On 2/10/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I keep adding to this
>
>random order due to photo.net but my laziness, too
>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
>
>A couple are from bus or train window -
>all digital - sorry, not ist
Really nice gallery Ann, your ey
On 2/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I didn't think this was necessary, but:
>
>:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
I've still got green skin!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysn
On 2/10/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Klingon's don't have green skin do they?! Or am I just an uneducated &
>misinformed toDsaH?
Just green under the lizard thong, p'Taak!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.
On 1/10/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>"Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are some
>things that can't be done gracefully.
>Hope this helps chase any negative feelings out of the list. Shot on a
>walkaround this afternoon with the DA 16-45/4. f4, 1/90
> Really nice gallery Ann, your eye for line and form is second to none.
As much as dislike agreeing with Cotty ;-) (kidding), I agree with him
completely.
Ann, you rule!
--
Boris
On 1/10/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>"Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are some
>things that can't be done gracefully.
>Hope this helps chase any negative feelings out of the list. Shot on a
>walkaround this afternoon with the DA 16-45/4. f4, 1/90
My comment wanted to highlight that buying an APS-C body + ultra-wide lens
will cost less than buying a FF body, while staying within a given system
(Pentax or other).
If one thinks it's time to switch (and I've been tempted again and again),
then buying an APS-C body is even more the way to g
Ewww!.
Dave
On 10/2/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Klingon's don't have green skin do they?! Or am I just an uneducated &
> >misinformed toDsaH?
>
> Just green under the lizard thong, p'Taak!
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> _
Graywolf wrote:
> Well, I guess I can post a copy of a comment I made to Annsan,
>
> --quote---
> Ah yes, digital saves money. Let's see, I bougtht the used
> Olympus C-5050Z for $200. I imediately started making 8.5x11
> prints. The printer went belly up so I had to buy a new one
as much as I hate to line up with the crowd, I agree with both. I don't know
which name kept going through my head more: Robert Frank, or Edward Hopper.
Makes me want to buy a Greyhound ticket.
I'm getting a bit sick of PDMLers and their galleries. First Juan, then
Jostein, now this. I may have to
I love the marina pic especially.
John
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 06:10:22 +0100, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I keep adding to this
random order due to photo.net but my laziness, too
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
A couple are from bus or train window -
all d
http://www.intro2020.co.uk/pages/zigview.htm
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
Looking forward to seeing some of your pics. I share your appreciation
of both the DA 16-45 and the FA 29-105, although my use of the later
has declined steeply since I purchased the DA 50-200. Coupled with the
DA 16-45, it gives one tremendous range in a very compact kit. The
solution to the b
My but you have a great eye. I love the "Bus stop in Redmond
California, " "City Lights Book Store," "Morning Cofee." Heck, there's
not a shot here I don't like. The sunset and powerline shot is just
beautifully composed. Great frame. "Welcome to Trina's" is fascinating.
Fabulous work.
Paul
On
Thanks Bruce. I shot with some trepidation. They probably weren't
pleased, but it was impossible to pass up.
Paul
On Oct 2, 2005, at 1:21 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Nicely done. You really caught a great moment that most of us have
experienced ourselves. I like this one.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thanks Cotty. And thanks to all others who responded to this post.
On Oct 2, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 1/10/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
"Why is he taking our picture," I heard one of them say. There are
some
things that can't be done gracefully.
Hope this helps cha
Interesting tool. Thanks for posting this.
On Oct 2, 2005, at 6:14 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
http://www.intro2020.co.uk/pages/zigview.htm
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user
John Forbes wrote:
As well as immediate feedback ;-) , I think the two biggest advantages
of digital are the much greater control that you have over the image
(I'm talking about colour here, it's not the same with b&w), and the
fact that the cost is zero until and unless you want to print.
1333 hits on the web page and 143 submissions so far.
Still trickling in.
Tell everyone to go to:
http://www.donsauction.com/Pentax
and take _THE_ Pentax Wishlist survey.
Or, contact me at:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for comments/suggestions/praise/butt chewing.
Thanks!
Don
Although the idea is very nice, I'm a bit sceptical against this! Don't
viewfinders have typically different enlargement ranges? Will this
finder cover the whole picture as you see it in the viewfinder? Will it
also include any metering information that is visible in the viewfinder,
but outside
I have ordered a Qoute for 3½ x 7 inches patches with "Pentax *ist D"
White letters on a black background, the star being red, of course.
I guess it can be cut in two, in order to loose the "*ist D" part, if
necessary.
