on 4/9/01 1:05 AM, James Apilado at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You speak "treason" by saying you would let go 35mm vs. APS and MF. But let
me join you in that.
Hi Jim,
Treason? Well, yes, but I am still practicing the monogamy by not getting
into a heresy of buying one of these plasticky
Just an idea:
Could the film manufacturers not put a magnetic 'sticker' on the outside
of 35mm film canisters. The camera could auto record read film info
like last used fram ISO override etc and use it for mid roll change etc.
If a film was loaded without the magnetic 'sticker' then obviously
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2001 15:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Film rewind with memory (WAS: Photo Expo Japan 2001 -
MZ-Sand FA31Ltd)
It would be easier for them to use the same sype of technology
as is used in APS
800-speed APS film is quite new, isn't it? Like two months old? Perhaps it
requires its own processing channel and all labs will have to learn with
experience.
In my view, the arrival of 800-speed APS film breathes new life into the
format, especially for available-light fans. But only if you
But you can't get here in N. America as far as I know. I read somewhere
that the U.S. photographers prefer prints than slides. Thus Fuji and Kodak
have avoided sending the E-6 film here,
Jim A.
From: "Paul Jones" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 13:54:16
Still too complicated. APS cameras with MRC is so much easier than any
approach formulated by the makers of upper end SLR cameras.
Anyway you look at it, you will lose one frame.
Change of topic. The current Shutterbug magazine mentions hybrid cameras
that use film and also storing digital
Then again, Pentax could have made an APS camera and you wouldn't have to go
through all this hassle to get to an unexposed frame.
Jim A.
From: Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:09:54 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Film rewind with memory
on 4/8/01 6:51 PM, James Apilado at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then again, Pentax could have made an APS camera and you wouldn't have to go
through all this hassle to get to an unexposed frame.
Hi Jim and all,
I am known to fond of APS (OK, duck hide ! :-). I know arguments about
smaller neg
Hi Ken.
When I started on this list back in '96 when APS was staring out, I took a
lot of flack from die hard 35mm fans who seemed threatened by the new
format. My only complaint with APS is that you can't buy slide film here in
the U.S. I recall when 110 came out in the early 70's, slide film
on 4/8/01 9:10 PM, James Apilado at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ken.
When I started on this list back in '96 when APS was staring out, I took a
lot of flack from die hard 35mm fans who seemed threatened by the new
format. My only complaint with APS is that you can't buy slide film here in
Ken,
I own the Nikon Pronea and the Canon ELPH 370z. Both have the MRC feature
and moderate to extensive PQI. Back in '96, an article appeared in Pop
Photography that speculated it would be possible to have an APS 35mm system.
I understand that there might be a hybrid system featuring APS and
11 matches
Mail list logo
