Re: Remember when we used to bemoan the small image buffer?

I've never saturated the K5 buffer and I always shoot RAW + JPG On 7 November 2013 15:50, Darren Addy wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHOagAADH_M > > > -- > Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

Done, thanks Stan :) On 7 November 2013 17:39, Stan Halpin wrote: > Download and look. The folder on Dropbox is less than 1 gig s oif you have a > reasonable connection . . . > > On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:47 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > >> Would like to see the full size images (that many pixels shrunk

Re: Remember when we used to bemoan the small image buffer?

On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:48:01AM -0500, Stan Halpin wrote: > Interesting movie. I thought the plot was a bit one-dimensional and the > acting was quite thin (particularly considering the star quality of the two > main characters), but all in all a good depiction of the rapid pace of change > i

Re: Remember when we used to bemoan the small image buffer?

Interesting movie. I thought the plot was a bit one-dimensional and the acting was quite thin (particularly considering the star quality of the two main characters), but all in all a good depiction of the rapid pace of change in the modern world. I must say, though, that I was disturbed by the f

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

Download and look. The folder on Dropbox is less than 1 gig s oif you have a reasonable connection . . . On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:47 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > Would like to see the full size images (that many pixels shrunk down > to web resolution is going to look good, regardless). You can sure see

RE: Old Dirty Kodachrome Slides

I did this job for a friend a couple of years ago. My technique was to use clean slightly soapy water on the non-emulsion side to gently wipe the muck off. If the emulsion side is dirty too, you can try the same technique, and if they're were processed by Kodak they will most likely survive. S

Re: Remember when we used to bemoan the small image buffer?

Looks like Ricoh's has put some effort into the K3. ... :-) Godfrey > On Nov 6, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHOagAADH_M > > > -- > Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/lis

Old Dirty Kodachrome Slides

In my home repair/decluttering, I've run across a couple of boxes of old Kodachromes I had packed away. They're all I managed to salvage from the binders destroyed when my roof came off during Hurricane Fran in 1996. They look like they were washed in muddy water. Is there any way to clean them

Re: Just for Bob

On 11/6/2013 9:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: On 11/6/13 6:59 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: I shot some 4x5 Polaroid with my Speed Graphic back in the '80s. Great fun. Landscapes had a painterly look. Still have a polaroid back for a 4x5, but don't think film is available. And if it were, I'm sure it wou

Re: Just for Bob

On 11/5/2013 9:41 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: ... "Now, every frame is meaningful again." Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a while. Every frame means another $3 spent. Good point! If I shoot large format every frame will c

Remember when we used to bemoan the small image buffer?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHOagAADH_M -- Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: PESO - Down and Out

Jesus, Bill, it's just a picture. Oy, gevalt! ;-) Cheers, frank Bill wrote: >On 06/11/2013 7:16 PM, knarf wrote: >> Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather >pleased at how it turned out: >> >> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/11/down-and-out.html?m=1 >> > >Rarely

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

Would like to see the full size images (that many pixels shrunk down to web resolution is going to look good, regardless). You can sure see the difference in the dynamic range when you compare the 51200 with the 6400 (such as flipping between image 43 and 42 (on page 2). Thanks for sharing those.

Re: PESO - Down and Out

XJVT, you couldn't drink this picture good Mark ! Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Bill" Subject: Re: PESO - Down and Out On 06/11/2013 7:16 PM, knarf wrote: Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather

Re: New 20-40 DA Limited is official

On 11/7/2013 12:20 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/camera-lenses/HD_PENTAX-DA_20-40mm_F2.8-4_ED_Limited_DC_WR Finally! Pentax is doing something that Pentax is best at doing - making great lenses. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman

Re: Playing with the K-3

On 11/7/2013 3:12 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: And Grace doing her homework, ISO 3200, f5.6, 1/100th: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17588691&size=lg Excellent shot, Paul... Naturally, K-3 is a great camera and in your hands it is even better. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.

