Boris Liberman wrote:
> Malcolm,
>
> Sorry to join late...
>
> If you *absolutely* have to have WR lens, then I think that 16-85 is
> preferable. The difference between 18 and 16 mm on wide end is
> significant. It will give you more interesting compositional
> opportunities. The difference
Igor wrote:
> Malcolm,
>
> I haven't used any of these lenses, but I was thinking about a similar
> question.
> Just in case you haven't seen this review, - it might give you some
> impression of this lens, and answer some technical questions, including
> some comparisons between different
Bob W wrote:
> Not sure if this link will work, but I'll give it a try.
>
> High tide in Greenwich earlier today, taken with my phone.
>
> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=439D213A93634DD4!105870=!
> AEJ73VLiIcHsff8=album%2c
Always amazed at what a phone camera can produce with the right
Bipin Gupta wrote:
> Hello Malcom, choice of lenses have always been the most difficult
> decision for most of us. So how do we finally decide.
> Ask simple rational question like:
> a) Genre of photography
> b) Predominantly wide or tele user.
> c) Bright or Low Light photography
> d)
Darren Addy wrote:
> Clearly you need to purchase both.
> :)
Aaah!! You mustn't make comments like that! Horrifying thought :-)
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Your wife rides a three-legged horse? That must take some special
> training for both of them.
You realise I now have visions of landscape photographers saddling up their
tripods to cross the countryside :-)
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Darren Addy wrote:
> Rereading your original post...
> I like to look at my lens line-up as a "team" that I am constantly
> working to upgrade, sometimes in incremental ways.
> What you are describing gives you the opportunity to upgrade yours:
> The 18-55mm you have is essentially just a kit
Brian Walters wrote:
> I have the 18-135 and it's become my most used lens. My 16-45 has got
> very little use since I got the 18-135. Maybe my IQ standards are not
> as stringent as those of other people but I have absolutely no problem
> with the lens.
>
> Having said that, reviews suggest
Bruce Walker wrote:
> Visiting Vancouver model Muirina Fae at a lighting workshop. NSFW.
>
> http://off-axis.brucemwalker.com/image/132039125717
>
> 645Z, DFA645 55/2.8, f:7.1, 1/125th sec, 200 ISO.
>
> 7' Profoto parabolic umbrella front camera-right. Couple of Profoto
> heads on background.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> http://themetapicture.com/the-different-poses-of-a-photographer/
Regularly do the leaning on a horse trick. One of the horses my wife gets to
ride is a brilliant tripod. Only tripod I've used that expects a bit of fuss
and a mint or carrot piece though!
Malcolm
--
I have the opportunity to add either an 18-135mm WR lens, or a 16-85mm WR
lens to my collection at a discount.
In the past I would have jumped to add another lens, but as I already have
the 18-55mm WR & 55-300mm WR lenses, I am struggling to see what advantage I
would gain by acquiring either of
This purchase I need to make, the only decision is which one. I have been
given a number of Carousel magazines, in 80 & (I think) 140 capacity
versions. My old projector isn't great and the magazines have long been lost
for it, and I'm fed up feeding slides in one at a time.
I have been told the
Larry Colen wrote:
> I'm quite interested in hearing about the relative merits and drawbacks
> of all of the weather sealed lenses, as my 16-50 is my only lens in
> that category.
I don't generally worry too much about taking equipment out in poor
conditions, WR or not, but on one occasion I got
Darren Addy wrote:
> Carousel projectors were the consumer models and Ektagraphic projectors
> were the better business models.
> http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/faqs/faq5600.shtml
Very useful, thanks.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bruce Walker wrote:
> Have you considered getting the slides scanned and using an LCD
> projector?
>
> Old Kodak Carousel's are the crankiest and most problematic machines
> around. I have two of them in the basement (I think; though I haven't
> seen them in a while and they may have crawled
P.J. Alling wrote:
> From what I understand the 18-85 WR is a superior lens of it's type in
> every way, except manual focusing, in that respect it takes after the
> FA 17-70, which gives all the tactile feedback of a, I was going to say
> dead fish, but that actually give tactile feedback, the
Darren Addy wrote:
> I'm not sure where the "discount" is coming from, or how much of a
> discount it is, but if it is sizeable enough that you could turn around
> and sell the lens and make a profit - it would be worth doing just for
> the "free money" aspect of it. In that case, I would look
Collin B wrote:
> I periodically find good later units like the 5200 in the $20 range.
