Re: G'day

On May 25, 2011, at 4:21 AM, David Savage wrote: > Thought I'd re-sub given what I've just read in the archive, and > reconnect with the Pentax faithful. Welcome back. > > News from downunder: I hurt my back late last year. The pain was > making me irritable & wore away my tolerance for BS. Th

LR 3.4.1 is available

I haven't seen it been mentioned on this list. Just in case: Lightroom 3.4.1 was released 2 days ago to fix some error leading to JPEG corruption. Here is the description of its difference from 3.4: http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2011/05/lightroom-3-4-1-and-camera-raw-6-4-1-now-available

Re: OT Picture fix help

On May 25, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > > On May 25, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > >> >> OK, I took the FFT processed result and did some spot-cloning, noise >> reduction (Noiseware Pro), two passes of Smart Sharpening and finally levels >> to improve black level and con

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:38:25PM -0400, Doug Franklin wrote: > >Just about every website that you can post pictures to has the same > >non-exclusive license agreement. > > Yummm, no, not true. Do the reading, including the history, not just > "today's spin". Quite. All hosting sites have ter

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

>Just about every website that you can post pictures to has the same >non-exclusive license agreement. Yummm, no, not true. Do the reading, including the history, not just "today's spin". -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSC

Re: OT Picture fix help

On May 25, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > OK, I took the FFT processed result and did some spot-cloning, noise > reduction (Noiseware Pro), two passes of Smart Sharpening and finally levels > to improve black level and contrast/brightness ... > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2254722/pic

Re: PDML Flickr Group goes live to much fanfare

So, when I post a peso from flickr, should I also post it to the pdml group? Or are you looking it keep it to the collaborative project? It's easy enough to do, just click Actions-> post to group-> pdml -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pd

pesos tree bark

The light on the redwood outside my bedroom window caught my eye. I'm not sure whether I like the B&W or color treatment the best. color http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5760523494/in/set-72157626807385116/ B&W http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5759981009/in/set-72157626807385116/ I t

Re: Peso - Untitled

That's a great shot, Ann. They march like a bunch of Marines. A few weeks ago, I was at an event at our local community college/ I ran across this sign: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13196993 The goose was indeed on the nest. I tried to get a decent profile, but no matter how many t

Re: PAW72 - Dublin Dog

It makes you wonder what he was up to. On 5/25/2011 3:51 AM, DagT wrote: Came home from Dublin last night... http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html K-5, DA15mm, 1/60s, f/9, ISO100 DagT http://www.thrane.name/ -- Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Eart

Re: Peso Jay in flight # 1

That's really nice, at least at web size. On 5/24/2011 7:11 PM, David J Brooks wrote: Hello all. Our back yard bluejays have returned and i have started their yearly photo shoot. From Monday, day was heavy overcast, ISO set to 1600 and AF360 for fill at -0.5 EV. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On May 25, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: > > ... Amen. I've been on a lot of lists over the years. PDML works as is. The > people who have been here long enough have seen it weather storms that would > have killed many lists, like getting unceremoniously thrown off Pentax' > servers

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On May 25, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Bob W wrote: >> >> As I understand it, the idea for a PDML group on Flickr grew out of >> Christine's idea for PDML collaborative projects. It would seem to me >> that having a common workspace for such collaborations would be useful. >> > > it's for the people col

Re: Skyscrapers in Chicago

Bob, Thanks for the reference. That Chicago Spire building has always been iffy, and the economic downturn put it on hold for sure, if not killing it outright. This has happened before in Chicago. From the 1929 depression to 1957 and the Prudential building at 57 stories, nothing tall was built i

Re: OT Picture fix help

Oh my, FFT - fast fourier transforms! I haven't thought about those since grad school. Regards, Bob S. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > On 11-05-25 4:20 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >> >> On 11-05-25 11:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >>> >>> A good friend of mine has a scan of an

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

Christine, I'm with you! I'm 502 messages behind and can't read this whole thread, but I =hate= flickr. Its interface is the worst since MSDOS, the alternative views are slow, navigation is difficult, and discussions are hard to follow. So, I say FF! (not "full frame", but f*#@ flickr!) Ric

Re: Test.

