On 23/4/06, Colin J, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Forgive me if this has been mentioned here before,
You are forgiven
> but I noticed
>that Stephen Gandy's Cameraquest web site is offering a Pentax K
>(lens) to Canon EF (body) adapter at $175. For further
>information follow this link ...
>
>ht
For the hell of it I decided to see just how many pixels were recovered
on each side. I noticed,
some time back, that they didn't seem to be the same on each side of the
frame. So I counted the
number of lines recovered all round.
Left 20, Right 14, Top 12, Bottom 5
For some reason the Pentax
Hi Godfrey
Photo.net accepts only SFW JPG from Photoshop and not safe as
greetings
Markus
>
>>
>>Why use Save for Web?
>>
>>Godfrey
>>
The legendary Steve Gibson has an interesting story of his own
experiences.
http://www.grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
He has some security tools on his site too.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/23/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html
>
> I've been using this fr
> Sunday, April 23, 2006, 12:40:48 AM, you wrote:
>
> SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/trees_in_fog.html
>
> >>From an old negative ...
>
>
> SB> Shel
Reminds me of one of my favourite Sutcliffe works.
Click on top picture.
http://www.sutcliffe-gallery.co.uk/cgi-bin/sutcliffe.pl?TASK
João Moreira wrote:
I have made some researches and, after I saw Dario's
homepage, I became a little concerned on the sharpness
of the *ist D. Is it really unsharp?
If you shoot JPEG, there something left to be desired, as in-camera JPEG
conversion is good, but not the best around (Canon, Nik
For my needs (I have a DS) the additional cost of the D wasn't worth it.
The DS/DS2 has a number of features that even some D users would like, and
the D has some features some DS/DS2/DL users might like. I sometimes
wonder how many of the D owners would have purchased a DS had it been
available
Got my *istDL before Christmas and have so far done nearly all my
shooting with the lens that came with the camera: a Sigma 28-125.
I've been using that lens because (a) it is autofocus and I have
trouble focussing, (b) it has a nice range of focal lengths, and
(c) it's fairly light.
In the last
For my taste and kind of shooting, the difference worth considering is (in
no special order):
D pluses:
1 - two-wheel interface for aperture/shutter speed setting
2 - Direct selection (switch) for AF-S/AF-C
D minuses:
1 - Histogram+bright portion warning unavailable
2 - Awkward selection of WB,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I love how photography has become a numbers crunching exercise for some
people. Pick up the camera, focus, press the shutter, and see what
happens, see what you get.
Perhaps an advantage of digital photography is that it can satisfy both
kinds of people. :-)
S
On 4/24/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love how photography has become a numbers crunching exercise for some
> people. Pick up the camera, focus, press the shutter, and see what
> happens, see what you get.
>
> Shel
>
As opposed to developing optimal exposure techniques, develo
Just found this on the web, had a hearty laugh, and thought I'd share it
with you:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1394199
Have a nice day.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries -
>
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/24 Mon AM 08:15:48 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: *ist D
>
> For my needs (I have a DS) the additional cost of the D wasn't worth it.
> The DS/DS2 has a number of features that even some D users would like, and
> t
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Two from this afternoon in Birmingham, Michigan. I couldn't decide
between these, so I posted them both.
Smoke Break:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367972
This guy's going to be there all day long!
Spare drink and spare cigar by his side, prepared to hang
David Savage wrote:
BTW, I have no idea what Gonz is on about either :-)
Approximately, he's saying that if you deliberately underexpose, you
lose shadow detail. This shouldn't really come as a surprise...
S
Gautam Sarup wrote:
The legendary Steve Gibson has an interesting story of his own
experiences.
Legendary he may be , but it's worth pointing out that there are many
other internet security experts out there with a very low opinion of him.
http://grcsucks.com/
S
Sup,
What is the largest quality print size for 6.1Mpix *istDL images. I'd
ordered A4 (200x300mm) photo prints with outstanding detail and
sharpness (specially chosen image with lot of detail on it
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060414172055 ) but I wonder if A3
(suggested in my *istDL manu
Seems only the digests are getting through to me again.
Sigh.
Received an email from Mr. Logo, and the lettering is to small to read when
stiched.
He sent me a revised, were in the camera body, lens and mountain outline are
there and a big PENTAX DISCUSS MAILING LIST is on the outside. Looks
On 4/24/06, Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sup,
No thanks I've already eaten.
