Hi!
> I just got back from two weeks of vacation in Hong Kong and Philippines.
> I brought with me the following camera equipment:...
Dave, that's one fascinating story. I should say one of your points
puzzles me. The only thing you gain with 28-105 over 16-45 is the
45-105 range which transl
Old style, (STTOS), they had a greenish complexion. New Style, (ruffles
have ridges look), they seem to be swarthy but with human style variations.
David Savage wrote:
Klingon's don't have green skin do they?! Or am I just an uneducated &
misinformed toDsaH?
Dave
On 10/2/05, Cotty <[EMAIL
It's like watching a good friend slowly succumb.
I ran volume numbers yesterday for the past three summer seasons (July and
Auguat).
Without knowing our actual numbers, I guestimate we'd probably come up with
very similar results. On the up side, however, we're printing a TON of
digital stuf
Klingon's don't have green skin do they?! Or am I just an uneducated &
misinformed toDsaH?
Dave
On 10/2/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Yes, and then to add insult to injury they accuse us of being fascists.
>
> That's right - the
Nicely done. You really caught a great moment that most of us have
experienced ourselves. I like this one.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 6:01:17 PM, you wrote:
PS> "Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are some
PS> things that can't be done gracef
I keep adding to this
random order due to photo.net but my laziness, too
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
A couple are from bus or train window -
all digital - sorry, not ist
ann
I just got back from two weeks of vacation in Hong Kong and Philippines.
I brought with me the following camera equipment:
Pentax *ist-DS
SMC Pentax-DA 16-45mm f/4 AL
SMC Pentax-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 (IF)AL
SMC Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4
SMC Pentax-FA 135mm f/2.8 (IF)
AF330FTZ
2.5 gigs of SD cards.
G'day Derby,
Neat series. I didn't realise Noah was into music. He always struck me
as rather "artistic" so I really shouldn't be surprised.
These are my faves:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/05_09_magicballs/04.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/05_09_magicballs/11.htm
...and this sh
Gee, I've been trying to figure out the make of the dark colored car.
Didn't realize you were talking about the Lotus.
On 10/1/05, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice one Paul, thanks.
> The car in the background looks too expensive for me to
> know what it is. But it's very yellow.
Thanks, Dave. I'm flattered. Your comments are much appreciated.
On 10/1/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've come back to this shot a few times since you first posted it and
> I have to say I really like it. The intensity of her expression really
> makes it.
>
> Very well done.
>
On 10/1/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
Hi!
>
> As far as my zero knowledge of Spanish goes, Angelita means "Baby
> Angel", right? She is in anything but angelic mood. You managed to catch
> the moment just right.
I believe you are correct about her name. Her mood is static,
Think lightweight: SMC Pentax-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 (IF)AL. Some of us
here have that lens and really enjoy the results we get from it. The
24-90 is a hair better, but the 28-105 is a LOT more affordable, and
still very good.
Don Sanderson wrote:
I'd really like to replace my A35-105/3.5 wi
This isn't surprising. I think most consumers just want to be able to
take pictures with as little inconvenience as possible. Your numbers
certainly suggest that to be the case. I'm guessing a significant
chunk of your printing business is from digital files. My wife
received almost 200 prints
Definitely an Esprit, not sure if it's the Turbo or the V8 though.
Great capture of the moment.
-Adam
Mat Maessen wrote:
Looks like a Lotus Esprit in the background.
I'll take two, please...
-Mat
On 10/1/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Why is he taking our picture," I
Looks like a Lotus Esprit in the background.
I'll take two, please...
-Mat
On 10/1/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are some
> things that can't be done gracefully.
> Hope this helps chase any negative feelings out of t
On 1 Oct 2005 at 21:33, Don Sanderson wrote:
> Thanks all, time to start saving my pennies. ;-)
> I've been looking (drooling) at the 24-90, it's hard to
> justify the cost because the range overlaps several of
> my other 'better' lenses. And I really hate losing the
> extra stop at the long end.
Heh, I'll probably keep mine in the kit even when I get a DSLR.
The only issues I've seen with it are a bit of flare in bright light
(lots of pieces of glass in that thar lens), and a hood that bites the
big wonder weenie.
I'd probably get something like an FA-J 18-35 to match with it on a
DSLR, a
Hi!
Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
http://photography.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?pos=-27
or if the above link isn't working or is taking too long:
http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id32.html
Christian, you should start skimming some real good money for sho
Definitely a clean yellow Lotus - look @ the emblem on the wheel.
