On Sep 27, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 27/09/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> All way too complicated. Gimme a manual flash and a flash meter. ;-)
>
> I absolutely LOATHE flash. But it also can produce some wonderful
> results. So I let the flash do all the work. Top
On 27/09/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>All way too complicated. Gimme a manual flash and a flash meter. ;-)
I absolutely LOATHE flash. But it also can produce some wonderful
results. So I let the flash do all the work. Top of the range Canon
580EX that is a computer with a li
On Sep 27, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Axel Belinfante wrote:
>> All way too complicated. Gimme a manual flash and a flash meter. ;-)
>
> I really, really, really like the aperrant simplicity of ttl flash -
> the protocol is dead simple -- start, stop -- and all funky
> computations/
> settings can hap
> All way too complicated. Gimme a manual flash and a flash meter. ;-)
:-)
I really, really, really like the aperrant simplicity of ttl flash -
the protocol is dead simple -- start, stop -- and all funky computations/
settings can happen in the camera, flash needs to know nothing.
I'm really, r
William Robb replied to my remark:
> > I guess the bottom line is that "dedicated" by itself is
> > an empty phrase.
> > "dedicated" is not an absolute notion, but a relative one.
> > it is relative to a (family) of camera body(s).
> >
>
> "Dedicated" is an absolute term, and means that the flash
All way too complicated. Gimme a manual flash and a flash meter. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 9/26/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I knew there was something more involved here but I couldn't verbalize it
> with the limited mental resources I allotted for the task.
LOL
Mark!
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
day, September 25, 2007 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Axel Belinfante" Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
>
>>
>> I guess the bottom line is that "dedicated" by itself is
>> an
>
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/25 Tue PM 03:22:29 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> My Nikon SB15 lit the flash ready signal on Nikon FM/FE bodies way
> back in the 1970s.
>
> Li
- Original Message -
From: "Axel Belinfante" Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> I guess the bottom line is that "dedicated" by itself is
> an empty phrase.
> "dedicated" is not an absolute notion, but a relative one.
>
On Sep 25, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Axel Belinfante wrote:
>> Lighting the flash ready signal is not the same as responding to the
>> body's flash control protocol for Flash EV Compensation, setting the
>> exposure time and lens opening automatically, allowing HSS, etc, that
>> are what a "dedicated" f
> My Nikon SB15 lit the flash ready signal on Nikon FM/FE bodies way
> back in the 1970s.
>
> Lighting the flash ready signal is not the same as responding to the
> body's flash control protocol for Flash EV Compensation, setting the
> exposure time and lens opening automatically, allowing
My Nikon SB15 lit the flash ready signal on Nikon FM/FE bodies way
back in the 1970s.
Lighting the flash ready signal is not the same as responding to the
body's flash control protocol for Flash EV Compensation, setting the
exposure time and lens opening automatically, allowing HSS, etc, th
; -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Boris
> Liberman
> Sendt: 24. september 2007 11:58
> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Emne: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I have AF220T unit which is a good flash,
2007 11:58
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Thinking of AF280T flash
Hi!
I have AF220T unit which is a good flash, but it can only give me a
full discharge on K10D. I don't want to buy either 540th or 360th
flashes. They are too expensive and 360th does not swivel.
It seems that AF280
Mail List
> > Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
> >
> >
> > On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
> >
> > > ... If you can get a
> > > dedicated flash for Pentax that isn't TTL, and will talk to the
> > > electronics
&g
>
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/24 Mon PM 03:08:07 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
>
> > ... If you can get a
> > d
Interesting stuff. Them's wacky folks at Metz ... !
G
On Sep 24, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Axel Belinfante wrote:
> metz sca stuff will do anything dedicated it is able of,
> at least in my experience. it is not always as capable
> as we would like it to be, though...
>
> some discussion is also at
> ht
was ok with this body.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
> Cory, when you say "work well" you mean tha
> William Robb wrote:
> > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> >> On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
> >>
> >>> ... If you can get a
> >>> dedicated flash for Pentax that isn't TTL, and will talk to the
> >>> electronics
> >>> in the camera, I think that would be best from an ease of operation
>
AFAIK the Metz flash permits that all exposure settings are uploaded
to the flash automaticaly and the flash will still do computer mode.
However my 40MZ2 + SCA 3701 is unreliable on a ist-D.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
>>
>>> ... If you can get a
>>> dedicated flash for Pentax that
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
>
>> ... If you can get a
>> dedicated flash for Pentax that isn't TTL, and will talk to the
>> electroni
On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>> On 9/24/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If you're going to be using a non-dedicated flash anyway, why not
>>> buy
>>> a NEW Sunpak 383 or Vivitar 285HV auto-flash for under a hundred
>>> dollars as opposed to a used Pentax
the lens. If you don't do that, it's at your own risk :-)
>>
>> Dario
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 1
On Sep 24, 2007, at 7:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
> ... If you can get a
> dedicated flash for Pentax that isn't TTL, and will talk to the
> electronics
> in the camera, I think that would be best from an ease of operation
> POV. ...
