On Sep 23, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 9/23/2010 10:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
You're right - he's the Top Banana
ann
Cotty is taller than Bob W...
If he had hair, it'd be hard to tell Cotty from Chewbacca.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You're right - he's the Top Banana
ann
Cotty is taller than Bob W...
Cotty's the Big Banana, but I get to go on top.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Bit late on this one Eric (crap computer repair cost me two days without
reading emails), but if you are still thinking of a medium range zoom either
of the Pentax 28-105 mm zooms(PZ or FA, but not Takumar) will do an
excellent job. I had the PZ version, it got damaged beyond repair in a fall
and
Nor mine - load of rubbish springs to mind.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: Thursday, 23 September 2010 9:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT - Brave New World of
The amount of fuss we're seeing on the Lisa (IOW, none at all) is
pretty much what I'd expect regarding a $10,000 medium format camera.
You're such a Mona when it comes to price
A lot of us just don't have the Monet for something like that.
Yeah but you can make do if you try Cezanne.
On 24/9/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty's the Big Banana, but I get to go on top.
I may be violently ill.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
. [I've got the *ist DS and an a 28 2.8. Also an m 50 1.7 and an m 100
f4 macro. Might change those for a versions if I get the opportunity.
But I'll sticking with just one for a while. Maybe the 28, and just
hold off on
http://jalbum.net/blog/entry/introducing-jalbum-breezebook/
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Right. We're expecting a book to arrive by the beginning of October. I
will the report as to how it stacks up to PDML books Mark printed
previously.
Boris
On 9/24/2010 12:35 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://jalbum.net/blog/entry/introducing-jalbum-breezebook/
Dave
--
PDML
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
it seemed to me like a way to say that the readings are nonsensically
variable (and perhaps a slur on Tambovikans)
First it was the Jews. Then it was the Christians. Now it's the Tambovikans.
What the hell's going on
Dave,
I enjoyed these pictures and your viewpoints... No Corvairs though?
John Graves
WA1JG
jh.gra...@verizon.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
I agree about the lens. Nice results and a good FOV on
micro-four-thirds. I've only used it on the E-P1, but I've leaned to
be sneaky with the LCD screen.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
Nowadays, a Panasonic G1 with Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 is the
Some nice pics here, nice cars as well. I like that green three wheeler!
Paul
On Sep 23, 2010, at 12:34 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks Frank and Brian
Dave
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Brian Walters
supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:22 -0400, David J Brooks
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
it seemed to me like a way to say that the readings are nonsensically
variable (and perhaps a slur on Tambovikans)
First it was the Jews. Then it was the Christians. Now it's the Tambovikans.
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
it seemed to me like a way to say that the readings are nonsensically
variable (and perhaps a slur on Tambovikans)
First it was the Jews. Then it was the Christians. Now
Mark,
Why If you go linguini you're all stuck up?
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:14 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
it seemed to me like a way to say that the readings are nonsensically
variable (and perhaps a slur on Tambovikans)
Thanks Ann, Steve, Brian and Frank.
Dan
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms,
Hi all,
I'm walking my first steps into the overwhelming world of color
management. Any of the gurus can help me with a couple of questions?:
+ How often are you supposed to calibrate an LCD monitor. I don't know
if it's relevant but I have this monitor and this calibration system:
Fernando wrote:
I'm walking my first steps into the overwhelming world of color
management. Any of the gurus can help me with a couple of questions?:
+ How often are you supposed to calibrate an LCD monitor.
It depends on how critical/neurotic you are. LCD monitors are pretty
stable and if
That's a Mark. Maybe because my dog loves Frisbee.
or the frisbeetarians (when you die, your soul gets stuck on the roof.)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
K7, FA20-35 with 360 flash bouncing off the ceiling.
http://chemistry.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
AFAIK Sony has an APS-C video camera just as Panasonic has a 4/3 one.
FF is a possibility (mount allows for it) nut nothing more than rumors AFAIK.
2010/9/23 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
I know some of you are interested in the video functions of your DSLRs,
Pentax or otherwise. The video camera
From the couple low-res pics seen until now, it seems one get 1.5 EV
more easily compared to K7.