Re: Playing with the K-3

Thanks for posting Paul the high ISO is pretty damm good IMO - I'm thinking more about acquiring. Anything negative you've found? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" Subject: Playing with the K-3 My camera

Re: PESO 2013 - 128 - GDG

Love it! :-) cheers, frank Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >Sometimes the camera's influence on a photo is very acute. This is >never more obvious than when you're working with Polaroid cameras and >films. > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/10709211404/lightbox > >This was taken with a 1960s era

Re:PESO - Up There

Dave, Don, thanks for the comments. Really appreciate it. Cheers, frank Don Guthrie wrote: >I agree Frank, sometimes the color just makes it more real & less >abstract. There is more excitement in the color version. Start carrying > >yellow jerseys for the riders to put on. Nice photo, > >pdml-

PESO - Calaveras Big Tree Park

Thanks to all who took time to comment or peek at the images from the Rim Fire. It was quite a change to walk among the trees in this forest. The scent from the incense cedars were fantastic. http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/calaveras-big-tree-park.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List P

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:51 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:43:53PM -0500, Stan Halpin wrote: >> Except the two in the bar are with the K-3 even though the title doesn't say >> that. > > The 51,200 shot in the bar is surprisingly usable. > > Looking at the tight crops of 51K i

SV: Your opinion on mr Rowell?

Dave, You can buy a soft-cover reprint at the mountainlight webpage. I flipped through it, and the print quality is better than the original; I have a battered copy aquired at a second hand bookstore. Jostein -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: David Mann Dato: 5. november 2013 06:08 Til: Pe

Re: New Q Lens 08 is official (3.8-5.9mm) 17.5mm to 27mm (35mm equiv. FOV)

http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM You can compare images here. The Q7 is noticeably sharper and resolves more fine detail than the original Q. There wasn't hardly much difference between the Q and Q10 in terms of IQ. It higher ISOs the Q7 gets probably a stop better. On Wed, Nov

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:43:53PM -0500, Stan Halpin wrote: > Except the two in the bar are with the K-3 even though the title doesn't say > that. The 51,200 shot in the bar is surprisingly usable. Looking at the tight crops of 51K it looks rather rough. There's a lesson there about not seei

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

Except the two in the bar are with the K-3 even though the title doesn't say that. On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > Yes, if the title doesn't say K-3, then that sample image was with the K-5ii. > Somewhere, I think UpperRight corner, there is a hotspot: a mouseover pops an > o

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

Yes, if the title doesn't say K-3, then that sample image was with the K-5ii. Somewhere, I think UpperRight corner, there is a hotspot: a mouseover pops an option to view the exif to get a little more info . . . On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:25:30

Re: PESO - Down and Out

On 06/11/2013 9:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:26:23PM -0600, Bill wrote: On 06/11/2013 7:16 PM, knarf wrote: Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather pleased at how it turned out: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/11/down-and-out.html?m=1

Re: Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:25:30PM -0500, Stan Halpin wrote: > It was raining today. Pretty much all day. > > I did a couple of shots (6400 and 51,200) at a local pub while out for lunch. > Did a couple of shots each of the K-3 and K-5ii sitting side by side and the > AF360FGZ and the new AF540F

Re: K-50/500 vs. Q7 vs. MX-1

Have you considered m4/3? Much better IQ than Q and not much heavier IMO. You are already possibly willing to forgo a viewfinder, so why not a pen or something? On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Thomas Bohn wrote: > Since I want to sell most of my equipment I'm starting to think if an > DSLR is re

Sample images w/ range of ISO's - K3 & K5ii

It was raining today. Pretty much all day. I did a couple of shots (6400 and 51,200) at a local pub while out for lunch. Did a couple of shots each of the K-3 and K-5ii sitting side by side and the AF360FGZ and the new AF540FGZii sitting side by side. Then I did a few series of a "still life" w

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

On 11/6/2013 16:11, Mark Roberts wrote: Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I spend a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is unimportant and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to stu

