On 6/18/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've looked at this a couple of times - it is too abstract for me.
Your explanation helps some, but not enough. I'm sure some will
really like it, but not for me.
--
Bruce
Jens I like it. It's not too abstract IMO, but still recognisable
Dave mate, can you please stop posting these beautiful shots of NZ?!
Every time I see them I want to go on holiday I can't get the time
off to do that, so it's torture. ;-)
Dave
On 6/15/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/photodb/view.php?p=434t=1
This
Awesome, Dave - awesome.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 17. juni 2006 17:07
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PAW -
I've just tried Ninja and compared the result to that from Neat.
The noise I have to deal with comes from different sources. The
microscope illumination system, three different cameras (two digital and
one film) plus the very strange noise introduced by JAlbum if you make a
gallery with any
Been busy as heck and working on so many pictures ...
This one, taken a couple of months ago, appealed to me strangely ...
it seems to be in a new aesthetic vein. I'm not entirely sure how
successful it is by itself.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/23.htm
The now-usual larger
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This one, taken a couple of months ago, appealed to me strangely ...
it seems to be in a new aesthetic vein. I'm not entirely sure how
successful it is by itself.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/23.htm
It's a curiously interesting image, Godfrey -
I just read that links to galleries are frowned on,
but I was keen to get some feedback on a few pictures
I just uploaded to my website. There's only a few
online at the moment but I plan to add more.
Most of the pictures were taken with a Pentax MZ5,
which I think was called the ZX5 in the US.
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
I dare say that every lens can be forced to flare. But Pentax lenses are
definitely more resilient.
I have heard that Pentax stretch the limits of the optical formula
they chose for the 43. This makes it more flare-prone that you would
like and
Thanks, Dave.
This image was used as a starting image in a presentation concerning the
redevelopment of a harbour area.
When I talked to my boss about using the image for the front page on a
report on a seminar, about the redeveloping af the harbour - he could NOT
see that it was a ship!
What can
John Coyle wrote:
Anyone have any ideas on current prices for this? I just searched Ebay with
no luck on current auctions.
I was down at Bernie's Camera (Pittsburgh's only remaining independent
camera shop) a week ago and noticed that they have one of these...
NEW! No kidding. In the box and
I don't know why anybody would frown on links to galleries. There are
some very interesting shots there, particularly the 2 Australian
creatures.
One word of warning though (and this applies to everyone).
Ducks. Don't bother.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi Godderrs,
I like this one a lot. It's seemingly simple, but upon loking closely
there's more to be seen than immediately met my eye. For example, at first
look in the smaller pic i didn't realize that I was seeing a tree and its
shadow ... this is one I'd like to look at again - might have
Not sure which is best:
Colour:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646s.jpg
Desaturated:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646bw.jpg
Just right:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646f.jpg
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://www.web-options.com/P6180644s.jpg
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jun 18, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Steve Jolly wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/23.htm
It's a curiously interesting image, Godfrey - I think I like it. I
can
see a couple of dark streaks running across it on my monitor though -
shadows? Artefacts? Art? :-)
Thanks for
On Jun 18, 2006, at 6:22 PM, David Savage wrote:
Dave mate, can you please stop posting these beautiful shots of NZ?!
Every time I see them I want to go on holiday I can't get the time
off to do that, so it's torture. ;-)
Your accommodation is waiting :)
Paul,
Does the A2XS allow both A and AF operation?
Thanks,
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's a little grainy. I misspoke below. It was actually ISO 800
and cropped. The feeder this shaded by a tree. Not a lot of light. I
needed 800 just to get 1/90th shutter.
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
I dare say that every lens can be forced to flare. But Pentax
lenses are
definitely more resilient.
I have heard that Pentax stretch the limits of the optical formula
Another ... I think I'm near caught up again.
Also taken a couple of months ago, not processed until now.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/24.htm
Comments, critique, flames always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have had some troubles with my connection for a week or so, so it's been
quiet from me...
I have mixed emotions about this picture myself. I kind of like it, as is,
on the one hand. But I also dislike the blown out parts, it attracts too
much attention.
The corrected version is better when
Tom C wrote:
Pictures at:
http://www.4lomza.pl/fotogaleria.php?id=19598
Tom C.
