Bruce, just curious... I've never used Picture Window Pro or Phase One
Capture One. Does either one stand out as being significantly easier to use
or producing better results w/less effort than Photoshop? I have PS CS2 at
present.
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
FA* 250-600/f5.6 @ 600mm, 1/1250 @ f6.3, *ist-D at ISO 200, monopod
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:56:55PM -0700, Jim Apilado wrote:
Interesting shot of the Blue Angels cargo plane winging close to Alcatraz.
What lens was used to get the shot?
Jim A.
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 10/11/2005 9:59:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NOT FRANK and MAX's CAFE leapt out at me
had to see who taht good looking guy was - and I
see it is Juan :)
I'm too sleepy to do this . but certainly some
nice stuff there, girl
ann
I was
There's nothing wrong with cropping, per se - most of the shots
I've submitted to PUGs or PESOs have been cropped somewhat. But
this weekend part of the exercise was to try a little different
sort of thing ('street' photography, if you will), where there's
a little more emphasis on composing in
In a message dated 10/11/2005 10:17:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zion, not sure, not sure, Bryce, Bryce, not sure (although I've seen that
just don't remember where), Grand Canyon, Mesa Verde, the narrow gage
railroad
(forget what it runs between, but I know it goes
Gotcha... just yanking chains... :) I like the Fat Albert shot. My
favorite of the bunch.
Tom C.
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO: NorCal PDML Meet - five from me, too
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:56:17 -0400
On 11/10/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a nonsense children's game,
It's not nonesense to us children!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
fra: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TØ This reminds me: Jostein and other fellow Norwegians, how
TØ about making a Fiddly Bits PDML soon?
JØ I'm game. I remember Bergen in October/November, though... :-)
We don't have to meet in Bergen at this time of year.
I'm going to Oslo in first
On 12/10/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've just found time to clear off enough space from my hard drive
to be able to take a first look at my weekend images.
Here are five that caught my eye; (no cropping, just minor tweaks)
On 11/10/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any and all feedback merits a beer, my treat, at GFM
next year.
Er, read some books.
(1 beer)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 11/10/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any and all feedback merits a beer, my treat, at GFM
next year.
er, read some more books.
(2 beers, you getting the idea?)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 11/10/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any and all feedback merits a beer, my treat, at GFM
next year.
Read as many books as you can
(3 beers. I'll stop now if you just call it a couple of cases :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 11/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
This is a photo my wife, Annette, took while we were at the Austin City
Limits 2005 festival a few weeks ago. This was opening night, right
before Thievery Corporation went on stage. One of the hottest days of the
year and not a cloud in
On 11/10/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
My youngest offspring had a gig a couple of weeks ago. I'm not the least
proud of the photo, the light was beyond hope. But I am proud of my son; he
is the one with the silly glasses. He was performing at a rock event of four
local bands. His
On 11/10/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think he was quite careful in his phrasing...
Why don't you learn to spell.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
OK I have to get on to some other items I've left languishing of late so I
decided to try something different to show-case the trip. I've put together a
montage of some very hastily selected images, surprisingly it didn't take long
to do using some simple batch routines in PS. The individual
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This will broaden the product range
to offer consumers greater choice'.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 12/10/05, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This will broaden the product range
to offer consumers greater choice'.
Hi,
thanks to all who commented and/or took the quiz. Here are the right
answers:
2065 - Yosemite Valley from Olmsted Point, CA
2091 - Mono Lake, CA
2130 - A view from Angels Landing, Zion NP, UT
2216 - Dixie National Forest, UT
2235 - Bryce Canyon NP, UT
2295 - Angel's Window from Cape
Hi Cotty,
I think this is big news, or am I wrong? Samsung with Pentax would be a
big player, no?
sure, and IMHO it's a good news - Samsung is slowly replacing Sony as
the (technological) leader in consumer entertainment so the future
should be clear for Pentax from now on.
Bedo.
fra: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/10/05, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This will broaden the product range
to
Cotty wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
I think this is big news, or am I wrong? Samsung with Pentax would be a
big player, no?
