I bought one of the Zenitar-K 16mm f/2.8 fish eye lenses, based on
the wonderful work that I've seen John Bean and others produce with
it. It's truly a delightful toy ... It *doesn't* replace the Pentax
DA14 lens at all, but it is simply FUN to shoot pictures with it ...
http://homepage.m
Hi,
> > People who have seen his contacts say that one of the most
> remarkable
> > things about them is that every frame is a good photo.
>
> They much be wearing HCB coloured glasses then, I have a
> photo book byHCB full of very ordinary images.
>
which book is it?
Bob
Hi,
This is my first post to PDML.
I'm thinking of getting an MZ-S and wondered how
solidly it's built. Would it be likely to last
a few decades of weekend use? Also, how good is
it at keeping dust out? I travel a fair bit to
dusty places so both things are important.
Regards,
Gautam
On Jul 26, 2005, at 9:28 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On digital FOV(28,35) would be 28 * 1.53 = 42.84 ~= 43... Looks
kinda "limited" to me ;-)...
A 28mm lens on 16x24 format is a nice 'wide-normal' .. one of my
favorite field of view choices. Kinda like the 40mm lens on my old
favorite Rol
Expect a fair to goodly amount of fog, low contrast as well. Since there's
really no way of knowing how fogged the film is, or how poorly it's fared,
perhaps the best bet is to develop it normally for an EI of1600 and add
+10% or so. Bottom line, it's a crapshoot.
Shel
> [Original Message]
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Vid Strpic wrote:
> >I have one, not yet tried it on digital, but plain photos on 35mm film
> >look nice. Have you also considered MIR-47 2.5/20? I just ordered one,
> >it seems to be rectilinear lens...
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:49 PM
>
> I believe that his binary grain clump theory is somewhat flawed rendering
the
> remainder of the argument moot.
>
I think the same, and wonder what Reichmann has been smoking or
Hi Tim
as others have told you too:
You have to backup on different non rewritable mediums to be "quite" safe.
Whenever you connect and use your external hard disk, your data is at risk
and a (yet unknown) virus could do it's damage.
You see Tim, **valid** and useful backup strategies have been in
I'm far from an expert in English, but I'll try to enlighten you on the
phrase "nice catch". I believe it comes from the simple but noble arts of
fishing or hunting. A big fish is a nice catch. Simple as that.
I tend to use it when talking about capturing a moment, when timing of the
shot is impor
I have trouble realising that I myself do age. My mirror tells me that I do,
and I don't have a backup ;-)
All you and others do tell me does sound logic. But is this real threats in
let us say a 3-5 year perspective? Within this time I will probably need
more disk space, so I'll change the drive a
You could put it into a zip file with a password. May even compress it a bit.
Powell
>
>
>I've been assigned a project to distribute a video in a windows media file
>format.
>Security is essential with this data, so we don't want it to get outside
>the company.
>What steps are necessary to set t
Hi!
I told this girl she wasn't supposed to fly away. At least she stayed
long enough for a pose. :-)
http://www.oksne.net/paw/humle.html
Take it or leave, but for some reason I was expecting to see Ellen ;-)...
It is just a bit too tight on the bottom...
Is Bill Robb's most recent enablem
Hi!
As we were looking around for places to shoot the sunset, we came upon
this scene. It was late in the day, but the sun wasn't far enough
down to really kick up the color. To give you an idea of just how big
Monument Valley is, this first pic is a 100% crop from the
lower-middle frame of th
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/paw/simplicity
*istDS, Tamron 28-200 f3.8-4.5, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1/400s
Taken next to Putney Bridge, in London.
All comments and criticisms encouraged. :-)
Julia disagrees, but I think mine
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=199955
is simpler ;-)...
On 7/26/05 10:11 PM, "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i never noticed before
> today, but Pentax has only 1700 employees. encouraging early retirement for
> 300 is close to 20%.
I thought Pentax was a holding company and the actual consolidated number of
employees is over 5,000 (still no
Hi!
In answer to your first question, I recently acquired a used FA 28/2.8 in
excellent condition from Adorama for $149. Retails for for $229 at both
Adorama & B&H. I like the slightly wider than normal view I get from the lens
on the istDS.
Am unable to answer the 2nd question as I have no e
And?
Regards,
Bob...
