Oh yeah, that's mighty fine news. Thanks Mark.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 4:37 PM
Subject: Best Christmas present ever!
I just got a phone call from Bill Owens!
But here's the best part:
I'm just going to send my M50 to you... let me know when you're done
cleaning out the fungus
CW
;)
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 5:52 PM
Subject: What I did on my Christmas vacation...
The M50 1.4 I got last weekend defiantly has fungus.
Way I see it, I have four options, most with associated questions :
Leave it.
It'll get worse, right? can it really spread to other lenses?
Pitch it. It's a well built - (fast!) lens in otherwise great condition so
this option isn't likely
OK, please allow me to better explain my view. Please, try to get the point
and don't stick to possible unproper words, due to my different mother
tongue and my poor expression capabilities.
I wrote:
First, I agree that blown highlights can just be another way to show the
right part of the
Hi all,
Does anyone know the exact distance
between the front surface of the *ist D
mount and the sensor?
Note for Cotty: Its warming up here --
only -12C. I read (on the BBC ticker)
this morning that it's very cold in the
UK a dreadful Siberian -2C! And they
expect *6 inches* of snow!
On 28 Dec 2005 at 12:11, Don Williams wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know the exact distance
between the front surface of the *ist D
mount and the sensor?
The K-mount flange to film plane distance I believe is 45.46mm and according to
the mechanical diagram in the spec sheet for the sensor
That's really neat. Where is it?
Bob
On Dec 27, 2005, at 9:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Usually when you think of a Flatiron building you think of a
skyscraper, (more than 4 stories at least), but not in this case...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_flatiron.html
Tech info:
Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know the exact distance
between the front surface of the *ist D
mount and the sensor?
45.5mm
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Nice one :-)
I would suggest croppin 4-5 cm from the bottom...
Michael
On 12/28/05, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's really neat. Where is it?
Bob
On Dec 27, 2005, at 9:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Usually when you think of a Flatiron building you think of a
skyscraper, (more
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: Re: PESO Shit happens...
That's how destiny treats Nikon users, I suppose...:-)
Bad Karma.
Switch from Pentax to Nikon and see what happens?
I switched from Nikon to Pentax and all of a sudden pretty girls started
hanging around me,
Hahahaha!!! Rock'n'roll! Thanks for the data. Now I'm
free fallin' ;-)
Albano
--- cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lots of great ones have hit the wall, as it
were...
Tom Petty did it...nearly lost his job too...
From Wikipedia:
On their come-back album Southern Accents (1985) Tom
Petty
Thanks for your wishes. In fact it's almost the first
time I punch anything. was talking in terapy
about discharging my anger, I use to get everthing
inside (but obviously not in this way).
I got some very hard days lately, and when the sign
hitted my head hardly (I'm 1,95m tall) I blinded
On Dec 28, 2005, at 1:51 AM, Gary Sibio wrote:
Snakes don't see more than a few feet in front of them anyway. (The
Spitting Cobra may be an exception to this.)
Oy, and how would you know how far a snake can see?
Bob
Hey, my heart is still with Pentax too. It just was
impossible to justify the buying against the
advantages of the Nikon.
Regards
Albano
--- Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's how destiny treats Nikon users, I
suppose...:-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
LOL!
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: Re: PESO Shit happens...
That's how destiny treats Nikon users, I
suppose...:-)
Bad Karma.
Switch from Pentax to Nikon and see what happens?
I switched from Nikon to Pentax and
On 12/28/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 Dec 2005 at 12:11, Don Williams wrote:
Note for Cotty: Its warming up here --
only -12C.
We endured a sultry day of 33 deg C with RH heading into the high 80s,
lovely, not, the forecast predicts temps in excess of 40 dec C in the
-9°C here.
Had a light sprinkle of snow this morning. Huge, beautiful crystals.
Will get back to that in a later post. Have some raw file conversion
to do first...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday,
Nice picture. The out of focus parts of the snake emphasize just how
close you were to the critter!
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/27/05, Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(A different kind of coils than in the book)
To get this shot I used a technique that I read about in one of Tim
Fitzharris's
P. J. Alling wrote:
Usually when you think of a Flatiron building you think of a
skyscraper, (more than 4 stories at least), but not in this case...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_flatiron.html
Tech info:
Pentax *ist-Ds iso 200 @ 20s
smc Pentax 17mm fisheye f4.0 @ f5.6
What a
Thanks very much. The in-focus field
diameter projected by the transfer lens
is exactly 50mm which is what it ought
to be. The flat (corrected) part of the
image is about 38 mm across. The smaller
sensor of the *ist D has certain
advantages here; the field is flat to
less than 0.5 mu all
Don Williams wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know the exact distance between the front surface of the
*ist D mount and the sensor?