Could be - or it could mean that Pentax are about to start rebadging
Samsung digicams instead of developing their own. I
Cotty wrote on 12.10.05 9:54:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This will broaden the product range
to offer consumers greater choice'.
Great news! Now
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 11, 2005, at 6:33 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 13 Jan 2004 at 6:58, Christian Skofteland wrote:
OK I performed some practical tests with various combinations of
lens TC and tubes. In all cases I used the full 57mm 3 tube set
with the lens
fra: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote on 12.10.05 9:54:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This will broaden the product range
to
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote on 12.10.05 9:54:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This
Well, I guess that answers the Sonyt Sensor question. Samsung of course
fabs it's own sensors.
-Adam
Cotty wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:58:47 +0200, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/10/05, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This
On 12/10/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Pentax trademark is worth a lot more than Samsung in this market so
my bet is that they keep using it both on the cameras and on the lenses.
The announcement reads like Pentax will be second fiddle.
What of a possibility that
From: Peter Lacus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/10/12 Wed AM 08:14:18 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO: Southwest Quiz
Hi,
thanks to all who commented and/or took the quiz. Here are the right
answers:
2065 - Yosemite Valley from Olmsted Point, CA
2091 - Mono
Hi,
2422 - Blue Mesa of Petrified Forest NP, AZ
2582 - Height Ashbury, San Francisco, CA
Haight?
yep, sorry for typo.
Bedo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12.10.05 11:41:
The Pentax trademark is worth a lot more than Samsung in this market so my bet
is that they keep using it both on the cameras and on the lenses.
Leica is bigger name in the world of photography too, but Matsushita has
been selling digicams produced in
Cotty wrote on 12.10.05 12:06:
What of a possibility that there will be some tandem products. I can see
a Samsung ZLR with a Pentax lens
Or even some Schneider-Kreuznach lenses with KAF mount 8-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Cotty wrote:
What of a possibility that there will be some tandem products. I can see
a Samsung ZLR with a Pentax lens
Possible, but not top priority. Samsung already uses Schneider lenses, which
are close to Zeiss reputation.
I can see a Pentax ZLR sooner.
Samsung image quality is not
Yep, the Fat Albert shot is a lot of fun. Looks like it's going to take
the masts off those ships.
Paul
On Oct 12, 2005, at 3:33 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 12/10/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've just found time to clear off enough space from my hard drive
to be able to take a
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Cotty wrote:
What of a possibility that there will be some tandem products. I can see
a Samsung ZLR with a Pentax lens
Great, but mostly irrelevant to me. It's SLRs that I do and K lenses
that I have plenty of.
However, I misread the announcement; it clearly says
Beautiful and fascinating. I spent way more time studying it than I
should have :-)), A lot of excellent photography packed into one image.
Paul
On Oct 12, 2005, at 3:45 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
OK I have to get on to some other items I've left languishing of late
so I
decided to try something
Dario Bonazza wrote on 12.10.05 12:48:
Balancing pros and cons, I think this is a good move for Pentax, especially
when considering that there's probably nothing better left (since Sony
already teamed with Minolta and Panasonic with Olympus). The alternative
(with a different vision) could
On 12/10/05, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pentax could be perceived more and more as a manufacturer of cheap products
only (Pentax=Samsung).
Interesting. I regard Samsung quite highly.
I use a Samsung PDA phone that was released in limited quantities back in
early 2004 that
On 12/10/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
it clearly says possesses a wide
range of interchangeable lenses.
Support for K mount. So Samsung might release K mount DSLRs? Or they will
just concentrate on the electronics side of things, with Pentax the only
logo on any
Really nice Rob. I can just Imagine how much detail is in the full
sized version.
Dave
On 10/11/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just generated a quick and dirty test pano from one of the 65 pano sequences
that I shot during my recent trip. I used thumb-nail files only so the image
fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote on 12.10.05 9:54:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Cotty wrote:
On 12/10/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
it clearly says possesses a wide
range of interchangeable lenses.