As you suspect, there are no dedicated flash units that wil
William Robb wrote:
> > Godfrey, another thing that makes 280T very attractive is that it has
> > this low level mode GN 8 or so that has very rapid recharge times. I
> > will most definitely use it for my daughter ;-).
>
> Boris, I haven't used my 280T for quite some time, but I do recall it as
>
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/24 Mon PM 12:52:06 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> Cory - one more question - you don't put any hardware between the
> flash
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
> Godfrey, another thing that makes 280T very attractive is that it has
> this low level mode GN 8 or so that has very rapid recharge times. I
> will most definitely use it for my daug
>
> From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/24 Mon PM 12:20:31 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> Boris, like most auto flash do, you have to choose a flash range (e.g. 4-7m)
>
>
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/24 Mon PM 01:18:41 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> Excellent. I mean - this is more or less what I want - to have
> understandable a
>
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/24 Mon AM 09:58:08 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
> Hi!
>
> I have AF220T unit which is a good flash, but it can only give me a
>
Godfrey, another thing that makes 280T very attractive is that it has
this low level mode GN 8 or so that has very rapid recharge times. I
will most definitely use it for my daughter ;-).
On 9/24/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only because I don't know even zilch about flashes. Ca
Only because I don't know even zilch about flashes. Can you enlighten me?
On 9/24/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're going to be using a non-dedicated flash anyway, why not buy
> a NEW Sunpak 383 or Vivitar 285HV auto-flash for under a hundred
> dollars as opposed to a use
If you're going to be using a non-dedicated flash anyway, why not buy
a NEW Sunpak 383 or Vivitar 285HV auto-flash for under a hundred
dollars as opposed to a used Pentax flash?
G
On Sep 24, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> I have AF220T unit which is a good flash, but it can only g
TTL is out, but I think I used them
> >> mostly in auto on the *istD anyway.
> >>
> >> Cory
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
n risk :-)
> >>
> >> Dario
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> >> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 1:45 PM
> >> S
f you don't do that, it's at your own risk :-)
>>
>> Dario
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 1:45 PM
>> Su
t;>
>>> Cory
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>>> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 5:58 AM
>>> Subject: Thinking of AF280T flash
in their
> "auto" setting with my K10. Of course, TTL is out, but I think I used them
> mostly in auto on the *istD anyway.
>
> Cory
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List&qu
;
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 1:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
>
> > Cory, when you say "work well" you mean that flash measures the light
> > on its own and it gives correct exposure as a result, right? If so,
> > how does flash knows wh
Message -
>> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 5:58 AM
>> Subject: Thinking of AF280T flash
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I
:-)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Thinking of AF280T flash
> Cory, when you say "work well" you mean that flash measures the ligh
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 5:58 AM
> Subject: Thinking of AF280T flash
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have AF220T unit which is a good flash, but it can only give me a
> > full discharge on K10D. I don't want t
D]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 5:58 AM
Subject: Thinking of AF280T flash
> Hi!
>
> I have AF220T unit which is a good flash, but it can only give me a
> full discharge on K10D. I don't want to buy either 540th or 360th
> flashes.
Hi!
I have AF220T unit which is a good flash, but it can only give me a
full discharge on K10D. I don't want to buy either 540th or 360th
flashes. They are too expensive and 360th does not swivel.
It seems that AF280T has both manual control on the power of discharge
and its own light sensor. Do
From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: RE: AF280T Flash Question
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:05:35 -0600
3 things I can think of:
1.) You had a bad battery in the first set, it shorted
internally when it got warm and continued
ax 35 SLR made and
> should work fine on any of them. Within camera
> limitations of course.
>
> Don
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lewis Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:44 AM
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.
nt: Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:44 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: AF280T Flash Question
>
>
> AF280T Flash problem/question:
> I used it with near new batteries; it performed normally for a
> dozen or so
> shots. Then it recycled very slowly followed by heating u
AF280T Flash problem/question:
I used it with near new batteries; it performed normally for a dozen or so
shots. Then it recycled very slowly followed by heating up and not recycling
at all. I removed the batteries and put it away. The next day, I loaded new
batteries and it recycled as normal
Just bought another AF360FGZ for backup so the backup AF280T is up for
grabs. Extremely light use. Condition is LN- and comes with case and manual.
$75 + shipping.
