On Oct 6, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Bob W wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/Fezcats/
I really like this one.
http://www.web-options.com/Fezcats/content/_9288941_large.html
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the P
Love the portrait, Bob, the guy has one of those faces that cries out for a
portrait session.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
W
Sent: Monday, 6 October 2008 10:30 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Sub
I just have my wife look at them. She is much more ruthless and not
very sentimental about my photos. She is a pretty good screener for
me.
This is especially true for weddings, portraits and events. You
can't let them sit very long or the client will get upset. So I
usually make a first pass
The easiest thing for me to do (and I usually do) is use my pro lab
sending the images through the Labtricity system. They know me there
and have all relevant information. However, we needed something
really quick and cheap (wife's angle on that one) so went to the
nearby Walmart.
--
Best regar
While it might be a good philosophy when trying to cull the gallery,
it doesn't do much for the learning to improve your shooting. It is
by examining the shots while you still remember details of shooting
that helps you learn how to improve your skills.
Don't get me wrong, I don't completely ig
Good thought Doug, but it won't work universally as many of the
formats I've used don't have a space for captions. But maybe a mixed
solution, using caption space where available, maybe even modify the
formatting on some of the pages to add in caption space... I'll
ponder a bit.
And Ann,
Stan Halpin wrote:
My question has to do with attribution of the photos.
Personally, I'd do the attributions in the caption text rather than
modifying the image.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUB
John Sessoms wrote:
That's the key. Anyone may reproduce copyrighted works WITH THE
COPYRIGHT HOLDER'S PERMISSION.
The bottom line is that if I have to worry about being accused of being
a thief to get my own photographs processed, I'll go elsewhere. Fuck them.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
-
Many years ago, CA State Univ turned down Ansel's offer to donate his archives.
Do you suppose they are sorry enough over that decision to accept mine?
Jack
--- On Mon, 10/6/08, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Philosophy
Stan - are the pages numbered? then (as much as a PITA) as it is, you
can list photographers and names on one page with the page numbers
where their photos appear leave attribution off group photos...
Or just write a little paragraph something like you just told us...
Most photos herein were
That doesn't look like motion blur. If it was, highlights would leave
trails corresponding to the path of the motion.
As the owner of one of the Pentax soft focus lenses, this blur looks
familiar to me. It's a core of sharpness surrounded by a halo of blur,
which the soft lenses achieve by havin
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh Font Of All Knowledge That Is The PDML,
Anyone here swing an axe? My son plays an acoustic 6 string, and has
professed a desire for an electric. I would like to get him a surprise
for his birthday in a few weeks so am doing my research. I am minded to
look for
So here I am in the final (?) throes of compiling/editing a Blurb
book representing a one-week trip by 19 of us from my church. The
sparse text mostly authored by me, with a few "reflections" authored
by and attributed to others. Of the 375 images, I would guess that
about 100-125 are mine,
Replace the 35mm lenses.
At least they'll work when Pentax comes out with a full frame digital
camera... ;-)
At 8:23 PM -0500 10/6/08, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Joe,
What do you really like to do?
Do those 67 negatives really excite you?
Maybe you need a 67 and a couple of lenses.
I think the 35mm
From Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fez has quite a large population of feral cats, living off scraps and
> presumably also keeping down the population of rats and mice.
Not if they're as big a bunch a freeloaders as my two.
Even if a mouse jumped in their food bowl, they wouldn't do anything
mor
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lovely smile and eyes. Would they be concerned that the files were
being ripped off maybe,.?? Dave
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
From a recent set of portraits I took of my daughter, my wife
wanted
some sm
Drew,
Yes, much better.
The sea stands out and the lighthouse in juxtaposition.
The crashing waves make great action.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:28 PM, drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone that commented or just had a look I took Christine
> and Ricks advice and
Thanks,
That did the trick.
Cory
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Forget about finding them in folders or any of that stuff. It's a good
way to mess up iPhoto and lose your photos permanently.
iPhoto has them stashed in its database and the folder structure it
manages. If you want to use them in ano
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
So I'm asking for recommendations from the crew.
What would a PDML'r do?
Replace my rarely used 67 gear? N
Replace my great 35mm lenses? Y
Buy new DA* optics for DigitalY
and sell my LXs and PZ-1p?
Sell all the gear I n
Two non-exclusive possibilities come to mind::
1. Motion blur;
2. Spray (salt spray?) on the front of the lens.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 10/6/08, Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Have you experenced this dou
Joe,
What do you really like to do?