> What is the largest quality print size for 6.1Mpix *istDL images. I'd
> ordered A4 (200x300mm) photo prints with outstanding detail and
> sharpness (specially chosen image with lot of detail on it
> http://roman.b
Hi!
Roman a écrit :
Sup,
What is the largest quality print size for 6.1Mpix *istDL images. I'd
ordered A4 (200x300mm) photo prints with outstanding detail and
sharpness (specially chosen image with lot of detail on it
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060414172055 ) but I wonder if A3
(sugge
Roman wrote:
Sup,
What is the largest quality print size for 6.1Mpix *istDL images. I'd
ordered A4 (200x300mm) photo prints with outstanding detail and
sharpness (specially chosen image with lot of detail on it
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060414172055 ) but I wonder if A3
(suggested in
Dave Brooks wrote:
>Seems only the digests are getting through to me again.
>Sigh.
>
>Received an email from Mr. Logo, and the lettering is to small to read when
>stiched.
>He sent me a revised, were in the camera body, lens and mountain outline are
>there and a big PENTAX DISCUSS MAILING LI
If we change the name of the thing is it different?
Does the light hitting the sensor make the difference, or the number set
on the ISO dial? AFAIK the only difference between a high ISO and a low
ISO on a digital camera is where on the curve --and maybe the contrast
settings applied-- the fin
On Apr 24, 2006, at 6:01 AM, David Savage wrote:
As opposed to developing optimal exposure techniques, developer ratio,
chemical temperature, development time & amount of agition for film?
There has always been a measure of calculation required in photography.
And there have always been thos
On Apr 24, 2006, at 8:36 AM, Roman wrote:
What is the largest quality print size for 6.1Mpix *istDL images. I'd
ordered A4 (200x300mm) photo prints with outstanding detail and
sharpness (specially chosen image with lot of detail on it
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060414172055 ) but I wond
I make 12 x 18 prints on Super B (13 x 19) paper from *ist D images, which are
the same resolution as your DL images. They are very nice. I've shown and sold
them in galleries. In my portfolios they're virtually indistinguishable from
prints that were made from scanned 6x7 images, which are show
-- Original message --
From: "Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Thank you.
> 2000x3000 pixels on a A4 paper is approx 250 dpi, which is fairly good.
> On a A3 paper, it would be approx. 160 dpi...
Interpolate Patrice, interpolate. I convert my RAW
>Today, a friend pointed out to me that Leica (my Rottie) is tied for 6th top
>obedience dog with the Rottweiler Club of Canada.
>Cool, Huh?
>William Robb
Whos is first, that dog "Film is dead", or "Point'N Shoot"
vbg
Congrats BTW
Dave
David J Brooks
Equine, Pets, Bands, Rural Landscape
Kieth, which is "better"?
Jack
--- Keith McGuinness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got my *istDL before Christmas and have so far done nearly all my
> shooting with the lens that came with the camera: a Sigma 28-125.
> I've been using that lens because (a) it is autofocus and I have
> trouble focu
I'm not usually one for shooting pictures of flowers. Seems it's all
been done and usually much better than I can.
But... for some reason I really like the light on this one, so I'll
grit my teeth, share this with the group, and wait for the onslaught
of criticism. :-)
http://charles.r
Nice, moody shot. I have an urge to nudge the frame
down and to the left a bit, though--was there
something distracting there?
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am feeling uninspired in naming this.
>
> I am back for a while (see the I'm back thread I
> will write later).
>
> I was in Mon
Same here.
G
On Apr 24, 2006, at 6:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I make 12 x 18 prints on Super B (13 x 19) paper from *ist D
images, which are the same resolution as your DL images. They are
very nice. I've shown and sold them in galleries. In my portfolios
they're virtually indistingu
And so that makes it sensible ... or not ... ?
I never post to photo.net. I post in the photo.net forums and put
links to my photos, hosted on my websites. I find their posting and
display setup needlessly complex and clumsy to use.
Godfrey
On Apr 24, 2006, at 12:45 AM, Markus Maurer wrote
Hi Mike,
IIRC, there's no difference in the bodies of the DS/DS2 and the DL/DL2, so
my comments should be valid (as far as opinions go) for the S and the L
series. I'm open for corrections, of course, since there's no L here with
which to make a direct comparison.
It's been a while since I he
This seems appropriate for today.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index7/06_04_HeartIR/08.htm
D
*
*
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
-- Original message --
From: "Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thank you.
2000x3000 pixels on a A4 paper is approx 250 dpi, which is fairly good.