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

me too... of course I'd like to see the original - you know me, nothing but trouble :-) ann On 11/6/2013 15:05, Jens wrote: The same from me...:-) Regards Jens -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, plea

Re: PESO - Down and Out

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:26:23PM -0600, Bill wrote: > On 06/11/2013 7:16 PM, knarf wrote: > >Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather pleased at > >how it turned out: > > > >http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/11/down-and-out.html?m=1 > > > > Rarely am I roused to com

Re: PESO - Down and Out

Not my favorite of your photos, frank. I think it's trying a little too hard. Godfrey > On Nov 6, 2013, at 5:16 PM, knarf wrote: > > Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather pleased at > how it turned out: > > http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/11/down-and-out.htm

Re: PESO - Down and Out

On 06/11/2013 7:16 PM, knarf wrote: Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather pleased at how it turned out: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/11/down-and-out.html?m=1 Rarely am I roused to comment on a picture shown to this group of friends by one of our friends.

Re: Playing with the K-3

Yes, AWB. But the menus offer a choice of strong or mild correction in tungsten light. I have it set to mild. The pic of Grace was warm as well. But I corrected it in conversion. Paul via phone > On Nov 6, 2013, at 8:41 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > Was the 2nd one with AWB? Strong colour cast.

Re: Playing with the K-3

Was the 2nd one with AWB? Strong colour cast. Great results though! On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > My camera showed up this afternoon. (Finally convinced B&H that I didn't want > to wait until the grip was in stock for shipping.) Been busy all day but got > a chance to

Re: PESO - Down and Out

It works for me, Frank. It shows me a story, and does it with restraint. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, knarf wrote: > Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather pleased at > how it turned out: > > http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/11/down-and-out.html?m=1 > > Hope yo

Re: Just for Bob

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:06:21AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > > >On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: > Godfrey DiGi

PESO - Down and Out

Not sure how this might be received, but I must admit I'm rather pleased at how it turned out: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/11/down-and-out.html?m=1 Hope you enjoy. Comments always welcome. Cheers, frank “Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Playing with the K-3

My camera showed up this afternoon. (Finally convinced B&H that I didn't want to wait until the grip was in stock for shipping.) Been busy all day but got a chance to play for a bit tonight. Like the way the autofocus functions are controlled by the front and rear wheels when the button is pushe

Re: New Q Lens 08 is official (3.8-5.9mm) 17.5mm to 27mm (35mm equiv. FOV)

Well, before the 08 the highest priced Q lenses have a street price of $296. I would expect the 08 to settle close to an actual selling price of $350 before very long. By the way, we've been interested to see the K-3 vs K-5/ii/iis image quality. Can anybody point me to a good comparison of the sam

K-50/500 vs. Q7 vs. MX-1

Since I want to sell most of my equipment I'm starting to think if an DSLR is really the right fit for me. K-50/500 has the advantage that I can still use my old nice 35mm lens and do photos like the last five years w/o much change. But it is as bulky as before and I won't just take it with me. T

Re: New Q Lens 08 is official (3.8-5.9mm) 17.5mm to 27mm (35mm equiv. FOV)

Quoting Darren Addy : http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/camera-lenses/PENTAX_08_Wide_Zoom_Lens_for_Q-Series_Cameras#!product-highlights Interesting, but my Q system is only used intermittently when I don't feel like lugging the K-5 around, so 500 bucks is a bit hard to justify. 49mm filte

Re: New 20-40 DA Limited is official

On 6/11/13, Steve Cottrell, discombobulated, unleashed: > PS that links to the DP Review page -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: New 20-40 DA Limited is official

On 06/11/2013 4:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/camera-lenses/HD_PENTAX-DA_20-40mm_F2.8-4_ED_Limited_DC_WR About the same size as the 31 LTD and a bit lighter. I guess the improved high ISO performance of it's contemporary cameras makes up for the slow aperture to

