Dear All,
Thinking about getting the HP B9180 printer and wondered if any one here had
had any experiences with it.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> not for me, but your pano is really neat!
Thanks. :)
As soon as I get my printer set up, and some Epson Premium Luster roll
paper, I'm going to start making prints again. Some will be gifts, but most
will be to sell.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorpho
...and my very first attempt at an HDR-alike (done by hand in Photoshop 6).
Shadows 1/3s at f/11, highlights 1/10s at f/11, K10D at 400ASA, FA 28-105.
Comments or criticisms appreciated. (As well as advice on noise-reduction
software for the shadows... I meant to shoot it at 100ASA)
http://keat
I never said it was anything more than a quick snap, literally a "grab.".
It's just a beginning. I don't consider it much of a photo either. It has
a lot of deficiencies.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Date: 1/6/2007 10:
Hey Bruce, maybe we can take a drive out to the Altamont Pass some time and
see what we can generate in the way of interesting photos. I think it
would be a challenge.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton
> These look difficult to shoot. There are a bunch out here in
> California,
No, I meant K35/2.0 ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: P. J. Alling
> Interesting shot, I think it would look better in B&W. By the way don't
> you mean K30/2.8?
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/charley.html
> >
> > Tech Details: istDS, K30/2.0 @ f/5.6, ISO 200, 1/100 sec
--
To be honest, without the back story it isn't much of a picture IMHO.
I find the fact that his hands and the top of his head are cut off
distracting. Get closer (or a longer lens perhaps), to focus on his
face (and it's a face with character in spades :-), or step back to
get more of the environme
These look difficult to shoot. There are a bunch out here in
California, but I have never been in a position to try.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 8:23:27 PM, you wrote:
RW> Ordinarily, I would be taking (and posting)
RW> winter-type photos now. However, it reached 72F/ 2
Hello Shel,
I look forward to more about him and his portraits.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 6:39:50 PM, you wrote:
SB> Charley sits in front of the El Cerrito Post Office almost every day. Over
SB> a period of months I've come to know a little about him, and have someti
On 07/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can see them all over the American west as well. They're somewhat
> of a solution to energy problems, but not very efficient.
> Interestingly enough, a lot of east-coast democrat congressmen and
> women were high on these at one time. And
On 07/01/07, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2007, at 5:22 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
>
> > but unfortunately my Epson has developed a problem with putting a
> > blue line into every color
> > scan at exactly the same place. Well, it's getting old.
>
> My guess would be dust on the s
Hi!
David Mann wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:57 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
>> radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
>
> A lot easier said than done on that kind of scale. It's quite hard
> to effectively s
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:29:27 -0700
"Russell Kerstetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, everything that paul said...
>
> russ
>
> On 1/5/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nice composition. Very dramatic. Excellent work. "Lost Horizons" to
> > us westereners.
> > > http://picasa
On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:57 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
> radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
A lot easier said than done on that kind of scale. It's quite hard
to effectively shield a room against RF, especially
--- David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:57 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> > You could always disable cell phones inside
> buildings, like any other
> > radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday
> cage.*
>
> I think this may be one of those problems where a
> level of
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:22:01 -0500
"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The modern world intrudes again.
> > regarding 'lost horizons', there is access to the Net available
> > through a mobile phone right from that spot. :))
nothing so dramatic :) mostly it's been a happy, sometimes not
On Jan 7, 2007, at 5:22 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
> but unfortunately my Epson has developed a problem with putting a
> blue line into every color
> scan at exactly the same place. Well, it's getting old.
My guess would be dust on the sensor, unless it's developed a dead/
hot pixel.
- Dave
-
You can see them all over the American west as well. They're somewhat
of a solution to energy problems, but not very efficient.
Interestingly enough, a lot of east-coast democrat congressmen and
women were high on these at one time. And then someone proposed
building some within viewing dis
On Jan 7, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
> Somebody in the next booth started making calls and talking to
> whoever he was calling very loudly.
That's something that bugs me, too. People always seem to raise
their voice when using telephones for some reason. Maybe it's the
same thing th
On 07/01/07, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ordinarily, I would be taking (and posting)
> winter-type photos now. However, it reached 72F/ 22C
> in Philadelphia today, the rosebush next door is in
> bloom, and it's not wintry at all.
