e:
I was going to take a few night photos in a location where I didn't want to
risk the K-5II or even the K20D, so I put a set new of Litniam disposables
into the old *ist-Ds. Well the damned camera won't turn on. Tested the
batteries and all were with specification for the camera to t
t a set new of Litniam disposables
> into the old *ist-Ds. Well the damned camera won't turn on. Tested the
> batteries and all were with specification for the camera to turn on.
> Cleaned the battery contacts, (using a rubber eraser), still no joy.
> Dragged out the external pow
I was going to take a few night photos in a location where I didn't want
to risk the K-5II or even the K20D, so I put a set new of Litniam
disposables into the old *ist-Ds. Well the damned camera won't turn
on. Tested the batteries and all were with specification for the camera
The filenames are only 4 digits. If you exceed the counter is
reset. Also if you create new jpegs from raw it will create files with
new numbers, so it really isn't relevant to much.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:53 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> If you've never reset the counter that should be close b
If you've never reset the counter that should be close but it's not
guaranteed. I know of at least two methods to make that different, one
approved one not.
On 9/1/2014 10:43 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Sep 1, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Eric Featherstone
wrote:
The shutter count is contained in the EX
On 9/1/2014 10:43 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Sep 1, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Eric Featherstone
wrote:
The shutter count is contained in the EXIF data contained in a photo
straight from the camera (some editing apps might remove data like
this.) Some editing apps (Lightroom? Photoshop?) can display thi
Black Magic doesn't keep you from tripping and falling. :)
The worst was when my K-5 with 12-24 fell off a tripod onto the
concrete. Putting a single button quick release centimeters away from
the ball release is quite possibly the worst tripod head design ever.
Camera's never been right since des
No need to ever drop a camera. Rapid Black Magic is a simple solution.
Paul via phone
> On Sep 1, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>
> I need to quit dropping them.
>
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm
I should dig out an old back up disk and try an old D1 file. I bought
it used with unknown but assuming a lot of actuation's and i put on a
ton myslef.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure my OG K-7 is well past
I need to quit dropping them.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure my OG K-7 is well past 50,000 now and my K-5 wasn't
>> very far from that number. I haven't looked at my IIs since I've
>> gotten it, but in th
On Sep 1, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> I'm pretty sure my OG K-7 is well past 50,000 now and my K-5 wasn't
> very far from that number. I haven't looked at my IIs since I've
> gotten it, but in the past 5 months it has probably exceeded 20,000.
> Looking forward to a K-3 to abuse :
I'm pretty sure my OG K-7 is well past 50,000 now and my K-5 wasn't
very far from that number. I haven't looked at my IIs since I've
gotten it, but in the past 5 months it has probably exceeded 20,000.
Looking forward to a K-3 to abuse :)
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
>
On Sep 1, 2014, at 12:21 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>> Curious—how did you get the "frame count” reading?
>
> My K-5 has never been in for rehab so it started out at 0 pictures,
> now i have 5867 pictures
Ah! OK.
-
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:20 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> take the PF one with a grain of salt, it came up with a shutter count
>> of 5764 on my last photo which is frame 5867
>
> Curious—how did you get the "frame count” reading?
My K-5 has ne
On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:20 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> take the PF one with a grain of salt, it came up with a shutter count
> of 5764 on my last photo which is frame 5867
Curious—how did you get the "frame count” reading?
-
On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> LR does not display all of the EXIF data. Shutter actuations are not always
> part of the EXIF and are coded quite differently from camera to camera... Not
> all cameras embed it in the image files either. The image numbering has more
> t
On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Eric Featherstone
wrote:
>> Looking at EXIF data of an image in LR 5, I don’t find shutter actuations
>> displayed. I’m wondering if this is incorporated into the file name format
>> I’m using, e.g., 20131012-IMGP8199. Could that "8199” be it?
>
> No, definitely
LR does not display all of the EXIF data. Shutter actuations are not always
part of the EXIF and are coded quite differently from camera to camera... Not
all cameras embed it in the image files either. The image numbering has more to
do with the camera settings for file naming.
To see all the
On 1 September 2014 15:43, Eric Weir wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Eric Featherstone
> wrote:
>
>> The shutter count is contained in the EXIF data contained in a photo
>> straight from the camera (some editing apps might remove data like
>> this.) Some editing apps (Lightroom? Photoshop?)