> Don't know how much of a hurry you are in ...
>
> Watch CL. A bargain on occasion there as well.
I take a look occasionally in local auction houses; I'd like one before
Christmas ideally.
Malcolm
--
Mark Roberts wrote:
> From the inside looking out.
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dc01537.jpg
I really like these sort of abstract images.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Frank Theriault wrote:
> Marking the passing of another summer (if we haven't marked it yet):
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2015/10/quietus.html
Really nice capture which marks this time of the year.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Jack Davis wrote:
> This shot in Nov. 2002. LX with A*300mmf/2.8. Shot the moon (a few
> times from our back patio) using a 1.4L Pentax T/C and tobacco colored
> filter.
> As many of you will remember. the LX would allow you to rewind the film
> to a desired frame. I did so and went to Gray
Frank Theriault wrote:
> Would you buy an e-cigarette from this man?
>
> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2015/10/service-with-smile.html
>
> Would you buy one from anyone?
>
> BTW, his scowl was there before he saw me and my camera. I think he's
> just a scowling type of guy.
No!
It's a
Jack Davis wrote:
> Back to the maudlin drum beat. This seems a comfortable composition of
> a Gray Heron who was just a little beyond the detail fetching K-
> 3/DA55~300.
> (The eye is the slightest bit visible in the tif version.)
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> J
>
>
Darren Addy wrote:
> Confession: I've never pored over the manual to fully understand my
> cameras. (It is a testament to Pentax that they make things intuitive
> enough to figure out how to get good images (at least for someone who
> already understands the basic principles from shooting film
Rick Womer wrote:
> I'd give Darren's "Sand Sower" the nod as my favorite this month.
> Ken's "Lighthouse" is close behind, but lists to the left. Malcolm's
> "Thistles" is also close behind, though the shot could use a bit more
> contrast.
Great gallery as usual, but my two favourites just
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> I have posted on Photo.net for many years, and never knew that the had
> a "photo of the day," and now I got two of 'um. I am still awaiting
> the cash award that certainly goes with the honor, however.
Worthy winner alright.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
John wrote:
> I don't watermark, but that doesn't mean that you (or anyone else
> shouldn't).
>
> I'm in the "You should only watermark images when you think it will
> deter some unscrupulous asshole from stealing them" camp ... although
> it doesn't seem like it actually does deter them.
>
> I
Sandy Harris wrote:
> There are ways to watermark that are quite hard to detect or remove.
> Quoting text I wrote most of at :
> http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Steganography#Digital_watermarking
>
> Encryption is often used as one of the steps in steganographic hiding
> of information. Consider
Thanks for the replies, Ann, Igor & Mark,
The point about theft with a watermarked image is well made. I'm not sure
how practical in terms of litigation it would be for someone in one country
to try and stop the use of a stolen image in another part of the world, but
in many ways it's beside the
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Total composite: One shot of a normal full moon taken with a super
> telephoto and then tinted red in Photoshop. Another shot of the antler
> arch taken with a shorter lens. Both pasted onto a black background
> with no stars.
In the last six months I've attended two talks
With recent discussion about pictures getting taken by unscrupulous
individuals and passed off as their own, or being used in part of an image
etc, what is the view of watermarking images that are posted by folk here?
The views I've read seem to vary; those in the 'no' camp because you should
P.J. Alling wrote:
> Any watermark that can't be removed or cropped off, annoys the viewer
> and ruins the image. Any digital watermark that's hidden in the image
> can be stripped out. But, just ask Dave Brooks, if watermarks actually
> discourage theft.