Note for Cotty: Its warming up here -- only -12C. I read (on the BBC
ticker) this morning that it's very cold in the UK a dreadful Siberian
-2C! And they expect *6
P. J. Alling wrote:
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_flatiron.html
Wow... I don't usually go for building pictures, but... Wow. The sky
color is fantastic and the building is perfectly exposed. Great use of
a fisheye in architectural photography when it is supposed to be a
Is this a Rattlesnake..or something equally deadly?
I'd shoot this thing...with nothing less than a 300mm.
Looks to be rather low light, but focus was spot on even though DOF was
likely not a choice.
Nice shot..(shudder).
Jack
--- Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice job, Francis. I
On Dec 28, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Is this a Rattlesnake..or something equally deadly?
Not a rattlesnake or any other pit viper. Since I don't know what
country Francis shot this in, I'm not sure just what sort of a snake
it is.
Bob
In a message dated 12/27/2005 4:20:17 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks, I think it will be fine. I was VERY concerned
at the beginning, since it's the camera holding hand,
so I was a bit affraid, but it's the 5º bone the
broken, the least important in hand operation.
In a message dated 12/27/2005 6:24:49 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Usually when you think of a Flatiron building you think of a skyscraper,
(more than 4 stories at least), but not in this case...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_flatiron.html
Tech info:
In a message dated 12/27/2005 8:26:42 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/snake.html
That was on Fuji 100 print film (while I was waiting for them slow pokes
to send my next case of slide) in my P3n (sitting on my bean bag) with
my late 2x
On 28/12/05, Don Williams, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anyone know the exact distance
between the front surface of the *ist D
mount and the sensor?
African or European ? ;-)
Note for Cotty: Its warming up here --
only -12C. I read (on the BBC ticker)
this morning that it's very cold
In a message dated 12/28/2005 6:48:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After about two hours of this I had to go out. In direct contrast, the
heavily salted main roads are littered with vehicles doing about 15mph
wherever there is the thinnest layer of slush.
Roll on global
On 28/12/05, Don Williams, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anyone know the exact distance
between the front surface of the *ist D
mount and the sensor?
Oh yeah. 45.46mm
Source:
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mounts.htm
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On 28/12/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
At the moment, Scotland is cut off
LOL
Love the English thinking there Mike.
Reminds me of the wartime headline after communications cables were
severed during WWII:
'Continent cut off' :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Albano Garcia wrote:
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/2005/12/27/operado/
I'll be out of business for about 3 to 4 weeks. I got
a simple surgery on my hand due to a
stupid-moment-punch I gave to a street signal.
Regards
Albano
OUCH! -
hope it isn't the hand you write with -
I
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_flatiron.html
Very nice Pete.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 28/12/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I switched from Nikon to Pentax and all of a sudden pretty girls started
hanging around me,
.with tattoos.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Sounds like you may have missed your calling. You should be a weather man.
Dave :-)
On 12/29/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is, we don;t have a climate in the UK, just weather. As a
depression or anti-cyclone passes through, it either pulls in cold
northerlies, icy easterlies,
As read all these war stories, I've come to realise that there are a
lot of angry frustrated people here.
Dave g
On 12/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/27/2005 4:20:17 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks, I think it will be fine.
Cotty wrote:
On 28/12/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
At the moment, Scotland is cut off
LOL
Love the English thinking there Mike.
Reminds me of the wartime headline after communications cables were
severed during WWII:
'Continent cut off' :-)
I thought that was Fog in
Cool idea!
If we can keep forwarding costs reasonable - I'm in!
BR, Margus
Tallinn, Estonia
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
Cool,
please contact me off list!
Oh, and merry Christmas!
Pancho
Scott Loveless schrieb:
On 12/24/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You want anyone from
At 06:51 AM 12/28/2005, you wrote:
On Dec 28, 2005, at 1:51 AM, Gary Sibio wrote:
Snakes don't see more than a few feet in front of them anyway. (The
Spitting Cobra may be an exception to this.)
Oy, and how would you know how far a snake can see?
A penchant for reading and a 45 year
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:45:39 -0800
Eactivist wrote:
..
California finally hit rainy season two weeks ago, mid Dec, after a very dry
year. Mentioned this yesterday and that we need rain. And today we are having
a BIG storm.
I guess that means be careful what you wish for.