I got it but it seems the subject line is defective - after about three seconds the letters became really thin and seemed to have lost some color... 2011/5/26 Jack Davis : > OK, thanks very much, Peter. ;) > > Jack > > --- On Wed, 5/25/11, P. J. Alling wrote: > >> From: P. J. Alling >> Subject:

Re: GESO: Cotswold Churches

Chris, I really enjoyed those. That is a walk I would love to take. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Tue, 5/24/11, Chris Mitchell wrote: > More from our trip on the Cotswold > Way. This time, some of the > churches we encountered. > > http://www.mitch.myzen.co.uk/CotswoldWayChur

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

OK, no big deal there. As long as folks post to the list as well as Flickr, not much has changed. Members can comment here or there. Posters who don't put a link here (or check here for comments) may get a smaller response. It's just an experiment, and if it doesn't work we can hunt down those

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

Only if they have Flickr accounts, either free or paid. On 11-05-25 8:36 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: OK, question: If I flickr poster puts a link on the list, can those here put comments on the Flickr site if they click in? On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:51 PM, David Savage wrote: On 26 May 2011

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

OK, question: If I flickr poster puts a link on the list, can those here put comments on the Flickr site if they click in? On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:51 PM, David Savage wrote: > On 26 May 2011 05:36, Matthew Hunt wrote: >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Stenquist >> wrote: >> >>> Godfr

Re: Test.

OK, thanks very much, Peter. ;) Jack --- On Wed, 5/25/11, P. J. Alling wrote: > From: P. J. Alling > Subject: Re: Test. > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 3:17 PM > Sorry, I didn't get it. > > On 5/25/2011 2:19 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > Going through another pe

Re: Test.

LoL.. Jack --- On Wed, 5/25/11, John Sessoms wrote: > From: John Sessoms > Subject: Re: Test. > To: pdml@pdml.net > Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 2:41 PM > From: Jack Davis > > > Going through another period of non returning posts. > ??? > > If you don't receive this, let me know. OK? > > >

Re: OT Picture fix help

On 11-05-25 4:20 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: On 11-05-25 11:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote: A good friend of mine has a scan of an old family photo in pretty rough shape and asked me last night if i could help fix it. I just got the scan a few moments ago: http://www.caughtinmotion.com/picture0001.jpg

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On 26 May 2011 05:36, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Stenquist > wrote: > >> Godfrey isn't saying it doesn't happen. He's saying it doesn't matter. I >> quite agree, but I know that the practice deeply offends some photographers. >> So, essentially, there's no argu

Re: OT Picture fix help

That could work. Especially if those streaks are part of the paper it's printed on. Paul Stenquist said the streaks are caused by it being printed on some kind of textured paper. I've seen textured papers, but never one with that kind of parallel lines. Not disagreeing, just never seen a tex

Skyscrapers in Chicago

interesting slide show and discussion here: B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

RE: pdmlon flicker etc

> >>> That would be "to whom I'm talking." > >> > >> Nope, Godfrey is correct: > >> > >> http://grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions2.html > >> > > > > it's probably 'who' rather than 'whom' that twisted Paul's panties. > 'Whom' > > is a relic of the case system that used to be part of English an

Re: PESO - Cowgirl

nice On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13192512 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow >

Re: OT Picture fix help

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Peter Zalabai wrote: > Well... not much you can do for mainly 2 reasons: > 1. Sharpness > The picture seems very soft... It's probably because of the age. > 2. The 'texture' > That's a really challenging task to remove, I would say you might need to > edit the pic

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On May 25, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Bob W wrote: >>> That would be "to whom I'm talking." >> >> Nope, Godfrey is correct: >> >> http://grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions2.html >> > > it's probably 'who' rather than 'whom' that twisted Paul's panties. 'Whom' > is a relic of the case system that u

