On 24 May 2005 at 17:12, Tom C wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> But for the larger sizes, microdrives are 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of CF.
Not now, check prices, 1/2 where I buy, the peace of mind is worth it.
> I don't care that a microdrive may be a second or so slower than a CF card.
> It's usually many seco
On 5/24/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
> lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
> from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
>
> http
On 5/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/POPPIES/
>
> or you can go to the first one and click on the next button
>
> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/POPPIES/pages/poppy1.htm
>
> Comments welcome, naturally.
The first shot is really nice.
On 24 May 2005 at 7:29, mike wilson wrote:
> It's an effort thing. If one is going to do a lot of something, learn how to
> do
> it properly and save yourself a heap of time, money and all sorts of other
> things in the long run.
I can appreciate that but when do you surrender to automation aft
On 5/24/05, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I may jeteson stuff given my mode of transport...
> but no one has yet helped me decide hat to bring
> --
> funny signs or paris?
Paris.
No, funny signs.
Ah, hell, Ann, bring 'em both.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -
--- Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Bergstrom wrote:
> > I don't suppose KEH will take my word for it that it's partially
> broken
> > and return $100 or so.
>
> You seem like a decent, upright citizen. Feel free to quote me on
> that
> in writing. Good luck! :-)
>
> S
"Dear
Hi Rob,
But for the larger sizes, microdrives are 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of CF.
I don't care that a microdrive may be a second or so slower than a CF card.
It's usually many seconds or minutes before I'm taking the next shot. With
the *ist D's small buffer, if I was shooting in rapid succession
frank theriault wrote:
>
> On 5/24/05, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking of asking a question of you all but
> > didnt want to pose it
> > to the entire list. (nothing very deep, just about
> > which photos I should
> > bring with me)
>
> Ann,
>
> My portfolio is qui
> Michael Bergstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I don't suppose KEH will take my word for it that it's partially
> broken
> >and return $100 or so. I'll just have to write them and see what
> >they're willing to do for me.
>
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> True story: I rela
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Seriously, I doubt that I'm responsible for more than 75% of the
>trouble on this list. 80% tops. What about Cotty? He's a good 20%,
>anyway...
He's good for much more than that. I think between the two of you, you
and Cotty are responsible for 150%
On 5/24/05, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking of asking a question of you all but
> didnt want to pose it
> to the entire list. (nothing very deep, just about
> which photos I should
> bring with me)
Ann,
My portfolio is quite small right now, the best part of it is
curre
Michael Bergstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't suppose KEH will take my word for it that it's partially broken
>and return $100 or so. I'll just have to write them and see what
>they're willing to do for me.
True story: A few years ago I bought a Pentax FA*80-200/2.8 from KEH. It
was list
So there I was, flipping through the latest Newsweek,
when my eyes were caught by some boxed test:
Warning: This digital SLR is so professional,
the purchaser may be asked to
photograph weddings and other social functions
So I take a look at the camera - and it's a *ist-Ds !
On 5/23/05, Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been a member of this list since the days of The Who. [How many
> remember that?]
> I do not recall enablement on the list from those days. It may have
> been because I was such a photographic 'newbie' :-)
>
> Anyway, I saw my photographer fr
On 5/24/05, Tom Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Frank is responsible for 90% of the trouble on this list. It's probably
> his fault. I'm sure you're now as anxious as the rest of us to exact
> your revenge at GFM. Note: The 90% is probably low but I wanted to be
> conservative in my estimate.
On 24 May 2005 at 16:50, Thibouille wrote:
> I guess normal is:
> * faster ?
> * less power consumption
>
> while Microdrive is:
> * cheaper :D
>
> While I'm at it, does High Speed card really matter in a D/Ds? Or is
> it only useful when reading back in a card reader on the Computer?
I just ri
On 5/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Humm, a 90 Macro eh. That is hopefully my next purchase along with a Sigma
> 500 Super
> flash.
> How do you like it.?
So far so good. I like it a lot as a portrait lens. I've not really
gotten any macro pix back yet. I was at my la
Michael Bergstrom wrote:
I don't suppose KEH will take my word for it that it's partially broken
and return $100 or so.