Do those 67 negatives really excite you?
Maybe you need a 67 and a couple of lenses.
I think the 35mm kit is really important.
I'd replace as much of that as possible,
although I might consider the DA lens option.
There has been lots of positive comments on the n
From: "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Back when I was an art student and was in my first photography class, my
professor (Alice Shaw, www.aliceshaw.com) was giving a slide show about
famous fine art photographers and their creative processes.
One photographer she mentioned, whose name I wish I
I would second that. I like tripod mounts on lenses that need them.
I have this lens and can't think of any need for one. It is small
and light enough that it would only get in the way.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, October 6, 2008, 5:16:03 PM, you wrote:
AM> Tokina versions of Pentax lense
2008/10/7 David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I disagree, Winogrand would wait sometimes a year before he developed his
>> film. He thought that it gave him a more perspective view of his photos
>> because he was less atta
Do you have a "protective" filter fitter?
Cheers,
Dave
2008/10/7 Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I some images produced bt my K20D + DA 50-200 I have notices a strange blur,
> actually closer to a double image, in some pictures. They are not enough
> frequent to send it immediate
A definite improvement. The only teeny little additional change I would
suggest would be darkening the sky a bit.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 10/6/08, drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: PESO: Stormy sea
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mai
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
What would a PDML'r do?
Replace my rarely used 67 gear? Y N
N
Replace my great 35mm lenses? Y N
Depends on which lenses they were
Buy new DA* optics for DigitalY N
and sell my LXs and PZ-1p?
Keep the LXen, buy
Tokina versions of Pentax lenses are not available in K mount. The
only way to get the Tokina is to switch to Nikon or Canon.
Also the lens is small enough that there is no advantage to a tripod
mount. It's really a very compact lens for its range.
-Adam
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Tom Lesse
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: PESO - Offhanded Complement
Don't know how accurate this is, but I have heard about a photog that
would give his clients the means to get prints done at labs and then
encouraged them to do so. He would then turn around and sue t
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: PESO - Offhanded Complement
No, the issue for labs is that if they reproduce something that is
copyrighted they are on the hook for it. If a customer came in with
copyrighted material and said it wasn't, the lab is still liable
On Oct 6, 2008, at 16:52 , "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Buy a digital camera, plus the 2 final options, and shoot some amusing
photos for your descendants to sell on eBay.
Bob
As I wrote in the original, I already have the digital bodies, so I
can go straight to the analog ones to
Thanks Kenneth. Maybe I should have told them it was a Pentax and
then they would have released the pictures...
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, October 6, 2008, 4:53:45 PM, you wrote:
KW> Hell, it was taken with a black camera so it has to be professional !
KW> Nice image BTW, I remember seei
On Oct 6, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Cotty wrote:
Oh Font Of All Knowledge That Is The PDML,
Anyone here swing an axe? My son plays an acoustic 6 string, and has
professed a desire for an electric. I would like to get him a surprise
for his birthday in a few weeks so am doing my research. I am minded
Donate everything to either "your" University, or to the archives of
the town you spend the most productive time in (photographically) or
throw it all in a box and ship it to the Smithsonian. Let them throw
it out! :-)
But don't do it until you're given only months to live.
Accidental de
Hell, it was taken with a black camera so it has to be professional !
Nice image BTW, I remember seeing it a while ago.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Offhanded Complement
>From a recent set
I like this one much better. Nice shot. Your work has done it proud.
Reminds me of the time I was standing deck watch on the "Bonnie Dick"
carrier in the Pacific, and we were taking green water over the bow,
itself 65 feet above the waterline. (I was tied to the island with a
150' rope) For
Hola,
These were hand held ... right?
Bong
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I some images produced bt my K20D + DA 50-200 I have notices a strange blur,
> actually closer to a double image, in some pictures. They are not enough
> frequent to s
On Oct 6, 2008, at 13:55, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Back when I was an art student and was in my first photography class,
What sort of philosophy do you have when working with your photos,
both
old and new?
John
Have? Or wish I had?
Anyone who has been into my Gallery (
I've always been fond of Tele's, nice guitars, especially for a Fender.
What sort of music does your son play? Tele's are good classic rock
and country guitars, but most current stuff is played on a super-strat
type guiter like an Ibanez RG or Jackson Dinky.
