Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Used the remote control unit to take a selfie of our family Sunday:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039600
Just a snapshot, but comments are always wlecome.
Very fun. Now you need to get this photo printed on a T-shirt for the
dog to wear and re-shoot it.
On Jun 16, 2015, at 5:09 pm, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
> Any e-mail you get from PDML contains list management information, how to
> subscribe/unsubscribe.
All I see at the bottom of messages is a link to the web-based subscription
interface. I might store your message for future reference as I ha
Brian,
A few days ago (June 9 or 10), I've seen that the mail-archive was stack
for a few hours, as it was not getting any new messages, while I was
getting (digests) those just fine. Then either it cleared up by itself or
Doug used a proverbial plunger.
Since that I haven't noticed much of
Thanks for looking, Ann.
The three poles are part of the dock, to accommodate boats that need
to be tied down to board passengers. I guess they are a distraction
that I should clone out.
I was attracted by the contrast between the modern, under-stated,
business-like attire of the woman and the
Nice travel shot - would like to see the rest of the story, so to
speak... what are those 3 poles, is the dragon the head of a boat?, etc.
ann
On 6/15/2015 11:06 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
On the shore of Kunming Lake, on the grounds of the Summer Palace, Beijing:
http://photo.net/photodb/pho
Sliding along the rail is what I gathered. I added the word "sideways."
Very well caught, Frank!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Knarf"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 7:34:54 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Mike on the Rail
No, he's sliding along the rail, but usually
Thanks, Ann and Jack.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Cute idea well done!
>
> J
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 7:18:1
On the shore of Kunming Lake, on the grounds of the Summer Palace, Beijing:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039611&size=lg
Comments will be appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
Cute idea well done!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 7:18:14 PM
Subject: PESO: Selfie
Used the remote control unit to take a selfie of our family Sunday:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039600
Just a
Quoting John :
I've occasionally been seeing something similar; I see threads of some
replies before I see the original post. Then I'll see the original post
with additional replies threaded off of it.
I could live with that but my problem is that the original posts never
show up (or, at le
Quoting "Daniel J. Matyola" :
Did you try your spam or junk folder?
Yep - nothing there.
I don't seem to be having any problems on the PDML, but on another
list to which I belong, gmail is sending posts from certain senders to
my Spam folder, and it is happening to others there as well.
Fun!
ann
On 6/15/2015 10:18 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Used the remote control unit to take a selfie of our family Sunday:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039600
Just a snapshot, but comments are always wlecome.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PD
Very cool shots. Those are beautiful, jewel-like arachnids. Who knew spiders
could be so gorgeous?
Cheers,
frank
On 12 June, 2015 5:48:51 PM EDT, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
>Thanks to all who commented, Alan, Toine, Dan, Eric, Mark, Brian!
>
>Eric, - to answer your question: I used Pentax D-FA 1
Gorgeous, both of them!
Cheers,
frank
On 12 June, 2015 9:28:48 PM EDT, Rick Womer wrote:
>A couple of postcard-like pics, perhaps, but I like them anyway:
>
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18036485
>
>and
>
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18036486
>
>(K-5, DA 16-45)
>
>Commen
No, he's sliding along the rail, but usually (and more easily) riders will use
the axle pegs on the same side of the bike (ie., either both left side or both
right side). That makes mounting and dismounting the rail much easier.
If you look carefully at Mike's wheels his front wheel is to the le
Thanks, Frank!
The faces on the shirts are not actually of my dog. I found the
shirts on the internet, and they are so close to my dog that I
couldn't resist buying them.
Years ago, my wife b ought matching tiger face shirts for my father,
my son and I. The picture that was taken that day is on
Beautiful steeple, and well captured and all, but...
Love the second shot! The human element makes all the difference. He's almost
dwarfed by the massive structure but it looks like a great place to read,
contemplate or just sit.
Great stuff.
Cheers,
frank
On 15 June, 2015 7:40:54 PM EDT,
Thanks, Ann!
:-)
Cheers,
frank
On 15 June, 2015 9:51:43 PM EDT, ann sanfedele wrote:
>Yeah Mark makes a good point something ghostly about it. -- anyway, I
>like it, too Frank...
>
>ann
>
>On 6/14/2015 10:23 PM, Knarf wrote:
>> Maybe I should have clipped my cycling shoes into the pedals
>ba
That's a fun shot! Love the t-shirts, they're a terrific likeness of your
gorgeous dog.
I like it!
Cheers,
frank
On 15 June, 2015 10:18:14 PM EDT, "Daniel J. Matyola"
wrote:
>Used the remote control unit to take a selfie of our family Sunday:
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039600
Used the remote control unit to take a selfie of our family Sunday:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039600
Just a snapshot, but comments are always wlecome.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailm
Nice action shot, Frank.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Knarf wrote:
> Finally got out and took some real piccies on the weekend. The boys were at
> the skatepark yesterday.