You seem like a decent, upright citizen. Feel free to quote me on that
in writing. Good luck! :-)
S
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Bergstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hmmm...deciding whether to attempt to put it back together correctly
> >myself or return it... I should probably return it since this may
> not
> >be the only problem it has and I could easily make it
On 24/5/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The Sleepless Goat is the cafe where my little exhibit is up this
>month. A few people asked if I took pix of the installation, so here
>it is (most of it, anyway; there are about 8 or 9 pix on a couple of
>other smaller walls. Some of y
The Sleepless Goat is the cafe where my little exhibit is up this
month. A few people asked if I took pix of the installation, so here
it is (most of it, anyway; there are about 8 or 9 pix on a couple of
other smaller walls. Some of you may even recognize a few of these
:
http://www.photo.net/p
On 24/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>The California state flower is the California poppy. Which is a
wildflower --
>basically a weed. Because it is a weed it tends to grow by roadsides, and in
>some inaccessible places like on the sides of a steep hills.
Is it still again
On 24/5/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That might be where I am at as well. My "portfolio" seems to be somewhere in
>the twilight zone at the moment.
Save all the tattoo stuff for next year :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|ht
yes. and love every minute of it! :)
mishka
On 5/23/05, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mishka,
>
> You've clearly never been to Texas. :-)
>
> John
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 00:13:41 +0100, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > why not move to texas?
> >
> > mishka
> >
> > On 5/23
I'm not buying the wine as an investment though...
I'm buying it as an ingestment...
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: CF card: normal or Microdrive?
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 15:55:33 -0600
- Original Message - From: "
mike wilson wrote:
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> > mike wilson wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including
> >>the lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of
> >>a file from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymout
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: RE: CF card: normal or Microdrive?
In my case, saving money on a 4GB microdrive (only $160)... 4 1GB CF crads
would be $250-$280, a 4GB flash is $400+. Buys a few bottles of Italian
wine.
If you are buying Italian wine, I suggest t
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Another GFM photo
Well i should mention my 'portfoloi' is a ratty old 3 ring binder from
work,with a pile of
page protectors.
We can laugh together.
That might be where I am at as well. My "portfolio" seems to be somewhe
Henri Toivonen wrote:
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> >anyone know what this guy fits on???
> >
> >http://users.rcn.com/annsan/mysterypolarizer.jpg
> >
> >it has no threads - just the outside gear notches
> >that
> >you see here.
> >
> >diameter is roughly 2 1/8"
> >
> >and say doesn't anyone have s
Here's my thinking.
There is an unresolved struggle for dominance going on between the
compositional elements - the forms as well as the tones - which never
resolve themselves. This produces an additional conflict with the subject
matter, which is not itself stressful.
The higher lamp is breakin
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
anyone know what this guy fits on???
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/mysterypolarizer.jpg
it has no threads - just the outside gear notches
that
you see here.
diameter is roughly 2 1/8"
and say doesn't anyone have second hand 58mm pol
for me?
ann
Cokin A
Have one of
anyone know what this guy fits on???
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/mysterypolarizer.jpg
it has no threads - just the outside gear notches
that
you see here.
diameter is roughly 2 1/8"
and say doesn't anyone have second hand 58mm pol
for me?
ann
Michael Bergstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hmmm...deciding whether to attempt to put it back together correctly
>myself or return it... I should probably return it since this may not
>be the only problem it has and I could easily make it non-returnable by
>opening it up. That's very disappoin
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Mike
Somehow I like this shoot a lot .
It would be even nicer *if* it was the right camera and lens at the right
time...
greetings
Markus
Don't make me weep, Markus..
the lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out
of a file from the Opt
Michael Bergstrom wrote:
Brief introduction: I'm a long-time lurker on the mail-archive version
of this list. I subscribed for a very brief period a couple of years
ago, made some inane postings and rapidly retreated back to lurkdom. I
failed to unsubscribe by the favorite 'reply to the digest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Subject: Re: Another GFM photo
> >
> >
> >
> > >>
> > > I am planning to bring my favorites done whilst taking the darkroom class
> > > the past few
> > > w
> Michael Bergstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is this a straight return to KEH or does anybody know of any quirks
> >with this lens that would cause these effects?
>
> This lens has been repaired at some time in the past and reassembled
> incorrectly (the focusing helicoid has six threads
Hi Marnie
This must be *real* passion or is it called *love* ?
I am sure you will get the "poppy shot of the century" one day, you simply
deserve it.
Thanks for the story and the pictures, I'm sure you will make them even
better the next time.
greetings
Markus
>>The California state flower is the C
Hi Kevin
Of course I do miss seeing some of your shots but thanks anyway for the good
and interesting reading of your 13 days
adventure.