To be so lucky...
A few years ago, the same happened in a motorway near Madrid. A moving
car was hit by a meteorite, the drive was lucky and didn't suffer any
harm, except a big fright.
Carlos
--
PDML
Thanks Shel!
I keep going back to look at it too. There's something about it that
I find very off-beat and evocative of some ideas I've had lately. I
found a whole bunch of similar photos taken around that time period
(February or so) in my archives that I hadn't really done much
On Jun 18, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Steve Jolly wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/23.htm
It's a curiously interesting image, Godfrey - I think I like it. I
can
see a couple of dark streaks running across it on my monitor though -
shadows? Artefacts? Art? :-)
Thanks for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom C
Sent: 18 June 2006 01:01
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Is this a clichi?
It rather reminds me of the 1960's The Prisoner TV series
and the bleak
beach scenes at Port Portmerion. There is
No, the A2X-S, like the A2X-L has only the A contacts. Mine has a
damaged lock pin. The spring has evidently become unattached, so it
won't lock on the lens. It still works fine as long as I make sure the
lens is all the way engaged. But I almost dropped my A400 yesterday,
when it spun off the
Hi,
Great idea for a photo nice scene, nice subject, nice framing.
This is a situation that almost requires a dozen or more frames to be
exposed. Subtle differences in the movement of the kids, your arm, tilt of
a head, may alter the effect of such a photo, some positions making it
In a message dated 6/11/2006 10:07:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie _ I took your suggestion and came up with this
revision - in a kinda sneaky way :)
I think it is better
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/desertsolitairebetter.jpg
a note to Abbey fans - yeah, I know, a
Hi!
It would have been interesting to see how the lens fared without the
extra UV-filter.
Jostein
I realize that. However I don't take UV filters off my limited lenses as
a matter of course... It already proved once its use... Fortunately it
was merely Galia's finger, yet I prefer to
Insurance agents have surprising access...
Jack Davis wrote:
..or state, county, city government agencies. DMV access codes freely
available.
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3rd try...
On 6/17/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
Used to be easy to get
On 18/6/06, Rob Geraghty, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just read that links to galleries are frowned on,
?? Where?
Here's a FAQ for this list:
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
POSTING PHOTOS-- For PESO/PAW/ETC, you put it up on the web somewhere
and post a URL in your
I won't use a filter on any lens, not matter how valuable, unless I
require filtration. I figure there's not much point in buying superior
lenses and then shooting through a piece of inferior glass. Even if the
filter is of optimum quality, it's adding an unnecessary element and
limiting the
Film at 11?
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Pigs Fly.
Paul
On Jun 17, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Cotty wrote:
Can someone please serve me some pie?
Reading through the couple of recent threads on pixels and jpegs vs RAW
spurred me on to do another test (I hate tests because it means work).
When I got a
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I won't use a filter on any lens, not matter how valuable, unless I
require filtration. I figure there's not much point in buying superior
lenses and then shooting through a piece of inferior glass. Even if the
filter is of optimum quality, it's adding an unnecessary
The seed in the feeder looks nice and sharp, the bird seems a bit soft.
Not much DOF with that combination at ~f11. Nice capture though,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
A friend gave me a goldfinch feeder and a bag of thistle seed. The
feeder requires the birds to eat hanging upside down. Apparently,
I focused on the bird. The difference might be that the bird is moving
and the seed is stationary :-).
Paul
On Jun 18, 2006, at 2:40 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
The seed in the feeder looks nice and sharp, the bird seems a bit soft.
Not much DOF with that combination at ~f11. Nice capture though,
Hi all,
I just encountered a very brief review of the effectiveness of the
K100D (Beta) SR.
Reviewer is a well known camera writer who always has a privilege for
sneak previews.
He is reviewing a K100D + DA 21mm F3.2 AL Limited, but no review of
the lens, only on the SR.
He talks about the
Great news. I'm looking forward to the 10 megapixel model. The older I
get, the more I need IS :-).
Paul
K wrote:
Hi all,
I just encountered a very brief review of the effectiveness of the
K100D (Beta) SR.