-
"The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to Frenc
Thanks for the link Bill. I was really trying to ask (pardon my
beating around the bush) if I need to make any development
compensations due to the age of the film. I seem to recall reading
somewhere that it might be necessary to adjust development times for
old film, but I can't find the referen
I exposed the film about three weeks ago. Once I realized just how
old it is, I stuck it in the refrigerator. It's still there waiting
for me
On 7/26/05, Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you just exposed it, it is probably OK. maybe not the best you can get
> out of the film, b
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: OT film processing
Howdy, gang!
I have inadvertently exposed a very expired roll of P3200 TMAX. Circa
1997. Exposed at 1600 ASA. Would anyone have any processing
recommendations, or do you think I'm SOL?
P3200 is, in reality,
if you just exposed it, it is probably OK. maybe not the best you can get
out of the film, but not bad.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 10:58 PM
Subject: OT film processing
Howdy, gang!
I have inadvertently
Ouch! Looks like Ninja has won his fair share of door prizes.
Wonderful photo. Grain, contrast, yadayadayada. It's all about the
moment, which you have certainly captured. Thanks for sharing.
On 7/26/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cotty's question of whether I had any clos
- Original Message -
From: "David Mann"
Subject: Re: RAW file processing
Can you still get Disc format processed and printed? My brother used
to have one of those cameras.
No.
William Robb
Howdy, gang!
I have inadvertently exposed a very expired roll of P3200 TMAX. Circa
1997. Exposed at 1600 ASA. Would anyone have any processing
recommendations, or do you think I'm SOL?
Thanks!
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
- Original Message -
From: "K.Takeshita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But I just finished polishing up my cloudy crystal ball and now I can see
> @#!?*&%.
I traded my SMC crystal ball for an L. The future seems less cloudy now...
:-)
Christian
On 7/26/05 9:49 PM, "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After all, a higher end SLR typically sell 1/10 or less the quantity of entry
> level models;
Exactly.
Here's what Canon are saying. It might show some of their mindset.
[To tell the truth, we (Canon) still do not know the size and t
On 7/26/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bingo!
Thanks!
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 7/26/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm guessing "bunny", maybe "fuzzy bunny".
Maybe just Fuzzy.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 7/26/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank
> your are one of the (lucky?) photographers where the content of the shots
> usually out weights the technical shortcomings.
> Still a PDML collection for a good scanner would be a good idea ;-)
> I like the enlarged crop a lot more t
On Jul 27, 2005, at 5:36 AM, William Robb wrote:
[...] as well as online storage on two different servers,
preferably on two
different continents is definitely the way to go if you want to
limit your risk.
I've done this for some stuff: local backup here plus another copy in
the USA. Wit
On Jul 27, 2005, at 5:33 AM, William Robb wrote:
It's also getting difficult to find printing for oddball neg sizes
now, to the point the average consumer is shit out of luck if they
want a 127, 126, or any of the weird mini sheet sizes of black and
white film printed.
Can you still get D
On 7/24/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I debated a while about posting this but I've decided to after all
>
> http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_aneighborhood.html
>
> No technical data I'm feeling lazy.
>
> As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
>
I
On Jul 27, 2005, at 3:34 AM, danilo wrote:
My forehead is also flatter now, I thrashed it on my keyboard
several times.
I've also spent a couple of days wandering like a zombie in the city,
swearing to some saint. People though I was insane. Indeed I was.
I remember reading about a photograp
On Jul 27, 2005, at 12:41 AM, William Robb wrote:
Oh and I don't see any 43's there. Your collection is incomplete!
I have something like a dozen 50s. Is that close enough?
Only if one of them is the special Limited-style one that was sold
with the LX2000.
I'm starting to feel inadequat
introducing the 645D tells me that they consider the 645 market their loved
ones and that they are willing to sacrifice the rest. i never noticed before
today, but Pentax has only 1700 employees. encouraging early retirement for
300 is close to 20%.
Herb
- Original Message -
From:
On 7/26/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This story harks back to the thread last week about ancient water from
> glaciers:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/4718573.stm
>
> Bob
I'm speechless - on so many levels...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Carti
an interesting typo in NYT:
"The president's aides, including Ari Fleischer, his press secretary,
and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, would attempt to
blunt Mr. Wilson's claims in on-the-record briefings, before *Air Force Once*
took off for Senegal and then for the correspondents f
On 7/26/05 8:26 PM, "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm not selling any of my Pentax equipment to finance whatever i get because
> i don't need to. i just won't use it as much because it isn't able to do the
> job that i need from a camera system. meeting 80% of my needs isn't good
> eno
On Jul 26, 2005, at 6:26 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
the heads rest on an air bearing when running. when not, they are
resting on the drive.