It's probably going to be too expensive (like 150 USD for 100 patches).
I guess
William Robb wrote:
It's like watching a good friend slowly succumb.
I ran volume numbers yesterday for the past three summer seasons (July
and Auguat).
The highest film processing volume my lab has done was 2003, and I
still had access to those numbers as well as 2004/2005.
I will treat 2003
On 2 Oct 2005 at 6:36, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Looking forward to seeing some of your pics. I share your appreciation
> of both the DA 16-45 and the FA 29-105, although my use of the later
> has declined steeply since I purchased the DA 50-200. Coupled with the
> DA 16-45, it gives one tremendo
On 2 Oct 2005 at 13:04, Toralf Lund wrote:
> I've never been able to believe that the cost is quite zero, though. Not
> for the pictures you want to keep (whether you print them or not),
> anyway. Storing & maintaining data on a digital medium costs something,
> too - especially if you want any
Tom C wrote:
Hi Keith,
If we're talking about film cameras I'd agree with you. I perceive it's
going to be different in the digital world though. Who here expects
their *ist D and derivatives, to be the camera they're shooting with 5
years from now, 10 years from now? I don't.
Based o
On 1 Oct 2005 at 22:51, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> And photographers make pictures. (or ought to,
> with what ever equipment they have).
Photographers can do whatever they like, they can shoot with-out film loaded if
that's what makes them happy. My point was that this is a Pentax forum and we
hav
What charger are you using Rob?
Dave
On 10/2/05, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2 Oct 2005 at 6:36, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> > Looking forward to seeing some of your pics. I share your appreciation
> > of both the DA 16-45 and the FA 29-105, although my use of the later
> > has dec
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
Fantastic stuff!
Where *didn't* you go (other than to my part of the country, that is)?
ERNR
VM> I'm on the lookout for a waist-level viewfinder camera for a while
VM> already, and since the LX is outside of my budget, I was considering an
VM> old Pentax or Praktika SLR-camera that didn't have the prism yet... (a
VM> little OT here, but any of you having experience with that?). Most of my
On 2 Oct 2005 at 20:32, David Savage wrote:
> What charger are you using Rob?
The LaCrosse Technology BC-900, technically hard to beat but not the best
build. Still looking for a 3VDC switch-mode DC convertor so I can use it in the
car.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UT
Saw a review of this gadget a while back:
http://www.kickstartnews.com/reviews/hardware/zigview_digital_angle_viewfinder.html
Cheers,
David
Rob Studdert wrote:
http://www.intro2020.co.uk/pages/zigview.htm
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTE
"E.R.N. Reed" wrote:
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
> >
> > >
> Fantastic stuff!
> Where *didn't* you go (other than to my part of the country, that is)?
>
> ERNR
Lovely to open my eyes first thing on Sunday and
get kudos - thanks _all_ of you
>
> The 28-105 continues to be a great companion to the 16-45. What can I
> say... I loved this lens on my ZX-5n, and still like using it on the
> *ist-DS. Again, the convenience of a zoom on vacation outweighed the
> performance gains of the primes.
Hi Ann and welcome back.
Great stuff. I love shopping and welcome to trina's.
Dave
> I keep adding to this
>
> random order due to photo.net but my laziness, too
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
>
> A couple are from bus or train
> At 01:19 PM 9/29/2005, Glen wrote:
> I'm afraid that I'll probably have to settle for printing them on a color
> printer, or color printing service, and forget about the special appeal of
> selenium-toned silver images. I guess this is how the platinum
On 10/1/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never actually used their service. But their black and white
> prints were the first that came to mind. I think someone on the list
> may have stated that they use mpix for their printing.
Me. I've used their printing, although not the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Ann and welcome back.
>
> Great stuff. I love shopping and welcome to trina's.
>
> Dave
>
Thanks, Dave!
The "victems in these shots like them, too, I'm
happy to say.
oh, now I really do have to get out of here
later,
a
> >
You should be a politican, Rob. :-) Nobody said that people who didn't
submit pictures didn't have a right to discuss things.
John
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:17:12 +0100, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 1 Oct 2005 at 22:51, Kenneth Waller wrote:
And photographers make pictures. (
- Original Message -
From: "John Celio"
Subject: Re: The slow and painful death of film.
Without knowing our actual numbers, I guestimate we'd probably come up
with very similar results. On the up side, however, we're printing a TON
of digital stuff. How are you guys doing in tha
- Original Message -
From: "Toralf Lund"
Subject: Re: The slow and painful death of film.