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

That's a matter of opinion. Standard usage still avoids ending a sentence with a preposition, although some grammarians disagree. But that's not the issue. The pronoun should be "whom" rather than "who," since it's used objectively here. But I was just trying to respond with humor to a discussi

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:27:50 -0600 William Robb wrote: > Why don't we just put a copyright on "PDML" and be done with it? trademark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above a

Re: PESO - Cowgirl

For some reason I expected a girl in a had not a girl with a cow... On 5/25/2011 3:23 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13192512 -- Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom! --Marvin the Martian. -- PDML Pentax-Discus

Re: Peso - Untitled

That's really sweet. On 5/25/2011 12:33 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping... and found this http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Medium Aside to those in the area - th

Re: Test.

Sorry, I didn't get it. On 5/25/2011 2:19 PM, Jack Davis wrote: Going through another period of non returning posts. ??? If you don't receive this, let me know. OK? Jack -- Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom! --Marvin the Martian. -- PDML Pe

RE: pdmlon flicker etc

> > That would be "to whom I'm talking." > > Nope, Godfrey is correct: > > http://grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions2.html > it's probably 'who' rather than 'whom' that twisted Paul's panties. 'Whom' is a relic of the case system that used to be part of English and is still part of German.

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

I'll leave the grammar discussion to you folks. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Miserere wrote: > On 25 May 2011 17:35, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> That would be "to whom I'm talking." > > Nope, Godfrey is correct: > > http://grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions2.html > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discu

Re: Hope our Oklahoman's are ok

I'm okay. There was one headed to the north of us, and one headed to the south of us. I live right next to a river, and I think it affects their path. I don't think it damaged the house of anyone I know, but I have been out of the office this week. Ira - Original Message > From: An

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On 25 May 2011 17:35, Paul Stenquist wrote: > That would be "to whom I'm talking." Nope, Godfrey is correct: http://grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions2.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi

Re: Test.

From: Jack Davis Going through another period of non returning posts. ??? If you don't receive this, let me know. OK? Jack Ok. - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3658 - Release Date: 05/24/11 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: OT Picture fix help

If you could use your K10 to copy thye original you'll probably get a better result that wotking on that scan. I've had very satisfactory results copying old family B+W prints with my K20. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Joh

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Godfrey isn't saying it doesn't happen. He's saying it doesn't matter. I > quite agree, but I know that the practice deeply offends some photographers. > So, essentially, there's no argument. I feel ripped off. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss M

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

That would be "to whom I'm talking." On May 25, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > With all due respect, I don't give a goddam who I'm talking to, Bob. > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: >> Godfey, >> Your talking to an ex-ad agency executive and current freelance

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> And, as I mentioned earlier, flickr is the favorite hunting grounds of art >>> directors the world over. Hell, I've even helped some of them hunt when we >>> were pressed for time. Literally tens of thousands of comp ads have been >>> b

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

Godfrey isn't saying it doesn't happen. He's saying it doesn't matter. I quite agree, but I know that the practice deeply offends some photographers. So, essentially, there's no argument. Paul On May 25, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Godfey, > Your talking to an ex-ad agency executiv

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

With all due respect, I don't give a goddam who I'm talking to, Bob. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Godfey, > Your talking to an ex-ad agency executive and current freelance > photography professional. > This is an argument you ain't gonna win... > Regards,  Bob S. > > On

RE: OT Picture fix help

From: David J Brooks A good friend of mine has a scan of an old family photo in pretty rough shape and asked me last night if i could help fix it. I just got the scan a few moments ago: http://www.caughtinmotion.com/picture0001.jpg and had a quick look. I'm not even sure i know how to go about

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Stenquist >wrote: >> >> And, as I mentioned earlier, flickr is the favorite hunting grounds of art >> directors the world over. Hell, I've even helped some of them hunt when we >> were pressed for time. Literally tens of thousands

