Don Williams wrote:
I was referring to my own use of adjectives. On re-reading my post I see
ambiguity.
Don
The counter tells us more than 3000 people have opened the page, but I
doubt more than a few have read the entire paragraph. I stopped before I
got halfway. The paranoid ranting
On 3/7/06, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
The only reason they would 't use it, I think, is
free-lancer politics.
Doubtful. If a (newsworthy) picture meets the criteria of the picture
editor, then it will be used no matter what the source. I can't believe
that a local paper would run
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:16 AM, Vid Strpic wrote:
http://checkout.google.com/
Any opinions? Could it change the Paypal domination?
Not for me as it's currently US only :)
Other than that it looks pretty good, although I haven't really spent
very long reading the documentation (from a
On Jul 4, 2006, at 1:37 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
it's also important to shut it down at the end of the
day using the power switch on the printer, not just turning off a
power
strip.
I find that very easy to believe... when I turn off my 2100 with its
power switch, it spends a few seconds
It all depends on where you live. In bigger cities no one would care
at all but in a small town like Sonora, CA things are a bit different.
We had a fire hydrant burst sometime last year or the year before and
it made front page news. Things are very different in small towns.
;-)
Bryan
On
On Jul 4, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I came across a burst fire hydrant a couple of hours ago - a car
ran into
it and the driver sped off before I got there - and I took a bunch
of pics
of the scene.
[snip]
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/bursthydrant.html
This is why
On Jul 4, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Bob W wrote:
What do others think of this as an example to evaluate the printers?
If it's not a good example, what features should be in a photo to get
a decent trial of a printer's abilities?
If you're going to be printing a lot of BW, you might as well try a
William Robb wrote:
It's not Pentax, so I figure it's probably OK to post this one.
The product decription is unbelievable.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=150002224988ru=http://search.ebay.com:80/150002224988_W0QQfromZR40QQfviZ1
Well... ROTFLMAO :)
But it's still a
Thanks Dave. I'll save that for later.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Mann
Sent: 04 July 2006 07:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
On Jul 4, 2006,
Congratulations on your independence. If you do change your minds,
just let us know - I'm sure we can come to some sort of arrangement...
http://todayspictures.slate.com/20060704/
--
Regards,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 04.07.2006, at 04:41 , Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Are you saying that Samsung's or Pentax's line was unprofitable?
Pentax's PS digital cameras pushed Pentax Canada to the two most
profitable months in the company's history, very recently.
Same here, in Poland. Figure sales from Pentax PS are
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The cost of paper and inks for the Epson R800 doesn't seem to be all
that different than for the Oly P440. I have assumed that one set of
inks would last for 100 A4 prints. Whether that is true or not I don't
know - my last lot would never have lasted that
On 04.07.2006, at 02:52 , Adam Maas wrote:
That 10MP sensor is far too small to be the one for the K10D. Expect a
Sony sensor, either the D200 sensor or the 3fps version from the
Alpha A100.
It is 1/1.8 sensor - at 10 MPix it will probably generate more noise
than some in-phone cameras :-/
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 01:52:47 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Newsworthy Photo - Burst Fire Hydrant
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I came across a burst fire hydrant a couple of hours ago - a car ran into
it and the
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 02:34:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
But how well set up was the digital system?
It was a demonstration by the manufacturer's agent. Should have been
I live in a very small town, and pics like this have often been run as
either news or human interest.
BTW, I used to own some property in Sonora - or, rather, just outside the
town. Sonora is larger than the little community in which I live.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bryan Vyhmeister
BTW, to add to my last post, the local paper thought it interesting enough
to send a photog out to grab a couple of shots as well. As it turned out,
neither her shots nor mine were used, but it ~was~ of interest to the paper.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bryan Vyhmeister
It all depends
I've been in touch with a local dealer about the FA-50/1.4, now. They
say they don't have it in stock, but will be happy to get it for me.
It's going to cost NOK 2550, though, which is equivalent to something
like US$410, I always expect prices to be quite a bit higher here than
in the US, but
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, William Robb wrote:
It's not Pentax, so I figure it's probably OK to post this one.
The product decription is unbelievable.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=150002224988ru=http://search.ebay.com:80/150002224988_W0QQfromZR40QQfviZ1
Listed in category:
On 3/7/06, Bryan Vyhmeister, discombobulated, unleashed:
It all depends on where you live. In bigger cities no one would care
at all but in a small town like Sonora, CA things are a bit different.