It would be at least mildly interesting to have the numbers of the years
leading up to 2003, too, though. What I mean to say is that if 2003 was a
particularly good year for film processing, t
Ann. I always enjoy viewing your photos, and you came through again
here. well done.
Doug
On Oct 2, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I keep adding to this
random order due to photo.net but my laziness, too
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
A couple are from b
Sorry. Stepped out to take some photos. :)
I've never claimed Pentax makes bad products. I've only called into
question their slowness to market, the fact that the 2 other big players are
releasing upgrades/improvements to which Pentax has no answer in over 6
months, and their market directi
I picked up my MX last night. I heven't used that camera in over a
year. The size of the viewfinder and its brightness, compared to the
istD, makes me want to cry.
I know the istD viewfinder is not too bad, by current standards. But
what would it take for a not full frame camera like the istD to h
Depending on what kind of vacation I am at, I too find myself using zoom
lenses a lot. Most of my vacation pictures are snaps, no need for
sophisticated primes or fast zooms for snaps. So why bother carrying around
at the heavy fast primes, when I'm only using them for, let us say, 5% of my
photogr
And here I think is a key item in this discussion I'd like to bring to
peoples attention. I'm not picking on Jens here, I promise. He wrote:
I am in fact a very proud owner of a *istD and a MZ-S.
The thing is, I'm a proud owner of Pentax equipment as well. No one here is
attacking anyone'
Back out for more pictures...
Tom C.
Hi,
try www.fotoabro.nl in the Netherlands, they have a K 20mm f4 for sale for
195 euro.
I'm not sure if they ship abroad though. I already have the A 20mm f2.8, and
I need the cash for acquiring a K 200mm f2.5, hehe.
Frank
There some really good pictures here. To be honest, I think all of them are.
As somebody has stated before; you have fabulous eye for lines and
perspective: Shopping is a winner:
btw: sorry about my : and ; my keyboard is freaking out here:
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never und
Don,
I own this lens and I have made some pictures I like very much, it gives
very nice results. You're not going to find a constant aperture lens in
that zoom range. I don't know about any good replacement, as I wouldn't
sell mine but would only another lens additionally.
I think you're gonna
Hi Paul,
you really caught the moment!
However, of course it's not kind having taken the young ladies like
this. I hope you talked to them afterwards and asked politely for
permission to show it on the web.
In a german photo forum, there is a recent thread about street
photography, photograp
On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:30, Juan Buhler wrote:
I picked up my MX last night. I heven't used that camera in over a
year. The size of the viewfinder and its brightness, compared to the
istD, makes me want to cry.
I know the istD viewfinder is not too bad, by current standards. But
what would it take
Well, the point I would like to make is that despite the influx of
digital you are still doing more than 1/2 the film processing business
you were doing before digital. Since today there are probably more
people using digital (especially camera phones) than were using film
that says a lot.
Of
Bob,
We've seen a gallery or two from you, all good.
Just time for you to take a road trip... :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/2/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as much as I hate to line up with the crowd, I agree with both. I don't know
> which name kept going through my head more: Robert Frank
Thanks Pancho, I think you may be right.
I'll just have to build my muscles a bit! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Pancho Hasselbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 10:07 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Challenge my zoom!
>
>
> Don,
>
> I
Hi Juan ...
I essentially made the same comment a few days ago. As nice as the Pentax
DSLR viewfinders are supposed to be, they do not compare favorably with the
view through the Leica, MX, LX, and even the earlier K-body cameras. Thus
far, I enjoy using the Leicas and the MX far more than the i
Hehe,
training while shooting saves time at the gym!
Pancho
Don Sanderson schrieb:
Thanks Pancho, I think you may be right.
I'll just have to build my muscles a bit! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Pancho Hasselbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 10:07 A
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 2 Oct 2005 at 13:04, Toralf Lund wrote:
I've never been able to believe that the cost is quite zero, though. Not
for the pictures you want to keep (whether you print them or not),
anyway. Storing & maintaining data on a digital medium costs something,
too - especial
:)
No, I'm not crying. The istD, with its instant feedback convenience,
improved my photos a bit, so overall it has been a gain.
Now, probably, the ideal camera for me then would be something like
the Epson RD-1. Minus the price tag, of course--no way I'll pay $3000
for a six megapixel camera...
Over in the LeiCanon list, this product was mentioned as a goo choice for
dust removal and sensor cleaning.
http://www.visibledust.com/
What do you use ... I may need to add some sensor cleaning stuff to my kit.