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 4:24 PM
>>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.n
Michael Bergstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is this a straight return to KEH or does anybody know of any quirks
>with this lens that would cause these effects?
This lens has been repaired at some time in the past and reassembled
incorrectly (the focusing helicoid has six threads and there are
t
Well, actually not.
Belgium is as flat as 40mm pancake :)
--
Thibouille
--
Z1,SuperA,KX,MX,P30t and KR-10x ...
2005/5/24, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Which was exactly the point of the post. Some people don't know about the
> limitations of the
Hi Mike
Somehow I like this shoot a lot .
It would be even nicer *if* it was the right camera and lens at the right
time...
greetings
Markus
>>>the lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out
>>>of a file from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset,
>>last year.
>
Brief introduction: I'm a long-time lurker on the mail-archive version
of this list. I subscribed for a very brief period a couple of years
ago, made some inane postings and rapidly retreated back to lurkdom. I
failed to unsubscribe by the favorite 'reply to the digest with
Unsubscribe in the su
And you can tell by how poorly I composed the last paragraph that a few more
bottles of Italian wine is exactly what I need.
Tom C.
In my case, saving money on a 4GB microdrive (only $160)... 4 1GB CF crads
would be $250-$280, a 4GB flash is $400+. Buys a few bottles of Italian
wine.
> It's first thing Saturday morning,
and in about 1/2
hour, I'm off to
> Kingston to visit the kids for the long weekend. This is our Victoria
> Day weekend. May 24 is when we celebrate the birthday of our last
> Empress, Queen Victoria. I don't think it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I just worry about putting all my eggs in one basket. I wouldn't
>want a 4 gig CF card either, although I think CF is less likely
>to fail than a microdrive. I carry 4 1 gig cards and 3 half gig cards.
>They'll fit in a pocket. I don't feel encumbered. And
> should one
Hello, Boris ... I like this one quite a bit. The monochrome look - all in
brown tones - adds quite a bit to this image. Interesting composition as
well. Good work!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 5/24/2005 11:09:25 AM
> Subject: PAW: Etu
Nukes vaporize the mess...
Regards,
Bob...
"A picture is worth a thousand words,
but it uses up three thousand times the memory."
From: "Steve Jolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Forbes wrote:
Glad you said that. I couldn't work out how you got t
Hi Boris -
I suppose the critic meant "split composition" in that the image can be seen
as having to competing centers of interest in the form of the two lamps.
Personally I like a lot of what is going on here in terms of placing the
main elements of the shot along the diagonal and in terms o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/24/2005 11:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Bori
I agree in principle, and I plan on emptying the 4GB daily or more often if
I fill it up sooner. I, like most people, tend to split the finest of hairs
on things like this and then split them again. I'm trying to become less
like myself. :)
There's no guarantees. With film, it could be bad (
In a message dated 5/24/2005 11:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
>
> Please be brutal. But honest :).
>
> Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
>
> Boris
Whooo, boy! I c
I just worry about putting all my eggs in one basket. I wouldn't want a 4 gig
CF card either, although I think CF is less likely to fail than a microdrive. I
carry 4 1 gig cards and 3 half gig cards. They'll fit in a pocket. I don't feel
encumbered. And should one fail, I won't lose all my work.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
http://www.fotocommunity.
I agree at the 1GB point, but compare at the 4GB capacity and microdrives
are significantly less. I'm taking some long trips where I want more
storage than 1GB so I don't have to manage alot of CF's.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.n
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
Whooo, boy! I can't even read the headlines on that paper, it's so
soft! ;-)
keith whaley
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Subject: Re: Another GFM photo
>
>
>
> >>
> > I am planning to bring my favorites done whilst taking the darkroom class
> > the past few
> > winters. I have
> > several 11x14's i want to
For those who might be interested, this page has a breakaway photo of the
drive, as well as other information. Kind of interesting if you've never
seen the inside of one of these puppies ;-))
http://www.steves-digicams.com/microdrive.html
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
Hi!
I guess normal is:
* faster ?
* less power consumption
while Microdrive is:
* cheaper :D
While I'm at it, does High Speed card really matter in a D/Ds? Or is
it only useful when reading back in a card reader on the Computer?
I've got 2 1GB Sandisk Ultra II cards... They work just fine. I
That's a very handy little program, I got the Palm OS
version too.
It's crude but for $8.00 worth it.
I see they'll have a new Palm version soon for $15.00.
Thanks Peter,
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 11:45 AM
> To: p
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'll see if I can't dig up my portfolio.