On Sep 1, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Eric Featherstone
wrote:
> The shutter count is contained in the EXIF data contained in a photo
> straight from the camera (some editing apps might remove data like
> this.) Some editing apps (Lightroom? Photoshop?) can display this kind
> of info
Looking at EXIF da
take the PF one with a grain of salt, it came up with a shutter count
of 5764 on my last photo which is frame 5867
Dave
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Eric Featherstone
> wrote:
>
>> The shutter count is contained in the EXIF data contained in
On Sep 1, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Eric Featherstone
wrote:
> The shutter count is contained in the EXIF data contained in a photo
> straight from the camera (some editing apps might remove data like
> this.) Some editing apps (Lightroom? Photoshop?) can display this kind
> of info, or you can upload
i dont have my istD anymore but i used this;
http://www.pentaxforums.com/pages/check-shutter-count-exif.html
Dave
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> Don’t find it in the menu.
>
> Thanks,
>
The shutter count is contained in the EXIF data contained in a photo
straight from the camera (some editing apps might remove data like
this.) Some editing apps (Lightroom? Photoshop?) can display this kind
of info, or you can upload a sample here:
http://www.camerashuttercount.com/
On 1 Septemb
Don’t find it in the menu.
Thanks,
--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
eew...@bellsouth.net
"Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred."
- Amos Oz
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
Ok so it seems that almost no one has any thoughts about this and
unfortunately everything suggested I've tried. I guess I'll have to
keep my Ds with out batteries, and remember to take them out when I'm
done. Thanks to everyone who replied.
On 9/8/2011 2:47 PM, P. J. Alli
On 9/8/2011 3:43 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-09-08 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as
my backup/carry anywhere camera, and until recently it was serving
admirably. Now however it's acquired a new annoying behavior, to
That's the problem, it was turned off. I put the batteries in just
before Irene hit and picked up the camera today. batteries were flat
lined. This is the third time something similar happened.
On 9/8/2011 3:28 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
My ist*Ds was always decent in terms of battery
On 11-09-08 2:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as my
backup/carry anywhere camera, and until recently it was serving
admirably. Now however it's acquired a new annoying behavior, to wit,
after loading a new set of lithium ba
My ist*Ds was always decent in terms of battery life.
One spare set of lithiums is all I ever carried.
How about when you turn the camera off?
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as my
Yes I know the Ds is hopelessly outdated, but I've been using it as my
backup/carry anywhere camera, and until recently it was serving
admirably. Now however it's acquired a new annoying behavior, to wit,
after loading a new set of lithium batteries it will totally drain them,
in l
On Feb 18, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have an *istDS with a bad "sensor unit" according to CRIS, who
> wanted $380 to replace the "unit". It wil show images but if you try
> to take a shot it's just black. (I opted instead to get a refurbished
> E-PL1 for $340
> Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:12:02
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: FS Friday- Bad *ist DS
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> I have
You got me on that. I actually paused to think about it for a second.
-Original Message-
From: David J Brooks
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:12:02
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: FS Friday- Bad *ist DS
On Fri, Feb
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have an *istDS with a bad "sensor unit" according to CRIS, who
> wanted $380 to replace the "unit". It will show images but if you try
> to take a shot it's just black.
Use it for night photography
Dave
>
> --
> Steve
Hey Guys,
I have an *istDS with a bad "sensor unit" according to CRIS, who
wanted $380 to replace the "unit". It wil show images but if you try
to take a shot it's just black. (I opted instead to get a refurbished
E-PL1 for $340). It is useless to me but it would be a source of
parts. Pay for
Again, my response below only acknowledges some of the responses to this
question, all of which were helpful.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:21 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>> On 7/2/2010 9:55 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm frame
>> the fie
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Just clarifying a point. Some replies have mentioned a 'green button'.
> The DS doesn't have a green button as such but the AE-L button on the
> back of the camera performs similar functions.
> Another point in ca
Again, my response below only acknowledges some of the responses to this
question, all of which were helpful.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:21 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>> On 7/2/2010 9:55 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm frame
>> the fie
75mm on
> > 35mm, a 30-35mm lens is now normal. Pentax's little 18-55 is a pretty
> > good little lens for the money.