On a A3 paper, it would be approx. 160 dpi...
Interpolate
Yep ... that's in part what I was trying to do. Set something of a period
feel to the photo.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: mike wilson
> http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/trees_in_fog.html
> Reminds me of one of my favourite Sutcliffe works.
>
> Click on top picture.
>
>
http://www.su
Nice one Derby.
Is this the monument with a statue of the fallen soldier being carried
on a shield?
Tomorrow I'm going to the local march with camera in tow.
Dave S
On 4/24/06, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems appropriate for today.
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/ind
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You've lost me completely. I don't understand the "math of photography."
Just snap the shutter and see what comes out. Push a few buttons in
Photoshop, or adjust the light in the darkroom. If it works one way or not
another, then the answer is clear.
Well, as long
This reminded me -- I did 24x36s of landscapes and interiors for a guy who was
using the 55mm 3.5 (don't know which one, but it used to belong to PDMLer Bill
O'Neill) and they were quite nice. Not a bad lens by any means.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECT
We saw a ship in the distance heading for the ship channel. We raced
over the bridge to get to the observation area. These ships move faster
than you think, before you know it, the ship goes by. So part of the
excitement is getting to the observation area before the ship passes.
We parked th
In a message dated 4/24/2006 7:13:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice, moody shot. I have an urge to nudge the frame
down and to the left a bit, though--was there
something distracting there?
Rick
===
Probably. Think the edge of another building. One with more lights
Cute kid. You caught his excitement beautifully.
Nicely done.
Dave S.
On 4/24/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We saw a ship in the distance heading for the ship channel. We raced
> over the bridge to get to the observation area. These ships move faster
> than you think, before you know i
A glorious catch. Absolute treasure!
Who shot the image/who is grandchild 'riding'?
Jack
--- Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We saw a ship in the distance heading for the ship channel. We raced
>
> over the bridge to get to the observation area. These ships move
> faster
> than you think,
Frank - a better title might be "How dare you interrupt me?" :-)
My only nit with this is the cat being centered.
You sure got his/her attention.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 8:46 PM
To: PDML
Subject: P
http://www.infotecbusinesssystems.com/wildlife/
Cute!
I wonder what'll happen if they run across a cat!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT: my personal pic of the day
Just found this on the web, had a hearty laugh, and thought I'd share it
with you:
http://www.photosig
Jack Davis wrote:
A glorious catch. Absolute treasure!
Who shot the image/who is grandchild 'riding'?
Thanks Jack. The grandson is riding on top of his Auntie. I shot the
pic when I saw the excitement on his face. He'd never seen a live ship
before. It was taken with the *istD + DA16-45
Cool yes -
Great!
Says alot about Leica's trainer.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT: Bragging
Today, a friend pointed out to me that Leica (my Rottie) is tied for 6th
top obedience dog with the Rottweiler Club of Canada.
Coo
David Savage wrote:
Cute kid. You caught his excitement beautifully.
Nicely done.
Thanks Dave. The color version is also quite nice since the sun was low
and gave him a beautiful glow. I might work on that tonight and post it
tomorrow for comparison.
Dave S.
On 4/24/06, Gonz <[EMAIL P
Ha!
Fun picture.
On 4/24/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cute!
> I wonder what'll happen if they run across a cat!
Probably not much. The mouse isn't that big.
Dave S.
> Kenneth Waller
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http:/
Well done - a real family keeper - I love the facial expressions.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Gonz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Watching the ship
We saw a ship in the distance heading for the ship channel. We raced
over the bridge to get to the observation ar
You caught a great expression ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Gonz
> http://www.g0nz.com/images/watchingtheship3.html
Excellent. Beautiful granson and mom. Great shot.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We saw a ship in the distance heading for the ship channel. We raced
> over the bridge to get to the observation area. These ships move faster
> than y
I'd seen this before but never tried it, so I was curious just how
much 'edge' it would recover from a DS file.
I took the RAW example file in DNG format from my "DA14mm Examples"
set at
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/14mm-Examples/
I rendered a full native resolution JPEG from it, and
2 days until expected hatching.
P.
At 08:24 AM 24/04/2006 , you wrote:
>
>http://www.infotecbusinesssystems.com/wildlife/
>
Moody and interesting, virtually sepia toned. I like it it! Wish the
posted size was a little larger.
Tom C.
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Trees in Fog
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 00:40:48 -0700
htt
That's pretty neat. Thanks.
Tom C.
2 days until expected hatching.
P.