>
> So, I've returned to my collection of pix from our
Ordinarily, I would be taking (and posting)
winter-type photos now. However, it reached 72F/ 22C
in Philadelphia today, the rosebush next door is in
bloom, and it's not wintry at all.
So, I've returned to my collection of pix from our
trip to Germany this fall, for this shot taken on a
cold, wet,
Man, that list keeps growing. Are certain people more believable now?
Dave :-)
On 1/7/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome.
>
> BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark Roberts,
> Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
On 1/4/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> >If you're not shooting any film, the DA70 is a better option
> >(smaller, less expensive, just as good). Otherwise, the 77. >Maybe,
> just maybe, this will result in a few more 77LTDs on the
> >used market.
>
> I doub
I know what part I believe...
Brian Walters wrote:
> Now which part of that do we believe?
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++
> Brian Walters
> Western Sydney Australia
>
>
> Quoting Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
>> I don't know WHAT YOU ARE SAYING YOU MORON Ca
Interesting shot, I think it would look better in B&W. By the way don't
you mean K30/2.8?
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Charley sits in front of the El Cerrito Post Office almost every day. Over
> a period of months I've come to know a little about him, and have sometimes
> helped him out.
>
> Toda
He's Canadian, his entire country is a metaphor...
Cotty wrote:
> On 6/1/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> A metaphor for your country.
>>
>
> What's a metaphor?
>
>
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germa
You two are asking for a spanking...
Cotty wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>> her up to the dock.
>>
>> Cap'n Bob
>>
>
> Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>
> I didn't think you'd have a clew.
On 1/6/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
> >On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> >>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
> >>her up to the dock.
> >>
> >>Cap'n Bob
> >
> >Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
> >
> >I didn't think you
On 07/01/07, jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought i read in an interview (links where posted to this group ) of a
> K10D engineener/designer that at 50 iso, a lot of voltage/current? needed to
> be pushed
> through the sensor. thus using battery power quickly.
> Anyone confirm this??
Does
Cotty wrote:
>On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>>her up to the dock.
>>
>>Cap'n Bob
>
>Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
>
>I didn't think you'd have a clew.
Perhaps he should take a bow?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Now, Boris seems to be missing. Ya better get ready to cover, Sweety.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
>
> Well someone has to.
>
>
> Darling.
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___
Excellent portrait. I'd like to meet Charley.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 9:39 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Charley sits in front of the El Cerrito Post Office almost every
> day. Over
> a period of months I've come to know a little about him, and have
> sometimes
> helped him out.
>
> Today I had
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:06:00 +0100, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
>Yes, it is possible if imaging processor allows this. In firmware v
>0.2 it was possible to set iso50 and 3200. I believe for some reasons
>Pentax has cut these sensitivities in firmware v 1.0
I thought i read in an interview (link
Charley sits in front of the El Cerrito Post Office almost every day. Over
a period of months I've come to know a little about him, and have sometimes
helped him out.
Today I had my camera handy - it was in my hand rather than in the Domke
case - and when he saw it he became quite interested, w
Hi Tim, Your question isn't intrusive or out of line in any way.
Frankly, when i saw the fence while driving by it, it provoked no "emotion"
in me whatsoever other than to make me think it would be a nice subject to
photograph and add to my collection of similar flag photos. Over time, and
befor
See my response to Bill.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stenquist
> Interesting subject. I'm not sure this dead-on shot does it justice.
> Paul
> http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/amfence.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_p
Yes, that too. Your comment got me thinking about photographing the fence
again, but from a lower angle, and I fully intend to make a wider shot at
some point. There's an item in the yard on the LHS of the frame that might
add some humor to the scene, but today was not the day to make that shot
f
I've always been puzzled be scenes like this one, to me it is very exotic.
So I'm wondering what kind of emotions the scene provokes in you personally
Shel.
I hope you don't find the question intruding.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
I think it is time you readjusts your mail filter Cotty, you are obviously
under some influence ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: 7. januar 2007 01:23
To: pentax list
Subject: Re
You can also purchase Bruce Fraser's Real World Camera RAW. It was
written with CS1 in mind, but it's quite a close match to Elements.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Hello Ed,
>
> If you're using Camera Raw with Photoshop Elements, most of the
> information from Bruce
Now which part of that do we believe?