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

Godfey, Your talking to an ex-ad agency executive and current freelance photography professional. This is an argument you ain't gonna win... Regards, Bob S. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Stenquist > wrote: >> >> And, as I menti

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On May 25, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Stenquist > wrote: >> >> And, as I mentioned earlier, flickr is the favorite hunting grounds of art >> directors the world over. Hell, I've even helped some of them hunt when we >> were pressed for t

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On 2011-05-25 13:05 , Bob W wrote: If conversation about the pictures takes place on Flickr then you have de facto split the PDML, since the PDML is principally a discussion forum. this is already happening -- as i have noted previously, i follow all the PDMLers that i can via their blogs; i o

Re: PESO - Curve Ball

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > I like it. The motion blur is a plus, but I'd crop out the one-legged > shortstop:-). Damn! I changed the title on the blog to "Fastball", as I figured he's too young to be throwing curves (so the experts say). Then I used the wrong titl

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > And, as I mentioned earlier, flickr is the favorite hunting grounds of art > directors the world over. Hell, I've even helped some of them hunt when we > were pressed for time. Literally tens of thousands of comp ads have been > built w

Stanley Kubrick & Pentax

Just an amusing aside in the answer to question #2 in this interview: http://www.avclub.com/chicago/articles/2001s-keir-dullea-reflects-on-his-starmaking-role,26868/ -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.n

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On May 25, 2011, at 4:43 PM, steve harley wrote: > On 2011-05-24 21:34 , Bob Sullivan wrote: >> Sorry, but I don't care much for flicker either. >> Who owns what's posted there? > > you own it, and you have very detailed control over licensing and privacy; > for example you can set some of your

Re: OT Picture fix help

Well done! I'm impressed. Paul On May 25, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > On 11-05-25 11:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >> A good friend of mine has a scan of an old family photo in pretty >> rough shape and asked me last night if i could help fix it. I just got >> the scan a few moments a

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On 2011-05-24 21:34 , Bob Sullivan wrote: Sorry, but I don't care much for flicker either. Who owns what's posted there? you own it, and you have very detailed control over licensing and privacy; for example you can set some of your photos to various Creative Commons licenses, and others to A

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

Just about every website that you can post pictures to has the same non-exclusive license agreement. If you want to post your pictures on a photosharing website, you pretty much have to expect that the pictures will be shared with other people. If that is a problem, don't post pictures on Flickr

Re: Converting an *ist DL to IR

You have to take off the IR cut filter, and add clear glass of the same thickness, otherwise you can't focus properly. When you are shooting, if you want to only shoot IR, you still need an IR filter to cut out the visible and UV light. Likewise if you want to shoot visible, you need a filter tha

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On 2011-05-25 16:20, David Parsons wrote: What do you mean? The person who took the picture owns them. Flickr doesn't take anyone's copyrights. Just like the furor over the third-party APIs, a bit of Google searching will provide a much better report than I could manage. They were at one t

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On 2011-05-25 15:05, Bob W wrote: [...] I'd be highly unlikely to take part in any discussions on Flickr. Bingo! Community fragmentation. It's not that anyone posts photos anywhere in particular. It's when the discussions jump to the other venue or split between them. I like the way the

Re: OT Picture fix help

On 11-05-25 11:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote: A good friend of mine has a scan of an old family photo in pretty rough shape and asked me last night if i could help fix it. I just got the scan a few moments ago: http://www.caughtinmotion.com/picture0001.jpg and had a quick look. I'm not even sure

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

What do you mean? The person who took the picture owns them. Flickr doesn't take anyone's copyrights. On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Sorry, but I don't care much for flicker either. > Who owns what's posted there? > Regards,  Bob S. > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM,