If you display hundreds of high class
P.J. Alling wrote:
> You know it's funny, I hadn't thought about this in a long time, but:
> It was always touted that you paid more for a modern digital camera
> than an equivalent film camera, up front, and saved on the cost of
> processing the film over time. It just occurred to me that I
John Francis wrote:
> I've got the FA* 250-600, A* 300, and FA* 80-200, none of which I've
> used for a period measured in years, not months. :( Mind you, I've
> hardly even picked up my K5 (and the stable of DA* zooms) in over a
> year.
>
> I need to get off the fence and decide whether I'm
Brian Walters wrote:
> Apparently some official details on camera specs in early October.
Didn't they announce recently that some of their new lenses were being
delayed as well? If so, this isn't a great surprise. There have been some
stunning new FF cameras launched recently, and I fear the
John wrote:
> OR you could look for a used lensbaby in Pentax K mount if that effect
> is your thing.
>
> IF the show is available in your region, you still can't watch it
> online without a CBS subscription.
I have such a lens, but to be honest it isn't as good as PS Elements for
making the
Igor PDML wrote:
> It is possible that all PDMLers have known this long ago, but just in
> case somebody was as ignorant about it as myself, I thought I'd share
> it here.
>
> I just learned that tilt-and-shift effect was used in the new Colbert's
> show.
> Apparently, tilt-and-shift can be
Igor PDML wrote:
> Sorry, yes CBS is very selective with showing their full-videos of the
> shows. There are some clips from the show on Youtube, but not the short
> recurring portion where the shots of New York City are shown as those
> of a miniature model of the city.
A great shame, as New
Darren Addy wrote:
> We have a web project at work that involves digitizing some 35mm
> slides.
> I have an Epson Perfection V600 Photo which could do the job, but I
> decided to snag a Pentax Bellows II and slide attachment off of eBay
> and hope to do the job with my K-3.
>
> By my
Finally got to see them all in peace. Excellent pictures, but four stand out
for me:
Portrayal - Adam Montoya
Straight Ahead - Ann Sanfedele
Happy Birthday To Me! - Ken Waller
It Was A dark And Stormy Night - John Sessoms
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
P.J. Alling wrote:
> I think if it supports SDHC it will support the largest SDHC card,
> which is 32mb IIRC. I don't know for sure, but, once again IIRC, the
> K100D doesn't support the SDXD standard. I'd look it up but the U.S.
> Ricoh-Immaging site which hosted the change logs for all Pentax
Another question from the dark ages of digital photography. There was a
firmware update to allow the K100D to use larger SDHC cards. Does anyone
know what the biggest size card that update will support? Thanks!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Another Memorial Day scene:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18080162
> K-5 II S, DA 18-135 zoom
> Comments are invited.
Really well observed and framed.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> New York's Bravest relaxing on the street after a building evacuation
> in mid-town Manhattan:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18079203=lg
> K-5 II S, DA 18-135 zoom
> Comments are always appreciated.
Not only a great moment captured, but I like the shadows
Marco Alpert wrote:
> It's a bit of one of the five fountain pen ink testing stations at last
> weekend's San Francisco International Pen Show. Each station offered
> 100 different inks to try. And yes, that's 500 different fountain pen
> inks (who knew?). Here's a slightly wider view:
>
>
John Coyle wrote:
> Old it may be, but my *ist-D still knocks out perfectly good A4 size
> prints if needed, and still mainly works as designed. I can no longer
> zoom into a frame on the LCD screen, but otherwise everything works as
> well as it did when brand new.
> It was such a
Bob W wrote:
> If you think digital cameras have been revolutionary, you ain't seen
> nothin' yet.
In 30+ years of motoring with all the so called improvements in technology
to cars and the infrastructure, the one thing that is shameful is the
standard of the road surface. If anything, this has
I recently got a nearly new camera for very little money. Embarrassingly
little money. Camera with a couple of hundred shutter activations, all boxed
as new, with all the original packing. Still works perfectly. I'll tell you
that it takes a CF card and you'll know it is an *ist D.
I still have a
Bob W wrote:
And then there are all the other costs that car ownership entails.
Owning a car is a modern form of slavery. Getting rid of mine was on a
par with giving up smoking as far as feeling liberated is concerned.
