an Epson 7500 inkjet
>at the store where I work and made some big prints. Done a few 18 x 24
>inch prints and been impressed with the quality. A couple of days ago I
>went whole hog and ran off
I used to have a Topcon Super D for that reason :-).
I am actually thinking about getting a Superr D agian that (pruely
mechanical) SOUND!
It is also one of the most beautiful cameras ever made IMO :-)
Many architects and designers bought a Topcon for the looks - the Topcon
design has this pu
Lately I've been taking advantage of my access to an Epson 7500 inkjet
at the store where I work and made some big prints. Done a few 18 x 24
inch prints and been impressed with the quality. A couple of days ago I
went whole hog and ran off a 24 x 36 inch print. It's an entirely
different experienc
OK, that's nice to know wrt wide open. But how about with the lens stopped
down a bit? Is the DOF still about the same? What about with a different
plane of focus? If you're getting these figures from a chart or
calculator, which one? I'm only familiar with fCalc and I'm not sure if it
does DO
On 9/2/05, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>This was originally taken on Velvia and was a very monochromatic image
>except for some blue and green from sky and trees reflected in the chrome.
>Scanned and converted to grayscale.
>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3105267
>
>Tom C.
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
I use AA NiMh rechargeables.
My charger says "output 900 mA MAX", so it's a maximum
of 900mA per hour.
My question is: if I put 4 AAs to charge, this output
splits in four? or 4 batteries receive 900 mA each?
Regards
Are you reading this on the wall wart or the char
Just got an email with a virus sent to me. Because these things
automatically forge their headers there's no way of knowing who it came
from but the "From" line had one PDML member, the "return path" had
another PDML member and the message body mentioned a third. So it's a
good bet that it came fro
On 9 Feb 2005 at 6:40, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> The "Saturday" pic is great! While I like it just fine the way it is, a
> ~little~ less DOF might have provided a little more "punch". I don't know
> if you could have gotten less DOF with the DSLR;
A 35/2 at f2 with the focus plane at about 1.5m o
On 9 Feb 2005 at 13:19, Albano Garcia wrote:
>
> Hi gang,
> I use AA NiMh rechargeables.
> My charger says "output 900 mA MAX", so it's a maximum
> of 900mA per hour.
> My question is: if I put 4 AAs to charge, this output
> splits in four? or 4 batteries receive 900 mA each?
> Regards
The quest
On 9 Feb 2005 at 12:47, Peter J. Alling wrote:
> Yea, that's right. I'm going to put my $1000+ digital camera, not to
> mention a lens that worth a few hundred more, into an underwater housing
> that doesn't seem to have a depth rating? How much you paying me?
My bet is that the case will be
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