Not in any modern drive that I'm aware of. Any good modern drive's
head mechanism does a retract and lock when powered down.
Of the last 15 or so drives t
why now? because there is every danger that Pentax will have to exit the
camera business entirely. i think Olympus, Fuji, and Konica Minolta face the
same issues. Pentax camera shipments placed it 9th largest in terms of unit
shipments among Japanese companies last year, and like the other three
Herb wrote:
> Pentax hasn't demonstrated that it knows one of the simplest business rules,
> make sure you know who your loved ones are (core market) protect that
> market. Pentax ought to be making a camera that sells to Pentax enthusiasts
> who have been buying lots of those lenses that we al
On 26 Jul 2005 at 20:17, Don Sanderson wrote:
> Lubricants dry and thicken.
> Components change value, esp. capacitors.
> Contacts oxidize.
> Rubber seals, cushions, bumpers, etc. deteriorate.
> The magnetic data on the platters weakens.
>
> These changes are very gradual on a drive stored in
> c
On 26 Jul 2005 at 18:20, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2005, at 6:12 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
>
> > the heads rest on an air bearing when running. when not, they are
> > resting on the drive.
>
> Not in any modern drive that I'm aware of. Any good modern drive's
> head mechanism does a r
Watch out for nuclear blasts or similar phenomena. They can erase your
HDD unless stored properly in a Faraday cage or something...
OTOH, I am not sure if most photographs are actually _worth_
preserving in case of global nuclear shootout...
?
Frantisek
On Jul 26, 2005, at 6:12 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
the heads rest on an air bearing when running. when not, they are
resting on the drive.
Not in any modern drive that I'm aware of. Any good modern drive's
head mechanism does a retract and lock when powered down.
Godfrey
If you read carefully, Herb, you will notice that I didn't presume
anything. I commented that you'd *have* to wait a while to get a
decent price.
Godfrey
On Jul 26, 2005, at 6:08 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
you're assuming i would sell within 2 years of them going belly up.
Herb...
- Origin
Lubricants dry and thicken.
Components change value, esp. capacitors.
Contacts oxidize.
Rubber seals, cushions, bumpers, etc. deteriorate.
The magnetic data on the platters weakens.
These changes are very gradual on a drive stored in
carefully climate controlled conditions but they do
occur.
Don
i don't replace them because they fail. i said i upgrade drives, not
replace.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Storing digital images (Was: RAW file processing)
I don't get it either. I h
I wasn't inferring that there was necessarily any learning going
on-at least in my own case!
At 4:03 PM -0400 7/26/05, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I would suggest that since you get an image review with digital
you not only learn with digital you learn faster and right on the
spot!
JCO
-Origi
the heads rest on an air bearing when running. when not, they are resting on
the drive. there may be a small amount of lubricant present. that ages,
bearings fail, etc. stiction isn't the problem it used to be, but it still
happens. magnetic media itself fades after a while and needs periodic
r
I don't get it either. I have hard drives up to a decade old that, on
test, show zero bit errors. Replace hard drives every three-four
years? Seems a waste of money. The only reason to replace archive
drives that frequently is to obtain more capacity, and that's
economically viable because
you're assuming i would sell within 2 years of them going belly up.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
Um, not immediately. You might have to wait for the collector
Among other things bearings wear out when the drives are spun up and
down. They wear less when the
drives aren't spinning and strangely when they spin continually.
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I don't get this. A normal HD does age. That I do understand. They do spin
at 7200rpm. But does a disconnected
I don't get this. A normal HD does age. That I do understand. They do spin
at 7200rpm. But does a disconnected external drive age?
The whole external drive idea is based on two "facts"
1. That they don't spin when not used.
2. And that it's rather unlikely to get viruses at a disconnected drive.
Um, not immediately. You might have to wait for the collector
community to rev up if Pentax were to pass out of existence.
Normally, when a manufacturer goes belly up, their products are fire
sale territory for a while.
Godfrey
On Jul 26, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
no, they will
i'm not selling any of my Pentax equipment to finance whatever i get because
i don't need to. i just won't use it as much because it isn't able to do the
job that i need from a camera system. meeting 80% of my needs isn't good
enough. Pentax glass is still better and there are plenty of times wh
On 26 Jul 2005 at 17:34, danilo wrote:
> Don't rely only on the external drive.
> It may save you thousands of hairs.
