On 8/28/2010 8:39 PM, Bob W wrote:
your LR problems suggest that it might be broke.
It *might* indeed.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the direct
> On 8/28/2010 4:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> > XP64 is pretty buggy, especially with consumer hardware. MS didn't get
> > a truly usable 64-bit version of Windows out until Vista 64 (Win7 64
> > is Vista 64 under the hood, there are no significant non-UI
> > differences in the 64 bit version) and dri
On 8/28/2010 4:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
XP64 is pretty buggy, especially with consumer hardware. MS didn't get
a truly usable 64-bit version of Windows out until Vista 64 (Win7 64
is Vista 64 under the hood, there are no significant non-UI
differences in the 64 bit version) and driver support for
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 8/26/2010 8:14 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
>> Regards your crashing problems, your hardware looks up to snuff
>> although I'm not sure why you'd run Win XP 64-bit rather than Win 7
>> 64-bit. Seems to me that Win 7 is a LOT better at 6
On 8/26/2010 8:14 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Regards your crashing problems, your hardware looks up to snuff
although I'm not sure why you'd run Win XP 64-bit rather than Win 7
64-bit. Seems to me that Win 7 is a LOT better at 64bit operations
than anything out of the XP generation, but then "I
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Since I don't edit my images anywhere else than in LR and since I also don't
> have more than one LR version installed on my computer at any time, it is
> yet unclear to me why LR decided that my MD was incorrect in a way...
If you use onl
Thank you for a very detailed response, Godfrey. My reply is interspersed...
1- Which metadata is "correct" depends upon your workflow and policy.
My workflow is such that the "correct" metadata is always what is in
the Lightroom catalog, not what is contained in the original image
file, because
1- Which metadata is "correct" depends upon your workflow and policy.
My workflow is such that the "correct" metadata is always what is in
the Lightroom catalog, not what is contained in the original image
file, because Lightroom is the only way I *add* metadata to my files.
Other applications like
On 8/23/2010 11:37 PM, Bob W wrote:
whichever is correct, LR should not have crashed. It should have shown Boris
both versions and given him the option, assuming they were both valid.
I apologize for I reached for conclusion too soon. It keeps crashing
again, less often perhaps, but crashing n
> > Hi!
> >
> > If you remember, I mentioned on the list that my LR3.0 behaves oddly.
> > Almost every second time I would start it, it would crash. It seems I
> > did something today that resolved this very issue. Perhaps it would be
> > useful for you too...
> >
> > LR indicated that some of my p
From: Boris Liberman
Hi!
If you remember, I mentioned on the list that my LR3.0 behaves oddly.
Almost every second time I would start it, it would crash. It seems I
did something today that resolved this very issue. Perhaps it would be
useful for you too...
LR indicated that some of my phot
On 2010-08-23 10:34, Boris Liberman wrote:
LR indicated that some of my photos had some kind of discrepancy in its
metadata. It said that whatever LR knows is different from what is
written on disk. This is as far I could understand it. So I went to the
topmost location in my catalog, selected a
Hi!
If you remember, I mentioned on the list that my LR3.0 behaves oddly.
Almost every second time I would start it, it would crash. It seems I
did something today that resolved this very issue. Perhaps it would be
useful for you too...
LR indicated that some of my photos had some kind of di
13 matches
Mail list logo