-Adam
Who owns a Parker P-42, Jackson
Greetings:
I hope I am not being sacrilegious asking here about the Tokina version
of the 50-135/2.8, but I'd really like this range in a lens with a
tripod mount. Does anyone know whether Pentax is planning to offer the
lens with a mount, or if not, where I can buy a Tokina?
Thank you
Tom
Bruce Dayton wrote:
From a recent set of portraits I took of my daughter, my wife wanted
some small, cheap prints done. This is a job for Walmart. So I went
in and put the digital order in. When my wife went to pick them up,
they wouldn't release them because they looked 'too professional'.
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
I some images produced bt my K20D + DA 50-200 I have notices a strange blur,
actually closer to a double image, in some pictures. They are not enough
frequent to send it immediately to a warranty repair, but enough to try to
understand its causes.
Here you have three 10
Buy a digital camera, plus the 2 final options, and shoot some amusing
photos for your descendants to sell on eBay.
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Joseph McAllister
> Sent: 06 October 2008 21:55
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I enjoyed it before - enjoy it more this time. It feels very real,
especially the colour and texture of the sea.
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of drew
> Sent: 06 October 2008 23:29
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PE
On 6/10/08, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What sort of philosphy do you have when working with your photos, both
>old and new?
Interesting you should mention this. Very recently I was looking back
through my archive for some pictures of our old house from a couple of
years ago. We were
On 6/10/08, Joseph McAllister, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What would a PDML'r do?
>Replace my rarely used 67 gear? Y N
N
>Replace my great 35mm lenses? Y N
Y
>Buy new DA* optics for DigitalY N
>and sell my LXs and PZ-1p?
N
>Sell all the gear I now own and Y N
>get
I'm going to be the exception, of course, but I sort of related to the birds in
their circumstance of dealing with the heavy weather.
Jack
--- On Mon, 10/6/08, drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: PESO: Stormy sea
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> D
Oh Font Of All Knowledge That Is The PDML,
Anyone here swing an axe? My son plays an acoustic 6 string, and has
professed a desire for an electric. I would like to get him a surprise
for his birthday in a few weeks so am doing my research. I am minded to
look for a Telecaster, probably a Mex as it
I always take a studied look at everything I shoot immediately upon
processing/downloading. I learned a long time ago not to throw things out
because of an initial feeling my expectations were not meant. I've sometimes
found that the image stands on its own when I'm further from the moment.
BTW,
I like it better. Wow, the wave really pops, doesn't it. Real nice Drew!
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "drew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Stormy sea
Thanks to everyone that commented o
Thanks to everyone that commented or just had a look I took
Christine and Ricks advice and had a crop at it, also had a play with
levels to give a little more life. Better???
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rileyelf/2920156526/
Thanks again all.
Drew.
David J Brooks wrote:
Great shot, an
Hi everyone
I recently got myself involved with the acquisition of a DA*16-50 and a
DA*50-135. Hard work but I got them!! Sold my MZ-s and and battery grip
and... more stuff than I'd like, but got those beauties!!
The next step is to sell the house in order to get an 24'' iMac. I think
that I
Bong: All are nice, but I think my fave is the ship (2nd one). Colors &
composition are lovely. Also, I think the 2nd one has a stronger sense of
mood. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Bong Manayon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, Oc
Another lovely one Bruce. First I've heard of this kind of situation
before. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:47 PM
Subject: PESO - Offhanded Complement
>From a recent
This one's a doosey!
http://www.web-options.com/Fezfest/content/P9289005_large.html
This one's nice also
http://www.web-options.com/Fezfest/content/_9289080_large.html
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
Sent: Mon
Well, if it is motion blur it is different to the one I have experienced with
my previous non-stabilized DSLR, that's why I find it strange.
(and I have many other pictures blurred in the 'traditional' way)
thanks,
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para:
Nice portrait, Bob. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 7:29 AM
Subject: Photography help in Fez
When I arrived in Fez I found that I had forgotten to pack my spare
batteries and b
Bob: This one has some serious potential.
http://www.web-options.com/Fezcats/content/_9309597_large.html I'd
straighten out that vertical an tighten the crop.
Having said that, these are pretty great too:
http://www.web-options.com/Fezcats/content/_A029826_large.html and
http://www.web-op
Okay, just save me one of those weird Canadian beers for GFM next year...
Norm
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bass on Mondays?