Reviewer is a well known camera writer who always has a privilege for
sneak
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/ros_in_action.html
Rosalind is 12 years old, and sometimes she's a bit stiff and it's hard for
her to get around. I was able to get her to exercise some this morning. She
seems to be enjoying herself ;-)) I think Bob, her owner, may just enjoy
this shot of his
Nice shot. Great technique. I would crop out the dead area on the
right of frame, but perhaps that's just me.
Paul
On Jun 18, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/ros_in_action.html
Rosalind is 12 years old, and sometimes she's a bit stiff and it's
Hi Paul,
Thanks, Actually, I put up the wrong pic. The correct one is up now. I
wanted the dead area as it gives Ros a place to run to, but what I did do
was put up the pic with a little cropped off the top. I think it changes
the dynamic a bit, and may, perhaps, make the dead area to which
Yep. That's a good crop. I like it.
Paul
On Jun 18, 2006, at 3:38 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks, Actually, I put up the wrong pic. The correct one is up now.
I
wanted the dead area as it gives Ros a place to run to, but what I
did do
was put up the pic with a little
Ahh, but the Tamron, isn't the nearly legendary SMC-P F 1.7x AF
adapter. This device along with being a very capable 1.7x converter,
also will make you manual focus lenses into autofocus, (well sort of),
lenses. I've never seen anything like it from any other manufacturer.
By the way I have
If you're interested I've got one for sale. But please remember that I'm
located in Sweden.
/Paul
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 3:40 AM
Subject: AF 1.7 converter
Anyone have any ideas on current
Thanks, Ken. Great report and good news about the SR. I too wish that
Pentax was not so conservative.
Pentax have been developing this system over so many years, way before
Minolta announced the CCD shift method, and even during the film camera
era.
Ken, do you mean than even when Pentax
On 6/18/06, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any ideas on current prices for this? I just searched Ebay with
no luck on current auctions.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Grr...
On Jun 18, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Ken, do you mean than even when Pentax produced only film cameras,
they
were nonetheless working on shake reduction for an eventual digital
sensor?
Hi Joe,
That's what this reviewer is saying.
Pal was saying that Pentax had a basic
If it were space junk, it would hardly look metallic after re-entry.
Gonz wrote:
It looks non-meteoric, more like a metallic disk of some sorts. Space junk?
rg
Tom C wrote:
Pictures at:
http://www.4lomza.pl/fotogaleria.php?id=19598
Tom C.
To be so lucky...
--
When
Thanks for the inside info, Ken. Three+ stops of shake reduction is
good news indeed! Things are looking up for Pentax...
Regards, Jim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Great shot Shel!
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 2:21 PM
To: PDML
Subject: PESO - Rosalind in Action
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/ros_in_action.html
Rosalind is 12 years
Thanks to all who replied and gave indications on price. It has certainly
helped me decide!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: AF 1.7
In a message dated 6/17/2006 7:51:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what do you guys think of stuff like this:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/168902023/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
=
Interesting. I think I might prefer it right side up though (which
In a message dated 6/18/2006 12:22:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Been busy as heck and working on so many pictures ...
This one, taken a couple of months ago, appealed to me strangely ...
it seems to be in a new aesthetic vein. I'm not entirely sure how
successful it
Jostein wrote:
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
I dare say that every lens can be forced to flare. But Pentax
lenses are
definitely more resilient.
I have heard that Pentax stretch the limits of the optical formula
they chose for
In a message dated 6/18/2006 12:22:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/ros_in_action.html
Rosalind is 12 years old, and sometimes she's a bit stiff and it's hard for
her to get around. I was able to get her to exercise some this morning. She
In a message dated 6/11/2006 5:38:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This should have been a PESO. By the way, it's with the DA 12-24, 12mm,
f11 @ 1 second.
Paul
On Jun 11, 2006, at 7:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I shot this in early spring with no leaves on the trees. Here
In a message dated 6/18/2006 10:17:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another ... I think I'm near caught up again.
Also taken a couple of months ago, not processed until now.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/24.htm
Comments, critique, flames always
In a message dated 6/7/2006 3:11:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The new version is at the same page
http://www.photosight.org/photo.php?photoid=37679ref=author
Below the picture you will find a thumb Versjon 2 that's the one
Tim
I prefer the first version, with
On Jun 18, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Dave
Brooks wrote:
[snip]
I think you meant MasterCard, who's lawyers will be contacting you
shortly :)
- Dave
Well, just goes to show you how much impact Mastercard has on me.