We had a fire hydrant burst sometime last year or the year before and
it made front page news.
Go to www.adorama.com, look for Pentax lenses. Notice the price after
rebate. Adorama has subtracted the rebate valid to 6 July *and* the one
valid *from* 1 July. But surely you won't get both? I'd check if I were
living in the US, though...
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
You can still contribute to PUG by commenting the pictures.
Jostein
On 7/4/06, Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that the recent spate of messages about PUG resulted in a
healthy number of photos.
Maybe we should all gripe a bit a week before the due date. Sorry I
The photo editor liked it - called it hydrant art. The general editor
felt that, since the paper [was] full, he wasn't going to run it, as so
doing would have required bumping something else. Anyway, I like the pic,
newsworthy or not, and it was fun to get excited about the possibility of
having
One from my latest batch of scans...
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/photodb/view.php?p=460t=1
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 09:01:14 GMT
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Subject: FA-50/1.4 (and 43 limited) price again...
I've been in touch with a local dealer about the FA-50/1.4, now. They
say they don't have it in stock, but will be happy to get
Hi Toralf,
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:01:14 +0200, Toralf Lund wrote:
I've been in touch with a local dealer about the FA-50/1.4, now. They
say they don't have it in stock, but will be happy to get it for me.
It's going to cost NOK 2550, though, which is equivalent to something
like US$410, I
mike wilson wrote:
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 09:01:14 GMT
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Subject: FA-50/1.4 (and 43 limited) price again...
I've been in touch with a local dealer about the FA-50/1.4, now. They
say they don't have it in stock, but will be
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 11:05:38 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: FA-50/1.4 (and 43 limited) price again...
mike wilson wrote:
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 09:01:14 GMT
To: Pentax Discuss
I've been in touch with a local dealer about the FA-50/1.4, now. They
say they don't have it in stock, but will be happy to get it for me.
It's going to cost NOK 2550, though, which is equivalent to something
like US$410, I always expect prices to be quite a bit higher here than
in the
For those thinking of using a larger capacity card in their Pentax DSLR's,
this information may be useful.
http://tinyurl.com/ft6up
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0606/06062801toshiba4gbsdhc.asp
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:42 AM, mike wilson wrote:
It was a demonstration by the manufacturer's agent. Should have been
perfect.
As anyone who's been into a television showroom can tell you that this
is rarely the case. ;)
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
Why are dye-subs more prone or more sensitive than inkjets to dust?
The paper goes back and forth in them three or four times, so three
or four times the opportunity for dust to settle on the surface.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I guess they want to move 'em out to make room for the new cameras. $100.00
rebate on the DL, plus $5.00 - $100.00 rebates on lenses, and rebates on
Optios.
http://tinyurl.com/26tso
http://www.steves-digicams.com/diginews.html#pentax_rebate
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 11:41:05 GMT
To: PDML PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Toshiba Announces a 4GB SD Card
For those thinking of using a larger capacity card in their Pentax DSLR's,
this information may be useful.
http://tinyurl.com/ft6up
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 11:51:37 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:42 AM, mike wilson wrote:
It was a demonstration by the manufacturer's agent. Should
BTW: I had always understood the FA
70-200
to be a dog.
Detail in the shirt, arm, hat and guitar is excellent.
So much for that theory!
Don
I thought it was the F 80-200 that was the dog.??? Oh well.:-)
I used this 70-200 instead of the 50-200. I
I don't know - I still confuse kilobytes with megabytes, and both with
Tastybytes, a favorite snack food for Silicon Valley software engineers.
The PR did say ~minimum~ though.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
For those thinking of using a larger capacity card in their Pentax
Aaron,
I'm saying that Pentax had profit problems with the PS line after
everybody got into the Optio S size cameras and decided to make a
strategic withdrawal. Having good sales, but loosing a little bit on
each camera is not a good idea. They turned the market over to
somebody with more
Op Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:05:04 +0200 schreef Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW: I had always understood the FA 70-200 to be a dog.
Detail in the shirt, arm, hat and guitar is excellent.
So much for that theory!
Hi Don,
I had the FA70-200 (powerzoom), bought the F70-210 based on it's
mike wilson wrote:
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 11:51:37 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:42 AM, mike wilson wrote:
It was a demonstration by the manufacturer's
Let me tell you a funny story I heard in my retailing days:
One time in the dear, dim past, a salesperson for a manufacturer of ps cameras
put together a camera plus case plus batteries bundle. The bundles were in
stores before anyone realized that neither the batteries nor the case were not
I noticed that they go rather cheaply.