Now for a tuffy - what flavor was the ice cream?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: A little smile for the list
"Why is he taking our picture," I heard one o
That's two votes for Lotus and one vote for clean. I seem to recall
that my son (who keeps track of such things) told me it was a Lotus
when we saw it in town a few weeks ago.
Paul
On Oct 1, 2005, at 10:48 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 09:01:17PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Pentax don't make pictures they make equipment (on occasion).
And photographers make pictures. (or ought to,
with what ever equipment they have).
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
On
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 09:01:17PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> For extra points. What kind of car is that in the background? I have to
> admit I didn't even notice it until I looked at this photo.
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3772172&size=lg
> Paul
Looks like a Lotus to me -
Great capture Christian. Now was it the equipment, the workshop leader or
the guy who pushed the release?
A minor nit - I'd crop out the lighter URH corner.
Well Done
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Cape May teaser (OT - not
Paul Stenquist wrote:
For extra points. What kind of car is that in the background?
A clean one.
Nice one Paul, thanks.
The car in the background looks too expensive for me to
know what it is. But it's very yellow. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 8:01 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: PESO: A l
Great action shots Paul.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: On the Board
Shot some more wakeboariding a couple of weeks ago. I used the DA
50-200 for these. Manual focused it,. It has a good feel used that way,
and is qui
Thanks all, time to start saving my pennies. ;-)
I've been looking (drooling) at the 24-90, it's hard to
justify the cost because the range overlaps several of
my other 'better' lenses. And I really hate losing the
extra stop at the long end.
But I keep hearing such good things about it maybe it's
Thanks Ann.
On Oct 1, 2005, at 10:16 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
"Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are
some
things that can't be done gracefully.
Hope this helps chase any negative feelings out of the list. Shot on a
walkaround this afternoon w
Thank you William.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Fabulous picture Ken.
William Robb
Honestly Paul I thought this image was fine just the way I posted it, but
that was why I posted it to get opinions from others.
Thanks again
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Having seen this shot now on sev
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> "Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are some
> things that can't be done gracefully.
> Hope this helps chase any negative feelings out of the list. Shot on a
> walkaround this afternoon with the DA 16-45/4. f4, 1/90 ISO 200, 45mm.
> For extra po
Yes. The 24-90.
Rick
--- Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd really like to replace my A35-105/3.5 with
> something
> smaller and lighter, maybe even AF.
> So I go take a couple of sample pics with the D to
> show
> on eekBay.
> Then I can make the big bucks!
> Problem is that the
Wow, Beautiful shot Dave. I really like the various layers created by
the clouds.
Nice job.
dk
On 10/1/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?p=104&t=1
>
> BTW this is from the same shooting session as a previous PAW of mine:
> http://w
Actually, after you ask that, I took a look and I did find another one
that I take at the same time. I opened the aperature a bit more on
this, (f8,as opposed to f16), it does blurr out the background a bit
more.
http://www.pbase.com/davekennedy/image/50107825
I had cloned out that part of the we
Paul Stenquist wrote:
"Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are some
things that can't be done gracefully.
Hope this helps chase any negative feelings out of the list. Shot on a
walkaround this afternoon with the DA 16-45/4. f4, 1/90 ISO 200, 45mm.
For extra points. Wha
"Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are some
things that can't be done gracefully.
Hope this helps chase any negative feelings out of the list. Shot on a
walkaround this afternoon with the DA 16-45/4. f4, 1/90 ISO 200, 45mm.
For extra points. What kind of car is that in
In my case, I shoot a load of pics, then view them on computer. The few I
print I get done at the shop. If I printed all I shot, I would be broke
several times over.
John
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:45:55 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I guess I can post a copy of a comment
I didn't think this was necessary, but:
:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
J
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:29:56 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, and then to add insult to injury they accuse us of be
Can I add a me too to your excellent post John?
Mark MacLean and I had a conversation this morning, including a discussion
about whether we needed a full-frame sensor in a future Pentax: my view is
that, in the past I seldom made prints bigger than 11x14 from film, either
colour or mono, and I
Thanks, John. Really no surprises in your response. As I suspected,
it's the post picture-taking experience that you find "better".
"Better" is such a subjective word that I simply couldn't let it go by
without putin' up a hoop for you. ;-]]
I too enjoy some PS activity and disk re-burning (almost
Only those that someone disagrees with.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Cotty wrote:
On 1/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, but this is a debate that should be DIScouraged!
