excellent scenery and photo!
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Christine Aguila
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 11:36 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re:
I like #3.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Christine Aguila
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 11:50 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Intermission
If you can live with manual focus, the tokina at-x 100-300/4
lens is outstanding and there is an A version of it. FF too.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Bipin
there were two versions of the tamron 90/2.5 macro adaptall lens.
do they both have this problem? (same optical design on the rear element?)
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net]
I like it but it needs a little counterclockwise rotation, the
horizon is skewed slightly.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Sunday, March 25,
if you just want to do 8.5x11 prints you can buy
a really decent photo printer for only $100 or so. Paper
and ink will be an ongoing expense however.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
out an inferior print if I can offer the purchaser a better value --
even if it causes me some extra expense.
Do you suppose it would be worth the trouble to bother getting decent
paper for it?
-- Walt
On 3/24/2012 11:11 AM, JC O'Connell wrote:
if you just want to do 8.5x11 prints you can buy
If youre going to use a third party for prints, I would
recommend you NOT direct ship the prints, you will need to
quality control them yourself before giving to a client.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
If they come up with a BW only sensor it would have to be
panchromatic characteristic or the whole thing is pointless.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P.
J.
were they all shot at 10mm setting?
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Derby Chang
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 7:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO
YES, If it were Pentax FF and ultra high resolution,
like 40 real Mpixel, I'd consider one. Especially if
it was low noise at high ISOs.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
yeah, but what if you get other bonus stuff in exchange for a BW
only sensor like higher resolution, and better sensitivity, or much lower
cost?
If all you got extra with a BW sensor is lack of color of course nobody
would want it.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
I always thought that with flashbulbs the bulb was fired prior to the
shutter to account for the delay between bulb firing and maximum bulb
output
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
so much for the need for multicoated autofocus optics...
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark
C
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 11:08 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
stunning quality. imagine how good the originals must look
on a light table. proves even 70 years ago top photo image quality
was there for the initiated.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Over 20 years ago, I once bought about 90 rolls of K64 marked down to
$0.10/roll.
Took me 10 years to shoot it all (freezer stored) . Loved that film and my
pro
Kodak carousel projector at the time. Wasn't scanning at the time or
it may have been much less fun.
-
J.C.O'Connell
I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only
shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering
if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly?
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
FWIW, the one roll I did shoot and scan was TMAX100
and the sharpness was impressive but even this fine
grained BW 100 speed film showed grain noisier than iso
200 images from my *istDS.
---
jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
looks good despite supposed lens issues (promaster?).
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Walt
Gilbert
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 1:43 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
looks over-processed to me, the bold edges seem to have too much contrast.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 1:51 PM
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/articles/why-i-went-full-frame-and-why-you-d
ont-need-to
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
nice, but did you try one with the sun actually in the frame too?
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 7:55 PM
To:
I bought on ebay a $25 split image RF screen for my istDS
when I bought the camera, works great. Chinese.
No cutting required. This was 5 yrs ago though.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
FWIW, Only the upper section looks like an oil paint Monet, the reeds dont,
they look like pencil drawings. Too distinct to be a Monet.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
looks like an facial impression in snow or sand. What is it?
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
knarftheria...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 8:07 PM
To:
Cool pic. Looks like an old chevy monza funnycar.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 8:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
I like it but I would try copy/pasting something into that blank
upper left hand corner
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Bruce Walker
Sent: Monday, February
just by name alone I would think exposure is the entire image
level and brightness would be midpoint gamma levels only.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David
I would be concerned that the cheap compensation lens definitely degrades
the fine image quality of the nikkor mounted.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Walt
bad news : its the worst pentax lens I have ever used with regards to
gemetric distortion. very high barrel distortion. the smck 20/4 fixed the
problem.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
me either...
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:44 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Macro -- got it
...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
kwal...@peoplepc.com
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:22 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 20mm f4.5 - thoughts?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: JC O'Connell hifis
Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of JC
O'Connell
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:11 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 20mm f4.5 - thoughts?
nope, its just a very early very wide very bad design
by pentax
I forgot to mention I preferred the early version with
49mm filter threads due to better build quality. It's built like
a precision tank. The later version with 55mm threads is more
plastic feeling and lighter.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original
34 matches
Mail list logo
