Kodachrome is the most Archival color film ever made. Very chemically
stable. I'd bet that Kodak has a US Government contract to supply the
stuff. (The colors will fade when exposed to light, but if stored in a
cool dark place they supposedly last figuratively forever).
Mark Roberts wrote:
: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 12:40:21 GMT
To:
Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
Kodachrome is still available.
Not 25, sadly. Unless someone wants to make an offer for my
remaining roll.
Also, there is only the Swiss facility in Europe for processing. Yo
I've got a couple of rolls of 25 a few of 64 and a few 200. Not to
mention about half a dozen that I exposed about 8 years ago and never
had processed for some reason. They've been in three different fridges
so far, I'm very afraid of what might be on them...
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 24 Jan
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:48:06AM -0600, Gonz wrote:
>
>
> John Francis wrote:
> >
> >
> >Anyway, just ignore the big words and consider the
> >example I gave. If a colour patch illuminated by two
> >different lights maps to the same tristimulus value
> >for a given sensor (such as, say, the RAW
John Francis wrote:
Anyway, just ignore the big words and consider the
example I gave. If a colour patch illuminated by two
different lights maps to the same tristimulus value
for a given sensor (such as, say, the RAW readings)
then there's nothing you can do from then on to find
out whether
John Francis wrote:
I think you should do a little more research.
Metamerism is a general term to describe the way that
different colours appear to a sensor (usually the eye)
when viewed under different lighting conditions.
Thats better. Thats how I interpret the term. Your initial post
imp
>
> From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/01/25 Wed AM 08:44:22 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Re: OT: Kodachrome 25
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:25:49AM +, mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > From: Jo
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:25:49AM +, mike wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > You could even argue that not reproducing the way that certain
> > shades of orange tended to show up as purple on some films is
> > a plus - you're recreating the ideal version of
>
> From: Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/01/25 Wed AM 03:56:55 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT: Kodachrome 25
>
> This is most likely what I need to do. Once I figure it out, I'll
> just apply the same manipulations to ev
>
> From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You could even argue that not reproducing the way that certain
> shades of orange tended to show up as purple on some films is
> a plus - you're recreating the ideal version of the film as it
> should have been, not how it actually behaved.
Orange?
>
> From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/01/25 Wed AM 04:32:34 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT: Kodachrome 25
>
> On 24 Jan 2006 at 21:35, mike wilson wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
van <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:09:04 -0600
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
> Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:09:05 -0500
>
> 25 and 64... Bob
Thanks, Wendy. Got it. I'll try them soon.
On 1/24/06, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/24/06, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
> > Kodachrome 25 from the late
t; With enough time and patience, you can copy any tint/saturation
> level/contrast level through digital manipulation.
> Paul
> On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> > I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
> > Kodachrome 25 from th
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> > I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
> > Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
> > portraits. The color is amazing. Anyone have a r
On 24 Jan 2006 at 21:35, mike wilson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > No, but it's enough to reproduce a film "look." While a digital recreation
> > of a Kocacolor or Velvia or what-have-you look may not replicate every
> > color the same way the film would, the overall look and feel can
>>this, and have chosen different films for different purposes.
> >>>
> >>>Once two real-world lighting conditions have been mapped to
> >>>the same recorded tri-stimulus values, though, there's nothing
> >>>you can do split them apart again. Gi
25 and 64... Bob S.
On 1/24/06, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2006 at 12:06, William Robb wrote:
>
> > I should have read that more carefully. I still have a couple of rolls of
> > 25. I was saving them for something special, if I leave it long enough, it
> > might end up b
lation.
Paul
On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
portraits. The color is amazing. Anyone have a recommendation how I
might achieve this look today?
-
006 at 06:52:20AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >
> >>With enough time and patience, you can copy any tint/saturation
> >>level/contrast level through digital manipulation.
> >>Paul
> >>On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> >>
> >
quist wrote:
With enough time and patience, you can copy any tint/saturation
level/contrast level through digital manipulation.
Paul
On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 03:14:26 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Kodachrome 25
I forget the name of the process (it's something like K13 - you will find it in
google)
On 24 Jan 2006 at 12:06, William Robb wrote:
> I should have read that more carefully. I still have a couple of rolls of
> 25. I was saving them for something special, if I leave it long enough, it
> might end up being in a museum.
Har, mine too. So who else has a stash of this stuff lingering
I love Kocacolor!
Dario
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Kodachrome 25
No, but it's enough to reproduce a film "look." While a digital recreation
of a Kocacolor or Velvia or what-
e, you can copy any tint/saturation
level/contrast level through digital manipulation.
Paul
On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
portrait
n Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:52:20AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > With enough time and patience, you can copy any tint/saturation
> > level/contrast level through digital manipulation.
> > Paul
> > On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> >
> > >I jus
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:22:02PM +, mike wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 12:40:21 GMT
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
> >
> >
> > - Original Messag
Stenquist wrote:
> With enough time and patience, you can copy any tint/saturation
> level/contrast level through digital manipulation.
> Paul
> On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> >I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
> &
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas"
Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
K64 is, last I checked K25 was not, and from everything I've heard and
seen, the two are NOT identical apart from speed.
I should have read that more carefully. I still have a couple of rolls of
2
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
Very different from E6. I think the only place you can get Kodachrome
developed in the U.S. is at Kodak in Rochester.
Kodak privatized the process many years ago. Canadian Kodachrome now goes to
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Are you suggesting that someone actually *use* film?
What's gotten into you?
Pre-senior moment.