Hmmm. Are
Well, I guess I can post a copy of a comment I made to Annsan,
--quote---
Ah yes, digital saves money. Let's see, I bougtht the used Olympus
C-5050Z for $200. I imediately started making 8.5x11 prints. The printer
went belly up so I had to buy a new one (Epson R200, all I could
aff
Kenneth Waller wrote:
>
> Tom, thanks for commenting.
> This was taken last year - end of Aug early Sept.
> I had forgotten about it until I got a critique from a pro photo friend who
> stated it was amont the best barren ground bear shot he had seen!
> Wanted to know what others thought.
>
> Ken
On 2/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Yes, and then to add insult to injury they accuse us of being fascists.
That's right - the 'they' you are referring to is not actually a fellow
human being who enjoys using Pentax equipment - 'they' are strange and
dangerous aliens who must be
>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>> Yeah, it's OK ... ;-)) From what I understand, it's the forum of choice
>> for many Canon users
Not to mention Leica users ;-)
On 2/10/05, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>They just come here to read all the emails complaining about Pentax and
>feel reas
Yes, and then to add insult to injury they accuse us of being fascists.
John
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:14:25 +0100, Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yeah, it's OK ... ;-)) From what I understand, it's the forum of choice
for many Canon users
They just come here to
Please note the distinction between the word "discouraged" and the word
"disallowed". ;-)
John
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:11:24 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
We can all think of one.
Why John, if I didn't know you any better I w
Hi,
I've been away for a while, but now I'm back. Revamped my website last
night, and put up a new gallery. Noah Taylor and Loene Carmen played a
support gig recently at the very retro Mandarin Club.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/05_09_magicballs/index.htm
OT: I normally don't like IE
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yeah, it's OK ... ;-)) From what I understand, it's the forum of choice
for many Canon users
They just come here to read all the emails complaining about Pentax and
feel reassured that they chose the right brand... ;-)
S
The 24-90 is an excellent lens, though not inexpensive.
John
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 23:57:43 +0100, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Don,
Sorry to disappoint you, but that is one of the lenses that I shoot
with these days. After my Tamron 28-75/2.8 bit the dust (couple of
drops
On 2/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>We can all think of one.
Why John, if I didn't know you any better I would have said you're
showing some fascist tendencies ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
We can all think of one.
John
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 23:51:50 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, but this is a debate that should be DIScouraged!
Hmmm. Are there any other debates that should be discouraged?
Cheers,
Cotty
I would have loved to - didn't even know about it. I saw it on the
evening news last night - g
--
Bruce
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 3:30:49 PM, you wrote:
WR> Did any on our SF people take this in?
WR> http://www.pbase.com/salim/icerair2005
WR> William Robb
Hello Don,
Sorry to disappoint you, but that is one of the lenses that I shoot
with these days. After my Tamron 28-75/2.8 bit the dust (couple of
drops), I was searching around for something for my wedding work and
stumbled across it. I have to say that it is pretty darn good.
--
Best regards,
Thanks Herb
Shadows are a bit dark,yes. I boosted them abit in PS but i thought it took
away from the
"feel" of the shot.
Your comments are greatly appreciated, thanks Herb
Dave
> fine composition. on my calibrated monitor,
the shadows look a little dark.
On 1/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Yes, but this is a debate that should be DIScouraged!
Hmmm. Are there any other debates that should be discouraged?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Rob,
My statement referred only to the prolific posters; it had nothing to say
about non-prolific posters, and my words did not, and should not be taken
to, denigrate anybody who doesn't post prolifically.
I am fully aware that you are one of those who feels that Pentax does not
presently
Sorry.I'll try better next year.LOL
Thanks Tom
dave
> Only one first place. We will have to
ask you to leave the list.
>
> Or in other words, congradulations, Dave.
>
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
>
Did any on our SF people take this in?
http://www.pbase.com/salim/icerair2005
William Robb
It's like watching a good friend slowly succumb.
I ran volume numbers yesterday for the past three summer seasons (July and
Auguat).
The highest film processing volume my lab has done was 2003, and I still had
access to those numbers as well as 2004/2005.
I will treat 2003 as my baseline.
Here'
On 1 Oct 2005 at 19:38, John Forbes wrote:
> Have you noticed that the most prolific posters of pictures on this site, and
> the best photographers, do not as a rule jump on the Chongwagon. They just
> get
> on with life and take pictures.
