Hope you enjoy the camera!
I was interested in the shots from the perspective that I lived in DC from
77 to 90, and the National Cathedral was being finished when we moved
there. I see it is still being finished! :-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You can use gearbox bikes on gnarly terrain; they just need to be
built for it :)
http://www.laharbikes.com/
If you'll excuse the shockingly bad website, that's a full carbon-
fibre downhill racing bike with a 14-speed planetary-geared hub
mounted in the frame.
Don't think it's
On 11/12/06, Beaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone think a tilt-shift adapter that fit between a SLR and 645
lens would be practical? (Wide lenses and leaning spires got me
thinking about it.) The MF lens circle would lend a fair amount of
movement. According to a lens registration chart I
In search for some information for my coming calendar with panorama shots I
fonud the following link collection, some
of the links contain english translations. Thanks alot to the original
poster Kai on http://forum.digitalfotonetz.de/viewtopic.php?t=23257
Markus
Hier eine kleine Übersicht:
On 12/11/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 10, 2006, at 11:36 PM, David Savage wrote:
FF: Full Frame?
um. no.
Oh!?
I wonder what he meant then.
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Dec 11, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't know what David's bike cost.
A bit more than yours did, but still a lot less than the '07 Epic
Marathon I've been drooling over. Maybe it's a good thing that
events conspired against me getting to test-ride that.
- Dave
--
I'm not sure I follow what your problem is.
True, program line setting is not located in the User menu, but in the
Custom menu. Whatever you set it to, the camera remembers your
selection.
What makes it more desirable to have it located in the User menu?
Dave
On 12/11/06, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL
MJ quotes Canon claiming that in-body SR is no good for long lenses,
because it would require the sensor to move by 1/4 of an inch.
They are talking of course about full frame 35mm. The required movement
would presumably be rather less on an APS-C sensor.
John
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:04:31
Flying Fauferf of courfe.
Joftein
FF: Full Frame?
um. no.
Oh!?
I wonder what he meant then.
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Zörk makes such adapters.
There are also the Hartblei lenses. Buy one in a 645 mount and use a
645-K adapter, and you're there. :-)
Jostein
On 12/11/06, Beaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone think a tilt-shift adapter that fit between a SLR and 645
lens would be practical? (Wide lenses and
Hi David,
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:12:15 +0900, David Savage wrote:
I'm not sure I follow what your problem is.
True, program line setting is not located in the User menu, but in the
Custom menu. Whatever you set it to, the camera remembers your
selection.
What makes it more desirable to have it
John,
The movement required would be the same for say a 500mm lens independent of
sensor size - a point in the middle of the sensor would still move the same
distance with the same angular displacement of the camera/lens combination.
Still I am impressed with getting a fair proportion of my
On 11/12/06, Rod Connan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The large movement available in the K10D sensor support plate is evidenced
by the clearly heard thunk when you tip the camera from side to side (when
the camera is off)
Scaling and measuring images of the SR mechanism I estimate the
clearance
Ahhh right. I'm with you now. :-)
Dave
On 12/11/06, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:12:15 +0900, David Savage wrote:
I'm not sure I follow what your problem is.
True, program line setting is not located in the User menu, but in the
Custom menu.
I have seen the Zork site before, couldn't find the link. It is what
I had in mind.
But then, it was more of a day dream, than a product search.
The Zork products look like they would be incredibly fussy to use.
Effective, but fussy.
Thanks for reminding me of the url- it's a nice place to
Rod,
I think I'd have to disagree with this. For sure if you comapre like
focal lengths what you say is true, but it is surely better to comapre
like FOV, in which case the K10D has a 1.5x advantage over a full
frame moving sensor system.
Eric.
On 11/12/06, Rod Connan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the amount of movement is the same for the same lens, but the smaller
sensor has more room to move before it gets outside the image circle.
DagT
Fra: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ quotes Canon claiming that in-body SR is no good for long lenses,
because it would require the
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20895457-5006784,00.html
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
I am planning to get a K10D but don't want the Sigma kit lens. I have
some film Pentax lenses but on a digital camera they wouldn't be as
wide as I would like. I would like to get a lens for travel as close
as possible to the 18-200 Tamron, but with less distortion than I
have read that lens
The sensor will move through the same angle for any given lens, but as the
APS-C sensor is smaller than a 35mm sensor, the distance travelled by the
edge that is furthest from the fulcrum will be shorter.