Thanks,
Bruce
http://www.wuthrich.cc/AF280T.pdf
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 22:27, Ian bromehead wrote:
> My AF280T didn't come with a manual, so does anyone know where I can =
> pick one up, although it isn't very sophisticated compared to more
> modern units, it does have quite a few switchable modes that I'm
> unfa
Lon Williamson wrote:
a) The SP manual states that leaving the flash on,
in _any_ mode, keeps the SP's meter perpetually on.
Yet, with both my SPs and both my 280's, switching
the flash off causes the camera to lose flash synch
(125 will no longer display as the shutter speed, and
the lightning b
John, I don't know if these are still available new.
I bought mine on Ebay. Boz's K Mount site will tell
you which ones to get.
-Lon
fatbratcat wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:28:04 -0400
From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: flash for Super Program
butt
Also B&H and ebay have them.
Tele is 135, wide is 24.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I believe Adorama ( http://www.adoramacamera.com ) sells a Pentax AFT-1
Tele
> Adapter ($22.50) for AF-200S/200SA, 280T Flashes (gives greater
> concentration of the flash beam with telephoto
On 18 Jun 2002 at 11:27, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
> Hi,
>I am considering dumping my Metzes as they are getting older and
>older, and getting that AF280T. But I am concerned about the lower
>power it has...
>
>1) Does it accept NiCds? I was told that the orig.manual stated to
>
>1) Does it accept NiCds? I was told that the orig.manual stated to
> NOT use NiCds... Any danger in using them? I never use alkalines as
> the recycle times are just 3x as slow then... What about NiMH too?
I run mine with NiMH rechargeables inside, and have had no problems. On
full charge,
Frantisek,
Setting my Gossen Luna Pro Digital F to ISO 100 and 1/60 flash synch,
it reads F8 for a value when the flash is fired on manual from 2
meters. Hope this is what you are looking for.
It also takes about 4 seconds to recharge after firing manual using
fresh NiMHs.
Bruce
Tuesday, J
002 12:01:54 +0100
>From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: AF280T flash: recycle, power,...
>
>Hi,
>
>Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
> >
> >1) Does it accept NiCds?
>
>Yes. I've used them for years. Don't know about other
>recharg
He was talking about me.
Here it is again!
http://photography.skofteland.net/documents.htm
Christian
On Friday 19 April 2002 12:48, you wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, TM wrote:
> > I'll search for the manual, then, thanks.
> >
> > Chris who?
>
> If he's talking about me, I've never put a manual
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, TM wrote:
> I'll search for the manual, then, thanks.
>
> Chris who?
If he's talking about me, I've never put a manual up on a website.
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't for
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:28 AM
Subject: RE: AF280T flash
> Steve,
> But if I shoot faster than 1/125, it won't sync, correct? Of course,
> that fast
> and flash probably don't make sense.
>
> Taka
>
I've been doing this for years with business cards. I found that it works
better than my Lumiquest bouncer.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:18 AM
Sub
Thanks Dave- will look for what you're talking about.
I think I'll have to get a diffuser for the flash, unless that's what
you're
talking about.
Taka
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Steve,
But if I shoot faster than 1/125, it won't sync, correct? Of course,
that fast
and flash probably don't make sense.
Taka
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Galler
> Cheers
> Cooty
"Cooty"? ;-)
Freb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>Hi Taka.I also have the AF280T and Super Program combo.I have
>done a few rolls of flash with an M 50mm f1.7 and they
>turned out nice using TTL switch on the flash.
>Make yourself a 'plastic bouncy thingy'See Cooty's site.
URL for you:
http://www.macads.co.uk/pentax/reflectormod.html
Cheers
- Original Message -
From: "TM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:01 PM
Subject: RE: AF280T flash
> Okay- you all convinced me, just run the flash in TTL and forget about
> it, eh?
>
> That means I still h
Hi Taka.I also have the AF280T and Super Program combo.I have
done a few rolls of flash with an M 50mm f1.7 and they
turned out nice using TTL switch on the flash.
Make yourself a 'plastic bouncy thingy'See Cooty's site.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/broo
Now put it on TTL with the Super P and
forget about it ;)
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "TM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: AF280T flash
&
hanks to you all, I now have an AF280T flash.
>
> Now the question is- how do I use it? All I got
> was the flash, no instructions. Pentax doesn't have
> this flash's manual on their website. :-(
>
> With a Super Program on the way, all I need are a few
> more lense
Steve,
Thanks, I figured that part out, but I'd like to know about the other
modes.
Can you help out w/ these other modes?
I tested the TTL capability- works great.
I think this flash may also replace my Minolta flash for use w/ the
Spotmatic.
Taka
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Taka,
I copied the instructions and somebody put them up on a web site. Was it Chris?