The F 70-210 is a fine lens but IMO the bokeh is rather harsh
for portraits.
I like the results in Daves shot, I may have to try one.
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Lucas Rijnders
Sent:
For those thinking of using a larger capacity card in their Pentax DSLR's,
this information may be useful.
http://tinyurl.com/ft6up
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0606/06062801toshiba4gbsdhc.asp
This is an SDHC card isn't it? I don't think this will work in existing
Pentax cameras; or
Is this fact or speculation? Pentax Canada experienced both their highest
profits and largest volume of sales in the company's history, fueled by their
profits on Optio sales. It's possible that Japan could sell to North America
at a loss, but it would be a really bad idea, especially since
Toralf,
I assume you have looked at the foto video Nett pages.
Unfortunately, unless they have employed some new staff lately, they
do not have neither compentence or interest in Pentax products. Two
times, they've tried to convince me that whatever Pentax has to offer,
it's higher priced _and_
Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments...
* Gianfranco Irlanda: A Car?
Interesting as an object but the image is a little static.
Perhaps another angle?
Hi Keith,
First, thanks for taking the time to comment on the whole
gallery.
I agree, the subject is interesting but I had
Hi all.
I'v decided to try and get some poundage off this old body, and have recently
started bike
riding around
town. The added weight of even the smaller Lowpro treker is a bit to much, so i
thought
i'd get a PS
digital and just keep it in my pocket or clipped on the bike
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue PM 12:33:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
Let me tell you a funny story I heard in my retailing days:
One time in the dear, dim past, a salesperson for
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue PM 12:29:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
mike wilson wrote:
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue AM 11:51:37 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss
One thing to consider is that you're pricing Epson Premium Glossy
paper, one of the most expensive surfaces available from Epson, and
you're pricing directly from the Epson website ... in other words, at
retail list prices. Other choices at lower price abound. With the Oly
P440, you don't
Cotty wrote:
On 3/7/06, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
The only reason they would 't use it, I think, is
free-lancer politics.
Doubtful. If a (newsworthy) picture meets the criteria of the picture
editor, then it will be used no matter what the source. I can't believe
that
Love the shot, Dave. I'd like to see the skin tones rendered with a
bit more snap however. Should be easy to do!
Godfrey
On Jul 3, 2006, at 10:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
istD with FA70-200 and shot in Raw. Converted in PSCS to BW
R=80,G=20,B=5. Constant-2.
Some S/H but only a tweak.
Pentax USA may be just a reseller but it is a wholly owned subuiderary
of Pentax Japan. I don't know anything about the Japanese tax system
but it could be of some advantage to move profits overseas.
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Is this fact or speculation? Pentax Canada experienced both their
A Curves adjustment layer applied to separate the skin tones...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/db-four/
Godfrey
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:06 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Love the shot, Dave. I'd like to see the skin tones rendered with a
bit more snap however. Should be easy to do!
Godfrey
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:37:51 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'd get a PS
digital and just keep it in my pocket or clipped on the bike some were.
Any suggestions. 4-5 megapixels are fine.
Optio S4. Little. Not yellow. Different. :-)
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Aaron
I didn't know there was a different mindset for digital - except for trying
harder to avoid overexposure/blown out highlights. I usually regard JPEGs as
slides, RAW as negs.
I have BTW noticed that I'm not the only one who normally underexposes
deliberately by 0.3-0.5 F-stop. (I shoot RAW
If you want really small, I'd go for the Panasonic LX1. Superb lens,
image stabilization, RAW format capture available. If you're willing
to carry a little bit more, a Konica Minolta A200 is fantastic. About
half the weight of a Pentax DS with 18-55 lens, about 30% smaller
overall, and
Sensors respond to light differently compared to film. Chapters one
and two of Bruce Fraser's Real World Camera Raw with Photoshop CS2
explains why there is a difference. As a result, exposure evaluation
requires a different mindset and different settings. JPEG and slide
film, although
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I live in a very small town, and pics like this have often been run as
either news or human interest.
BTW, I used to own some property in Sonora - or, rather, just outside the
town. Sonora is larger than the little community in which I live.
Shel
I wrote to
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
Why are dye-subs more prone or more sensitive than inkjets to dust?