Shel
On 10/2/05, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you think about it, there's no way that a smaller screen could
> possibly look as big and bright in a viewfinder. Less total light
> hitting the surface area of the screen = less light to your eyes. No
> way around that without some so
Or maybe a full frame viewfinder with the system which Pentax used
with their "Panoramic" mode... So you can cycle between full
frame/actual framing.
Of course actual framing will be less enlarged but... well, dream!
2005/10/2, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/2/05, Charles Robinson <[EMAI
Well put, Tom. People are "not even talking about the same thing" here.
I believe most contributors in this and similar threads really want a
constructive debate on this important issue; the future of Pentax.
But for some reason the debate ends up in a dead end, people attacking each
other inste
On 10/2/05, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I keep adding to this
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=518950
Oh my, I really enjoy your pictures, Ann -- every one of these is
worth a careful look. Lines! You have such a great eye for lines!
Lovely photographs, thanks very much for sha
On 10/1/05 8:01 PM, "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For extra points. What kind of car is that in the background?
Ferrari Testarossa.
-Holly
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Dust on Your Sensor
Over in the LeiCanon list, this product was mentioned as a goo choice for
dust removal and sensor cleaning.
http://www.visibledust.com/
What do you use ... I may need to add some sensor cleaning stuff to my
k
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: RE: Viewfinders
You've made an interesting "discovery" in that we often get used to
something - in this case the DSLR viewfinder - and forget what we've lost
or given up. It's easy to say how good the D and DS finders are compared
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: The slow and painful death of film.
Well, the point I would like to make is that despite the influx of digital
you are still doing more than 1/2 the film processing business you were
doing before digital. Since today there are proba
It would be at least mildly interesting to have the numbers of the
years leading up to 2003, too, though. What I mean to say is that if
2003 was a particularly good year for film processing, then obviously
you might have expected the volume to drop a bit in 2004 and 2005
even without digit
On 2/10/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What do you use ...
Canned air and adrenalin.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 2/10/05, Holly Hegeman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>> For extra points. What kind of car is that in the background?
>
>Ferrari Testarossa.
>
>-Holly
Is that Four-Barrel Holly, or just the two? ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.
Hi!
Over in the LeiCanon list, this product was mentioned as a goo choice for
dust removal and sensor cleaning.
http://www.visibledust.com/
What do you use ... I may need to add some sensor cleaning stuff to my kit.
I bought standard camera cleaning kit (I think it is roughly $10 in
Israel)
On 10/2/05 12:10 PM, "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/05, Holly Hegeman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>> For extra points. What kind of car is that in the background?
>>
>> Ferrari Testarossa.
>>
>> -Holly
>
> Is that Four-Barrel Holly, or just the two? ;-)
>
Sheesh. Obviously
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, i have the SB80DX which is supposed to be Nikons bee's knees as far as
flash. I to
have to
fumble with exposure, so its not just a Pentax thing. Although with the Sigma
super, is
still have
to do a lot of playing aswell. I think its just dslr
I noticed that there are Pentax 70-200 f4-5.6 zoom lenses with both F and
FA suffixes. What is the difference? The F version is a LOT cheaper on the
used market. I think they are both autofocus, so I suppose the difference
might involve how the camera metering works with the lens?
Does anyone
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
http://photography.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?pos=-27
or if the above link isn't working or is taking too long:
http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id32.html
Christian, you should start skimming som
At 02:18 AM 10/2/2005, John Celio wrote:
Without knowing our actual numbers, I guestimate we'd probably come up
with very similar results. On the up side, however, we're printing a TON
of digital stuff. How are you guys doing in that arena?
For what it's worth, I've been having at least as
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:54:11 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> That's two votes for Lotus and one vote for clean. I seem to recall
> that my son (who keeps track of such things) told me it was a Lotus
> when we saw it in town a few weeks ago.
It's a Lotus. If you look carefully, you can see the gr
The camera metering should work identically with either lens.
The Pentax FA is a SMC lens, (with power zoom), and you can see it here:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/long/FA70-200f4-5.6.html
The Pentax F is a non SMC (bargain lens) and you can see it here:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/k
Oh Yes, you can find a chart here:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/technology/summary/index.html
The whole site is well worth browsing through: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
P. J. Alling wrote:
The camera metering should work identically with either lens.