> Mine, An 120 Gb fill of 30-40Gb of pics has fallen from my table to
> the floor, while in motion.
> You know what? I lost at least 10 Gb of un-backed-up pictures, and
> some hand
no, they will be worth more.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
In a couple of years time, when Pentax have close down their image/camera
division or is bankrupt, your len
Not trying to speak for Herb...
No one is saying "Pentax is doomed". That seems to be the words that some
seem to be trying to stick in some of our mouths.
What's being said, is that Pentax is not inspiring confidence, by their past
actions, perceived misdirection, and lack of information re
William Robb wrote:
If you are not analyzing every single frame that you shoot, and discovering
why a picture works or not, and quantifying the reasons, you are shooting
too much.
If all you do is pull up a directory of thumbnails and go through them,
sending the ones you don't like to digi
On 26 Jul 2005 at 19:31, Herb Chong wrote:
> being able to operate a film camera.
Oh yeah, forgot about that, fully manual of course and with an external meter.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/pu
These are my opinions only.
William (The Wise) Robb wrote:
The way to become a better photographer is to educate your eye.
The way to do that is to look at pictures, not necessarily take them.
Look at them, see why the work, and more importantly, what causes them
to fail, which they inevitably
IV
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: "Pentax Discuss"
Subject: Re: Have digital cameras made us better photographers?
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:06:55 -0600
- Original Message - From: "Tom C" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005
being able to operate a film camera.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Have digital cameras made us better photographers?
It's too easy to make many shots in digiland so we need to design a new
Cotty,
With my Fuji S5000 digicam, you can record a voice
message to attach to the pic if you want. (never used
the feature)
Regards
Albano
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >But I never would have recorded the data in a
old boxes physically die. i can't imagine any reasonable scenario where a
JPEG won't be readable 100 years from now. the Internet has seen to that.
TIFF is almost as likely.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:33 PM
It probably boils down to money. If I had plenty, and could get my
tri-X developed and scanned by the time I return home, I might still
be using my Leica.
I also liked having time between shooting and editing. I still do, but
editing on the fly at least keeps me shooting more. I think that's the
r
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
OK, we've heard that they said that. I guess that means after the Optio
60 then... I'm not sure what they mean by three models. Three static
mode
I find the photographic experience has two aspects in this regard:
- I want to see my results, from either film or digital, as quickly
as possible to see what I did technically. This helps me reinforce
what I'm doing right in terms of exposure and camera operation ...
"Did I get the focus r
they most certainly age, and possibly badly. i trust them because i have
triple backups and upgrade all my hard drives about once every 2-3 years.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: RAW file proce
On 26 Jul 2005 at 23:51, Bob W wrote:
> How do we know that unless we see all the unpublished frames?
> Cartier-Bresson reputedly shot some 16,000 rolls of film during his life -
> that's about 800 a year over the 50 most active years. We only ever see a
> few hundred of the photos. This doesn't m
On 26 Jul 2005 at 15:42, Mark Roberts wrote:
> In the days before digital, it was commonly accepted that the best way
> to become a better photographer was to get out and take a lot of photos.
> I don't see any reason that would have changed with digital, but some
> people think it has.
It's too
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/paw/simplicity
*istDS, Tamron 28-200 f3.8-4.5, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1/400s
Taken next to Putney Bridge, in London.
All comments and criticisms encouraged. :-)
S
Juan Buhler wrote:
Well, I took it as success rate--how many good pictures over how many
total pictures you took.
I don't know if that works either. My pictures are improving all the
time but my percentage of keepers is about the same. As I improve, I
become harder to please. My bad pictures
On 26 Jul 2005 at 14:18, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Oh wait... you're referring to digital?
> Right. I took over 500 shots this weekend and got aperture, focal
> length, exposure compensation and lens data on every one. No pencil or
> notepad involved. Couldn't have done it with a pencil and notepad.
>
> How do we know that unless we see all the unpublished frames?
> Cartier-Bresson reputedly shot some 16,000 rolls of film during his
> life - that's about 800 a year over the 50 most active years.
>
Er, not it's not. It's, um, 16 over .5 times 1000 plus the
number I first thought of... twelvt
I don't think that it's digital per se that's helpful here. I think it's a
matter of your preferred or self imposed style of working. If you could
shoot TX and get the processed film back to you as conveniently, would one
way or the other matter? I'm the opposite, even when I've shot digital. I
On 26 Jul 2005 at 10:20, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Rob, you could console yourself with this:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7533716463&category=15240
Ah, thanks Joe, but I do still have 2 x the real thing :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 July 2005 23:07
> To: Pentax Discuss
> Subject: Re: Have digital cameras made us better photographers?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom C" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:21 PM
> S
>
> Well, I took it as success rate--how many good pictures over
> how many total pictures you took.