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know WHAT YOU ARE SAYING YOU MORON Cant you see your WRONG
> WRONG
> WRONG and I will rise out of the mist and become
Hello Ed,
If you're using Camera Raw with Photoshop Elements, most of the
information from Bruce Fraser's excellent book, "Real World Camera
Raw with Photoshop CS2", as pertains to RAW data theory and Camera
Raw basic functions, and suggested operational use, will be very
helpful to you. T
Yeah, that's where I'm at. I was shooting almost all MF (with a few
diversions to my Leica) when digital rolled around. I had been
looking for a high level scanner. I'm not looking very hard now. But
I am hanging onto my 6x7 lenses in anticipation fo the 645D.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 8:02 PM,
I should have said. My description was of a properly exposed shot. When the
exposure is way off, it happens, me too do some basic adjustments before
setting white balance.
My eye isn't good enough yet to set WB by eye. So I "cheat" using the eye
drop, or use some of the presets to get it nearly th
On 6/1/07, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
>her up to the dock.
>
>Cap'n Bob
Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
I didn't think you'd have a clew.
--
Cheers,
Master Bates
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pas
On Jan 6, 2007, at 8:22 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
> ... It's really
> hard to sink a lot of money into a technology that's on the wane -
> I can
> see even my MF film days coming to a close.
My own reluctance as well. My MF film days are pretty much confined
to hobbying now.
Godfrey
--
PDML
On 07/01/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >A metaphor for your country.
>
> What's a metaphor?
Its a tool
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/IMGP17853.jpg
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(
On 6/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Well someone has to.
Darling.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Jack, what does it mean "transom"?
>
> Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
>
> A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter
Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Jack, what does it mean "transom"?
>
> Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
>
> A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter
On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:35 PM, Cotty wrote:
> Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
>
> A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter is (no cheating on
> Google!)
Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can tie
her up to the dock.
Cap'n Bob
On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Jack, what does it mean "transom"?
Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter is (no cheating on Google!)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, P
On 6/1/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A metaphor for your country.
What's a metaphor?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
h
On 6/1/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
>radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
Only works one day a week though. Bummer.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
|
On 6/1/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Maybe it's been decided that Cotty's problems will quickly become
>evident ...
I don't know WHAT YOU ARE SAYING YOU MORON Cant you see your WRONG WRONG
WRONG and I will rise out of the mist and become THE GREAT GOD of the
aperture simulator a
On 6/1/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark Roberts,
>Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
Freedom at last!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
___
Interesting subject. I'm not sure this dead-on shot does it justice.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> This is certainly a good entry for your gallery. It carries a lot of
> meaning behind it.
>
> --
> Bruce
>
>
> Saturday, January 6, 2007, 2:55:03 PM, you wrote:
>
> SB> On
For some discussions and photos too on the PDML one needs to be American or
some kind of patriot to understand them at least partially IMHO.
I'm glad that I do not see white Swiss crosses here on the walls and that I
do not have to say thank you to the Swiss navy or some mad politicians.
As you s
This is certainly a good entry for your gallery. It carries a lot of
meaning behind it.
--
Bruce
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 2:55:03 PM, you wrote:
SB> One of the things I want to do this year is to photograph the areas in
SB> which I live and frequent, making photos of the things that may be
To expand on this, I'll also sometimes use curves to brighten the
midrange or increase contrast after I open a hot in PhotoShop. But
that's usually jsut an indication that I didn't quite get the job
done in the RAW converter. I interpolate everything in the RAW
converter to 16 bit, 144 meg
See, the rest of us don't say anything, so you can believe us!
--
Bruce
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 11:18:53 AM, you wrote:
TC> Welcome.
TC> BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark Roberts,
TC> Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
TC> Tom C.
>>From: Paul Stenquist <
Ed,
Welcome back aboard. Have lot's of fun with that new DSLR and post
some PESO's now and then. Join in the conversation when you can.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 6:38:35 AM, you wrote:
EK> Hello...
EK> Just wanted to introduce myself (again). I was once a subscribe
I'm probably a bit too tired and inebriated to do this, but I'll
rough it out.