Anyway if you don't get a response ask again and I'll dig out the original 16 jpg's
(3+ megs).
Regards, Bob S.
>Thanks to you all, I now have an AF280T flash.
>
>Now the question is
nesday, April 17, 2002 3:21 PM
Subject: AF280T flash
> Thanks to you all, I now have an AF280T flash.
>
> Now the question is- how do I use it? All I got
> was the flash, no instructions. Pentax doesn't have
> this flash's manual on their website. :-(
>
> With a
>On the subject of Metz modules, does anyone know the difference between
>SCA3702 and SCA3701? The 3701 appears to be older as it pops up on eBay now
>and again but is it functionally the same as the 3702? Anyone got one?
Mine is the "3701 Mk2". Other than it appears taller than the 3702, I do
Alan writes:
>An alternative is Metz flashes which you can switch the shoe. For instance,
>Metz 40MZ3i with SCA372 shoe can do TTL flashes on any Pentax bodies which
>can do TTL flash. However, since SCA372 shoe was designed for manual focus
>bodies (just like AF200T etc), features like AF asi
>I'm looking for a TTL flash to use with my Super Program and my MZ5.
>Boz's KMP seems to be saying that the FTZ flashes won't work at all with my
>Super Program? Is this true? Or will I simply loose the digital functions?
>Would an AF280T be a better choice to work with both cameras?
Basically
For power and flexiblity per dollar for your Super Program (and mine), I can't speak
highly enough of the Ritz Photo Quantary 35-85mm zoom bounce flash with a modular
(interchangeable) dedicated base. It's actually a rebadged respecced version of one of
the well-known affordable third-party fla
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTZ330 vs Af280T Flash for SP and MZ5
Hi,
The newer FTZ flashes will fire on a Super Program, but all you will get
is manual guide number flash. No auto aperture, ttl, etc.
I have an AF280T to use on my Super Programs and ZX-5n just for that
reason. It works
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Lillja
Subject: FTZ330 vs Af280T Flash for SP and MZ5
> I'm looking for a TTL flash to use with my Super Program and
my MZ5.
>
> Boz's KMP seems to be saying that the FTZ flashes won't work
at all with my Super Program?
The AF330 will only fire in manual mode 1/1 or 1/16 on
the SP, you can use it as a manual flash.
--- Christopher Lillja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a TTL flash to use with my Super
> Program and my MZ5.
>
> Boz's KMP seems to be saying that the FTZ flashes
> won't work at all w
Hi,
The newer FTZ flashes will fire on a Super Program, but all you will get
is manual guide number flash. No auto aperture, ttl, etc.
I have an AF280T to use on my Super Programs and ZX-5n just for that
reason. It works great.
William in Utah.
Christopher Lillja wrote:
>
> I'm looking for
I'm looking for a TTL flash to use with my Super Program and my MZ5.
Boz's KMP seems to be saying that the FTZ flashes won't work at all with my Super
Program? Is this true? Or will I simply loose the digital functions?
Would an AF280T be a better choice to work with both cameras?
Chris L.
Sc
"Leon Altoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I haven't got it but I've seen lots of people say how good it is and it
>has a useful feature if you do the occasional macro shot - the head
>will tilt down by 5 degrees (I think - it could be slightly more) so
>you can leave the flash mounted on the hot
Okay, a few pictures of the mod I made to a perfectly good AF280T are up.
I've left the sketches up as requested - I'll take a little extra time in
future on things like that. Looking at them now, I whince.
http://www.macads.co.uk/pentax
click on 'AF280T flash modificatio
I bought mine new in the mid-80's with several of the specialized heads &
accessories available for it.
I usually leave it cocked up on the first click (to avoid red-eye); the
diffusers & etc seem to be in the "fishing lure" category sucks for
catching fish but sure catches fishermen.
I dunn
Spotted in rec.photo.marketplace.35mm
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=rec.photo.marketplace
Todd
<<<<
Subject:
FS:Pentax SuperProgram w/ 4 Lenses + AF280T Flash
Date:
5 Jun 2001 11:45:18 -0700
From:
vegne af
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. marts 2001 19:49
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: WTB AF280T flash
Hi, gang.
I'm thinking in buying a 280T flash for my LX. I want to know if some list
member wants to part with his/hers one. It must be in perfect working
condition
and in good (at least) cosme
Spotted in rec.photo.marketplace.35mm
http://www.deja.com/bg.xp?level=rec.photo.marketplace
Todd
<<<<
Subject:
FS:Pentax AF280T flash Mint $75
Date:
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:07:06 -0500
From:
"chris wakeen" <[EMAIL
89 matches
Mail list logo