I think you're making some rather short-sighted state
Yes, but this is a debate that should be DIScouraged!
It goes nowhere, achieves nothing (except depression), and has a terrible
tendency to repeat itself every few weeks. It's a malady, and the only
remedy is abstinence.
John
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:31:54 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I'd really like to replace my A35-105/3.5 with something
smaller and lighter, maybe even AF.
So I go take a couple of sample pics with the D to show
on eekBay.
Then I can make the big bucks!
Problem is that the sample pics are so good I change
my mind again.
Does anyone have a suggestion for a repl
I agree. Superb pic. Amazing what a good tog can do even with very basic
equipment!
John
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 21:56:29 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/10/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
http://photography.sko
..'I find it ironic that I switched from Nikon to Pentax'...
I moved from a pretty complete Canon DSLR kit to Pentax DS and I have yet to
find cause for regret, Glen. That's why I mostly ignore this thread.
Godfrey
As well as immediate feedback ;-) , I think the two biggest advantages of
digital are the much greater control that you have over the image (I'm
talking about colour here, it's not the same with b&w), and the fact that
the cost is zero until and unless you want to print.
On top of that is t
Superb - very professional.
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original Message-
From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 2:40 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Cape May teaser (OT - not Pentax)
Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
h
I'll second that, John and Paul.
I am in fact a very proud owner of a *istD and a MZ-S.
Whenever I have some money to spend - I go for some nice glass. F. 2.8 or
better, regardless of the focal length.
Right now I'm testing a Sigma 2.8/70-200mm AP0. I'm considering a used FA
2.8/80-200mm in stead.
On 1/10/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That pretty well sums it up for me. Good post, John.
>Paul
>On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:05 PM, John Forbes wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> The continual negativism on this forum doesn't make it a better place,
>> and it certainly doesn't HELP Pentax. What
I'm not John, but I can answer from my point of view. First and
foremost for me is control of the entire process from exposure to
print. I had grown weary of scratched, dirty negatives. Second is
control of color temperature. I shoot in tungsten without losing any
stops due to filtration. I ca
Ditto
--
Bruce
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 2:10:53 PM, you wrote:
PS> That pretty well sums it up for me. Good post, John.
PS> Paul
PS> On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:05 PM, John Forbes wrote:
>> Tom,
>>
>> The continual negativism on this forum doesn't make it a better place,
>> and it certainly doesn'
That's a lot of money. On second thought a Taxi driver must invest in a
car - a new Mercedes Benz (most common cap here) is appr. 1 million Danish
Kroners, icluding normal taxes - perhaps 500.000 kr for cap driver. An old
rule of thumb here says that a million (161.000 USD) invested will create
one
This one time, at band camp, keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I continually shake my head at those comments that come from the folks who
> actually believe that crap about present day cameras becoming "obsolete."
> What's obsolete, but feeding a rampant quest for more and more new products.
Thanks Bruce. Yes, the lens is another nice bargain from Pentax.
Paul
On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Paul,
Got some nice shots there - that lens seems to be quite sharp. I may
even have to consider picking one up sometime.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, October 1, 2
That pretty well sums it up for me. Good post, John.
Paul
On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:05 PM, John Forbes wrote:
Tom,
The continual negativism on this forum doesn't make it a better place,
and it certainly doesn't HELP Pentax. What is does is to distort
people's assessment of Pentax's true position.
On 1/10/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
>
>http://photography.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?pos=-27
>
>or if the above link isn't working or is taking too long:
>
>http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id32.html
>
>Comments alw
John,
Because you seem firmly convinced of your position, please clarify for
me in what way digital provides you, "a much better picture-taking
experience". At the moment of capture?
This is in the serious hope that I'll read something other than
"immediate feed back".
Jack
--- John Forbes <[EM
Hello David,
Very cool shot! Love the cloud buildup on the top and then the
foreground with small silhouettes just tying the whole thing together.
Nicely done.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 2:20:40 AM, you wrote:
DM> Not sure if I'm getting ahead of myself or catching up
Hello Paul,
Got some nice shots there - that lens seems to be quite sharp. I may
even have to consider picking one up sometime.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 5:31:46 AM, you wrote:
PS> Shot some more wakeboariding a couple of weeks ago. I used the DA
PS> 50-200 for these
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, AvK wrote:
Please be patient until thursday when i am back.
No problem Adelheid. Thanks for letting us know.