Marnie aka Doe
I knew you would post this again, so I decided to wait until you did before
I recommended to everybody one of the books I have been reading while away.
It is a very interesting book edited by Paul Auster, called True Tales of
American Life a collection of stories by ordinary people who took part
On 29/12/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sounds like you may have missed your calling. You should be a weather man.
I am!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 28/12/05, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
It is still not enough for good skiing, especially here, in
Southern California.
I suggest that England should export their snow here.
Hang on mate, we're trying to give it to the Welsh.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
If anyone has not seen this exhibit, then if there is any way you can do
it, by all means do so, its absolutely stunning. Its in Forth Worth TX,
at the Amon Carter Museum through Jan 8th. The images are not only
amazing visually, but technically they are jaw dropping. They were made
with an
A list member recently contacted me off-list asking whether it was
possible to use a certain Pentax DA lens on Canon cameras. I don't want
to reveal the list member, but I'm sure they won't mind me posting my
answer as a general piece of info, I thought it might be of interest,
and perhaps
On Dec 28, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Gary Sibio wrote:
On Dec 28, 2005, at 1:51 AM, Gary Sibio wrote:
Snakes don't see more than a few feet in front of them anyway. (The
Spitting Cobra may be an exception to this.)
Oy, and how would you know how far a snake can see?
A penchant for reading and
Do i owe you $15.00 or are you arguing in your spare time.
LOL
Dave(sorry, just had to)Brooks
A list member recently contacted me off-list
asking whether it was
possible to use a certain Pentax DA lens on Canon cameras. I don't want
to reveal the list
On the same subject,
Anyone want to buy one of Mr Rolfo's PK-EOS adapters off me?
I bought one, intending to try and use my limited lenses on the 1Dmk2
but I chickened out. I just couldn't bring myself to do it.
Went for the more expensive solution
Bought a DS instead
--
Wendy Beard
Ottawa
I am enjoying (learning) what can be done with my Ds. But even though I
own the FA20-35, I find myself missing something. My next lens up is
the FA28-90, although I have taken some nice pictures with my screw
mount 85 f/1.9 as well. I am looking both for a Wide angle as well as
Longer lens
The 16-45 is an excellent lens, and a staple of my bag. Wide open its
fantastic.
John Graves wrote:
I am enjoying (learning) what can be done with my Ds. But even though I
own the FA20-35, I find myself missing something. My next lens up is
the FA28-90, although I have taken some nice
Kenneth Waller wrote:
I wish that the histogram was like the one in CS - Raw, i.e. broken
out into RGB
Why? What possible adjustment can you do in the camera that affects the
RGB curves?
I want to know if its a full blown clip, i.e. white, or just one of R G
or B.
Kenneth Waller
The 16-45 is a very nice lens. I use it a lot. It's not my favorite as
a portrait lens (although I have shot portraits with it) because it's
not very fast at f4. I generally like to shoot people at f2 or so. A
50/1.4 is a better and even more affordable choice for portraits. I
also use the K
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 27, 2005, at 4:46 PM, Steve Jolly wrote:
I don't know about in-camera adjustments, but I'd definitely like to
know when which of the channels has clipped, and by how much.
Which channel clips is determined by the RAW conversion to RGB channel
data, which
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to play with real snow in front of my macro
setup.
After sifting through the results, this is what's left:
http://www.oksne.net/foto/html/images/snow/images.asp
I've tried two optical combinations today. The M-28/2.8 reversed on
bellows is quite nice, but
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:45:39 -0800
Eactivist wrote:
..
California finally hit rainy season two weeks ago, mid Dec, after a very dry
year. Mentioned this yesterday and that we need rain. And today we are having
a BIG storm.
I guess that means be careful what you wish for.
I feel like an 18 year old again.
Must go find one soon.
They're not all they're cracked up to be...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jens Bladt
Subject: Re: PESO Shit happens...
That's how destiny treats Nikon users, I suppose...:-)
Bad Karma.
Switch from
Well done!
Move over Mark C.!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Snow crystals
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to play with real snow in front of my macro
setup.
After sifting through the results, this is what's left:
The 12-24 (18-36 equivalent) is probably a better supplement to the
20-35 than the 16-45 (24-70 equivalent)
-adam
John Graves wrote:
I am enjoying (learning) what can be done with my Ds. But even though I
own the FA20-35, I find myself missing something. My next lens up is
the FA28-90,
Igor Roshchin wrote:
It is still not enough for good skiing, especially here, in
Southern California. I suggest that England should export their
snow here.