>
> With that criterion though, Garry Winogrand was a terrible
> photographer.
>
How do we know that unless we see all the unpublished frames?
Cartier-Bresson reputedly shot some 16,000 rolls
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: Hank & Ansel go head-to-head in desert snapper death struggle
Hi,
I may have mentioned already that I am reading the newly-published
biography
of HCB. While reading it I have also been looking at the book "The Man,
the
Image & the World
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Have digital cameras made us better photographers?
Well it was at noon... BTW did I tell you that ...I no
longer drink?
Really?
What do you do to keep from dehydrating?
b...
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Have digital cameras made us better photographers?
"Alan P. Hayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Digital cameras have made me a photographer.
Taking more and more pictures has made me a better photographer.
In the days before di
On 7/26/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I scribbled:
>
> > A better photographer is, I guess, one who takes fewer bad
> > photos, or more good photos per exposure,
>
> I don't really mean more good photos per exposure, since you can only take
> one photo, good or bad, per exposure. I mean
it is a total bull. the guy was hungover or something.
mishka
On 7/26/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Offered to the PDML as basis for another discussion:
> >
> > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/clumps.shtml
>
> I read the article... What can I say?
>
> Hones
Rick,
I deleted the supporting thumbnail, but now has been
re-installed.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=71
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/mid-o.htm
Quite a few updates & improvements.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hi Tim
your strategy leaves a lot of security holes open.
A virus, fire, theft and else would eat your backups for lunch ;-)
only several backup copies (with a history) on non rewritable mediums stored
on different places are *quite" safe.
greetings
Markus (PC supporter)
>>-Original Messa
Beautiful shot. BTW, your text has it "Bubmle bee".
rg
Jostein wrote:
I told this girl she wasn't supposed to fly away. At least she stayed
long enough for a pose. :-)
http://www.oksne.net/paw/humle.html
Jostein
As we were looking around for places to shoot the sunset, we came upon
this scene. It was late in the day, but the sun wasn't far enough
down to really kick up the color. To give you an idea of just how big
Monument Valley is, this first pic is a 100% crop from the
lower-middle frame of the whole
"Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Shel never uses a pencil. He is always accompanied by his amanuensis.
Watch your language! This is a family-oriented list!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Another thing:
There are times when the instant review is actually too much of a
distraction to my train of thought, so I turn it off.
Godfrey
On Jul 26, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Tom C wrote:
Yes in some cases, no in others. There's only so much one can see
on a 2 inch screen.
Tom C.
From:
Boris is a man of strange compliments. ;-)
This plain Norwegian is a bit less subtle. I love the picture.
IR photo is now on my "things I want to play with in next life list".
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian.)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely a
Photolight tells me this image is missing, too.
???
Rick
--- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the return from our recent coast drive, I
> hesitated
> for this "drive-by".
> The scan was conveniently done on the Epson 3170.
> Soft
> detail is a lot to ask of this scanner.
>
>
http://w
I'm getting an error message, saying that the image is
missing.
--- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was a soft and pleasing scene I thought I'd
> share. Shot a couple days ago in Trinidad, CA.
>
>
http://www.photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=57
>
> The 'classic' "S" sha
On 26/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>But I never would have recorded the data in a notebook. No time for
>scribbling.
A voice note attached to a frame would be nice ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps
Yes in some cases, no in others. There's only so much one can see on a 2
inch screen.
Tom C.
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: RE: Have digital cameras made us better photographers?
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:03:41 -0400
I would sugge
Very nice photos. I think I prefer nr. 1. The building in the background
does it for me.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian.)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Jim H
Hi Juan,
In answer to your first question, I recently acquired a used FA 28/2.8 in
excellent condition from Adorama for $149. Retails for for $229 at both
Adorama & B&H. I like the slightly wider than normal view I get from the lens
on the istDS.
Am unable to answer the 2nd question as I have n
> I told this girl she wasn't supposed
to fly away.
At least she stayed
> long enough for a pose. :-)
>
> http://www.oksne.net/paw/humle.html
>
> Jostein
>
Very nice Jostein.
Very crisp and clean on my work monotor. The flash looks like it caught a
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