William Robb
mike wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 03:14:26 GMT
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: Re: Kodachrome 25
>
> I forget the name of the process (it's something lik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> When I started serious photography back in the Sixties, Kodachrome colors
> were the standard for making other color films. The other slide film was
> Ektachrome, but it wasn't on par with Kodachrome.
> I tried Kodachrome 64, but didn't like it compared to K25.
>
>
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Scott Loveless" Subject: OT:
Kodachrome 25
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
portraits. The color is amazing. Anyone have a
: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 03:14:26 GMT
>> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>> Subject: Re: Re: Kodachrome 25
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mike wilson wrote:
>>
>> >> From: "William Robb" <[
How much do you ask for doing that? ;-)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Jolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Kodachrome 25
Dario Bonazza wrote:
And then you can put on sale your "Jollyplays"
>
> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 03:48:18 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Re: Kodachrome 25
>
> >From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >
> >
> >It's also a much better
From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It's also a much better system than E6.
Velviaah aah ahh
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the worlds a sunny day, oh yeah
(For Jack Davis)
I used a Kodachrome 25 a couple o
Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mike wilson wrote:
>> Also, there is only the Swiss facility in Europe for processing. You can't
>> even send your film to your national centre for forwarding any more.
>
>Isn't it E6? What is special about it?
Very differen
>
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 03:14:26 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Re: Kodachrome 25
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mike wilson wrote:
>
> >> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 1/24/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mike wilson wrote:
>
> >> Wrom: HJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNY
> >> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 12:40:21 GMT
> >> To:
> >> Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
> >>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mike wilson wrote:
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 12:40:21 GMT
To:
Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
Kodachrome is still available.
Not 25, sadly. Unless someone wants to make an offer for my remaining roll.
Also, there i
Dario Bonazza wrote:
And then you can put on sale your "Jollyplays" plug-ins.
Heh, you don't think that people might be more tempted to pay me to
delete the plugins and then burn the hard disk to ashes? ;-)
S
And then you can put on sale your "Jollyplays" plug-ins.
Dario
Steve Jolly wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Funny you should ask that, Scott. Alien Skin Software today introduced
Exposure. Part of this Photoshop plug-in is a suite of filters that
emulate the look of specific films. Kod
On 1/24/06, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
> Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
> portraits. The color is amazing. Anyone have a recommendation how I
> might achieve
Bob Shell wrote:
Funny you should ask that, Scott. Alien Skin Software today introduced
Exposure. Part of this Photoshop plug-in is a suite of filters that
emulate the look of specific films. Kodachrome 25 is there. They even
have a filter to emulate the old GAF 500 slide film from the 70s
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 12:40:21 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Loveless"
> Subject: OT: Kodachrome 25
>
>
>
William Robb
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:42:55 -0800
>
>- Original Message - From: "Scott Loveless" Subject: OT:
Kodachrome 25
>
>>I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
>>Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: OT: Kodachrome 25
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
portraits. The color is amazing. Anyone have a recommendation how
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Bob Shell wrote:
Funny you should ask that, Scott. Alien Skin Software today introduced
Exposure. Part of this Photoshop plug-in is a suite of filters that emulate
the look of specific films. Kodachrome 25 is there. They even have a filter
to emulate the old GAF 500
With enough time and patience, you can copy any tint/saturation
level/contrast level through digital manipulation.
Paul
On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That&#
On Jan 24, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
portraits. The color is amazing. Anyone have a recommendation how I
might achieve this look today?
Funn
>
> From: Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue AM 07:00:05 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: OT: Kodachrome 25
>
> I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
> Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. T
I just spent some time looking through some portraits taken with
Kodachrome 25 from the late 70s or early 80s. That's right,
portraits. The color is amazing. Anyone have a recommendation how I
might achieve this look today?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
"You have t
Expired 11/2001 - refrigerated for the last couple of years since I bought
it (already expired then). I bought these to try out Kodachrome but never
got around to using them. Apparently Kodak Australia has announced that they
won't sell Kodachrome locally any longer and will stop processing it in t
Don't do it Glenn, we don't want to find out...
Norm
"D. Glenn Arthur Jr." wrote:
> If I decide I like Kodachrome 64, is that going to vanish next year?
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Antti-Pekka Virjonen clarified:
> They are discontinuing the Kodachrome 25 *consumer* film and
> Kodachrome 200 *professional* film.
Okay, this officially sucks. It was what, about a year ago
that I finally got around to trying Kodachrome and discovered
what the fuss was about?
Antti-Pekka,
While I applaud your vivid subject line, my choice would be "Mama Don't
Take My Kodachrome Away." --Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at htt
t;
Päivä: 25. huhtikuuta 2001 3:49
Aihe: Re: Goodbye Kodachrome 25?
>On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Creature's Comfort wrote:
>
>> As a result, Kodak has seen a significant decline in use of Kodachrome
>> 25 film. Kodak said it can no longer justify production of products
>> with extr
At 20:31 24.4.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Creature's Comfort wrote:
>
>> As a result, Kodak has seen a significant decline in use of Kodachrome
>> 25 film. Kodak said it can no longer justify production of products
>> with extremely limited usage.
When and if they finally discontinue the last
kodachrome films do not make the mistake of
"stocking up" on it. Processing will promptly
shut down I'm sure as it's so complex.
JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directi
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Creature's Comfort wrote:
> As a result, Kodak has seen a significant decline in use of Kodachrome
> 25 film. Kodak said it can no longer justify production of products
> with extremely limited usage. Kodak will continue to offer Kodachrome
> 64 and
62 matches
Mail list logo