I shoot only RAW. I open them in Camera RAW converter. I have CS1 on
my main computer and CS2 on my laptop. I use both. CS2 is only an
advantage for pics where you really need to pinch the curve at RAW
level. Aft
I like the concept. I'm not sure if the trees are strong enough to
command the attention as the subject. Especially as the leading lines
don't quite lead to them. If they were placed a little to the right
(you'd have to move - can't actually move the trees ) the
leading lines of boats would work
Well I certainly like the interaction here. One nit is the dark blob
above them somewhat steals my attention. I would be tempted to clone
it out.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 2:35:26 AM, you wrote:
BL> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
BL> Boris
--
PDML
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" Subject: PESO - American Fence
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/amfence.html
>
A metaphor for your country.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Maybe it's been decided that Cotty's problems will quickly become
evident ...
Brian Walters wrote:
> Am I imaging it or is this list getting longer with each new introduction?
> And what about Cotty? Is he now to be trusted?
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++
> Bria
You could always disable cell phones inside buildings, like any other
radio transceiver, just put one in a *Faraday cage.*
Bob Shell wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:56 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
>
>
>>> I think cell
>>> phone use in theaters, restaurants, and many other places should
>>> simply be b
One of the things I want to do this year is to photograph the areas in
which I live and frequent, making photos of the things that may be
interesting, unusual, or that in some way reflect the culture and the
atmosphere of the area. I don't expect great social commentaries, or for
the pics to alway
Hah! I knew it!
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> In my secret second ( or maybe third?) life, I'm Ken Rockwell, and
> I'm damn well tired of you Pentaxians making fun of me. Nikon rules!
> Paul
> On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:18 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>
>> Quoting Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
On Thursday 04 January 2007 20:29, Jens Bladt wrote:
> I am an architect (graduated 1978) doing city planning for a municipality.
> Mostly I do development briefs (local plans). I took a bachelor degree in
> project management five years ago.
Something like PRINCE2?
> I also do strategic planning
No this proves that Cotty is more unreliable than we first expected.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Walters
Sent: 6. januar 2007 23:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Introduc
Boats or Doorways? (Just being a wise a**).
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
>> Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
>> I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
>> scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little to
>> the r
The list is getting longer because Pentax is producing more viable
products. One goes with the other.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 5:14 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> Am I imaging it or is this list getting longer with each new
> introduction? And what about Cotty? Is he now to be trusted?
>
>
> C
As you might know, I'm no expert. So why don't others chime in correcting
me?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Walters
Sent: 6. januar 2007 23:11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE:
That list gets longer and longer...
Tom C wrote:
> Welcome.
>
> BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark Roberts,
> Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To: Pentax-D
Am I imaging it or is this list getting longer with each new introduction?
And what about Cotty? Is he now to be trusted?
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Welcome.
>
> BTW, Don't believe anythin
Hi!
Great shot if you ask me. Geat sky!
I just didn't see the red guy, and I believe cropping him off would
result in a cropped boat, too, and that will probably be much worse IMHO.
Too bad the two palm trees were not a bit more on the right, say, closer
to the right boats instead of the left
Thanks for that Tim. Very useful to know how others approach raw processing.
Oh, and welcome Ed!
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Welcome Ed.
>
> About raw word flow. I wrote an "article" des
Ya know, for many years I'd heard that word used in reference to the
motor mounting board or aft end of a boat. I just looked it up for the
first time and it may derive from one definition of, "a horizontal
cross piece".(?)
Jack
IOW, the "aft" or back end of the boats.
--- Boris Liberman <[EMAIL
For which package? The LX or MZ should weigh about 3-4lbs packed, the
K100D package will be a lot more as there's a lot more in it, maybe 10lbs.
A guesstimate would be approximately $40 for the MZ or LX and about $100
for the K100D package. I could have exact prices for you on monday
evening (I
Haven't named the drives yet, but my server is Thor - the desktop is Odin.
-P
Adam Maas wrote:
> Digital Image Studio wrote:
>> On 06/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Thanks for naming one of the drives after me:-).
>>> Paul
>>> My drives are bandit, jack, minnie and willie
yes, everything that paul said...
russ
On 1/5/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice composition. Very dramatic. Excellent work. "Lost Horizons" to
> us westereners.