The paper goes back and forth in them three or four times, so three
or four
On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:10 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Indeed. But if the manufacturer's agent can't do it Not to
mention that the whole premise that the digital revolution is based
on is that you just need to turn it on and go.
Why do you keep insisting that this bullshit is the truth?
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I didn't know there was a different mindset for digital - except for
trying
harder to avoid overexposure/blown out highlights. I usually regard
JPEGs as
slides, RAW as negs.
I have BTW noticed that I'm not the only one who normally
Hope it's a good one.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:42 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I wonder how many people bought them.
A lot of very unhappy people.
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
What one may think as newsworthy the editor may decide isn't. When I was
a stringer for CBS there was a huge fire near Cape Town. A candle
factory burned for two days. The enormous flames and smoke was visible
for 50 miles. It was comparable to an oil well fire in dramatic effect.
I went down
On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:04 AM, mike wilson wrote:
If I've got the convoluted syntax correct, the 4Mb/s minimum write
speed (sustained) means that it will take ~2.5 seconds (max) to
write a PEF file. Why so long, when internal memory can write in
~1/6th of the time?
Internal buffer
Dave,
Very nice!
I'd like to see a big print and the details on the horizon.
Marvelous colors.
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/4/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One from my latest batch of scans...
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/photodb/view.php?p=460t=1
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Peter Loveday wrote:
For those thinking of using a larger capacity card in their Pentax
DSLR's,
this information may be useful.
http://tinyurl.com/ft6up
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0606/06062801toshiba4gbsdhc.asp
This is an SDHC card isn't it? I don't
mike wilson wrote:
The outlaws (who, for some reason, are making a lot of prints at
the moment) using a consumer Epson, get 8-9 A4 prints from a
colour cartridge.
On my Epson 820 I get about 20 8 x 10 prints from a color cartridge.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue PM 02:30:39 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:10 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Indeed. But if the manufacturer's agent can't do it Not
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/04 Tue PM 02:42:36 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Toshiba Announces a 4GB SD Card
On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:04 AM, mike wilson wrote:
If I've got the convoluted syntax correct, the 4Mb/s minimum write
Aaron,
I have no knowledge of Pentax's internal accounting statements.
I am speculating based on public interview with the Pentax CEO last year.
That would be about the right time frame for unfolding this Samsung stuff now.
Also, I imagine the market here in the US is quite different from
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:51 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Why do you keep insisting that this bullshit is the truth?
It's just how it appears to me from all the ads I see for whizzy
new technology. But, of course, being a half-blind, senile old
Moley, I'm obviously completely wrong.
Quite. ]'-)
Yes, it's an SDHC card. Some time back I posted a message I received from
Pentax stating that they will provide a firmware upgrade for current
cameras once the SDHC standard has been established and implemented. I'd
be very surprised if the new cameras didn't take advantage of these newer
cards.
Godfrey,
You've got to explain this.
Digital sensors can't give any detail in overexposed highlights.
You can recover details in underexposed areas with post processing.
So don't you want to avoid blown highlights at all costs?
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/4/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:56 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Internal buffer transfers are different from writing through the SD
IO port. Internal writes are primary storage write speed, not
secondary storage write speed to non-volatile memory media in the
case of the SD card cage.
Thanks. I wondered if
Yup. :-)
In eons past, I did a lot of such stuff as a newspaper stringer. It
was always 1 chance in a hundred that a picture of mine would get
picked, but I did get four or five into the papers. Nothing of any
note, sadly. People who make a living as stringers a) do a LOT of
ambulance and
Toralf,
Error seems to be available, but it is an error.
The latest Pentax rebates state - May not be combined with any other offers.
So there is no way to get 2 rebates from Pentax.
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/4/06, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go to www.adorama.com, look for Pentax lenses.
We've had almost record rainfalls this year, but the truth is that
California is a semi-arid state. Water use and conservation is always an
issue. Further, according to a couple of people I spoke to at the scene,
this is the second or third time that particular hydrant has been hit by a
vehicle
Hi Bob,
Film, like the human eye, is very sensitive to subtle differences in
tones at the darker end of the scale.
It is very insensitive to the differences at the brighter end.
Digital, on the other hand is linear, equally sensitive to all light levels.
However, when shooting RAW you have only 12
Hi Bob,
You wrote:
Digital sensors can't give any detail in overexposed highlights.
JPEG's can't give any detail in overexposed highlights.