John
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:00:23 -, Digital Image Studio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/12/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sensor will move through the same angle for any given lens, but as the
APS-C sensor is smaller than a 35mm sensor, the distance travelled by the
edge that is furthest from the fulcrum will be shorter.
Obviously the compensatory sensor
Mike,
I don't think there is a wideangle-to-tele zoom in the current lens
lineup. I'd recommend a two lenses combination, such as DA16-45/4 and
DA50-200/4-5.6.
There are also the FAJ counterparts for a cheaper option.
Jostein
On 12/11/06, MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am planning to get a
On 10/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/38.htm
Very very nice Godders. Stark but interesting. Detail in the horizon
makes it for me.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I really have to use sarcasm /sarcasm tags for this?
Mr. Alling, I apologize for offending you. I realize that you were being
sarcastic. We apparently share the same view of people who acquire tools and
pronounce themselves experts without benefit
Already exists. I have one that allows me to use my Pentacon 6 or
Mamiya 645 lenses on my Canon EOS. It's made in Munich, Germany, by
Zörkendörfer. You can see all of their products at:
http://www.zoerk.com
Good stuff. Beautifully made.
Bob
On Dec 10, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Beaker wrote:
On 11/12/06, Ralf R. Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/7414242
Comments and suggestions are as always most welcome.
And I worry about the shit my Land Rover pumps out...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 11/12/06, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed:
I couldn't give a FF
Full Frame ? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
D'oh!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I must admit it is a heady feeling selling one. Yes, my first sale ever of
photography.
Congrats Marnie. Well done chuck.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
For once discombobulated himself, Cotty exclaimed:
D'oh!
:-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: MikeM
Subject: Lens for K10D
I am planning to get a K10D but don't want the Sigma kit lens. I have
some film Pentax lenses but on a digital camera they wouldn't be as
wide as I would like. I would like to get a lens for travel as close
as possible to the
Maybe it's like New York, never really finished,
Cheers
mike
On Dec 10, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Hope you enjoy the camera!
I was interested in the shots from the perspective that I lived in
DC from
77 to 90, and the National Cathedral was being finished when we
moved
In a message dated 12/10/2006 9:37:30 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harrumph!!! Now I suppose you expect to be congratulated and made much
of... Well, then, CONGRATULATIONS, Marnie! Good for you!
===
Hehehehe.
No, I think I was mainly expressing amazement.
Congratulation as well Marnie.
Will you show us your artsy modification?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:46 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: OT: I Sold one!
On 10/12/06, [EMAIL
The 6 meg size will be equivalent to the no. of pixels captured by
your istD.. I always shoot at whatever the full sensor allows -- I
have 4 digital cameras now, 2, 4 5 and now 10 MP -- since I use
photoshop (or i-Photo) I'll do any resizing there, anyway. I don't
screw around in camera.
IM0 those all-purpose lenses are not nearly as good as the less
extreme zooms, and they are not as good as prime lenses.
My wife wanted something fairly wide on her new K10 so we got the
pentax 16-45-- like a 24-60 mm on a 35 mm camera Our next
purchase sill be a telephoto-- probably;y
I didn't see this before, don't know how I missed it.
Good luck Tom.
Markus Maurer wrote:
I hope everything goes well Graywolf.
greetings
Markus
By the way, if anybody is interested, I am going down to Duke Tuesday to
see a specialist as the doctors here in Boone, and previously in
That's just sick...
(But funny).
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:59 PM, cbwaters wrote:
I have set you up the Tree Kitty. All your presents are belong to
us, make
your list, check it twice HAHAHAAAHAHAHAH.
http://www.ceilingcat.com/
- Dave
--
Congrats, when you've sold 3 it'll be old hat.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still don't have new computer totally up yet, so still not really reading and
writing to list yet.
But gotta share this.
The show was a mixed bag of: pottery, jewelry, stained glass, watercolor,
oil, and photography.
Don't they know real perverts use digital.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20895457-5006784,00.html
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
It is common knowledge that the K10D does not have the capability to
do TTL flash metering. While there are options to buy dedicated PTTL
strobes for mounting on the hotshoe, there are no options currently
for a PTTL ring flash.
I do not use flash very much and for general work my Sunpak 383 in
I would like to get a Pentax lens, but because of the cost I will
probably have to settle for something like the Tamron lenses I have for
my *Ist.