Btw, it seems, right now, that DFS can indeed be set to OFF, at least
for a bit more than 30 seconds exposures.
I love the auto zoom in when AFing in LV mode, for sharpness confirmation.
It seems, of
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2010-markhamfair/album/index.html
Gallery contains photos for the BW division as well as the digital,
open colour and senior colour.
Photos to be delivered Saturday, judged Sunday.
Its all just for fun, like the GFM NPW contest, right...
Dave
--
Documenting
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:07 AM, John Graves jh.gra...@verizon.net wrote:
Dave,
I enjoyed these pictures and your viewpoints... No Corvairs though?
I did not see any, but that does not mean there were non. They had
1200 cars out apparently.
Dave
John Graves
WA1JG
jh.gra...@verizon.net
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:38 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Some nice pics here, nice cars as well. I like that green three wheeler!
Paul
Thanks Paul. Not sure what that was, but i knew if i did not grab a
shot i would regret it.:-)
Dave
On Sep 23, 2010, at 12:34 PM, David
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. We're expecting a book to arrive by the beginning of October. I will
the report as to how it stacks up to PDML books Mark printed previously.
Boris
Looking forward to the review.
Dave
On 9/24/2010 12:35 PM,
Thanks Mark
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Fernando wrote:
I'm walking my first steps into the overwhelming world of color
management. Any of the gurus can help me with a couple of questions?:
+ How often are you supposed to calibrate an LCD monitor.
On Sep 23, 2010, at 9:21 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I'm guessing you may have looked at a few of my PESOs, but if you
haven't, the blog can be found here:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/
Oh yeah, I loved the last one. And the monarchs, too.
Believe me, if you will be focusing
Very nice portrait; it shows lots of personality.
Dan
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
K7, FA20-35 with 360 flash bouncing off the ceiling.
http://chemistry.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sep 24, 2010, at 1:13 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
What is your chosen genre of photograhy as of this moment? If it is buildings
or people, a 28 on a digitial with a 1.5x factor is splendid.
When I bought my K1000 back in 1990 I thought it would be
landscape/wildlifle/nature. I was surprised
On Sep 24, 2010, at 3:52 AM, John Coyle wrote:
. . . . if you are still thinking of a medium range zoom either
of the Pentax 28-105 mm zooms(PZ or FA, but not Takumar) will do an
excellent job. I had the PZ version, it got damaged beyond repair in a fall
and the insurance paid for the newer
On Sep 24, 2010, at 6:22 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I have the A 28 f2.8 and use it a fair amount. It works well on the
istD and K10D.
Thanks, David. It's on my camera now. Maybe it'll stay there a while.
Bob W wrote:
http://www.foto8.com/new/online/photo-stories/1259-1248-hurry-up-and-wait
I think I'll have to get check that one out
thanks
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Nice collection. Night shots, geometry and textures, and some simple
portraits. Cotty, I had my sound off (I usually do) so i had not idea
what you were talking about. Really annoying.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Bob W wrote:
The Sony is much less capable than the Panasonic, but you can actually
buy the Sony. It's essentially a NEX-5 in a camcorder body with more
control over video and no RAW option for stills.
The Panasonic is essentially going to be a GH2 in a camcorder body,
likely with more video control and
Hi,
Frank is right. It means that some quantity or value (like the readout
of the instrument) has nothing to do (or very loose connection) with
reality.
I do not know the roots of this saying, but it have been used here for
quite a long time. Most probably it's a translation from russian.
Cotty's the Big Banana, but I get to go on top.
I may be violently ill.
my work here is done.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
A link from Dario. He points out that not only is the noise greatly
reduced, but the dynamic range on blacks is much improved as well.
http://www.popco.net/zboard/zboard.php?id=dica_forum_pentaxpage=1sn1=divpage=3sn=offss=onsc=onselect_arrange=headnumdesc=ascno=14223
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I love car galleries. Nice work.
-Original Message-
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:57:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Geso Car show
On Fri, Sep
the K5 iso6400 looks great, Ideal for
low light non flash lighting...