:-)
Dave
--
PDML
In a message dated 6/18/2006 8:39:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not sure which is best:
Colour:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646s.jpg
Desaturated:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646bw.jpg
Just right:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646f.jpg
Bob
===
Nothing
In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:07:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
Hi, All!
I have problems choosing between two crops of the same image.
(I have pros and cons for both).
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/SantaMonica/pages/IMGP3015_1.html
and
In a message dated 6/17/2006 7:04:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
This was composed by me, taken by my friend.
thats me on the bench with my friends kids
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4256144
MZ-6, Sigma 28-105, unrecorded media, handheld.
all comments
I prefer the colour version.
Dave
On 6/18/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure which is best:
Colour:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646s.jpg
Desaturated:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646bw.jpg
Just right:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646f.jpg
Bob
--
PDML
On Jun 18, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Bob W wrote:
Colour:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646s.jpg
Desaturated:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646bw.jpg
Just right:
http://www.web-options.com/P6180646f.jpg
LOL!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I like it the minimal approach. My kind of image.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 3:15 AM
Subject: PAW 2006 - 23 - GDG
Been busy as heck and working on so many pictures ...
This one, taken a couple of
Wonderful capture Shel!. The owner should really like it.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Rosalind in Action
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/ros_in_action.html
Rosalind is 12 years old, and sometimes she's a bit stiff
I saw this now.
Sorry for your loss Marnie. Take care.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I probably take better photos now than a year ago (let's hope). But I was
going through my pic directories and came across this. Shot over a year ago, in
Fremont when I was scooping out Mission San Jose for a possible Norcal PDML
outing (we went to San Jose instead).
Fremont id an interesting
On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/windmill.htm
A classic postcard picture! Very nice indeed.
Godfrey
... Sometimes I go backwards in time and discover gems I didn't
notice ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Marnie - a wonderful image but I'd prefer not to have it framed by the
foreground brush on either side the high grass on the bottom edge. I'm
also straining to see the details of the buildings suggesting a closer point
of view.
Hope you worked this scene as I can see other possibilities with
At 07:18 AM 18/06/2006 , you wrote:
I was down at Bernie's Camera (Pittsburgh's only remaining independent
camera shop) a week ago and noticed that they have one of these...
NEW! No kidding. In the box and on the shelf with the other Pentax
stuff. Didn't ask the price but if anyone's interested
At 10:46 AM 18/06/2006 , you wrote:
I won't use a filter on any lens, not matter how valuable, unless I
require filtration.
However, I can understand that
some prefer to protect their investment. I like to buy lenses from
those folk :-).
And you end up with a good collection of unused UV
On 6/18/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don, Noise Ninja produces custom profiles for different cameras, at
different ISO levels,
You can download Neat Image profiles for the DS.
All ISO settings and three noise filter settings. Quite useful when there
is no plain area in the
A classic postcard picture! Very nice indeed.
Godfrey
===
Thanks, Godfrey. :-)
Reply to Ken below.
In a message dated 6/18/2006 5:52:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie - a wonderful image but I'd prefer not to have it framed by the
foreground brush on either
I like this one. The broad perspective is appropriate here. Good work.
Paul
... Sometimes I go backwards in time and discover gems I didn't
notice ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks Ken,
I think Bob'll like this. Rosalind isn't too active these days, and it may
give him some pleasure to know that she still has a bit of the young girl
left in her yet.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kenneth Waller
Wonderful capture Shel!. The owner should really like it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Sanderson
Great shot Shel!
Don
-Original Message-
Shel Belinkoff
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/ros_in_action.html
Rosalind is 12 years old, and sometimes she's a
bit stiff and it's hard for her to get around. I was
able
I like the minimalist image and it intriguing how the shadow is so similar
and yet very different in many details.
Powell
Been busy as heck and working on so many pictures ...
This one, taken a couple of months ago, appealed to me strangely ...
it seems to be in a new aesthetic vein. I'm not
I like this one. The broad perspective is appropriate here. Good work.