>
> Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but
> since my decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating w
--
From: "Eric Weir"
Subject: Re: *ist DS
Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm
frame the field of view through the viewfinder, and not just in the
recorded image, will be 1.5 times what it would be
Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but since my
decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating with the list through that thread,
I changed the subject heading.
Do I understand correctly that when using lenses designed for the 35mm frame
t
0-35mm lens is now normal. Pentax's little 18-55 is a pretty
>> good little lens for the money.
>
> Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but since
> my decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating with the list
> throug
; good little lens for the money.
Actually, that was on the "Prayer Service at St. Michaels" thread, but since my
decision to go with a *ist DS I've been communicating with the list through
that thread, I changed the subject heading.
Do I understand correctly that when using lenses
ve it was mentioned here earlier today.
>
The latest update for the DS gives it the same FEATURE SET as the DS2, but it
is not the DS2 firmware specifically.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robi
On Jun 25, 2010, at 7:45 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> You did misunderstand actually. The last update for the DS brought it up to
> the DS2 standard for in functionality and menus. You can't actually update
> the DS with the DS2 firmware, but they are functionally equivalent, a
I guess that is what I was trying to say PJ.
Update the DS to firmware 2.02 and it's the same as a DS2.
I got a DS2 manual at the same time to know the new features.
Thanks Pentax USA.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:45 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> You did misunderstand actual
You did misunderstand actually. The last update for the DS brought it
up to the DS2 standard for in functionality and menus. You can't
actually update the DS with the DS2 firmware, but they are functionally
equivalent, after the DS 2.02 update.
On 6/25/2010 7:28 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
O
On Jun 25, 2010, at 7:08 PM, John Graves wrote:
> I had not heard that you could load the DS2 firmware. Hmm. I will search
> to see if I fnd any mention of that.
I might've misunderstood, but I believe it was mentioned here earlier today.
But thanks for the other information.
---
Eric,
I have updated my DS and that was mostly painless. IRC, just put the
firmware on a SD card (I think I had to create a directory) and turn it
on. I had not heard that you could load the DS2 firmware. Hmm. I
will search to see if I fnd any mention of that.
John
Eric Weir wrote
Thanks to all who have weighed in with good information.In my case,
I was suffering from a little aged brain crampitus.The lens is a
Super Tak and has its own switch for iris control, allowing for wide
open focusing when on. It was on and the DS couldn't tell so the
meterin
ns :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of J.C.
O'Connell
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 12:01 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: M
ns :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Adam
Maas
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 12:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Manual Lens on DS
Be sure
Av mode, but it will meter for
wide open only.
Most people use option 2 in this case.
-Adam
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:52 PM, John Graves wrote:
I wanted to try my Manual 85 MM on the DS. I cannot figure out how to set
up the camera to get the exposure. Is there any way to use the intern
you can also use Av mode, but it will meter for
wide open only.
Most people use option 2 in this case.
-Adam
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:52 PM, John Graves wrote:
> I wanted to try my Manual 85 MM on the DS. I cannot figure out how to set
> up the camera to get the exposure. Is there a
I wanted to try my Manual 85 MM on the DS. I cannot figure out how to
set up the camera to get the exposure. Is there any way to use the
internal meter to read the correct exposure or do I only have the
completely manual mode using an external meter to deterine the correct
exposure?
--
John
Yes my own stupidity. I put a new set of set of disposable lithium
batteries into the *ist-Ds, didn't turn the camera off and placed it in
such a way that the shutter button stayed half depressed for, oh I don't
know, for at least the amount of time to drain the batteries... Da
Thanks Bob! Just downloaded!
lf
Bob Sullivan escreveu:
Luiz,
If you can find a manual for the *ist DS2, that is written with the
2.0 software in mind.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
Well, after a long battle my DS arrived home. Alive and kicking, quickly
I still use mine. The D and DS can take quite a beating. I've always thought
they were both underrated little cameras.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob
Sullivan
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 7:39 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss
Luiz,
If you can find a manual for the *ist DS2, that is written with the
2.0 software in mind.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
> Well, after a long battle my DS arrived home. Alive and kicking, quickly
> demolished a set of ancient NiMH from Rayo
Well, after a long battle my DS arrived home. Alive and kicking, quickly
demolished a set of ancient NiMH from Rayovac or something like that...
currently working on a set of Philips NiMH 2300 mAH, and accepting
gladly kingston 2GB SD cards. But that's after the firmware upgrade to
See..I did need to put my glasses on...I try not to pound any of my
cameras.