Kostas
Tom,
The continual negativism on this forum doesn't make it a better place, and
it certainly doesn't HELP Pentax. What is does is to distort people's
assessment of Pentax's true position.
You wouldn't think so from some of the posts, but Pentax is a profitable
company. It clearly went th
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I think they key word here is "most", although I'm not speaking with a lot
of experience yet, as I'm just starting to see what results can be obtained
from some of my older lenses.
Can you please drop us a line when you evaluate the 30?
Thanks,
Kosta
Beautiful shot Dave!
Tom C.
From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PAW - "Otago Gold"
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 21:20:40 +1200
Not sure if I'm getting ahead of myself or catching up as it's only been a
couple of days since t
In answer to your last question, yes I've perceived that to be the case
sometimes, but not with the Chongwagon comment. However, it's not all
whining and negativism. Some of it's an ongoing analysis and, yes,
speculation regarding the future of the brand, and therefore the wisdom of
future po
I should add that I would of course expect to pay extra
for the grip and screens.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 2:16 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Daily Update-Pentax Petition and Petition Surv
Jens Bladt wrote:
...or two. When was the Hassie H2 with Imacon sensor/Ixpress back presented?
It seems a lot of pro's are using this already, judging from TV.
I guess it's quite expensive, being from Scandinavia, but I can't seem to
find a price anywhere.
I guess it's in the neighbourhood of 10
$1700.00 max
> -Original Message-
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Daily Update-Pentax Petition and Petition Survey
>
>
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > I finall
Hi Keith,
If we're talking about film cameras I'd agree with you. I perceive it's
going to be different in the digital world though. Who here expects their
*ist D and derivatives, to be the camera they're shooting with 5 years from
now, 10 years from now? I don't. Will service be available
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
I finally put my entry in:
"3" "In body image stabilisation."
"2" "Faster, larger buffer. (10 RAW file burst.)"
"2" "Full K/M Compatibility."
"1" "10+ Megapixel with present low noise level."
"2" "Battery/Vertical grip availability."
"1" "Lar
Brilliant, Great shot! Well done.
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 1. oktober 2005 20:40
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: PESO - Cape May teaser (OT - not Pentax)
Black skimmer: errr
Excellent action shot. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
On Oct 1, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Christian wrote:
Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
http://photography.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?pos=-27
or if the above link isn't working or is taking too long:
http://home.mindspring.com/~c
Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
http://photography.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?pos=-27
or if the above link isn't working or is taking too long:
http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id32.html
Comments always welcome.
Christian
Which is a pretty big market if you think about it, in MF terms.
Why don't you post a lot more negative messages about Pentax? That way
you'll make your worst fears come true.
It seems to me that in life we need a certain amount of optimism. People
who get things done are optimists; peopl
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The recently announced Optio S6 has a "Pet Mode",
"Not all subjects are willing to stand still and say “Cheese!” Fortunately,
the OptioS6 features tracking AF* which can track a moving subject around
the frame, while maintaining precise focus for pin-sharp results. Adding
That's a stunning shot Dave.
Dave
On 10/1/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure if I'm getting ahead of myself or catching up as it's only
> been a couple of days since the last one.
>
> This is a pretty sunrise I photographed in Dunedin during Easter. We
> stayed at a beautiful o
...or two. When was the Hassie H2 with Imacon sensor/Ixpress back presented?
It seems a lot of pro's are using this already, judging from TV.
I guess it's quite expensive, being from Scandinavia, but I can't seem to
find a price anywhere.
I guess it's in the neighbourhood of 10.000-15.000 USD??
Som
Tom C wrote:
I wouldn't have a problem buying another lens or lots more lenses. The
question is whether I feel it wise to invest in more K-mount lenses when
I'm not sure Pentax is going to be around in a couple of years, or if
they will be producing the camera I wish to purchase.
Tom C.
Hi gang
I've be offered a 645 MF outfit:
220 Back
300mm F4 ED + 1.4 ED conv
200mm F4
120mm F4 Machro
All in excellent - like new condition.
The seller is asking 1200 USD for the lot (220 back, 300mm ED + 1.4 ED, 120
MM macro and a 200mm ) 1200 USD (ebay survey).
Any offers, please?
Regards
Jens
Yep. I can't see the market for a 645D being too much more than owners of a
film Pentax 645 system.
Tom C.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 10:
It seems the 645D may be/might be coming in a year late...
Tom C.
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 10:13:46 +1000
This one time, at band camp, "W
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