Support for K mount. So Samsung might release K mount DSLRs? Or they will
just concentrate on the electronics side of things,
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote on 12.10.05 12:48:
Balancing pros and cons, I think this is a good move for Pentax,
especially
when considering that there's probably nothing better left (since Sony
already teamed with Minolta and Panasonic with Olympus). The alternative
(with a
Cotty wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This will broaden the product range
to offer consumers greater choice'.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
On 12/10/05, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Google translation is pretty good.
http://tinyurl.com/a4oyn
mmmalcoholic beverages
LOL.
Pen thak su *ist D.
Tablecoth technology. Now *there's* a thought.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
That's a great concept. It draws you in and you keep looking at it
looking at it looking at it, each time discovering new scenes that
you miss on the first, second, third etc. viewing.
Dave
On 10/12/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK I have to get on to some other items I've left
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:58:01 +0200, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/10/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
it clearly says possesses a wide
range of interchangeable lenses.
Support for K mount. So Samsung might release K mount DSLRs? Or they will
just concentrate on
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote on 12.10.05 12:48:
Balancing pros and cons, I think this is a good move for Pentax,
especially
when considering that there's probably nothing better left (since Sony
already teamed with Minolta and Panasonic with Olympus).
Scott, the integrity of a workshop rides with the leader. Some leaders are good
photographers and lousy teachers. Before you sign up for a workshop, make sure
you know about the leader check with previous workshop attendees if possible.
Stay away from photo tours if your looking for actual
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0510/05101201samsung_pentaxdslrs.asp
'Samsung announces agreement with Pentax to co-operate and jointly
develop new digital camera products. This will broaden the product range
to offer consumers greater choice'.
Oh YEAH!
Pentax
I mean full bear shots are done all the time.
I've got alot of those this was one of the reasons I took this image.
As I've said in a previous post, once you gotten to the point where you can get
good stock type documentary shots of wildlife, you need to move on capture
the extraordinary
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, the PDML
doomsayer contingent is gonna be depressed about this...)
Oh wait... Nah, the doomsayers will relieve themselves (so to speak) by
predicting that the Samsung deal will ruin Pentax. They'll take over and
make nothing but low-end digicams, etc,
In the consumer electronics industry Samsung is a
brand I grew to respect a long time ago.
They have an uncanny habit of producing products
as good _or better_ than the competition at lower
prices.
This bodes well mixing them with a company renowned
for quality glass and small, reliable, feature
Cotty wrote:
Interesting. I regard Samsung quite highly.
I use a Samsung PDA phone that was released in limited quantities back in
early 2004 that incorporates a Palm OS driven camera, phone, MP3 player
(I was listening to music from an SD card in my phone last year), other
apps, and full sync
I think the Samsung-Pentax agreement to be good for Pentax. However, I'm
afraid that either Sony or Panasonic could have been providing them more
advanced technology. Unfortunately, they are already engaged.
Who knows? Maybe within two years from now Samsung sensor technology could
be ahead
Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand what you mean. However, when I think of Samsung I mostly think
about 99 microwave ovens, cheap fax machines, all-in-one scanners/printers,
and the like.
Because of my engineering background, when I think of Samsung I think of
semiconductor
Hi!
Great news! Now the future of DSLRs with K-mount is much brighter, althought
not every of these products would carry Pentax logo! Samsung is now powerful
company - both economic and marketing wise!
Indeed. Let's hope now that 645 D and *istD replacement will already
benefit from this
sure is different. Nicely executed.
Now tell us what you did on your vacation ;^)
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO Last pics from my trip for a bit
OK I have to get on to some other items I've left languishing of late so I
decided to
G'day All,
I was looking through my archives tonight came across this shot I
took some time ago:
http://tinyurl.com/8oq8s
I've come back to it a few times since I took it I'm a bit
undecided. There are elements about it I like but to me something just
seems a off, and I can't quite put my
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:56:15 +0200
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: HOT NEWS: Pentax +Samsund DSLRs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Dario Bonazza
When I was working in electronics field (for a company designing and
manufacturing numerical controls) Samsung chips (mostly memory chips) were
tolerated. Not banned like some ST and TI were, and not as regarded as NEC,
AMD, Fujitsu, Intel, and many more.
Dario
- Original Message -
Well, that didn't take long.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 10/12/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/10/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any and all feedback merits a beer, my treat, at GFM
next year.