> Paul
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:43 PM, SJ wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > i've been going through some of my old photos (take
the second one is better, less distractions. the only thing maybe a
little distracting in this one is the few reflections off the snow...
at least the ones at the top that are in shadow
russ
On 1/5/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am curious as to your thoughts of this one, compar
thanks guys, doesn't sound too magical now though
Feroze
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> The sensor has a native sensitiivity. Software "pushes" the image
> much as you would in PhotoShop if you accidentally underexposed.
> That's why it gradually deteriorates as the ISO increases.
> Paul
> On Ja
In my secret second ( or maybe third?) life, I'm Ken Rockwell, and
I'm damn well tired of you Pentaxians making fun of me. Nikon rules!
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:18 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Quoting Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> If you are Ken Rockwell, you like strong colours.
>
> I'm
nice shot Dag. it makes me think of fishing... with your hands. what
is it they are *actually* doing?
russ
On 1/5/07, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=281748
>
> *istD, FA50mm, 1:1.4, 1/15 hand held.
>
> DagT
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discu
interesting/comical shot, I am not sure what I was expecting, but it
made me laugh out loud
russ
On 1/6/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
>
> Boris
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
Boris, nice mood shot. I like this one better than the flamingos (if
that means anything to you). I like you mentioned, did not notice the
an until others mentioned him, and I agree with Bob that you did a
good job on the exposure, I know that if I were there I would have
underexposed, and then I
The sensor has a native sensitiivity. Software "pushes" the image
much as you would in PhotoShop if you accidentally underexposed.
That's why it gradually deteriorates as the ISO increases.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Feroze wrote:
> They had K10 review in that issue and stated this: " CC
Yes, it is possible if imaging processor allows this. In firmware v
0.2 it was possible to set iso50 and 3200. I believe for some reasons
Pentax has cut these sensitivities in firmware v 1.0
On 06.01.07, at 21:32 , Feroze wrote:
> They had K10 review in that issue and stated this: " CCD
> s
- Original Message -
From: "Thibouille" Subject: Re: FS Friday (A day late)
> Canada.. Mmm do you have any idea about shipping costs to Belgium?
http://www.postescanada.ca/personal/tools/calcrate-f.asp
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailm
Something like that indeed.
Say the car can do it but obviously the manufacturer thinks the car
might not be secure enough, it might decide to artifically limit
specifications.
IMO (but really only an opinion) DSLRs manufacturers could enable ISO
25000 if they wanted. Of course it'd be meaningless
not for me, but your pano is really neat!
russ
On 1/5/07, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lots of lookers, but no bids just yet:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150076053687
>
> If you have any questions, or if you'd like to make an offer, please let me
> know.
>
>
Oh, like limiting a car to 250km/h?
Feroze
Thibouille wrote:
> I don't think there is hardware involved ither the hardware already in
> the camera.
> The manufacturer probably just choose or not to provide that option.
> They deactivated this possibility in final 1.0 fimware and *might*
> enable
Canada.. Mmm do you have any idea about shipping costs to Belgium?
2007/1/6, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Toronto, Canada
>
> Postal code is M6C 3L9
>
> -Adam
>
>
> Thibouille wrote:
> > Adam, where are you located ?
> >
> > 2007/1/6, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> All prices in Canadian,
The CCD has one sensitivity level. In the case of the K10D, that base
ISO is 100. Any change from 100 is done in firmware/software through
signal and image enhancement (?) or degradation (?). Within a narrow
range, the process works well. Not too different from "pushing" film
during the develo
I don't think there is hardware involved ither the hardware already in
the camera.
The manufacturer probably just choose or not to provide that option.
They deactivated this possibility in final 1.0 fimware and *might*
enable it later.
2007/1/6, Feroze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> They had K10 review in
Nothing unusual about removing distracting elements. The ducks at top
come across as black blobs. They don't contribute, they distract.
Therefore, I would remove them.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Paul
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Good one. I would crop it a little
I have replaced Cotty in the unreliable list:-).
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:10 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Tom C wrote:
>
>> Welcome.
>>
>> BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark
>> Roberts,
>> Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
>
> Seems like on
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