I bet the normal iso200? is very clean.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
The 50 has a focal length = 75mm if you were using film (good for faces), and
the 28 has a focal length = 42 if you were using film. I think that 43mm is
what is considered to be 1:1 with your eye (that is, it is not being magnified
nor is it wide angle), so a 28 and a 50 should cover most of
I read this link on dp a day or so ago. Am very impressed and have all but been
sold. ;)
Not recalling the exact language, do you have an understanding of the claim of
the K-5 capturing in analog and converting to digital...or something close to
that?
Jack
--- On Fri, 9/24/10, P N Stenquist
If I were a Taxi driver, I'd buy a 200.000 USD Mercedes. If I were a
portrait/advertising photographer, I wouldn't hesitate buying a 645D. Afterall,
10.000 USD is very reasonolable, if you want to make a decent living.
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
All CCD sensors capture in analog and convert to digital;
CCD is short for charge coupled device, which means that
the exposure value for each of the sensor elements is read out
as an electric charge (pedantically still digital, according
to quantum physics, but effectively an analog quantity).
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:50, P N Stenquist wrote:
A link from Dario. He points out that not only is the noise greatly reduced,
but the dynamic range on blacks is much improved as well.
Thanks, John! So, why then is it hyped as being a new and significant feature
of the K-5? Simply a marketing strategy?
Jack
--- On Fri, 9/24/10, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
From: John Francis jo...@panix.com
Subject: Re: K-5 vs. K-7
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
I have the same plans. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:13:48
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K-5 vs. K-7
On Sep 24, 2010, at
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:41 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same plans. :-)
I'll probably buy one as soon as I can pretend to be able to afford one.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2010-09-24 10:02, Fernando wrote:
+ How often are you supposed to calibrate an LCD monitor. I don't know
if it's relevant but I have this monitor and this calibration system:
http://accessories.dell.com/sna/products/displays/productdetail.aspx?c=cal=ens=corpsku=320-7825
- Dell 2209WA
On Sep 24, 2010, at 14:55, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:41 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same plans. :-)
I'll probably buy one as soon as I can pretend to be able to afford one.
Just got the K7 in June (or was it July?). I just can't jump to a new camera
after
On Sep 24, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
The 50 has a focal length = 75mm if you were using film (good for faces), and
the 28 has a focal length = 42 if you were using film. I think that 43mm is
what is considered to be 1:1 with your eye (that is, it is not being
magnified nor is
In the old days it was a 28mm, 50mm, and a 135mm
three lens set, all primes. you can do a lot with
that set and if you can afford another, I would lean
towards a 20mm for true wideangle work. A good 20mm
isnt going to be cheap though.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD
P N Stenquist wrote:
A link from Dario. He points out that not only is the noise greatly
reduced, but the dynamic range on blacks is much improved as well.
http://www.popco.net/zboard/zboard.php?id=dica_forum_pentaxpage=1sn1=divpage=3sn=offss=onsc=onselect_arrange=headnumdesc=ascno=14223
Very
On 24/9/10, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, I had my sound off (I usually do) so i had not idea
what you were talking about. Really annoying.
I'm at my best when I'm really annoying ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On Sep 24, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 24/9/10, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, I had my sound off (I usually do) so i had not idea
what you were talking about. Really annoying.
I'm at my best when I'm really annoying ;-)
You're also very annoying when
On 24/9/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
You're also very annoying when you're at your best.
Why Larry, that's the nicest thing anyone's ever said to me ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:10 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In the old days it was a 28mm, 50mm, and a 135mm
three lens set, all primes. you can do a lot with
that set and if you can afford another, I would lean
towards a 20mm for true wideangle work. A good 20mm
isnt going to be cheap though.
Cotty wrote:
On 24/9/10, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, I had my sound off (I usually do) so i had not idea
what you were talking about. Really annoying.
I'm at my best when I'm really annoying ;-)
Me!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
A very long time ago I used to sell them. They weren't horrible, but
they made better ashtrays.