>
> I'm told this is a deceptively difficult trick: you'l
Did you try your spam or junk folder?
I don't seem to be having any problems on the PDML, but on another
list to which I belong, gmail is sending posts from certain senders to
my Spam folder, and it is happening to others there as well.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On 6/15/2015 8:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
'morning all
Is anyone else experiencing this?
For the past week or so I'm not seeing messages from some of you - the
only way I know about some postings is when I see replies to posts where
I haven't see the originals.
Perusing the archives, it seems
Yeah Mark makes a good point something ghostly about it. -- anyway, I
like it, too Frank...
ann
On 6/14/2015 10:23 PM, Knarf wrote:
Maybe I should have clipped my cycling shoes into the pedals backwards. :-)
Thanks for the comments Mark. I rather liked the sun rays, too.
Cheers,
frank
On
Quoting Rick Womer :
Brian,
As far as I know, I'm seeing everything.
Have you checked one of the archives to see what proportion of the
messages you're missing?
Maybe Doug is late paying the bill...
Rick
Thanks for CC'ing that to me because it hasn't come though on the list.
The norma
Brian,
As far as I know, I'm seeing everything.
Have you checked one of the archives to see what proportion of the messages
you're missing?
Maybe Doug is late paying the bill...
Rick
On Jun 15, 2015, at 8:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> 'morning all
>
> Is anyone else experiencing this?
>
>
'morning all
Is anyone else experiencing this?
For the past week or so I'm not seeing messages from some of you - the
only way I know about some postings is when I see replies to posts
where I haven't see the originals.
Perusing the archives, it seems I'm not seeing anything from Dan,
Fr
It provides a scenic tower,
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039079
...and a quiet place to work:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039080
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments appreciated!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
That's really, really good, Frank; composition, timing, you are right
on top of him yet he's entirely in frame. Excellent b&w conversion
too.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Knarf wrote:
> Finally got out and took some real piccies on the weekend. The boys were at
> the skatepark yesterday.
>
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 6:26 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Eric Featherstone wrote:
>> On 15 June 2015 at 19:20, Larry Colen wrote:
>>> Thanks. I was aware of the delete option. It would just mean that my
>>> backups get copied twice. Unless they end up in their final destination
>>> before
Is Mike then moving sideways along the rail?
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Knarf wrote:
>
> Finally got out and took some real piccies on the weekend. The boys were at
> the skatepark yesterday.
>
> I'm told this is a deceptively difficult trick: you'll notice the his
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 15 June 2015 at 19:20, Larry Colen wrote:
Thanks. I was aware of the delete option. It would just mean that my
backups get copied twice. Unless they end up in their final destination
before the first rsync. I could change my workflow a bit. I like to not
move t
Great action shot...good timing on your part
-p
On 6/15/2015 4:41 PM, Knarf wrote:
Finally got out and took some real piccies on the weekend. The boys were at the
skatepark yesterday.
I'm told this is a deceptively difficult trick: you'll notice the his front and
back wheels are on different
Finally got out and took some real piccies on the weekend. The boys were at the
skatepark yesterday.
I'm told this is a deceptively difficult trick: you'll notice the his front and
back wheels are on different sides of the rail:
http://mondociclismo.blogspot.ca/2015/06/mike-on-rail.html?m=1
T
I'll save an additional $2,000 by foregoing the Sony while I wait for
the putative Pentax FF DSLR that's due out in "Autumn".
On 6/15/2015 2:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In other words, you'd only be twice as much on a Sony a99, rather than
six times.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Hasselbl
I had a K24 f2.8 which was fine lens, but sold it pre-digital. I can't
do a direct comparison but the K24 f3.5 is remarkably sharp.
On 6/14/2015 1:00 PM, J C OConnell wrote:
Welcome to the wonderful world of SMC Pentax K series lenses. Not
only are they optically superb, they are mechanically
Or download a trial copy of Helicon Focus…
If you do that, put it on Susan’s Mac!
stan
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Tom Reese wrote:
>
> Matthew Hunt wrote:
>
> "There's also "File > Scripts > Load Files into Stack" within Photoshop."
>
> This is how I (actually Susan while I watched) did i
Thanks - I did not know that.
On 6/15/2015 1:02 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Mark C wrote:
You probably already know this - but use Photoshop tools in Bridge to load
files into PS Layers for stacking. (I did not know that at first and the
process of manually loadi
On 15 June 2015 at 19:20, Larry Colen wrote:
> Thanks. I was aware of the delete option. It would just mean that my
> backups get copied twice. Unless they end up in their final destination
> before the first rsync. I could change my workflow a bit. I like to not
> move the files from a shoot
Yeah he's just churning things up.
-Original Message-
>From: John
>Subject: Re: OT: A thousand cows in limousines
>
>He sez after milking it for all it's worth.