You can recover details in underexposed areas with post processing.
So don't you want to avoid blown highlights at all costs?
Provided you don't
Bob, you've not been paying attention ;-)) This has been discussed here
several times. I'll let Godders explain it because he does a much better
job than I with this technical stuff. However, when he and I got together
last year, when I had my first DS, he showed me what he'd been talking
I'v really got to learn to use layers.:-)
Looks good. I;ll try that at home and see ehat i get.
Thanks
Dave
A Curves adjustment layer applied to separate
the skin tones...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/db-four/
Godfrey
On Jul 4, 2006, at
Yes, of course you don't want to go beyond the sensor's saturation
point in areas where you want detail. But protecting an exposure by
underexposure is the wrong methodology. It's difficult to explain
without some graphs to make it more intelligible, that's why I
recommend reading Bruce's
I left the crop loose figuring that, if the paper wanted to use the pic,
they'd have some room to crop to their needs. I shot about fifteen or so
frames - until there was no more room on the card I had - with somewhat
different angles and perspectives. I may post one or two more pics at some
Nice shot Shel.
I had been trying for 20 years to get a picture or letter into the l;ocal
paper. February
i managed several
from a fund raiser. The editor was there with a PS, saw me, came over and
chatted for a
second,
looked at my gear, and saidYou seem to know what your doing, heres my
Godfrey,
I hope you save some of your tutorial posts so you don't have to retype
them. This link is also helpful:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/expose-right.shtml
And yes, I know it was posted just a few messages back, but it can't hurt
to post it again.
Shel
[Original
Go to www.adorama.com, look for Pentax lenses. Notice the price after
rebate. Adorama has subtracted the rebate valid to 6 July *and* the one
valid *from* 1 July. But surely you won't get both? I'd check if I were
living in the US, though...
- Toralf
-
Adorama is a fine business to buy
It's not Pentax, so I figure it's probably OK to post this one.
The product decription is unbelievable.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=150002224988ru=http://search.ebay.com:80/150002224988_W0QQfromZR40QQfviZ1
William Robb
-
I don't think one would want to get into a
LOL:
http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/2006/06/great-photographers-on-internet.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|NK
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel,
The Nebbish's are a small but active family.
We even have some around the midwest,
but you don't hear much of them. ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/4/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had almost record rainfalls this year, but the truth is that
California is a semi-arid state.
Sonora is a nice little town but a very different one than many.
Because it is the county seat, it has a lot of stuff that most small
towns do not have. The newspaper is an strange one though. There are
funny politics in Sonora. If you ever come up this direction let me
know.
Bryan
On 7/4/06,
Godfrey,
Thanks for taking time to write that explaination.
I think I understand now. Like Shel said, I haven't been paying close
enough attention. I have underestimated how far to the right that I
should be pushing the histogram curve. I'll make some corrections now
that I shooting RAW.
These are the ones that jump out at me this month...
Curves in... by Jostein
Excellent abstract!
---
Watersurface by Jens Bladt
Another excellent abstract!
---
What am eye? by Robert Gonzalez
Love it and the color.
---
Who's head is it
Hi Bob,
You're welcome.
I used to use the blinkies, but then turned the feature off. While I rarely
look at the LCD screen these days, when the blinkies were on and i did
look, it was distracting.
Just go out and bracket some exposures and all will become perfectly clear.
However, you may want
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Thanks for taking time to write that explanation.
You're welcome.
In practice on the ist Ds, do you shoot with the blinking highlight
warning on? At what levels does it begin to warn that highlights are
blown? 4095, 4090, 4080?
I leave the
This is an area in which even a paper such as the San
Francisco Chronicle
has a section devoted to what needs to be fixed in the community.
The pot hole at Third and Maple has not been repaired for 27
days. Alvin
Nebbish, head of the city's street maintenance department,
said a
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The photo editor liked it - called it hydrant art. The general
editor felt that, since the paper [was] full, he wasn't going to
run it, as so doing would have required bumping something else.
Did you use a Pentax? If so that would explain why they said no. Not a
them. This link is also helpful:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/expose-right.shtml
And yes, I know it was posted just a few messages back, but
it can't hurt
to post it again.
Oh, I dunno - you wouldn't want to over expose it...
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks for the info. Probably not the best thing for my house then,
where dust never sleeps.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of William Robb
Sent: 04 July 2006 15:24
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pros and
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
