You've gotta change the setting right next to the
width and height boxes to fixed aspect ratio. Then,
you can fill in the values. But where do you go from
there? The image remains unchanged and the subsequent
crops aren't fixed to that aspect ratio.
Huh? Yes they are. I have Elements v.1.0
Mike,
I guess I can give you a preliminary report on comparing Elements to
Picture Window Pro. I haven't done everything (that I do) yet, but at
least for the simple basics they seem to compare quite favorably.
The differences are minor - Cropping is still a minor bit easier with
Picture Window
I don't know that there is any 'rule of thumb', and radius depends on the
image resolution. I would start here:
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/Sharpen.pdf
and continue on to here:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~binaryfx/PSTV_links.html#S
Maris
Mike Johnston wrote:
are there some recommended
boxes to fixed aspect ratio. Then,
you can fill in the values. But where do you go from
there? The image remains unchanged and the subsequent
crops aren't fixed to that aspect ratio.
Mark
I'm assuming Elements crop tool is the same as 6.0's crop tool.
you click on the crop tool
the dialog box
.
In Elements it seems even clumsier. Tell me how to quickly and easily
crop to a given ratio.
Thanks,
Bruce
hi all
I saw a minty Pentax M85/2 in my local shop for US$110... unfortunately,
the rear element was exhibiting seperation. This seems to be a common
problem because this is the 2nd 85/2 I've seen with that problem.
Are replacement elements still available as parts? Does anyone know?
If I can
Thanks Herb for all your replies,hope i did not
take up tp much of your day:)
I'll have some time Monday/Tuesday to look at
those sample programs in your link.I'm still
new to this digi stuff so my quiries and
concerns may seem odd sometimes.
I cannot answer the dpi etc size of the stitch
as
Begin Original Message
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:15:55 -0400
To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pentax-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT:PS Elements Panoramic Shots
i do a lot of stitched panoramas and i have
quite a bit of experience here.
Photoshop Elements
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is really usefull information.
Do you have experience with other panoramic software as well? Is there
software out there which would allow for wider angle lenses then 35mm?
Do you know anything about MGI PhotoVista for instance?
--
Thanks for the reply Herb.I cannot seem to
access the page.I'll try later.The images are
from the N D1.I shot all withe shutter
priority so i'll assume thats were my sky
problem is from.
So the program will try a best fit.eH Maybe i
need to reshot with 1-2 less frames.
Thanks
DAVE
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:37:35 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
Doesn't the conversion of an RGB source image to CMYK compress the colour gamut
somewhat particularly the greens?
I'm not sure exactly what it does, but it does change the colors a
little bit. I mainly notice it in a slight lightening
I hate the bundled imaging software that came with my Pacific Image
PrimeFilm scanner. I've been thinking about getting Photoshop Elements, and
need some help. Can anyone here (especially anyone who uses the PrimeFilm
and PE) give advice on your satisfaction? Are there other programs I should
Hi Chris,
I've used Elements with the PrimeFilm Scanner and it works just fine. I do
have to be honest and say that I haven't used Elements too much since I do
have Photoshop but tried it out of curiosity and acquiring was just as
smooth as Photoshop. I believe there is currently a rebate
How much do you want to spend and how sophisticated are you (or do you want to be)?
For about $100 or less PhotoShop Elements is good and fairly easy to learn and use,
but is limited in that you cannot work in CMYK or LAB color spaces. For the same
price range Corel PhotoPaint (an older
I've read of
Photoshop Elements leads me to believe it may be the right fit for me,
easy to understand and use, capable with some study. Most programs seem to
be on one side of the bell curve or the other, either exceedingly simplistic
or incredibly complex. But the problem is, until I sit down
Chris,
I use the latest version of Paint Shop Pro for my digital darkroom work.
It is a very full-featured program. Steve's Digicams says that it is ...a
close second to PhotoShop [the full version, not elements] in power and
popularity as a photo editing tool with plugin support. Here
Thanks, Delano!
I did see that demo and started to download it before my computer CRASHED
AGAIN. I'll have to check it out later.
Chris
Adobe has a 30 demo you can download:
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopel/demoreg.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Download the Photoshop Elements trial and try it out. Then (or now if you want) get
the CorelDRAW 9 Graphics Suite which includes Corel PhotoPaint 9 for $43.00
http://www.directdeals.com/product.asp?id=461 - it will give you an excellent idea of
what the full PS6 will do but it's
Chris,
You should also look at Paintshop Pro (www.jasc.com). I have tried
just about everything, including elements and feel that for general
photo editing, it works very well. It doesn't have quite the graphic
artist manipulation capabilities of Photoshop (full version), but is
only $100
Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote:
Paint Shop Pro may have a demo-download available, too - I know they did in the past.
They do:
http://jasc.com/
I like PSP for the few things I do.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
No - I'm suggesting the learning curve for PSP is steeper than for Photoshop Elements,
though from my recollection not as steep as for PS6 (I only tried it out as a demo
about a year ago).
Maris
- Original Message -
From: dave o'brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
]]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Adobe Photoshop Elements
Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote:
Paint Shop Pro may have a demo-download available, too - I know they did
in the past.
They do:
http://jasc.com/
I like PSP for the few things I do
, though - in addition to the
Cyberview tool, mine came with something called Presto Imagefolio LE,
which seems (to my unpractised hand) adequate but quite liberally
sprinkled with Gruyere, Mozzarella and fine farmhouse Wensleydale. If I
can be bothered to download 51MB, I may well give the Elements
elements and feel that for general
photo editing, it works very well. It doesn't have quite the graphic
artist manipulation capabilities of Photoshop (full version), but is
only $100 versus $600 for Photoshop. I believe you can get a trial of
both Elements and Paintshop Pro. That is the best way
be trying first.
CN I appreciate your response!
CN Regards,
CN Chris
CN Chris,
CN You should also look at Paintshop Pro (www.jasc.com). I have tried
CN just about everything, including elements and feel that for general
CN photo editing, it works very well. It doesn't have quite
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 20:16:34 -0600, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote:
BTW concerning the unsharp mask - to add to your suggestion - it is
(generally but not always) best applied either in the K (black)
channel in CMYK or in the L (luminosity) channel in LAB color space.
I find that the M (Magenta)
On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 06:30 AM, David Brooks wrote:
Still plan to buy the bnig Adobe book.
I;m still learning PS but the students i employ to run
my computers at horse shows have shown me some tricks too.
If you have a full version of Photoshop, I heartily recommend the
, but you can download
Photoshop Elements for free for 30 days from the Adobe website. I think it's
peachy for digital photographers. What it's not as good for is bw, since it
lacks the curves control, and prepress operations such as RGB--CMYK
conversion, and calibration controls are not as good
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Why not? Didn't Bill stated more than once that the monthly
theme has to be interpreted by the photographer personal vision?
:-)
Or are you afraid you won't be able to reassemble the lens?
Oh, I was thinking about smashing it into the ground.
Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I was thinking about smashing it into the ground.
Reassembly
wasn't something that concerned me :-)
You can still smash it for an open month...
We'll miss your submission.
Oh, no you wouldn't.
I'm not very good in telling lies... :^)
So here I am, the last day for submitting pictures to the PUG, and I
have no idea what to send.
I thought about breaking my M50 1.4 open and photographing it with my
M50 1.7 (or viceversa--any recommendations? :-) but that won't do.
I think I'll just break my new year's resolution of not
301 - 331 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