Re: PESO - Cowgirl

Thanks Jack. Grace and I met her at the farm last weekend. She won a 4H competition with this steer that she raised. He's only 7 months old and is still huggable. Paul On May 25, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > Endearing shot! Nice tone and composition. > > Jack > > > > --- On Wed, 5/

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

I'm with the "Christine and Ann" faction here. I don't have a need, a use, or any interest in PDML (or anything else) on Flickr. Well put - I'm with them. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Doug Franklin" Subject: Re: pdmlon

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On 2011-05-25 9:06, David Savage wrote: I'd be interested to know what exactly you have a problem with. Broken trust: (a) "land grabs" on uploaded content ownership; (b) implementing an API for third-party developers that didn't respect the privacy settings of the users that posted the conten

Re: PESO - Cowgirl

Endearing shot! Nice tone and composition. Jack --- On Wed, 5/25/11, Paul Stenquist wrote: > From: Paul Stenquist > Subject: PESO - Cowgirl > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 12:23 PM > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13192512 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Di

Re: Hope our Oklahoman's are ok

>Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:35:06 -0400 >From: Ann Sanfedele >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Hope our Oklahoman's are ok >Message-ID: <4ddd3dca.9050...@nyc.rr.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > >There are a couple of "us" that live in an area struck pretty ha

PESO - Cowgirl

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13192512 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

RE: That's one is for you, Bob W

> Hi! > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG3zbp-1jM0 > > Had my laff in the morning... > > Boris > he does a good American accent that fellow, but not quite as good as Hugh Laurie: B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.ne

RE: pdmlon flicker etc

> > As I understand it, the idea for a PDML group on Flickr grew out of > Christine's idea for PDML collaborative projects. It would seem to me > that having a common workspace for such collaborations would be useful. > it's for the people collaborating to decide how they want to use a common wo

RE: pdmlon flicker etc

> I believe the PDML has grown in recent years. Only listguy knows for > sure, but it seems we have a steady influx of new members. > > I have no interest in flickr and, like others, will call it quits if > the group migrates there. BTW, I recently sold a dream cruise photo to > someone who found

RE: Peso - Untitled

> Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping... and > found this > > http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps- > 2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Medium > you have to make some money out of that one, ann! Classic B > Aside to those in the are

Re: Peso - Untitled

Great shot! I like both, but prefer the B&W. On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping...  and found > this > > http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Me

Re: Peso - Untitled

On 25/05/2011, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping... and > found this > > http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Medium > > Aside to those in the area - this was on 14th St in Newp

Re: Test.

Thanks, Matt! ;) Jack --- On Wed, 5/25/11, Matthew Hunt wrote: > From: Matthew Hunt > Subject: Re: Test. > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 11:22 AM > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jack > Davis > wrote: > > > Going through another period of non returning po

Re: Peso - Untitled

On May 25, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping... and found > this > > http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Medium > > Aside to those in the area - this was

Re: Peso - Untitled

I believe that the color tends to support the lighter aspects of this scene. Jack --- On Wed, 5/25/11, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > From: Ann Sanfedele > Subject: Re: Peso - Untitled > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 10:21 AM > Thanks, Miserere > >   -- lets see tha

Re: Test.

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > Going through another period of non returning posts. ??? > If you don't receive this, let me know. OK? I didn't not receive it. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Test.

Going through another period of non returning posts. ??? If you don't receive this, let me know. OK? Jack -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: PESO - Curve Ball

I like it. The motion blur is a plus, but I'd crop out the one-legged shortstop:-). Paul On May 25, 2011, at 12:57 PM, frank theriault wrote: > The Little League-ers are at it again this year at the park at the > bottom of our street. Hopefully I'll get lots of decent pix this > year. This was

Re: Peso - Untitled

Terrific! A wonderful juxtaposition of subject and environment. Paul On May 25, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping... and found > this > > http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > Miserere, for all the reasons you stated above I'd say simply: carry on. >  The people who could benefit from using the Flickr "PDML" group will. The > people who don't care to won't. The PDML email list itself will be > unaffected. No damage