At 08:24 AM 24/04/2006 , you wrote:
>
>http://www.infotecbusinesssystems.com/wildlife/
>
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:34:34PM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> I love how photography has become a numbers crunching exercise for some
> people. Pick up the camera, focus, press the shutter, and see what
> happens, see what you get.
Oh, yes. And, of course, never ever discuss the possib
One reason many of you may not be getting all of the email from the PDML
is because, for some reason, some of it is being rejected here and there
by local servers signed up to the Spamcop service. The messages are
being bounced because, according to the bounce message, the PDML has
been blackli
Doug Brewer wrote:
One reason many of you may not be getting all of the email from the PDML
is because, for some reason, some of it is being rejected here and there
by local servers signed up to the Spamcop service. The messages are
being bounced because, according to the bounce message, the PD
I'm 129 posts behind the archive. The latest post I have is 20 hours old.
regards,
Anthony Farr
Turned out very nice, Marnie. I'm glad that you were able to get some
shots that worked for you. Hopefully you will share more of them.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, April 23, 2006, 5:30:10 PM, you wrote:
Eac> Before I went to Monterey I was smart enough to ask Bruce the settings he
Eac> us
Anthony Farr wrote:
I'm 129 posts behind the archive. The latest post I have is 20 hours old.
regards,
Anthony Farr
That's because yours is one of the servers rejecting PDML traffic.
Today, a friend pointed out to me that Leica (my Rottie) is tied
for 6th top obedience dog with the Rottweiler Club of Canada.
Cool, Huh?
William Robb
--
Congrats, Bill & Leica. Very nice.
A well-trained dog is a pleasure. I wish I had more time to
spend with my border collie, who
I never saw the original, and I don't see it in the archives ...
Doug, thanks for all your work and effort. They are very much appreciated
...
Shel
> Doug Brewer wrote:
> One reason many of you may not be getting all of the email from the PDML
> is because, for some reason, some of it is
John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:34:34PM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I love how photography has become a numbers crunching exercise for some
people. Pick up the camera, focus, press the shutter, and see what
happens, see what you get.
Oh, yes. And, of course, never ever
Let me try to explain it non-mathematically.
Imagine you are weighing something. You are given a scale. The scale
has 100 notches that you can balance the thing you are weighing against.
So you put on a small object, and it falls between 0 and 9 (out of
100). So there are only 10 slots it
Hi, Maybe I'm just misremembering, but I seem to recall that A lenses would
show their focal length in the PS browser and metadata. I'm not seeing
that these past couple of days. Is this normal?
Shel
Den 24. apr. 2006 kl. 19.15 skrev Doug Brewer:
Anthony Farr wrote:
I'm 129 posts behind the archive. The latest post I have is 20
hours old.
regards,
Anthony Farr
That's because yours is one of the servers rejecting PDML traffic.
...and so is mine?
DagT
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=232428
Comments are welcome.
DagT
Doug Brewer wrote:
>One reason many of you may not be getting all of the email from the PDML
>is because, for some reason, some of it is being rejected here and there
>by local servers signed up to the Spamcop service. The messages are
>being bounced because, according to the bounce message, th
Roman wrote:
Sup,
What is the largest quality print size for 6.1Mpix *istDL images. I'd
ordered A4 (200x300mm) photo prints with outstanding detail and
sharpness (specially chosen image with lot of detail on it
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060414172055 ) but I wonder if A3
(suggested in
I remember some discussion here a week or two back regards salvaging
files from a CF or SD card. I'm not at home and don't have access to
my archives just at present ...
What was the file recovery software used? Friend of mine has a
Sandisk Extreme III 4G card with a bunch of RAW image file
And I never got Doug's original message. However, thanks for all the
hard Work, Doug. Sometimes it seems like the spammers and the
anti-spammers are in a race to see which can make the internet useless
first.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Pr
Very fun indeed,
Yhanks for posting Ralf.
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Ralf R. Radermacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: segunda-feira, 24 de Abril de 2006 11:22
Para: Pentax Mailingliste
Assunto: OT: my personal pic of the day
Just found this on the web, had a hearty laugh, and
I have printed 12x18 from jpeg, nothing special done, and it looks fine
Russell
In English (and in Sundmørsk), the title suggests a self portrait.
It's a total bummer, if that's the case ;-)
Seriously: This is among your better photographs. And among _your_ better
says a lot.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large c
Powerfull image. I like the the way you saw it.