The Pentax FA is a SMC lens, (with power
Thanks - that's very kind. And you're right, I do need to take a road trip.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 October 2005 16:38
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: GESO: stuff from my bus/train trip
>
> Bob,
> We've
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> Black skimmer: errr. ummm. skimming
> >>
> >> http://photography.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?pos=-27
> >>
> >> or if the above link isn't working or is taking too long:
> >>
> >> http://home.mindsp
If you worked at my local Wal-Mart I would probably come to you too.
However, we have a bunch of college students, and otherwise unemployable
elderly ladies working at the Wal-Mart lab. Knowledge and skill is not
what the local management is looking for, but cheap wages. BTW I would
guess that
I was walking home from work yesterday, on a beautiful
autumn afternoon, and came upon this fella soaking up
the last rays of the sun:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3773799
Technical: Pentax Optio 33L, -1.7 stops exposure
compensation, cropped and contrast boosted a bit in PE
2.
Pl
I do not think the profitability of a given facility has much to do with
Kodaks decision to close it. Personally I think Kodak is being raided.
Goodby Kodak.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Toralf Lund wrote:
Yes,
At 02:49 PM 10/2/2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Oh Yes, you can find a chart here:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/technology/summary/index.html
The whole site is well worth browsing through: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
P. J. Alling wrote:
Thanks, PJ!
I don't believe that you guys are completely correct.
IIRC, there was a non-SMC (Takumar) 70-200 F zoom,
quite inexpensive. Though it was sharp, it was very
prone to flare.
However, there was also an SMC F 70-200 F zoom, shown
on Boz's site here:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/zooms/long/F70-21
Wiadomość Oryginalna
Od: Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Data: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:41:23 +0200
Temat: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
> No, I may have been exaggerating a bit (or a lot) about the price,
> although I'm quite sure the gap between
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Great capture Christian. Now was it the equipment, the workshop leader or
> the guy who pushed the release?
>
Thanks Ken, Paul, Frank, Jens, William, Boris, John, Mike, Cotty (I hate you
too; see below) and anyone else
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:00 PM
Subject: Dust on Your Sensor
> Over in the LeiCanon list, this product was mentioned as a goo choice for
> dust removal and sensor cleaning.
>
> http://www.visibledust.com/
>
> W
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: The slow and painful death of film.
I do not think the profitability of a given facility has much to do with
Kodaks decision to close it. Personally I think Kodak is being raided.
Goodby Kodak.
Kodak is seeing it's traditional mar
:) thanks Dave,
It's interesting. I've met a lot of actors who are musicians on their
days off. I think it has something to do with music being a good way to
have full control, something you don't get much when you are an actor.
(Still) photography is another outlet, for similar reasons.
D
Kodak has been taken over by MBA's they're doomed.
graywolf wrote:
I do not think the profitability of a given facility has much to do
with Kodaks decision to close it. Personally I think Kodak is being
raided. Goodby Kodak.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Pr
That's the SMC F 70-210. Which I mentioned in my post. There was no
70-200 version of this lens, (nor is there one mentioned on Boz's site),
if I remember correctly.
Rick Womer wrote:
I don't believe that you guys are completely correct.
IIRC, there was a non-SMC (Takumar) 70-200 F zoom,
q
Juan Buhler wrote:
I picked up my MX last night. I heven't used that camera in over a
year. The size of the viewfinder and its brightness, compared to the
istD, makes me want to cry.
I know the istD viewfinder is not too bad, by current standards. But
what would it take for a not full frame cam
The point is, the $650 cameras you mention do not have the same specs as
the $3300 FF one. The only 12MP APS-C camera I know actually costs
40-50% more than That 12MP FF, and over half of That Other 16MP FF [ ... ]
Disagree. Actually, dismissing sensor, 5D has WORSE parameters than 20D, th
On 2/10/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Greg Downing, was instrumental by providing really goos advice on
>how to shoot birds
Typo. You mean 'goose'.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 2/10/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Sensor Swabs and Eclipse Fluid
...and a full manicure ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 2/10/05, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I was walking home from work yesterday, on a beautiful
>autumn afternoon, and came upon this fella soaking up
>the last rays of the sun:
>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3773799
>
>Technical: Pentax Optio 33L, -1.7 stops exposure
>
I have a friend who asks:
>Would you by any chance know if Kodak lens cleaning solution is still
>available? Can't find it anywhere. Got some Hama cleaning fluid and tissues,
>they seem OK but...
In the UK, anyone have a pointer??
Thanks
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Pla
On 2/10/05, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:
>And I
>wouldn't be surprised if the norm becomes there is no norm,
Yeah, he's not been about for a while. Must be at a cell phone cover
conference in Brazil.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