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:  I prefer the > mailing list format rather than trying to browse a discussion group online. > > The PDML is special and I believe it should remain an independent entity. >  If we start spreading ourselves too thin we lose the cohesiveness th

Hope our Oklahoman's are ok

There are a couple of "us" that live in an area struck pretty hard by tornado's yesteryday... Hope they will check in to reassure they are fine - ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On May 25, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Miserere wrote: > > 3) Larry, John Sessoms and Dave Savage seem to have understood what > I'm after:There are a number of PDMLers that are also on Flickr, so > why not give them the option to add their photos to the PDML group so > anyone (whether they are on Flickr o

Re: Peso - Untitled

Thanks, Miserere -- lets see that's 4 for color 1 bw... I still can't decide myself... Thanks everyone for speedy comments -- I guess we know who is hanging out in front of their monitors! I think I'll head out while the sun is shining ann Miserere wrote: On 25 May 2011 12:33, Ann San

Re: Peso - Untitled

frank theriault wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping... and found this http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Medium Aside to those in

Re: pdmlon flicker etc

On May 25, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > On 11-05-25 11:28 AM, Miserere wrote: >> [...] So please >> continue your discussions and let me know if you reach an agreement. > > In the context of the PDML, that's the classic definition of an NP-complete > problem. Mark! > > -bmw > > -

Re: PDML Flickr Group goes live to much fanfare

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > On May 25, 2011, at 8:49 AM, David Savage wrote: > >> >> >> I've met some of you. The dark side is more appealing. > > Feh! > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4409775400/ That is

Re: PDML Flickr Group goes live to much fanfare

On May 25, 2011, at 8:49 AM, David Savage wrote: > > > I've met some of you. The dark side is more appealing. Feh! http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4409775400/ > > :-) > > DS > > On 25 May 2011 23:46, Bob Sullivan wrote: >> Just

Re: PAW72 - Dublin Dog

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:51 AM, DagT wrote: > Came home from Dublin last night... > > http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html > K-5, DA15mm, 1/60s, f/9, ISO100 Brilliant shot, especially with the human in the background having a similar body position to the dog's. cheers,

Re: Peso - Untitled

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping...  and found > this > > http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Medium > > Aside to those in the area - this was

Re: Peso - Untitled

On 25 May 2011 12:33, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Yesterday I went out to New Jersey for some necessary shopping...  and found > this > > http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-Snaps-2011/15389206_z3saz/1/1307163062_22BWQHJ/Medium > > Aside to those in the area - this was on 14th St

Re: Peso Jay in flight # 1

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:11 PM, David J Brooks wrote: > Hello all. > > Our back yard bluejays have returned and i have started their yearly > photo shoot. From Monday, day was heavy overcast, ISO set to 1600 and > AF360 for fill at -0.5 EV. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13183155 Te

Re: G'day

Welcome back, Dave. I was expecting a PDML logo on this shirt: http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/5684251370 I like this one a lot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/5618883047 And this one isn't perthfect, but I still like it: http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/5389943296 Cheers,

PESO - Curve Ball

The Little League-ers are at it again this year at the park at the bottom of our street. Hopefully I'll get lots of decent pix this year. This was taken on the way home from a walk by the lake, so I only snapped off about a dozen or so. This was the best of them: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.

Re: stupid-stubborn BuyDig / BeachCamera

I suffer from the same malady, Igor. Fixitivitus. Easy rancor from such bull headedness on the part of corporate inertia, or personal sloth. Good to see you won one! Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com http://gallery.me.com/jomac On May 25, 2011, at 08:36 , Igor Roshchin wrote: > > > Let

Re: PESO - Iridescent

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote: > Sorry I can't ID the bird but it is a nice bird capture. ID'ed by Matthew (a quick google search confirmed that he's right, it's a Tree Swallow). Thanks for the comment to you, Matthew and Dave and thanks to everyone else who looked. ch

  1   2   >