Mike Wilson replied:
We would love to but it is the wrong sort (TM British Rail)
Scientifically speaking, that's darn close to
I have both the FA20-35 and the DA16-45. The FA20-35 is small, light and
the onboard flash can be used with it. I consider it a very nice wide normal
to normal lens.
The 16-45 is longer and wider but bigger and heavier. At 28mm or so the
DA16-45 begins to cast a shadow with the onboard flash
Nice. Snowflakes are quite amazing, but what's even more amazing is
that more than one list member is willing to devote the time and work
it requires to accomplish this type of photography. Well done.
Paul
On Dec 28, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Jostein wrote:
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to
On 27 Dec 2005 at 8:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's not still under warranty.
Maybe you could secure the services of a kind lister who has the same kit to
check it out for you, at least then you could sell it on with confidence.
Temperature, user selected. But it works out to 6500 or
On 28 Dec 2005 at 14:56, Gonz wrote:
Isnt RAW supposed to contain raw RGB data? If any of the individual
pixel sites, R G or B maxes out, it would be useful data. Maybe I dont
care about blowing certain channels (pre-bayer). I know that final RGB
data is a Bayer combination of the RAW
Absolutely stunning Jostein! Very very nice!
Tom C.
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Snow crystals
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:00:12 +0100
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to play with real snow in front of my
In a message dated 12/28/2005 1:38:12 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe you could secure the services of a kind lister who has the same kit to
check it out for you, at least then you could sell it on with confidence.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
==
I am perfectly willing
The 16-45 is a very good lens, but I prefer the 20-35... I sold my 16-45. When
I really want wider, I use the DA14.
G
In a message dated 12/28/2005 1:43:01 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately the in camera histogram of a RAW file is derived from the jpeg
file embedded in it which is in turn affected by both the in camera colour
balance and the contrast settings. So the histograms
On 28/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Do i owe you $15.00 or are you arguing in your spare time.
20 bucks with a tip :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 28/12/05, wendy beard, discombobulated, unleashed:
On the same subject,
Anyone want to buy one of Mr Rolfo's PK-EOS adapters off me?
How much would you like for it Wend?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 28/12/05, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to play with real snow in front of my macro
setup.
After sifting through the results, this is what's left:
http://www.oksne.net/foto/html/images/snow/images.asp
WOW !
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
On 28 Dec 2005 at 16:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me understand this. The histogram is based on the JPEG. So when I shoot
RAW its histogram may not match the histogram I saw on the camera?
Yep.
The
histogram has less relevance when shooting RAW? Won't it still show if there
is some
What you describe is pretty much exactly like mounting
screw mount lenses on the ist-D with a K/M42 adapter.
A bit more work, but not only possible, but fun.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:47 PM
To: pentax list
Stuck enroute with my Treo ... Email consumes time... :-)
correction: the DA lens would be stuck at *minimum* aperture, f/22, not wide
open. Same as when I use them on an MX.
G
This one time, at band camp, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the same subject,
Anyone want to buy one of Mr Rolfo's PK-EOS adapters off me?
Im interested
How much?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 28 Dec 2005 at 14:56, Gonz wrote:
Isnt RAW supposed to contain raw RGB data? If any of the individual
pixel sites, R G or B maxes out, it would be useful data. Maybe I dont
care about blowing certain channels (pre-bayer). I know that final RGB
data is a Bayer
On 29/12/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
On the same subject,
Anyone want to buy one of Mr Rolfo's PK-EOS adapters off me?
Im interested
How much?
Go for it Kevin, I have them coming out of my ears ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 28/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
correction: the DA lens would be stuck at *minimum* aperture, f/22, not
wide open. Same as when I use them on an MX.
thinks about it
So the lens has a default setting of closed up, and only opens when
introduced to the body, literally
I keep looking for the A 85 f1.9 but I think it is the Pentax
equivalent to the Holy Grail.
[Well, it's probably only a typo, John, but] You'll probably stumble onto
the Holy Grail before you stumble onto any A 85/1.9 - g. For K-mount 85's
there are only the K 85/1.8, the M 85/2, the A*
On 28 Dec 2005 at 16:23, Gonz wrote:
Correct, thats the way its done (histogram from jpg). You would have to
have the white balance setting close to actual. But there's no reason
why they cant take an RBG histogram direct from the raw data. A simple
non-bayer filter-like transformation
Cotty wrote:
On 28/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
correction: the DA lens would be stuck at *minimum* aperture, f/22, not
wide open. Same as when I use them on an MX.
thinks about it
So the lens has a default setting of closed up, and only opens when
introduced to
John,
You may want to consider looking at the 77/1.8 Limited - a great lens
for the DS. It is not quite as long as 85mm but it is readily
available new and a few hundred dollars cheaper than a used A* 85/1.4
($1200 range on ebay).