-
Mike, if money is an issue, buy a less expensive camera (like the K100D)
but a good lens. DSLRs go out of date quickly, like computers. So
Pentax doesn't have an 18-200 equivalent available for the APS sensor
yet anyway. I think that you'll find that most super zoom lenses will
have a fair amount of distortion no matter who makes them. It's just
the nature of the beast. You should really take a look at the Tamron
before you
Your Land Rover may be the cleanest device you own...
Cotty wrote:
On 11/12/06, Ralf R. Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/7414242
Comments and suggestions are as always most welcome.
And I worry about the shit my Land
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: New (old stock) Pentax DSLR kits even lower prices?
I actually prefer the way the istD handles and feels in my hands.
I can hold the *ist D comfortably in one hand at rest for a couple of
hours,
I'm not offended, but some people seem to misunderstand my sense of
humor and irony, occasionally...
Y. Rowe wrote:
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I really have to use sarcasm /sarcasm tags for this?
Mr. Alling, I apologize for offending you. I realize that you were
I had friends who had a couple of tarantulas years ago that I was
permitted to pet.
at the Arizona Sonora Desert Museum , a docent was showing us one or two
and
Richard (my SO who passed away in 1993) claimed he had handled them before
so he was allowed to hold one in his hands - the shot
Cough Cough ... nice pic, nice Cough lighting Cough Cough.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's getting cold at last, over here. A mere three degrees above
freezing, biting cold, gusty wind, but what a wonderful December sky,
about 20 minutes after sunset. Distance between the foreground and the
Gentlemen, please notice that Tamron announced 18-250 zoom lens.
Eventually, and I guess rather soon, it will hit the shelves.
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No Cathedral is ever finished, they just stop working on them from time
to time...
Beaker wrote:
Maybe it's like New York, never really finished,
Cheers
mike
On Dec 10, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Hope you enjoy the camera!
I was interested in the shots from the
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 10/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I experimented with this quite a bit with my previous cameras that
had built in IS. Image stabilization is only of limited use at macro
magnifications, virtually useless at 1:1.
Use a sturdy support (copystand
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Tom Lesser wrote:
I don't know the specific rationale, but it's related to their
orthodoxy in some manner. If you order from them frequently, you
should get on their e-mailing list I think they're very good about
sending out notices when they'll be down in
I find the K10 nicer to handle than the D. It has a much deeper handgrip, so it
feel right in my grasp. I also like the feel of the vertical grip. I don't know
exactly why, but I find the vertical taking position more natural for me than
that of the D with grip. After about 1000 frames, it's
I'm not a heavy flash user ...
With a film camera, having TTL flash metering was useful, without it
one tends to waste a lot of film.
With a digital camera, a fully manual flash seems perfectly fine: I
shoot a couple of test frames, check them with the histogram, and
just leave those
The SR is (mostly) done by a translation, not a rotation; that
has the same amount of travel for all the parts of the sensor
(and does not depend on sensor size). There is no fulcrum.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:54:28AM -, John Forbes wrote:
The sensor will move through the same angle for
Perry -
Promaster lists one on their web site that they claim, with their Pentax
module, will work with the Pentax DSLRs, including the K10. Light
output is GN 35 at ISO 100.
-P
-
I forgot about this one. But I suspect that it has the same problem as a
flash from Sigma. You need to
Sigma's ringflash is supposed to be forthcoming in P-TTL form. Now that
Sigma has a copy of the K10D, it may appear soon.
I hesitate to buy one, though. Every time you buy a new body, you have
to send the flash back to Sigma for a new chip.
I, too, wish Pentax would bring one out. After all,
Coming from that other thread ...
I can hold the *ist D comfortably in one hand at rest for a
couple of
hours, with the K10D using the same lens I have no chance. My hand
feels strained to get a good grip and the camera feels quite
heavy. I
know that the actual weight is not that much
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:24:02AM -0500, gfen wrote:
Same thing. Shomer Shabbas means they don't use computers. I guess its
easier to shut the system down than to worry about it and possibly violate
their rules, than to leave it running. Not to mention, if its doing work
in the
My wife is an avid shell collector and I often photograph what she
finds for record keeping and to help her identify the species. The
size varies a lot, so the camera to object distance changes often
during a shoot. Every time there is a change in position, the
exposure has to be re-determined
I tend to shoot that stuff with a tabletop setup, not a ringflash. I
bought one of the Lightcubes ... makes it a breeze. Set the flash up
with a cable so it's a fixed distance from the outside of the cube,
put a stage in the cube for the object, and use a zoom (the F35-70
Macro does a
Thanks Paul for the suggestion. They do say that is works with the
K10D with the correct module. The output should be fine for what I
need. I will have to check out a source and price.