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

On 6/11/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or >anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good >image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering >I really like. >http://www.rob

Re: New 20-40 DA Limited is official

On 6/11/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: >That looks very nice! The 20-35/4 was my most used lens for a time on >the *ist DS, until the DA21 and FA43 Limiteds supplanted it. An f/2.8 >zoom with that range could likely be glued in place if the performance >is up to snuff. That w

Re: New 20-40 DA Limited is official

Interesting! DC auto-focus motor rather than SDM. H. Amazing that they even managed to shoehorn a motor of any description in there, let alone one with enough torque to handle the usual LTD buttered silkiness. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.c

I'm selling my K-m and Metz 48

I want to sell my current K-m camera and my Metz 48 flash. Does anyone know a site in Germany where I can do that, besides ebay? Also what a good price would be, currently I'm setting the price for the K-m at 210 euros and for the flash 150 euros. Incl. two sets of Eneloop batteries for both. The

New Q Lens 08 is official (3.8-5.9mm) 17.5mm to 27mm (35mm equiv. FOV)

http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/camera-lenses/PENTAX_08_Wide_Zoom_Lens_for_Q-Series_Cameras#!product-highlights 49mm filter diameter (!) -- Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: New 20-40 DA Limited is official

That looks very nice! The 20-35/4 was my most used lens for a time on the *ist DS, until the DA21 and FA43 Limiteds supplanted it. An f/2.8 zoom with that range could likely be glued in place if the performance is up to snuff. Godfrey > On Nov 6, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > > h

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

Looks like an example of excellent tonemapping. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or > anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good > image in there, but it took me a long time to come u

New 20-40 DA Limited is official

http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/camera-lenses/HD_PENTAX-DA_20-40mm_F2.8-4_ED_Limited_DC_WR -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

On 06/11/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering I really like. http://www.robertstech.com/p

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

The passer by's rich red attire is what I would have chosen.   Jack - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Cc: Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:11 PM Subject: Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR! Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >I am often amused when I re

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

Sure beats a lot of HDR I've seen and I would like it even without the person in the photo. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >>I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I >>spend >>a lot of my time in rendering figuri

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I >spend >a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is >unimportant >and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to stuff more into the >photo, >whether i

Re: Date clash

Quoting Derby Chang : Bum. I just got this in the mail tonight from the nice people at CR Kennedy. Was all ready to don my camo. But I checked my diary. The rather nice restaurant in the Opera House is closing at the end of the year and I have a booking on the very same night. Nibbles and

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

On 11/6/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering I really like. http://www.robertstech.com/pa

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

>OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or anything. >But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good image in there, >but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering I really like. >http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7db06303.htm > >-- >Mark R

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

Lovely photo, a nice rendering. I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I spend a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is unimportant and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to stuff more into the photo, whether it

Re: I don't test cameras

Thanks for sharing Bill. The IQ of the K-3 is amazing at high ISO. I've been wanting this camera for years! Regards Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Nov 5, 2013 04:39 "Bill" wrote: > With that in mind, I invite you to click the link below, for your > viewing

Re: K-3 First Shot and Impressions

Thanks for sharing. Nice to know :-) Regards Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Nov 5, 2013 04:29 "Mark C" wrote: > The UPS truck finally pulled up around 9 PM this evening - I was > starting to worry that my K-3 had gotten lost. Open the box, popped on > a > le

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

The same from me...:-) Regards Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Nov 6, 2013 20:11 "Thomas Bohn" wrote: > I would be disturb by the thing on the right edge. But otherwise I > have to agree, it looks really nice and well. > Thomas > > On 6 November 2013 19:42, M

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

Beautiful scene and rendering, Mark. Looks quite painterly to me. Well worth deliberating over. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or > anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good > imag

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

Don't, of course, know what you started with, but I think the "LDR" absolutely suits this image.   Jack - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Cc: Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 10:42 AM Subject: PESO: New photographic style - LDR! OK, so "Low Dynamic