Oh, I won't be offended if you can't find it: I eat enough humble pie at
these events anyway...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
With 1 gig CF cards now selling for eighty bucks or so, I can't think of any
good reason to go with a microdrive. The fewer moving parts, the better.
Paul
> Actually what i said is that they don't work well =at high altitudes=, not
> that they don't work well.
>
> Glad we cleared that up.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Reese"
Subject: Re: Who started the enablement here anyway?
Cesar looked for someone to blame for his recent acquisitions:
Mike Johnston actually started it. Many have been happy to continue with his
work.
I think of it as a fine legacy, corrupting
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Another GFM photo
I am planning to bring my favorites done whilst taking the darkroom class
the past few
winters. I have
several 11x14's i want to bring if i can find something nice to carry
them.
Also a few from the
In a message dated 5/24/2005 10:14:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't feel bad in your poppy quest. Geo's book is the result of over 15 yrs
of poppy shooting.
Kenneth Waller
==
Well, that's true. Thanks. I looked at the book, but didn't buy it. Right,
he's been
I guess we'll have to pedal this thread somewhere else. I heard it was BARred
here.
But we could then start a chain letter.
I better stop before I get CRANKy.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 24, 2005 11:32 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: My Lo
Actually what i said is that they don't work well =at high altitudes=, not
that they don't work well.
Glad we cleared that up.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 5/24/2005 10:02:27 AM
> Subject: RE: CF card: normal or Microdrive?
>
> Not a problem at all
"Untitled" is none too shabby. I like it. It might be a little stronger with
more of a vertical format.
I don't know where you're located but I've heard Gorman is one of the main
places for poppy shooting, although I've heard this wasn't an especially good
year for poppies. With all the rain o
> > ...
> > just a pair of little and easy scripts
>
> Thanks. Perhaps I'll fool with them when I get back from my travel.
>
let us know...
> I don't have a lot of time to do an analysis of GIMP vs Photoshop CS
> vs Photoshop Elements 3,
I can understand...
> but it isn't so much the f
Not a problem at all Shel. It's just that you started out with a blanket
statement "Microdrives don't work well", and I thought that was a misleading
assertion.
For many people they work just fine. It is good to know their altitude
limitations, as you said. I don't work as well at 10,000 ft
Thanks Peter, I just downloaded it.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 11:45 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: F stop question
>
>
> There's a neat little utility called Fcalc from a company called
> Tange
I'm not sure that a high speed card is even necessary for transferring
to the computer. The camera doesn't actually take much advantage of it.
I use a USB 2.0 hub and my not particularly special Lexar 1gig card
takes about 2 minutes to xfer to the computer. If you can fill up
another card in
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:15:29AM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye.jpg
> >> > http://www.robertstech.com/temp/eye2.jpg
> >>
> >> damn that's a big bicycle
> >
> >monocycle -
Kevin Waterson wrote:
Just re-subscribed after a 13 Day photo shoot of Dance.
The Dance was an Eisteddfod of dance with a mix of Ballet,
tap, jazz, cultural, contemporary and others.
My job was to capture each act digitally for sale during
the Eisteddfod.
Equipment
2 x *istD
1 x 70-200mm 2.8 Ta
Thanks Steve! Got it!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Jolly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:27 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: F stop question
>
>
> Aaagh!
>
> I got some numbers wrong. :-(
>
> See below.
>
> Steve Jolly wr
Thanks Cory!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Cory Papenfuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:07 AM
> To: PDML
> Subject: Re: F stop question
>
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > How does one figure partial stop numbers?
> > For instance what
There's a neat little utility called Fcalc from a company called Tangentsoft
http://www.tangentsoft.net/
The version that runs under windows is free.
It's worth downloading for help file, which contains the all the
formulas used, alone.
It includes an Fstop calculator
The multiplier isn't part
>-Original Message-
>From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 1:13 PM
>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>Subject: Re: PAW and a Question
>
>Hi!
>
>> This works for me. The light play is quite attractive.
>However, I find
>> the crooked shade on the lower
Wait till Frank sees it.
Doug Brewer wrote:
damn that's a big bicycle
Mark Roberts wrote:
Gianfranco Irlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excellent collection, Gianco. I especially like the one
called "The Eye". I was looking for a good abstract co
Which was exactly the point of the post. Some people don't know about the
limitations of the drives, and many people who live at lower elevations
take trips and vacations into the mountains. In many parts of the world
that means elevations above 9000 feet. Just driving around the western
part of
Amusing.