On 12/11/06, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perry -
Promaster lists one on their web site that
Thanks, all of you who have wished me luck, here or silently. I
appreciate the kind thoughts.
P. J. Alling wrote:
I didn't see this before, don't know how I missed it.
Good luck Tom.
Markus Maurer wrote:
I hope everything goes well Graywolf.
greetings
Markus
By the way, if
Perry -
Promaster lists one on their web site that they claim, with their Pentax
module, will work with the Pentax DSLRs, including the K10. Light
output is GN 35 at ISO 100.
-P
Perry Pellechia wrote:
It is common knowledge that the K10D does not have the capability to
do TTL flash
On 12/11/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perry -
Promaster lists one on their web site that they claim, with their Pentax
module, will work with the Pentax DSLRs, including the K10. Light
output is GN 35 at ISO 100.
-P
-
I forgot about this one. But I suspect that it
P.S. There is a company that puts out an LCD ringlight. Since it goes on
and off like a flashlight, you don't need to worry about P-TTL. Just
turn it on and your meter does the work. Bh may list it. Or do a Google
search. The limitation is that the light is pretty weak, so you really
need to
I think you're allowed to spell God, since it's a title not a name...
gfen wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Tom Lesser wrote:
I don't know the specific rationale, but it's related to their
orthodoxy in some manner. If you order from them frequently, you
should get on their e-mailing list
Some the shells I have had to shoot are less than 3mm and require
bellows, reversed lens or both.These situations make it very
difficult to illuminate the subject without shadow problems. The ring
light is the only thing I have tried that really works for all
situations.
On 12/11/06, Godfrey
Thanks Joe, This is an excellent suggestion. I have seen these before
but I totally forgot about them. However, the nice one at BH runs
$250. The cheapo Phoenix is less.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=detailsQ=is=REGO=productlistsku=365518
Thanks Joe, This is an excellent suggestion. I have seen these before
but I totally forgot about them. However, the nice one at BH runs
$250. The cheapo Phoenix is less.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=detailsQ=is=REGO=productlistsku=365518
Very interesting subject matter! I'd like to see some pictures.
Godfrey
On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Some the shells I have had to shoot are less than 3mm and require
bellows, reversed lens or both.These situations make it very
difficult to illuminate the subject
Joe,
Go to Newegg.com and checkout their user reviews of various LCDs.
There are a lot of gamers who buy and review LCDs from them and I
think you will find their comments useful.
On 12/11/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good, 19 lcd monitor. It is not for
Interesting devices ... I think I'd like them better than a flash as
you can see the modeling and highlights more easily.
Godfrey
On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Thanks Joe, This is an excellent suggestion. I have seen these before
but I totally forgot about them.
When I was at EKU, I used a copystand/pin register set-up and frequently
lit very small artifacts with a fiber optic tube. It took longish
shutter speeds, but it was a great way to light stuff.
Plus, it was a hell of a lot of fun.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Can anyone recommend a good, 19 lcd monitor. It is not for photography,
but for my son, who is a gamer. I'm not having much luck getting good
online reviews. Within reason I'll buy something high quality.
Thanks,
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 12/11/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Joe, This is an excellent suggestion. I have seen these before
but I totally forgot about them. However, the nice one at BH runs
$250. The cheapo Phoenix is less.
My partner bought a Samsung 205bw 20 cinema display format LCD
monitor. Cost was under $300, it has both DVI and VGA inputs. With
proper calibration, I found it suitable as a good quality
photographic monitor while my ACD 23 was down with a bad power
supply. Should certainly be good enough
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good, 19 lcd monitor. It is not for photography,
but for my son, who is a gamer. I'm not having much luck getting good
online reviews. Within reason I'll buy something high quality.
Thanks,
Joe
Dude, get a Dell. The Dell Ultrasharp series
On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:20 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/
0,20867,20895457-5006784,00.html
The world has become more stupid.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm not into it, (surprise!) but don't serious gamers 'require' a short
delay time of, possibly, under 5 ms.(?)
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My partner bought a Samsung 205bw 20 cinema display format LCD
monitor. Cost was under $300, it has both DVI and VGA inputs. With
On Dec 11, 2006, at 1:41 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
There are also the Hartblei lenses. Buy one in a 645 mount and use a
645-K adapter, and you're there. :-)
Second time I've heard reference to the Hartblei lens for the Pentax
645 ... someone else told me that the 45mm f/3.5 SuperRotator was
Thanks for all the comments.
