Thanks Bruce.I use a Vivitar 285HV with the D1.
It has a good 'sun tan factor' at full power,i think.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:23:04 -0800
To: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[3]: After a delay...question
be the time to experiment.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 17:19:45 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: After a delay...question
If the area is big enough for horses, I would guess all it would do
is make
your flash too
Have you considered the Omnibounce on the quickflip. They address two
different problems. The quickflip helps keep the shadows behind the
head, rather than to the side and also helps to reduce redeye. The
Omnibounce helps soften and spread the light so that it doesn't look
so harsh. A
an
Omnibounce for every flash I own, that's five of them.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: David Spaulding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: After a delay...question
Some of you may remember I asked a few photo business
quickflip,
and an off hot shoe connector with sync chord when I had the 645n.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: David Spaulding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:16:02 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: After a delay...question
snip
I do have a question here
I would suggest the Lumiquest bouncers. I've seen/tested the stofen and they
tend to really diffuse the light, at least with my 283, and as a result, I've
got to fiddle with apertures or the flash settings.
I've used the Lumiquest Pocket Bouncer to great effect with the stroboframe
It's only a sylable away from Wintermute. (William Gibson reference)
I use a Sto-Fen Omnibounce 95% of the time when I'm using on-camera flash (I
am also a Stroboframe user, including when I use my Vivitar 285. I really
like the results from the Stroboframe/sto-Fen combination. I have an
David,
I'm not sure that there is a big difference between the Omni-bounce
and the Lumiquest Softbox. I seem to get more consistent exposures
with the Lumiquest. For some reason, the Omni-bounce occasionally
produced some underexposure. If I were to purchase again I would get
the Lumiquest
. That was
my main wedding shooter rig.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: David Spaulding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: After a delay...question
It's only a sylable away from Wintermute. (William Gibson reference)
I use
I'm starting to wonder how the Omni-bounce or the
Lumiquest might help in my indoor horse work.I might
have to try one of the systems to see if it will still
supply ample light in an indoor arena,one fairly
well lite,the other not so.Right now is shoot full tilt
boogie at them.
I just
Dave,
While you get a full illumination when shooting directly (i.e. parallel to the lens)
you also get harsher shadows (although not as harsh as using in camera flash - a la
Point and shoots).
The Lumiquest I use is the Pocket Bouncer. You don't get the diffuse light that you
would from
PROTECTED]
DB Sent: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:36:35 -0600
DB To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DB Subject: RE: After a delay...question
DB Not a 544 but a 433D, a Metz 45CT4, an AF500FTZ, and a Canon 420EX,
DB and a
DB Vivitar 285HV. All with excellent results. I used the Metz and the
DB Vivitar
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: RE: After a delay...question
I'm starting to wonder how the Omni-bounce or the
Lumiquest might help in my indoor horse work.I might
have to try one of the systems to see if it will still
supply ample light
the AF500FTZ,
Sto-Fen, and 16mm fisheye but that would be a good project for a
weekend.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: RE: After a delay...question
I'm starting to wonder how
14 matches
Mail list logo