On 12/28/05, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I keep looking for
On Dec 28, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nice. Snowflakes are quite amazing, but what's even more amazing
is that more than one list member is willing to devote the time and
work it requires to accomplish this type of photography. Well done.
Paul
Check out:
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out:
http://www.snowflakebentley.com/
I know that site. The old man must have been mad as a hatter to do
that with a large format camera...
Also take a look at:
www.snowcrystals.com
Jostein
On Dec 28, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
It's a guide for RAW users, it's only accurate if shooting finished
files in
camera. We are talking about the Pentax DSLRs of course, I have no
idea how the
histogram is derived in other brands of cameras.
So far as I know they all use
Wow, very nice. Most of my experiements with high magnification are
small shells in the comfort of my home.
On 12/28/05, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to play with real snow in front of my macro
setup.
After sifting through the results, this is what's
It's the Town Office building of Deep River Connecticut.
Bob Shell wrote:
That's really neat. Where is it?
Bob
On Dec 27, 2005, at 9:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Usually when you think of a Flatiron building you think of a
skyscraper, (more than 4 stories at least), but not in this case...
Deep River Connecticut's Town Offices.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/27/2005 6:24:49 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Usually when you think of a Flatiron building you think of a skyscraper,
(more than 4 stories at least), but not in this case...
Pretty cool shot. Focus is spot on! The DOF is too shallow, but
doesn't ruin the pic. Nice goin!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, December 27, 2005, 8:28:16 PM, you wrote:
F (A different kind of coils than in the book)
F To get this shot I used a technique that I read about in one of Tim
F
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:13:39 -0800
Eactivist wrote:
Maybe someone has posted this before, but never noticed it. Windows only, PEF
supported. Free for home users.
http://www.faststone.org/
Marnie aka Doe
I did not know that one. Thank you!
I like it, and indeed, it's faster for
The short answer referring to the 16-45 is yes.
There is no A 85 f1.9. There is however an A85 f1.4. It's huge man,
especially on a *ist-D/Ds body. I use the M85 f2. It's got pretty much
the same limitations that Cotty has using his Pentax A85 f1.4 on a Canon
body, which is annoying since
Just delurking to sign off for a couple of weeks while I vacation in
Tasmania.
I wish a very Happy New Year to the PDML. See you all in 2006.
regards,
Anthony Farr
Thanks Ann.
I write with the left, but I use the computer's mouse
and grab the camera wth the right one, so I'm really
frustrated. I have to work on my temper for sure.
Regards
Albano
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albano Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 08:24:12PM -0500, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:13:39 -0800
Eactivist wrote:
Maybe someone has posted this before, but never noticed it. Windows only,
PEF
supported. Free for home users.
http://www.faststone.org/
Marnie aka Doe
I did
Thanks Cotty, I wasn't sure you were still speaking to me.
Cotty wrote:
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_flatiron.html
Very nice Pete.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I think he's got it.
Cotty wrote:
On 28/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
correction: the DA lens would be stuck at *minimum* aperture, f/22, not
wide open. Same as when I use them on an MX.
thinks about it
So the lens has a default setting of closed up, and
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:01:12 -0800
Jostein wrote:
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to play with real snow in front of my macro setup.
After sifting through the results, this is what's left:
http://www.oksne.net/foto/html/images/snow/images.asp
WOWnderful!
Igor
(long tale of woe follows)
My wife, Marianne, and I love to head to the shore any chance we get
to beach comb.
We live about two hours from Charleston, SC and the beach we go to
often is Folly
Beach. Since we spend all our time looking for shells I rarely bring a camera
because my hands are
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:32:38 -0800
John Francis wrote:
I'd bet that DNG readers will be around much longer than anything
that understands .xmp sidecar files, not to mention .PEF
.PEF files are read by quite a few different programs that don't
understand DNG. In my opinion, DNG has not become
After about a year my NiHM AA's are beginning to show their age. I got
only about 100 shots out of each of the two sets after the last charge.
Will doing an almost full discharge help at all. I don't think it will,
but I was wondering if anyone had tried doing that with any success?
--
My MAHA MH-C204F has a conditioning option. It does a nice job of
perking the batteries up. I do not think it give as-new performance
but will bring the NiMH's capacity back up.
Perry.
On 12/28/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After about a year my NiHM AA's are beginning to show
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