John Graves
WA1JG
P. J. Alling wrote:
Well I guess a pound ist DS is more palatable than a starkist DS...
John Graves wrote:
It's a #istDS before I put my glasses on.
John Graves
WA1JG
jh.gra...@verizo
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Recent completed listings on Ebay for the DS body-only show auctions
> completed successfully in and around the $205-220 range.
>
> The 18-55 kit lens sells new, by itself, for $175 or so. With a body,
> new, it adds $100 to the cost of the bo
Well I guess a pound ist DS is more palatable than a starkist DS...
John Graves wrote:
It's a #istDS before I put my glasses on.
John Graves
WA1JG
jh.gra...@verizon.net
Bob Sullivan wrote:
John,
What's a DS1?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, John Graves
wrote
It's a #istDS before I put my glasses on.
John Graves
WA1JG
jh.gra...@verizon.net
Bob Sullivan wrote:
John,
What's a DS1?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, John Graves wrote:
My aging eyes seem to tell me that my DS1 has lost about 1 stop. I find to
get the exposure that I wa
From: Tim ?sleby
he title says it.
My stepsons ex girlfriend has had my trusty ol DS on loan. After
becoming an ex she has asked to buy it. Whats a fair price of the body
plus kit lens? Don't want to overcharge her, but I'm not giving it
away either.
I have consulted the going pric
On Jul 23, 2009, at 13:00, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Thanks Peter and Godfrey.
I think I'll say 175.
The sad thing is that I hate to let it go. It was my first "real"
digital.
If you want to keep it, you could always point the "ex" to EBay so she
can get her own.. :-)
Thanks Peter and Godfrey.
I think I'll say 175.
The sad thing is that I hate to let it go. It was my first "real" digital.
--
MaritimTim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Recent completed listings on Ebay for the DS body-only show auctions
completed successfully in and around the $205-220 range.
The 18-55 kit lens sells new, by itself, for $175 or so. With a body,
new, it adds $100 to the cost of the body only package. Completed
auctions on the K2000 + kit lens
KEH.com was selling the DS body for between $225US and $270US and the
Lens for between $85US and $125US depending on condition. They don't
have a DS in stock just now, but that's where I looked to get an idea of
what my DS was worth.
Tim Øsleby wrote:
The title says it.
My s
The title says it.
My stepsons ex girlfriend has had my trusty ol DS on loan. After
becoming an ex she has asked to buy it. Whats a fair price of the body
plus kit lens? Don't want to overcharge her, but I'm not giving it
away either.
I have consulted the going prices at eBay, but t
Not a Ds2?
Bob Sullivan wrote:
John,
What's a DS1?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, John Graves wrote:
My aging eyes seem to tell me that my DS1 has lost about 1 stop. I find to
get the exposure that I want, I need to expose at +1 stop, Do sensors age
or have I changed my
John,
What's a DS1?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, John Graves wrote:
> My aging eyes seem to tell me that my DS1 has lost about 1 stop. I find to
> get the exposure that I want, I need to expose at +1 stop, Do sensors age
> or have I changed my methods by 1 stop. I tend to u
My aging eyes seem to tell me that my DS1 has lost about 1 stop. I find
to get the exposure that I want, I need to expose at +1 stop, Do
sensors age or have I changed my methods by 1 stop. I tend to use the
single spot for exposure and work from there. Or is this the difference
between what
From: Cotty
On 13/7/09, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The IstDS may be one of those where you have to use the stand-alone DNG
>converter to get it into CS.
Camera Raw 2.4 did the trick John.
Good.
Adobe's site used to have what cameras were supported by what version of
ACR, a
On 13/7/09, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The IstDS may be one of those where you have to use the stand-alone DNG
>converter to get it into CS.
Camera Raw 2.4 did the trick John.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnap
nope, I use a DS with RAW and it imports right into photoshop CS
with ACR.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Home Page - www.jchriso.com
Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list -
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdm
The IstDS may be one of those where you have to use the stand-alone DNG
converter to get it into CS.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Sounds good Cotty.