I'm not ready to give up ownership yet. I have a nine seat vehicle
Steve Cottrell wrote:
http://www.seeingeye.tv/PESO/001.html
Hopefully I can spur myself into doing some more...
A familiar sight in that area and I very much like how the moment has been
caught.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
John Francis wrote:
I've dredged a few more details out of my memory.
The unit we had was a Matrix QCR, and the camera body used was a Pentax
A3000.
Horizontal resolution was either 2k or 4k pixels (selectable). It came
with a GPIB interface, and it took several minutes to complete a single
Jack Davis wrote:
Who does the dance, you or Camilla?
My wife and I own a rescued King Charles Cavalier Spaniel (small dog)
who, when laying in my path as I approach, will back up through three
rooms rather than step aside. That's a lot of anxious jigging on both
our parts.
Me.
I pick her
John wrote:
Very optimistic. I wouldn't put money on anything being about on
planet Earth 1000 years from now :-(
Malcolm
Even if you did, how would you collect on the bet?
Life is resilient. It's a shame I won't be around to see what it's
like, but I expect there will be something
Ann sanfedele wrote:
I could have written that one too , Malcolm. :-)
But I've only had Ashley for 10 years... I was dropping things,
tripping over wires, spilling coffee etc before she came along... so I
can't blame her for all of it
Camilla is a 9 year chocolate point Siamese. She gets a
Ann sanfedele wrote:
This prevents what always happens when I do the work myself... tripping
over cords, dropping slides, dropping whole boxes of slides, put thumb
on slide, put the slides in the stacker upside down, drop my notes...
etc... burn my finger touching the projector.
Sigh Set up
Steve Harley wrote:
a company near my home, though i've not used them, has a very good
reputation and does this a reasonable cost - see Presentation Slides
on this page:
http://www.theslideprinter.com/services/film-services/
Thanks, I've seen a few of these services, but I'm keen to have a
Ken Waller wrote:
There use to be available an attachment for the end of the Pentax
bellows unit that allowed the copying of slides by a camera/lens setup.
I have one, I've used it - it worked well.
Other similar devices were available from other sources. If you can
find one, you could
John wrote:
There is still a lively debate going on regarding digital vs film as a
long term storage medium.
When I first joined PDML back in 2009 or so, the National Register of
Historic Places still required documentation photos for properties
proposed for addition to and/or preservation
George Sinos wrote:
sounds like an interesting problem and just for fun sound like
great reasons to me. Kinda describes model railroading too. gs George
Sinos
Absolutely.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
John Francis wrote:
While later film recorders may well have used lasers, that's not how
the original models worked. Back in the 1980s I had access to a film
recorder where I worked (Apollo); we used it to make slides for images
that we were submitting to SIGGRAPH.
Inside was a small
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
A thousand years from now, when future archeologists are digging out
the foundation of our civilization, they'll ask their AI, what the
heck is all that old plastic stuff in the box?
I think it was called film.
what's it for?
Recording still images.
Sheesh, what a
Some months ago I asked a question about how best to transfer slides to
digital images. All is good with that, and the slow scanning transfer
continues. Probably for several years as time allows.
However, I was asked the other day how to do this the other way, transfer a
digital image to a 35mm
Matthew Hunt wrote:
My understanding was that commercial film recorders didn't work by
projecting an image and photographing it, but rather by directly
exposing dots onto the film using tiny sources of light. Think of how
an inkjet printer head sprays tiny dots of ink, then imagine it
Bob W wrote:
If it's anything like tyre pressures then it's probably good for 440lb
[1].
As I understand things, to decide the maximum tyre pressure they
inflate them until they burst. They then declare the maximum pressure
to be half the bursting pressure.
[1] Caveat: I am not a test
Bob W wrote:
That's very impressive. I've found that cycling 6-7 hours a day across
France has a similar effect and you still get to eat snacks :0)
That's the benefit of cycling, which has allowed me to retain a small
chocolate ration in life!