I figured out the roll paper business with the R2400 last night.
After a couple of mis-starts, I got it right and proceeded to make
several prints. Only had 8.3 wide paper on hand ... thought I had
purchased 13 but oh well. (I bought it as a test several months
I'm happy for you.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11. desember 2006 02:32
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT: I Sold one!
Still don't have new computer totally up yet, so
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20895457-5006784,00.html
-
As I've said many times, if you give unintelligent, minimally educated
people the opportunity to exercise petty authority, guess what?
They do.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
I think you're allowed to spell God, since it's a title not a name...
Dunno, ever practicing Jew I've known on the Internet has gone with G-d. I
jsut repeat what they say.
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
Don't forget that there is also the Mamiya ZD, which can use all Mamiya 645
glass (although the non-AF lenses are stop-down only). It's a bit pricey at 12
grand or so. Personally, I'd rather a 645DII with a good back, but that's way
out of my price range at the moment.
-Adam
Kevin Waterson
Hi Gang,
I'm just curious how you would respond to the following. Any ideas would
help me out. Thanks.
Tom C.
-
Dear Mr Thomas Cakalic,
My name is Ivana Reic, B. Sc. Design from Croatia. I saw Your photos on
photo.net, and choose part of your photo: *Seasons End **
Godfrey,
I do not have access to my later photos here at work. I have some
earlier shots I can show. At the time I was trying to decide the best
way of getting these images. This set compares using a reversed
Vivitar 28mm lens and a Tamron 90mm F2.8 macro lens and teleconverter.
I think
That does sound like an interesting way to go. One or more LEDs
would be an way too. I might experiment with this approach.
On 12/11/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was at EKU, I used a copystand/pin register set-up and frequently
lit very small artifacts with a fiber optic
Neat stuff!
These shells are very beautiful. The ringlight gives a somewhat flat,
clinical lighting ... more of a scientific recording than capturing
their beauty. Probably fine for the purposes you have articulated,
but I think you could do better justice to the subject matter,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
With a film camera, having TTL flash metering was useful, without it
one tends to waste a lot of film.
With a digital camera, a fully manual flash seems perfectly fine: I
shoot a couple of test frames, check them with the histogram, and
just leave those settings in
I would ask for more than name on photo.
Dave
Quoting Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Gang,
I'm just curious how you would respond to the following. Any ideas would
help me out. Thanks.
Tom C.
-
Dear Mr Thomas Cakalic,
My name is Ivana Reic, B. Sc. Design from
For sale:
Pentax KX body. EXC+ cosmetic condition, full working order.
Mirror bumper and light seals OK, no leakage, but will need attention before
too long.
This is a very robust SLR body with the all-important depth of field preview.
Offers by private email please before it goes on that
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
I would make comments like that based
on an old folder? Are you kidding me?
Of course not. I am talking about
modern state of the art 35mm, MF, and
LF lenses. The bigger the
Is the Mamiya ZD still in production? I thought they had closed up shop.
G
On Dec 11, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Don't forget that there is also the Mamiya ZD, which can use all
Mamiya 645 glass (although the non-AF lenses are stop-down only).
It's a bit pricey at 12 grand or
I have three Dell Ultrasharps (19) running here: two on this system and
one on a nearby backup system. They do what they are supposed to
producing crisp readable displays. Have not idea how they stack up
with competition, but I am quite satisfied with them. I don't do gaming
:-) . I
Hi list,
Today I sent my two favourite zooms, the F70-210 and the FA28-105, to the
Dutch Pentax importer for repair. Both had falling damage to the zooming
mechanism after a moderate fall (from a table and from my shoulder, to
wooden flooring and asphalt respectively).
What sort of bugs me
For sale:
DOI 2X teleconverter for Pentax K mount.
Near mint condition, possibly unused. Comes with original front and rear caps
and leatherette case.
This was an exceptionally good teleconverter, thought by many to be the best
that was ever made for Pentax lenses. It received excellent
Me too, I would love to see some photos.
Have you also tried to put the shells on a white handkerchief or fabric and
then on a glass plate and give some additional lightening from the
bottom/back of the glass? I had some nice effects with clay figures with
that and 2 additional flashes softened
I understand how small the shells are but I nevertheless expected the
photos to be a lot sharper.
I woul as well try with a completely white and a black background instead of
the natural gray.
I could imagine them to be nice in black and white too.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