Ok, trout Tuesday it is.,
Dave
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:30 PM,
Which is fine Frankie, but I also like the other view. I just developed
a few rolls from last year, what I thought would be good or bad was
totally different when I didn't have the quick emotional attachment to
them. Interesting, that's what I don't like about digital.
Norm
frank theriault wro
Any one on the list knowledgeable in unions, start ups, voting in,
voting out, that sort of thing.
PLEASE reply off list if you do, i have a question.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
Norm Baugher wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
While it might be a good philosophy when trying to cull the gallery,
it doesn't do much for the learning to improve your shooting. It is
by examining the shots while you still remember details of shooting
that helps you learn how to improve your skills.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bass on Mondays?
Ok, trout Tuesday it is.,
Dave
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dave, stop drinking beer during the day :)
>>>
>>
>> Whic
Oh man that is sooo low.
Sounds a bit like my mane competion for the shows. I always
wondered why i would see new faces shooting after 1-2 shows. Found out
Saturday, he bounces the cheques, and they obviously don't come back.
Thats lw to.
Dave
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Bruce D
Bass on Mondays?
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave, stop drinking beer during the day :)
Which one.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRI
That depends on what sort of skills you're trying to develop.
Winogrand's method is good for compositional skills, the opposite for
technical skills where quick feedback can tell you if you're doing it
right.
-Adam
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagr
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree, Winogrand would wait sometimes a year before he developed his
> film. He thought that it gave him a more perspective view of his photos
> because he was less attached.
> Norm
Yeah, and he died with something like
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:33 PM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only if they can spare a plane, luckily they're a bit busy these days.
Our plane is busy this month, so i'll just keep using the shutter
button for AF, till it gets back.
Dave
>
> Bob W wrote:
>>
>> It's the Air Force butto
Don't know how accurate this is, but I have heard about a photog that
would give his clients the means to get prints done at labs and then
encouraged them to do so. He would then turn around and sue the labs
for copyright violations. Pretty low, if really true.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave, stop drinking beer during the day :)
Which one.
Dave
> Norm
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I disagree, Winogrand would wait some
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ann,
>
> the one with the meat is for amusement only - can't be many people
> who've seen a kitten eat a whole camel before!
He's got teeth this big,.
Dave
>
> Bob
>
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooks
Dave, stop drinking beer during the day :)
Norm
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree, Winogrand would wait sometimes a year before he developed his
film. He thought that it gave him a more perspective view of his photos
beca
Good set of photos Bob.
I like the compositions of all, but this one really stands out for me
http://www.web-options.com/Fezcats/content/_9288941_large.html
Dave
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While looking through the 1,000+ photos I took in Fez last week I
I can see what looks like a second chair image to the right, but
nothing on the other two.
All three are OOF or motion blur, at least thats what it looks like to me.
Dave
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I some images produced bt my K20D + DA 50
Hum, would not have thought about that.
FWIW i have never been asked, so take that as you may.
Dave
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, the issue for labs is that if they reproduce something that is
> copyrighted they are on the hook for it. If a cust
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree, Winogrand would wait sometimes a year before he developed his
> film. He thought that it gave him a more perspective view of his photos
> because he was less attached.
> Norm
I do the same thing, only I'm just la
No, the issue for labs is that if they reproduce something that is
copyrighted they are on the hook for it. If a customer came in with
copyrighted material and said it wasn't, the lab is still liable if
they reproduce it. So they either need a sworn statement from the
photographer on company lett
Curiously enough, today I reviewed several selected pictures form a 2005 trip
and to my surprised I liked quite a lot of them. I really expected not to like
many, specially since I'm becoming too used to 'digital grainless' and
sharpness. Both are lacking in my oldest pictures due to the equipme
Hi,
I some images produced bt my K20D + DA 50-200 I have notices a strange blur,
actually closer to a double image, in some pictures. They are not enough
frequent to send it immediately to a warranty repair, but enough to try to
understand its causes.
Here you have three 100% crops:
http://tin
Great set Bob, very colourful
I like this one.
http://www.web-options.com/Fezfest/content/_9289080_large.html
Dave
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A couple of days before the end of Ramadan there is a special festival
> for children. The girls in particular a
Lovely smile and eyes.
Would they be concerned that the files were being ripped off maybe,.??
Dave
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From a recent set of portraits I took of my daughter, my wife wanted
> some small, cheap prints done. This is a job for W
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would a PDML'r do?