Congrats DagT
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: DagT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: segunda-feira, 24 de Abril de 2006 18:55
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: PESO - i
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=232428
Comm
Great!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: DagT
> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=232428
Excellent. Good shadow detail. Imaginative crop. Works for me.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=232428
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> DagT
>
I own a DS and a D, and I've worked with files from a Canon Digital
Rebel for a couple of friends, which I suppose makes me somewhat more of
an expert than most. I've also handled a DL and my impression was that
it wasn't much different from the DS. First all Digital captures are a
bit soft a
I use two different programs "PC Inspector File Recovery" and "PC
Inspector Smart Recovery". I haven't checked lately to see if they have
new versions that directly support PEF files but they do recover Pentax
raw files as TIFFs. These are Windows programs, but they may have MAC
versions as w
I like the texture, the light around the eye and the crop
Russell
Yes. The chip that tells the camera focal length isn't present in A
series lenses. So "your" memory is faulty.
What was that question again???
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi, Maybe I'm just misremembering, but I seem to recall that A lenses would
show their focal length in the PS browser and meta
I misremembered in a previous thread too: none of the manual focus
Pentax lenses (K, M, A series) send any focal length information to
the DS body. Only F, FA, DA, D-FA series will provide focal length data.
Godfrey
On Apr 24, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi, Maybe I'm just misr
I just got how the title relates to the crop. very clever!
Shel
Godfrey,
I haven't used it, but my brother has succesfully used it once.
http://download.pcinspector.de/pci_us_smartrecovery.exe
ftp://ftp2.convar.com/pcinspector/pci_us_smartrecovery.exe
HTH,
Igor
Thanks for the pointers.
PC Inspector products are evidently 100% Windows platform. No sign of
anything from them for Mac OS X.
For Mac OS X, I have found FileSalvage, PhotoRescue and SanDisk's own
RescuePro so far. I can't say how effective any of them are yet,
although I've heard reason
Gonz wrote:
Let me try to explain it non-mathematically.
I still prefer "underexpose and you lose shadow detail" as an
explanation ;-)
S
> I use two different programs "PC Inspector File Recovery" and "PC
> Inspector Smart Recovery". I haven't checked lately to see if they have
> new versions that directly support PEF files but they do recover Pentax
> raw files as TIFFs. These are Windows programs, but they may have MAC
> ver
Another B&W conversion.
The Connecticut River one had a thriving seasonal business of shad
fishing. Small business such as this one were open during the spring
shad run and closed the rest of the year. River front property is
becoming much too valuable for these business to survive but there
> 1. Lexar "Image Rescue 2.0" -
> http://store.lexar.com/?category=25&subcategory=34
> 2. SanDisk "RescuePro 3.0" -
> http://www.lc-tech.com/software/rprowindetail.html
> But, maybe the URL's might help someone...
I should point out that the two programs are downloadable (no waiting for a
CD t
Cannot decide if i should get a PC version or Mac version(ibook) of CS2.
Soo, a question. Anyone using a laptop and external monitor to process photos.
If so are the results as you would expect.
BTW i'm leaning to the mac version.
Also, i have not done anything with colour yet. Is it best to ru
I never saw the message but checked the archive when i saw Steve's
comments.. really, Gonz, I don't need or want explanations, although I
appreciate that you feel furthering my education has some merit. I point,
I shoot, I see the results. I don't care to know any more at this time.
All the mat
Doug Brewer wrote:
>One reason many of you may not be getting all of the email from the PDML
>is because, for some reason, some of it is being rejected here and there
>by local servers signed up to the Spamcop service. The messages are
>being bounced because, according to the bounce message, t
On 4/24/06, Dave Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, i have not done anything with colour yet. Is it best to run the mac
> colour thingy on the
> laptop screen or the external or both.
If you're going to use the external screen to edit, run the colour
thing on the external monitor. If you'r
I use my desktop system (power mac g5 now) for most of my heavy image
processing work, but one of the reasons I also upgraded my laptop
(new PowerBook G4 1.67Ghz) was that I need to be able to do it
portably as well, occasionally. The laptop drives the same Cinema
Display 23" that I use wit
Nice, Peter. I grew up in CT in the 60s, and remember
seeing such places. We never stopped at one, though.
BTW, how do you get your copyright notice in the lower
right corner?
Rick
--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another B&W conversion.
>
> The Connecticut River one had a th
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
One reason many of you may not be getting all of the email from
the PDML
is because, for some reason, some of it is being rejected here and
there
by local servers signed up to the Spamcop service. The messages are
being
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