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

I believe you have found it. I don't know what the original looks like, but this is excellent! -- Bruce -- Sent from Sony Tablet S Mark Roberts wrote: >OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or >anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a goo

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

I would be disturb by the thing on the right edge. But otherwise I have to agree, it looks really nice and well. Thomas On 6 November 2013 19:42, Mark Roberts wrote: > OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or > anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new ther

Re: Date clash

On 6 Nov 2013, at 13:01, Derby Chang wrote: > > Bum. > > I just got this in the mail tonight from the nice people at CR Kennedy. Was > all ready to don my camo. But I checked my diary. The rather nice restaurant > in the Opera House is closing at the end of the year and I have a booking on >

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

Great rendering indeed, Mark... Not sure about whether the Dynamic Range is indeed Low or not, but I just like what I see. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or > anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

I like that a LOT, no acronym required. On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Walt wrote: > I love that, Mark. > > -- Walt > > > > On 11/6/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> >> OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or >> anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I n

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

I love that, Mark. -- Walt On 11/6/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering I really like.

Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

works for me Dave On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or > anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good > image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering > I really

PESO: New photographic style - LDR!

OK, so "Low Dynamic Range" isn't really a new Photoshop technique or anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering I really like. http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7db06303.htm -- Mark Roberts

Re: PESO 2013 - 128 - GDG

Great expression! On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Sometimes the camera's influence on a photo is very acute. This is never more > obvious than when you're working with Polaroid cameras and films. > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/10709211404/lightbox > > This wa

Re:PESO - Up There

I agree Frank, sometimes the color just makes it more real & less abstract. There is more excitement in the color version. Start carrying yellow jerseys for the riders to put on. Nice photo, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 3 Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 22:51:21 -0500 From: knarf To: Pentax-Di

Re: Just for Bob

On 11/6/13 10:48 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: The Impossible Project offers Polaroid-like film, and it's is about $3 a pop for the SX-70 size. Meaningful indeed. I have an SX-70 around here somewhere and have seriously contemplated doing a few f

Re: Just for Bob

On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: > The Impossible Project offers Polaroid-like film, and it's is about $3 a pop > for the SX-70 size. Meaningful indeed. > > I have an SX-70 around here somewhere and have seriously contemplated doing a > few frames with it, just because. Do it! I

PESO 2013 - 128 - GDG

Sometimes the camera's influence on a photo is very acute. This is never more obvious than when you're working with Polaroid cameras and films. http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/10709211404/lightbox This was taken with a 1960s era Polaroid Land 350. It took a bit of work to get it to funct

Re: Just for Bob

On 11/6/13 6:59 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: I shot some 4x5 Polaroid with my Speed Graphic back in the '80s. Great fun. Landscapes had a painterly look. Still have a polaroid back for a 4x5, but don't think film is available. And if it were, I'm sure it would be costly. Paul The Impossible Proje

Re: Series of PESOs from our vacation in Holland

On 6/11/13, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: >After this link: >http://pentax-ways.blogspot.co.il/search/label/Vacation_2013 > >You would find a 10 PESOs (9 of which are x3) from our trip to >Holland/Germany/Belgium this year. I don't think my photos hold any >particular interest, but

Date clash

Bum. I just got this in the mail tonight from the nice people at CR Kennedy. Was all ready to don my camo. But I checked my diary. The rather nice restaurant in the Opera House is closing at the end of the year and I have a booking on the very same night. Nibbles and new K3, or substantial ni

Re: Just for Bob

Paul Stenquist wrote: > >On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >>

Re: Just for Bob

On Nov 6, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: >>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >>> > On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > ... "Now, every frame is

Re: Series of PESOs from our vacation in Holland

I also liked Geometry of Maas and Countryside. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Just for Bob

On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:41:28PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: >> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: ... "Now, every frame is meaningful again." >>> >>> Shoot with a Polaroid SX-70 for a whi