>
> Replace my rarely used 67 gear? Y N
No
>
> Replace my great 35mm lenses? Y N
Yes
>
> Buy new DA* optics for DigitalY N
> and sell my LXs and PZ-1
Tough call.
>
> Sell all
I disagree, Winogrand would wait sometimes a year before he developed
his film. He thought that it gave him a more perspective view of his
photos because he was less attached.
Norm
Bruce Dayton wrote:
While it might be a good philosophy when trying to cull the gallery,
it doesn't do much for t
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It turns out that my insurance coverage (still haven't found the actual
> policy - just coverage limits) is replacement value. With a good addendum.
>
> Once my equipment's replacement costs are estimated by an independe
Boy, those last couple of choices really make the decision hard
. I used to shoot 67ii's (had two of them) and most of the
lenses. I let them go back when they actually had some value. So
I'm saying that I wouldn't bother with that equipment at this point
(unless you really love using it).
Even
It turns out that my insurance coverage (still haven't found the
actual policy - just coverage limits) is replacement value. With a
good addendum.
Once my equipment's replacement costs are estimated by an independent
company (I hope) I will be paid that amount without question for my
loss
>From a recent set of portraits I took of my daughter, my wife wanted
some small, cheap prints done. This is a job for Walmart. So I went
in and put the digital order in. When my wife went to pick them up,
they wouldn't release them because they looked 'too professional'.
In a way, it was pleasi
On 10/5/08, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/10/08, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
> >I think there has been lots more mischief created by the ease with which
> >one can use a cell
> >phone to clandestinely photo strangers on the street and blast them to
> >the world on
Bob W escribió:
A couple of days before the end of Ramadan there is a special festival
for children. The girls in particular are dressed up in new clothes,
given new henna tattoos, paraded around in miniature bridal chairs,
and made a big fuss of. It's very appealing, and the people of Fez are
I wouldn't put something aside for that long, although returning to
stuff later certainly helps. I think it's very useful to submit work
to others for critical judgement, provided they know the subject and
you trust their opinions.
Bob
[...]
>
> What sort of philosphy do you have when working w
Interesting thoughts, John.
I think there's something in this idea.
I've certainly got a number of images that I worked on not long after
taking them and I wonder now what I saw in them. But conversely, I've
noticed that when I review older images some time later (even a couple
of years later),
While it might be a good philosophy when trying to cull the gallery,
it doesn't do much for the learning to improve your shooting. It is
by examining the shots while you still remember details of shooting
that helps you learn how to improve your skills.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, October 6
Back when I was an art student and was in my first photography class, my
professor (Alice Shaw, www.aliceshaw.com) was giving a slide show about
famous fine art photographers and their creative processes.
One photographer she mentioned, whose name I wish I could remember,
would take photos and pro
RAW files do not have a colour space until they are converted in post
processing. While they might get tagged with one, that really only
refers to the colour space of the embedded JPEG.
You're having an export colour space issue, not an import ossie.
-Adam
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Bob W
A couple of days before the end of Ramadan there is a special festival
for children. The girls in particular are dressed up in new clothes,
given new henna tattoos, paraded around in miniature bridal chairs,
and made a big fuss of. It's very appealing, and the people of Fez are
crazy about children
On 6/10/08, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
>FWIW the built-in Quick Look feature is very good if you have 10.5
>(Leopard).
Ahar, I shoulda mentioned that I'm running 10.4.11. YMMV :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnap
On 5/10/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>But the question, as I read it, was "I have my files in iPhoto ... how
>do I use them in something else?"
Absolutely right. My alarm went off at 4.58 am as I had to be in London
for 9am this morning - it was 5.15 and the caffeine hadn't
Hey Dave,
You gotta leave some prizes for the simple folks. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:58 AM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well the fair is done for another year, and it was a good one. Weather
> held out and i won a few ribbons.
> One 1st, two 2nds, Two 3rds, a
Do RAW files include the colour space that the photo was shot in?
After leaving my batteries at home last week, and just before buying a
new one, my camera battery expired. When I put the new battery in the
previous camera settings were gone and I had to restore them from
memory. I set it up to u
Hi Ann,
the one with the meat is for amusement only - can't be many people
who've seen a kitten eat a whole camel before!
Bob
> Bob W wrote:
>
> >Thanks Ann. I haven't done any post-processing on them
> (except for the
> >chocolate-box kittens). The first is a failure really
> because it's n
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