Read as many books as you can
(3 beers. I'll stop now if you just call it a couple of cases :-)
I got a lotta books. I
- Original Message -
From: Colin J
Subject: BAD NEWS: Pentax +Samsung DSLRs
The reason Canon succeeds so strongly is that
Canon DSLRs use Canon-made sensors. All other
DSLR manufacturers have to buy in sensors from
sensor manufacturers. This has led to many
problems.
The
Colin,
When someone succeeds strongly there's ALWAYS more than just one reason.
Canon has done a lot of propers steps toward success, and very few mistakes.
Someone else has done the opposite. Your vision looks oversimplified to me,
as well as your conclusions.
Dario
This is BAD NEWS for
I think we should all slit our wrists. The sky is falling.
Paul
On Oct 12, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Well, that didn't take long.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: OT -- photographic education
This means something other than books. No beer for you.
If yer still talking about Bud Light, pour mine on his head.
William Robb
Thanks, Herb. This is really what I'm looking for. Trial and error,
reading, etc. are wonderful teachers, IMHO, but they're slow. It's
nice to have someone available who can lead me through. NYIP
certainly presents a pretty package, and their price tag is
reasonable. I've been cautious about
Here's a one question IQ Test to help you decide how you should spend
the rest of your day..
There is a mute who wants to buy a toothbrush. By imitating the action
of brushing one's teeth, he successfully expresses himself to the
shopkeeper and the purchase is done.
Now if there is a blind
Hi Colin,
This is BAD NEWS for Pentax.
The reason Canon succeeds so strongly is that
Canon DSLRs use Canon-made sensors. All other
DSLR manufacturers have to buy in sensors from
sensor manufacturers. This has led to many
problems.
snip contax
Kodak failed with the DCS 14n, Pro/n and
Hi!
But I'd be real curious if anyone likes the crops better. And which crop do
you like?
FIRST CROP:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/space1.htm
The forward arrows take you to the next crops.The back arrow on the first one
takes you to the original (however, the forward arrow on
Hi!
Here is one of my attempts at street work from the Norcal PDML outing
on Saturday. This man was singing the old 'Rice-a-Roni, the San
Franciso Treat' jingle from the commercials (for those of you who
might remember them). He was very entertaining and seemed to be
enjoying himself.
Pentax
Don Sanderson wrote:
In the consumer electronics industry Samsung is a
brand I grew to respect a long time ago.
They have an uncanny habit of producing products
as good _or better_ than the competition at lower
prices.
I used to agree with you, but my new Samsung LCD monitor has started
Mark Roberts wrote on 12.10.05 14:49:
Well, that didn't take long.
Mark, be my oracle please ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Wednesday, October 12, 2005, at 06:56 AM, Cotty wrote:
Pentax could be perceived more and more as a manufacturer of cheap
products
only (Pentax=Samsung).
Interesting. I regard Samsung quite highly.
I use a Samsung PDA phone that was released in limited quantities back
in
early 2004
Dave,
Not a crap photo at all. I think the change in the
texture of the water and the subject don't interact
well, though. What about cropping it about 1/3 of the
way up from the bottom and 1/3 in from the right?
Rick
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
I was looking
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Peter Lacus wrote:
sure, and IMHO it's a good news - Samsung is slowly replacing Sony as the
(technological) leader in consumer entertainment
Very interesting and encouraging. Any references?
Kostas
I shall do no such thing (as long as I have a few rolls of ektachrome in the
freezer).
Tom (Twice as Doomed) Reese
Paul (We're All Doomed) Stenquist wrote:
I think we should all slit our wrists. The sky is falling.
On Oct 12, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Well, that didn't take
We all know that marketing is where Pentax =really=
needs help (and has needed it for a lng time). So
we should rise to the occasion and figure out a name
for the offspring of the Pentax-Samsung marriage.
There are two obvious candidates. Pensung has no zip.
Samtax has a nice ring, but
Ah yes. The experts have spoken. Samsung is one of the best electronic
companies in the world. A second Sony. Pentax made a good deal. All the
experts can be wrong. Less than a decade ago. Silicon Graphics was
thinking of buying Apple at $22 US. SG put out a PR saying Apple wasn't
worth
Lucas wrote:
I think there are
several other reasons that Canon is succesfull. Hint: they already were
before the advent of DSLR's...