I'd have thought a decent mountain bike would
Rick Womer wrote:
I love seeing every month what different things people do with the same
theme,
I think this is another really strong and interesting gallery. My faves
are Malcolm's Diadrant Pop Art (they look like space snakes), Pat's
Foggy Beach, Brian's Yellow on Blue, and Ken's
Rick Womer wrote:
Just up the street from St. Paul's:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049358size=lg
You've posted some stunning images recently Rick, but this is my favourite
so far.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Ann sanfedele wrote:
You're late - I'm super late :-)
Thanks Rick - and thanks, Brian too for including mine in your hit
parade
Too much good stuff this month - but that doggie of Malcolm 's I think
is my personal fave.
Thanks Ann. That day I took pictures of the boats and the
Bill wrote:
This is 2:30 that you will never get back.
OT for Fuji Content.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtKkQjm-yX0feature=youtube_gdata
One of my friends has one of these, although it will only 'recycle' the
contents rather than the packing. His lifestyle is therefore excessively
Bob W-PDML wrote:
I don't drink all that much water when I'm on these trips.
This time I took 2 bottles, totalling 1.5l, and often enough still had
plenty left at the end of the day. My routine is generally to cycle 3
hours in the morning and 3 in the afternoon. After 1.5 hours stop for a
Larry Colen wrote:
It's not so much that people offer him that sort of money for his
photos, but that they are told that the photos are a good investment,
when in reality, they are nearly guaranteed to lose money:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-
Larry Colen wrote:
Thanks. The most important thing is to shoot in manual and watch your
histogram. It would be nice if Lightroom allowed a bit more adjustment
in terms of temperature and tint, but you can extend it a bit by
tweaking the slope/end point of the tone curve for specific
Mark C wrote:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/earwig
An earwig. Not as cute as the firefly... Comments welcome!
Not as cute, true...but that detail. Really enjoying these Mark.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Larry Colen wrote:
This set are my favorites photographically.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157654927530252/
Very impressed. I've never tried my hand at taking pictures in this sort of
light, but a couple of my friends have. From the comments they made
afterwards, I've got
Mark C wrote:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/firefly
Again with the K24 f3.5. I determine magnification by photographing a
metric ruler scale when I am done with the bug - in this case the frame
was more than 3mm wide and less than 3.5. So - about 7x life sized.
The more
Steve Harley wrote:
i don't have numbers, but i don't think that's the subscription's
advantage for Adobe; i think the advantage is cash flow and roping in
the users who would otherwise skip versions; the infrastructure for
license verification and updates, plus the cloud storage features,
Ken Waller wrote:
An abstract capture of a small portion of the Upper Tahquamenon Falls
in the Upper Peninsula Of Michigan.
The golden water tone is due to the tannins in the water caused by the
foliage along the river.
PZ1P, 300mm f4.5 FA and 1.4 X-S convertor ISO 50
Mark C wrote:
Another run with the SMC K 24 f3.5:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/june-bug
A bit busier than I would like... Approximately 5x lifesized - the
shorter lens makes higher magnifications much easier to work with.
Comments welcome.
Another outstanding image,
Bruce Walker wrote:
Also more expensive for folks like me who only need to upgrade about
every two or three major versions.
It's kinda like: what if Ford decided to remove the buy option and went
to a you can only lease option for all their cars. So you get
upgrades frequently but you are
Knarf wrote:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2015/06/toward-city.html?m=1
Yes, it's another bike by the lake shot. Same old crap or part of a
fascinating series? - you decide LOL! Taken one day that I had an early
meeting at work so I was commuting around 8am. Along the lake is
actually
Daniel J. Matyola
There have been a lot of insects and arachnids in recent PESOs, so I
though I would add this tarantula on display at the San Diego Zoo:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18037521size=lg
K-5 II S, DA 18-135 zoom
Comments are appreciated.
Great colours but far too
Ken Waller wrote:
The common snipe fly image is really spectacular, but then it was done
by Cassino !
I'm always captivated by these images. There are so many types of
photography I don't get or seem to be overdone, HDR, photomerge etc. These
stacked images really are something special.
John wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---
%20%20barbelle.html
Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited.