>
>On 6/14/2015 12:35 AM, Knarf wrote:
>> I won't udder another word.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> frank
>>
>> On 13 June, 2015 11:53:11
I have a Clack, be aware that most were stored /poorly/. The one I have
looks to be in very good condition, the lens however, would make a petri
culturing mold look good.
On 6/12/2015 3:27 PM, Paul wrote:
There are a bunch on Etsy. Most between $20 and $40 - a few higher.
Know nothing about
Oh, sorry. Didn't realize, that it's a Carl Zeise T* lens which
probably is actually worth twice what most other 24-70mm lenses are. So
there's that...
On 6/15/2015 2:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In other words, you'd only be twice as much on a Sony a99, rather than
six times.
http://www.bhph
Don't forget the 24-70mm Sony lens, which /must/ pick up some Hasselblad
magic simply by being mounted on the camera...
On 6/15/2015 2:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In other words, you'd only be twice as much on a Sony a99, rather than
six times.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Hasselblad_H
In other words, you'd only be twice as much on a Sony a99, rather than
six times.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Hasselblad_HV_vs_Sony_SLT-A99/BHitems/1034962-REG_891513-REG
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 21:18, Larry Colen wrote:
One thing that I haven't figured out how to do efficiently with rsync is for
it to track when I move a directory.
I think you want the --delete option
Thanks. I was aware of the delete option. It would just mean that
Matthew Hunt wrote:
"There's also "File > Scripts > Load Files into Stack" within Photoshop."
This is how I (actually Susan while I watched) did it. She as
Photoshop on her Mac. I however don't have it on my Windows machine.
I'll have to go through 2 learning curves simultaneously to focus
stack
this is how I (Susan) did it.
I would have preferred to do this in Lightroom because I don't have
Photoshop. My SO does have it but it's on a Mac and I'm using Windows.
I'll have to use her machine and go through two learning curves
simultaneously to focus stack with Photoshop. Please just kill me
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Mark C wrote:
>
>> You probably already know this - but use Photoshop tools in Bridge to load
>> files into PS Layers for stacking. (I did not know that at first and the
>> process of manually loading files a
But it's all moo-t.
On 6/14/2015 8:05 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
this is udder nonsense
Dave
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Knarf wrote:
There is whey more to this than there appears.
On 14 June, 2015 2:35:29 PM EDT, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kenn
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Mark C wrote:
> You probably already know this - but use Photoshop tools in Bridge to load
> files into PS Layers for stacking. (I did not know that at first and the
> process of manually loading files as layers was very time consuming.)
There's also "File > Scr
He sez after milking it for all it's worth.
On 6/14/2015 12:35 AM, Knarf wrote:
I won't udder another word.
Cheers,
frank
On 13 June, 2015 11:53:11 PM EDT, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Knarf"
Subject:
I don't know about Enfuse but if you have Photoshop CC you have a very
capable stacking tool. I downloaded the 30 day trial of Zerene Stacker a
while back, but it expired before I got any useful results. The problems
were not with the software, but rather in my technique. I then started
working
From Friday night and Saturday morning.
Working with a 35mm film SLR camera for once in a long bit… Old standby, a
Nikon.
https://flic.kr/p/upMGhS
https://flic.kr/p/upVvWK
https://flic.kr/p/tKwGer
enjoy!
G
—
The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it.
--
thanks for the reply Jostein. I tried using the Photoshop CC focus
stack and it worked somewhat better but still not good enough to show
anyone.
I shot two sets of images of separate flowers with 4 images in each set.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> Both Zerene
Hi Tom,
Both Zerene Stacker and Helicon Focus have trial versions. There is some
functionality built into Photoshop too, starting (I think) with version CS.
Have a go at the first two an see if you're more comfortable with the workflow
in those. It's probably a good idea to view the tutorials to
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 14:12 , Eric Weir wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>>
>> It's not perfect, but I'm already backing up actual copies of my RAW files
>> with:
>>
>> 1. Time Machine
>> 2. Crashplan (no speed issues here)
>
> Probably doesn't need to be
I installed Enfuse and tried a macro focus stack but the result is
awful. Now I'm not sure if I should pay something or give up on it. Is
Enfuse better suited to larger scenes like landscapes?
What is the customary donation for this type of thing?
is there a better way to focus stack macros in Li
Thanks, Jack and Larry. Yes, I thought the title would appeal to some
of the older folks on the list.
Thanks for looking and commenting, Rick. Yes, the focus on the eye
and nose is not as sharp as it should be. To my eye, I seem to have
focused on the neck hair or the ear, more than the face
Just what I expected, too!
Seems you nailed the focus on the rock, not so much on the camel (unless the
blur is from the smell and the fleas!).
Rick
On Jun 14, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039092&size=lg
> K-5 II S, DA 18-135 zoom
> C
A 50's Camels cigarette commercial
slogan.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 11:52 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> I must be of a certain age, because the photo is just what I expected from
> the title.
>
> Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18039092&s
60 matches
Mail list logo