True. The pros started buying Canon instead of Nikon as the EOS 1v (film)
was introduced in 2000 - mainly because it offered higher speed (expecially
AF-speed and
I like the guy in the background plugging his ears.
That's what I would have been doing (in the unlikely
event I would have gone to such a thing at all).
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a photo my wife, Annette, took while we were
at the Austin City Limits 2005 festival a few weeks
Hi, David,
I didn't attach it here, but I down loaded the image and severely
cropped both right and bottom. Also, took a little off the top.
Attractive angle and wing position. Wind disturbed water surface
muddles a reflection that, if placid, would have added somewhat to
it.
I think it's a
Hey, MacBurt, stop bringing common sense into this!
John
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:11:01 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah yes. The experts have spoken. Samsung is one of the best electronic
companies in the world. A second Sony. Pentax made a good deal. All the
experts can be wrong. Less
It's probably not ... read subsequent messages
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
There is one more distracting element - the *open* book on the
foreground. I realize it might have been impossible to get rid of it,
but it does distract, because open book always means a
I agree with Rick; the bird is a bit lost with all that water, and
cropping the pic brings out the shadow.
Nice texture and exposure though.
John
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:01:19 +0100, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave,
Not a crap photo at all. I think the change in the
texture
The most stupid thing you do is to change your trademark when you are going
through changes and need the customers loyalty. Pentax should remain Pentax in
all the markets where they are well known, while Samsung can be Samsung in
other places.
DagT
fra: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dato:
I've owned (film systems) Minolta, Nikon, Canon etc. There is one rule:
As soon as I sell a system it releases the best body aroud.
ironic font
I don't have the funds to do it, but some who has funds, should volunteer to
give you a state of the art Canon system (or whatever your heart desires).
In a message dated 10/12/2005 5:58:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that the first crop is the best of the three. The second one is
too tight and the third one seems to be simply a fragment really. Also
the third one seems to be too small a crop so that the limits
On Oct 12, 2005, at 2:35 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
My quick test with the 50mm seems to indicate the same thing.
Camera-tubes-converter-lens
nets greater magnification than
camera-converter-tubes-lens.
Would reversing the lens make any diffrence?
It might, but likely not. I'm using
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
Samsung is well regarded in many parts of the world, and, if memory serves
me, they are the biggest, or at least one of the two/three largest,
manufacturers of consumer electronics and goods in the world. They make a
lot of cards, chips, and boards that are used by other companies in their
LOL I was wondering when someone would catch that. Give that gal a
Kewpie doll!
Shel
Dario said:
That makes a lot of sense. I've always asked myself why they didn't do
that years ago.
ERN countered:
instead of just having Fuji put Super CCDs in Nikon cameras and label
them Fuji,
I've owned (film systems) Minolta, Nikon, Canon etc. There is one rule:
As soon as I sell a system it releases the best body aroud.
ironic font I don't have the funds to do it, but some who has funds,
should volunteer to give you a state of the art Canon system (or whatever
your heart
When I think of Samsung I think of cheap and not very reliable products.
But when I bought the TV before last I got a Samsung. The guy at the TV store
said they have improved over the last five years or so and are becoming quite
respected.
Then my Samsung went belly up after three months. So I
That was then, Dario - Samsung is well regarded when it comes to
electronics. Much of their renown is behind the scenes though, tucked
quietly inside hundreds, if not thousands, of highly regarded name brand
items. It's time to adjust your thinking. This is a company with cash and
ideas. They
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what isn't?
keith
Hi Rob
would you tell me how you did merge the squares in Photoshop automatically?
Or even better share the actions :-)
There is **a lot** to watch and like here...
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO Last pics from my trip for a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think of Samsung I think of cheap and not very reliable products.
But when I bought the TV before last I got a Samsung. The guy at the TV store
said they have improved over the last five years or so and are becoming quite
respected.
Then my Samsung went
1 - 100 of 444 matches
Mail list logo