On 9/24/2010 6:40 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:10 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In the old days it was a 28mm, 50mm, and a 135mm
three lens set, all primes. you can do a lot with
that
On Sep 24, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Me!
mark!
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On Sep 24, 2010, at 6:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/24/2010 6:40 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:10 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In the old days it was a 28mm, 50mm, and a 135mm
three lens set, all primes. you can do a lot with
that set and if you can afford another, I would
All I can say is wow! Both the shot and the dynamic range.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.
Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
P N Stenquist wrote:
A link from Dario. He points out that not only is the noise greatly
reduced, but the dynamic range on blacks is much
Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
(http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/franconia1/7da02723.html)
You don't have permission to access /galleries/franconia1/7da02723.html
on this server.
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog :
For still photography work, a quality desktop LCD display should only
require recalibration/profiling about every other month at most. I see
less than 2% drift with the Apple Cinema Display 23 (2006 generation)
in six months.
The Eye One Display 2 is an excellent calibration/profiling system.
The engine, not you. Your personal traits are a (mainly) problem for Mrs.
Cotty. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:11:38
To: pentax listPDML@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
Is there a public web site for posting photos taken with Pentax equipment? I
see a lot of posts on this list inquiring about lenses, and it would be helpful
if there was a gallery when Pentax users can post some pics. I'm ignorant
here...there may be one or more, but I don't know about them.
http://pug.komkon.org/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=HOMEsubSection=0subSubSection=0language=EN
Plus you can do your own peso's and geso's
picture everyso often
gallery everyso often
Dave
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a
A rotten lens builds character and thoughtful technique; it also takes rotten
pictures.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:05:11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I paid $35 for a Soligor 135, but that was in 1968.
Jeffery
On Sep 24, 2010, at 6:42 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Albinar
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Thanks much!
Jeffery
On Sep 24, 2010, at 6:41 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://pug.komkon.org/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=HOMEsubSection=0subSubSection=0language=EN
Plus you can do your own peso's and geso's
picture everyso often
gallery everyso often
Dave
On
David J Brooks wrote:
http://pug.komkon.org/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=HOMEsubSection=0subSubSection=0language=EN
Plus you can do your own peso's and geso's
picture everyso often
gallery everyso often
Also, many PDML members have their own pages:
Oooh! Let's talk about the Super Takumar 135 f2.5. That's always fun.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:45:18
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Over the past 42 years, my progression of SLR brands has been Mamiya - Pentax
- Nkon - Contax - Olympus - Pentax. I could have saved a lot of money by
sticking with the Pentax.
Jeffery
On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:10 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Oooh! Let's talk about the Super Takumar 135 f2.5.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
(http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/franconia1/7da02723.html)
You don't have permission to access /galleries/franconia1/7da02723.html
on this server.
Ralf, I've been getting a huge number of hacking attempts on my site
Super Takumar? or Takumar Bayonet the Super in m42 mount was
probably, thought I have no direct experience, head and shoulders above
the Takumar Bayonet as a picture taker.
On 9/24/2010 8:10 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Oooh! Let's talk about the Super Takumar 135 f2.5. That's always fun.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 08:25:29PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
(http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/franconia1/7da02723.html)
You don't have permission to access /galleries/franconia1/7da02723.html
on this server.
I think that SMC Takumars were M42 and they changed the name to SMC Pentax with
the K mount.
On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:38 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Super Takumar? or Takumar Bayonet the Super in m42 mount was probably,
thought I have no direct experience, head and shoulders above the Takumar
Everyone's a street photographer now:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/09/i-phone-photog.html
;-)
All this talk of rangefinders made me decide to look through some of
the discs of scanned rolls I took over the last year. This is one
that I originally rejected because it didn't work full
Prior the SMC was the Super Takumar line, which I think was dual
coated. Then the Auto Takumars and the Plane ol' Takumars and prior to
the m42 mount lenses there were the m37 Asahi Kogaku Takumar lenses for
the Asahiflex.
On 9/24/2010 8:44 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I think that SMC
On 2010-09-24 18:46 , frank theriault wrote:
Everyone's a street photographer now:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/09/i-phone-photog.html
check out that dude's camera bag!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
He seems to be taking a photo of something other than the street...