Paul
===
Thanks, Paul. :-) I thought it was pretty and pleasant.
I tried lightening the shadows on the two main buildings in response to what
Ken said, but I don't really think it improved it. I don't mind dark
On Jun 18, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
I won't use a filter on any lens, not matter how valuable, unless I
require filtration.
However, I can understand that
some prefer to protect their investment. I like to buy lenses from
those folk :-).
And you end up with a good
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: On subject of flare.
I realize that. However I don't take UV filters off my limited lenses as
a matter of course... It already proved once its use... Fortunately it
was merely Galia's finger, yet I prefer to clean the filter and
I'll sometimes use a filter, although it's rare. Still, I won't give up
the ones I have.
I'd like to add to my collection of crappy filters - those with
scratches, damaged glass, or in any other way useless as filters. If
anyone's got such filters and would care to send them my way, please
Yeah, Leica sales reps were known for doing that as well.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
I was at a sales seminar many years ago. Long enough ago
that smoking was still allowed at these things.
The Pentax rep was encouraging smokers to butt their
cigarettes out on a lens
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: On subject of flare.
I have several of them that I've used as table protectors for shot
glasses. They're much more useful that way than on the front of a lens.
My 600mm lens came with a 112mm filter on the front.
The filter
Shot this with an ancient Soligor Auto 35mm f2.8 screwmount lens on
Aaron's LX. It's the original flatiron building, Toronto's Gooderham
Building. One of my favourite subjects. Tri-X in Rodinal 1:25.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/170072183/
And for those who dislike flickr, a large version
Just fooling around with something a little different.
Comments, crits, rotten tomatoes welcome ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/soap.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I don't remember seeing Hay Fever Pretty but that is a great image, I
wouldn't change a thing.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Mustard Windmill
A classic postcard picture! Very nice indeed.
Godfrey
===
Thanks, Godfrey. :-)
Hi!
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I won't use a filter on any lens, not matter how valuable, unless I
require filtration. I figure there's not much point in buying superior
lenses and then shooting through a piece of inferior glass. Even if the
filter is of optimum quality, it's adding an
Hi!
I won't use a filter on any lens, not matter how valuable, unless I
require filtration. I figure there's not much point in buying superior
lenses and then shooting through a piece of inferior glass. Even if the
filter is of optimum quality, it's adding an unnecessary element and
Hi!
It would have been interesting to see how the lens fared without the
extra UV-filter.
Probably a lot different. I've found the 43 Limited to be exemplary
with regards to flare. Some have called it the best lens I ever
encountered in some flare tests:
Hi!
I was at a sales seminar many years ago. Long enough ago that smoking was
still allowed at these things.
The Pentax rep was encouraging smokers to butt their cigarettes out on a
lens that he had sitting on the table.
The SMC coating is remarkably tough.
Bill, I see what you and others
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: PESO -Soap
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/soap.html
I think it is a very nice still life.
As a nit-pic, it could use more depth of field, and perhaps a bit more
detail on the right side of the dish, though that can be more a
On Jun 18, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/soap.html
I like the colors and the contrasts. It would have been more pleasing
to me geometrically if you'd given the soap dish a little more room
in the frame.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Couldn't be done at the time, unfortunately. Didn't have the right lens -
just saw the shot and did a quick grab to see what might come of it. It
was even an afterthought to put it up here, but it was in the same folder
as the shot of Rosalind ... however, it's given me the idea to try
something
Hi,
Maybe. Didn't have many choices when I grabbed the shot. See my comments
to Godfrey
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/soap.html
I think it is a very nice still life.
As a nit-pic, it could use more depth of field, and perhaps a
Thanks! Received an email earlier from Bob, Rosalind's owner. He was
thrilled - said It strips away those years and makes her look young
again. What greater compliment can there be, and since Ros may not be
around much longer, he can have a nice pic for a remembrance.
Shel
[Original
On Jun 19, 2006, at 5:00 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
It is only logical to prefer to have to
replace the filter than go through the hoops replacing the front
element.
I think any impact that damages a filter is still likely to cause
problems within the lens - especially zoom lenses which
96 matches
Mail list logo