A wonderfully atmospheric picture, but I don't understand the culture
of young ladies covering themselves with body art/tattoos. I
P.J. Alling wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---
%20%20barbelle.html
Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited.
A wonderfully atmospheric picture, but I don't understand the culture of
young ladies covering themselves with body art/tattoos. I
Ken Waller wrote:
Malcolm - late August in the U P of Michigan can be a bitch. More like
late Oct/Nov in some northern states. Not like you want to be out in
that kind of weather but rather be wrapped up in a book by the
fireplace.
I'm the odd one out here. I really don't like Summer at
Another excellent selection.
Two favourites for me, although it is so hard to pick them; Ken's 'Lake
Superior' - because I love wet and windy days in August and I feel I'm
actually there, and Eric's 'Blue Pond' because I can imagine this enlarged
and framed on a wall in my house.
Malcolm
--
P.J. Alling wrote:
Horses? Noise? You don't need noise. I had a horse bolt on me catching
sight of waving cloth out of the corner of it's eye. It doesn't take
much strange to get on a horses nerves.
Very much aware of this; the horse my wife currently rides is terrified of
domestic wheeled
Ken Waller wrote:
A very creative new camera idea- not actually available now, they
apparaently need seed money to make it happen.
https://www.lily.camera/
In the more open patches of forest land and along certain waterway paths, I
can see this being a really useful viewpoint for mountain
Ah! They joys of the internet again. Funny how the utility companies
repairing their own pipes have to cut through all the other buried pipes and
cables, and turn a small leak into a 'what doesn't work today' special. But
I digress...
A tilt shift lens. The Samyang T-S 24mm F3.5 ED UMC Tilt
Mark Roberts wrote:
Also trivia: My mum still has my original ist-D (which cost me
$1500.00!) and as far as I know it's still working. I've got the
optional battery grip for it around here somewhere, too.
At least she has the camera for it to go with. After going missing after I
bought it,
Mark C wrote:
A macro of a moth - probably a gypsy moth:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/moth-macro
I love these focus stacked images, the detail is incredible.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Brian Walters wrote:
Actually this is nothing new - I'm surprised they're even offering new
camera support etc for CS6. They're really trying to move users to the
CC world. I wouldn't be surprised if LR 6 is the last stand-alone
version.
I'm surprised that LR 6 was offered as a stand-alone
Bipin Gupta wrote:
Bipin, I think I might be one of the ones who doesn't share these views.
1. It is more about equipment than we'd like to admit and smart kids.
No. It really isn't. The last couple of years have shown me that. I've been
playing with a K7 again in the last couple of days and
Stanley Halpin wrote:
Apparently by upgrading to LR6.0 I was automagically joining the
Creative Cloud.
I hope that if I choose to upgrade, they will offer a CD version. Last time
I logged into LR it offered what I thought was going to be an upgrade to 5,
but it turned out to be a link to
I've had an e-mail in from one of the UK dealers stating the body only
option is £769, which is better than I thought it would be launched at.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
...and built-in GPS. Not enough to make me flog off my K-3 and buy the
K-3 II but annoying just as well. The display of my Garmin portable is
slowly dying and the clip-on GPS module for the K-3 is awfully big.
Built in GPS, that's good.
No more pop up flash, for me,
Frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2015/04/spadina-car-4092.html
Wonderful street scene.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
David Mann wrote:
We're cropping reality every time we take a photo.
Mark!
However: this is also a great observation that is often overlooked. Aside
from choosing the specific image of the area I am in, I now find myself in
the digital age drawn to cropping from the original I've taken. I
Alan C wrote:
Quite true, but we used to crop (mask) on the enlarger too so it's
nothing new, just easier.
It's new to me! I used to almost exclusively use slide film - which I am now
having the joy of scanning (and cropping at times) - but I have an
opportunity to learn how to develop and
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
I would stitch photos together in software to make a panorama.
Which is basically the same thing a swing-lens camera does. Hence, a
real panoramic image.
I accept that, but I don't want another camera.
I would use
filters to produce I/R images.
This is
501 - 600 of 1859 matches
Mail list logo