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/ca
John Forbes wrote:
Glad you said that. I couldn't work out how you got those numbers, but
didn't want to argue with a nuclear physicist!
Fair enough - particle beams at dawn can get a little messy... ;-)
S
So don't use it in those applications... that specification does not equate
with 'don't work well'.
For you who lives essentially at sea level, it wouldn't be a problem.
Luminous Landscape has an article regarding microdrive usage.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/4gb-hita
Well, not so "great," kind of boring, actually. But here is is. :-)
The California state flower is the California poppy. Which is a wildflower --
basically a weed. Because it is a weed it tends to grow by roadsides, and in
some inaccessible places like on the sides of a steep hills.
It's a sim
Glad you said that. I couldn't work out how you got those numbers, but
didn't want to argue with a nuclear physicist!
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:26:37 +0100, Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aaagh!
I got some numbers wrong. :-(
See below.
Steve Jolly wrote:
Don Sa
Presuming a constant rate of shots per day, that means about 35,000 frames
with one camera in ten days. Wow!
I don't know the life expectancy of an *istD, but you must take the record
for using it up in the least amount of time. OTOH a job like that should
pay for all the *istDen (*istDs is usel
Microdrives don't work well, and may even fail to work, at high altitudes,
above 9,000 feet.
>From IBM:
"The Microdrive does need "AIR" to float the heads and typically above
10,000 ft the mass of the air is too low and the drive requires a
pressurized environment similar to an aircraft or spacec
On 24/5/05, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>yep. it's a vicious cycle
Can you handle it?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
> damn that's a big bicycle
monocycle - but suprisingly easy to ride 8-)
Next: puncture jokes.
>>>
>>>Guess you spoke too soon...
>>
>>This chain of events always happens.
>
>Good thing I'm already geared up for it then!
You're in the frame!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Aaagh!
I got some numbers wrong. :-(
See below.
Steve Jolly wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half way between 4 and 5.6?
4.76 :-)
And where does 4.76 fall?
Half way between 4 and 5.6 :-)
Or in other words
I use both 1GB Flash and 1GB microdrives. I find no important noticeable
difference in performance. I just bought a 4GB microdrive for $160. Have
not put in camera yet.
In my opinion the price difference more than outweighs any performance
concerns. As far as reliability, I've had no probl
>OK Ken is your wife's name French
Yes (her maiden name), but I use it as her first name.
>taking a little poll of those going to be there
what they are more curious about
I'm partial to your western scenics
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED
I see this group axles at going around like this...
We will all soon tyre of this...
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 24, 2005 10:06 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: My London PDML 2005 Gallery, at last...
>>> damn that's a big bicycle
>>
>>mon
Don Sanderson wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half way between 4 and 5.6?
4.76 :-)
And where does 4.76 fall?
Half way between 4 and 5.6 :-)
Or in other words, f4.76 is 1/4 of a stop slower than f4 and 1/4 of a
stop faster than f5.6
This is a 2
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
Thanks Paul, I'm just curious as to how one determines where
a number like 4.76 is.
This is the number I get with the 1.7x on a 2.8 lens.
Is it the amount of light one would get at F/4 divided by 1.7,
which puts it nearer 5.6. Or is it closer to 1/2 stop
Just re-subscribed after a 13 Day photo shoot of Dance.
The Dance was an Eisteddfod of dance with a mix of Ballet,
tap, jazz, cultural, contemporary and others.
My job was to capture each act digitally for sale during
the Eisteddfod.
Equipment
2 x *istD
1 x 70-200mm 2.8 Tamaron AF
1 x 50mm 1.4 Pen
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
How does one figure partial stop numbers?
For instance what stop is half way between 4 and 5.6?
And where does 4.76 fall? This is a 2.8 lens with the
SMCP-F 1.7x converter.
I'm guessing there is a simple multiplier for this but
with my limited knowledge
mike wilson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A fortunate coming together of many factors. Unfortunately not including the
> lens I would have chosen or the body. This is about a 40% crop out of a file
> from the Optio 330GS. On holiday in Weymouth, Dorset, last year.
>
> http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/p
I guess normal is:
* faster ?
* less power consumption
while Microdrive is:
* cheaper :D
While I'm at it, does High Speed card really matter in a D/Ds? Or is
it only useful when reading back in a card reader on the Computer?
--
Thibouille
--
Z1,SuperA,KX,
101 - 200 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