On 9/24/2010 8:46 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Everyone's a street photographer now:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/09/i-phone-photog.html
;-)
All this talk of rangefinders made me decide to look through some of
the
On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Over the past 42 years, my progression of SLR brands has been Mamiya -
Pentax - Nkon - Contax - Olympus - Pentax. I could have saved a lot of
money by sticking with the Pentax.
These days the biggest difference in performance between brands
On Sep 24, 2010, at 4:42 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
A rotten lens builds character and thoughtful technique; it also takes rotten
pictures.
someone has to Mark this.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010
He appears to be overcompensating for something.
On 9/24/2010 8:55 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2010-09-24 18:46 , frank theriault wrote:
Everyone's a street photographer now:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/09/i-phone-photog.html
check out that dude's camera bag!
--
His lack of
On 9/24/2010 8:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Over the past 42 years, my progression of SLR brands has been Mamiya - Pentax - Nkon
- Contax - Olympus - Pentax. I could have saved a lot of money by sticking with
the Pentax.
These days the
I shot a play last night with the 77/1.8. It is a wonderful lens that performed
very well in low light on my recently-acquired K-x. I will never regret getting
the 31, 43, and 77 Pentax lenses. They have served me very well.
Jeffery
On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep
Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 24, 2010, at 4:42 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
A rotten lens builds character and thoughtful technique; it also takes
rotten pictures.
someone has to Mark this.
Oh contraire. When a quotation as good as that one comes up no one
needs to Mark it. :)
--
PDML
On Sep 24, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I shot a play last night with the 77/1.8. It is a wonderful lens that
performed very well in low light on my recently-acquired K-x. I will never
regret getting the 31, 43, and 77 Pentax lenses. They have served me very
well.
It seems that
On 2010-09-24 20:41, John Francis wrote:
BTW, on a slightly related note: Does anyone know why so much
spam/hacking/malware seems to come from the Netherlands?
It's quite likely that the attacks originate from Dutch IP addresses,
but aren't initiated from The Netherlands. With a 'bot
On 2010-09-24 19:42, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
A rotten lens builds character and thoughtful technique; it also takes rotten
pictures.
There's a corollary in racing: a bad car offers the driver a lot more
opportunities to learn, but it's a lot less likely to win any given race.
--
Thanks,
On Sep 24, 2010, at 6:40 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-09-24 19:42, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
A rotten lens builds character and thoughtful technique; it also takes
rotten pictures.
There's a corollary in racing: a bad car offers the driver a lot more
opportunities to learn, but it's
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:10 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
In the old days it was a 28mm, 50mm, and a 135mm
three lens set, all primes. you can do a lot with
that set and if you can afford another, I would lean
towards a 20mm for true wideangle work. A good 20mm
isnt going to be
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
If I were a Taxi driver, I'd buy a 200.000 USD Mercedes. If I were a
portrait/advertising photographer, I wouldn't hesitate buying a 645D.
Afterall, 10.000 USD is very reasonolable, if you want to make a decent
living.
No, if
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
K7, FA20-35 with 360 flash bouncing off the ceiling.
http://chemistry.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
Look at those big, blue eyes!!
Sweet photo.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:41 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home
Perhaps it's common knowledge here, but this site allows you to select a lens
and the view the images on the site that were shot with it.
Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-09-24 20:41, John Francis wrote:
BTW, on a slightly related note: Does anyone know why so much
spam/hacking/malware seems to come from the Netherlands?
It's quite likely that the attacks originate from Dutch IP addresses,
but aren't initiated from The
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:41 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home
Perhaps it's common knowledge here, but this site allows you to select a lens
and the view the images on the site that were shot
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:56 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2010-markhamfair/album/index.html
Gallery contains photos for the BW division as well as the digital,
open colour and senior colour.
Photos to be delivered Saturday, judged Sunday.
Its
On 24 September 2010 22:12, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:41 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home
Perhaps it's common knowledge here, but this site allows you to select a lens
and the view the images on the site that were shot with
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