Glad he is enjoying the work experience. This kid of thing, i found,
is invaluable later in life.
Tell him to tell the Canon guy, the Ds is supposed to be slow, it
lakes better pictures that way.:-)
Dave
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 9/7/09, Davi
the *ist Ds into the original Photoshop CS (version 8) no
problem at all. It was for Stefan - he's into day 3 of his work
experience with the Oxford Mail newspaper and he's loving it. The
problem is that he keeps sending me ebay links to auctions for used
Canon 1D mark II 's !! The
Cotty
Have you found a copy. I have what i think is the correct version
here, but not 100% sure. Its a file from 2006 so it may be if you need
it.
Dave
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 8/7/09, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>2,4 also fully supports DNG so it can be us
On 8/7/09, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>2,4 also fully supports DNG so it can be used in concert with Adobe
>DNG converter to process RAW files from any camera supported by any
>version of ACR.
Thanks Adam.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||
a RAW for
> Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
>
> Appreciate it.
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
> ||=| http://www.cottysnaps.com
> _
>
>
>
> --
> PD
ACR 2.4 works with istDS and photoshop CS.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Home Page - www.jchriso.com
Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list -
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml
m,
can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW for
Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
Appreciate it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
Turned out to be 2.4 - anything beyond 3.0 won't work with CS, but has
to be CS2.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
On 8/7/09, paul stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I believe 2.7 is the last version of ACR Adobe released for PSCS. I
>know it supported the *istD, not sure about the DS.
Thanks Paul, will try.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I believe 2.7 is the last version of ACR Adobe released for PSCS. I
know it supported the *istD, not sure about the DS.
Paul
On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Cotty wrote:
Hi team,
can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW
for
Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds
On 8/7/09, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hi team,
>
>can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW for
>Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
>
>Appreciate it.
OOPS- version 2.x and got it on my Mac :-)
sorry.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Hi team,
can anyone point me in the direction of which version of Camera RAW for
Adobe CS supports the Pentax *ist Ds ?
Appreciate it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax
The DS2 has a 2.5" LCD and slightly faster SD write speeds as well as
a few extra options in the firmware. The DS has a 2.0" LCD. The
firmware changes were given to the DS as well in v2.0 of the DS
firmware. So they're essentially identical. The Samsung GX-1S is a DS2
with sli
DS2 Has bigger LCD and is much much harder to find.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Nick Wright
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:35 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: ist ds and ds2?
What ar
What are the differences between those two models? Thanks.
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the direct
Well, as the title says I'm looking for some items, and would rather
deal with list members in the US, since I'll be speeding trough Florida
in april (no, not from april 1st). Here it comes:
1) *ist DS or DS2 camera in fair/ good/ excellent condition, mirror/
finder/ sensor in perfe
ll work better.
If the amount of energy in those things would be equal to the amount of
energy used discussing their use... :-)
LF
William Robb escreveu:
- Original Message - From: "Brian Walters"
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
I'm with you, Charles.
I'v
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walters"
Subject: Re: *ist DS storage question
I'm with you, Charles.
I've tried numerous brands and the Eneloops have proven to be far
superior to any of them in practice.
If others have had different experience, fine. Use
Derby Chang escreveu:
Hi Luiz,
I popped a 16GB SDHC A-Data card into my *ist-DS I leave at work
(powered happily by Eneloops, BTW). Other than the frame counter
showing 999, it all works fine.
D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.n
oun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: *ist DS storage question
I've had some experience with NiMH and a good battery charger
with
my -DS although no Eneloops (yet). I've had two differ
I've had some experience with NiMH and a good battery charger with
my -DS although no Eneloops (yet). I've had two different batches of
cheap, no-name batt (Powerizer?), and a couple sets of Energizer. I've
got a LaCross BC-900 charger so I can accurately see how they perf
. :-)
I'm considering my digital options, within the well-under-$500 range, and
wonder about the DS and DS2 bodies. While they lack shake reduction and sensor
cleaning, both accept AA batteries and would not seem mismatched in my bag. Big
question so far: do they accept SDHC cards? Not just 2G
1 - 100 of 3475 matches
Mail list logo
