That's cool, but what did you take the photo with?
On 4/14/2022 6:18 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
I’ll just leave this here…….
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/pen.html
Cheers
Cotty
On 7 Apr 2022, at 18:13, Larry Colen wrote:
that still leaves the question of glass
--
%(real_name)s
> On Apr 15, 2022, at 12:06 AM, John Francis wrote:
>
>
> you know, I might have one of those (and a K-mount to u4/3 adapter) lying
> around.
> I've definitely got an A50mm/f1.4, an A50mm/f1.7, and an M28mm/f2.8; I'm just
> not
> entirely sure whether or not I hung on to an M50mm/1.4 to
you know, I might have one of those (and a K-mount to u4/3 adapter) lying
around.
I've definitely got an A50mm/f1.4, an A50mm/f1.7, and an M28mm/f2.8; I'm just
not
entirely sure whether or not I hung on to an M50mm/1.4 to keep my MX company.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:18:44PM +0100, Steve
I’ll just leave this here…….
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/pen.html
Cheers
Cotty
On 7 Apr 2022, at 18:13, Larry Colen wrote:
that still leaves the question of glass
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:07:54AM -0400, John Francis wrote:
>
> Last weekend I decided I was going to stick with the lighter system.
> I knew I wanted something wider than 40mm, but I wasn't sure whether
> to go for the 12-40/2.8 or the 12-100/4. I eventually decided to go
> for the 12-100, and
> On Apr 9, 2022, at 3:59 PM, Brian W wrote:
>
> Some years ago during the pre-digital era (remember that?) I was in outback
> South Australia when the only camera I had (a Ricoh as it happens) packed it
> in.
> I was unable to replace it until I reached Adelaide a week or two later
>
Some years ago during the pre-digital era (remember that?) I was in outback
South Australia when the only camera I had (a Ricoh as it happens) packed it in.
I was unable to replace it until I reached Adelaide a week or two later (another
Ricoh!)
I vowed never to travel without a backup again -
John, a lot of sense in which you say. I have never been that fussy &
luckily have never had a crisis. I have retained my K110D body just in
case my K5 packs up some day but don't cart it around with me. In fact I
still use it occasionally just for the hell of it. If I don't need to
crop much,
I too always take two cameras when shooting for a client. Now it’s a K-1 and a
K-3. I can fit both and about ten lenses in a pelican case, but it’s pretty
damn heavy. That’s okay when I’m working out of the trunk of a car , which is
almost always. My list of cameras owned is similar. I still
On Apr 7, 2022, at 10:00 AM, Alan C wrote:
>
> For me, one camera is quite enough.
I've run into enough situations where one camera isn't enough to always want a
backup in my camera bag.
For one thing I spent a few years earning my ticket into motorsports events by
shooting for a website.
What about setting up a LIVING MUSEUM in your lounge?
Alan C
On 08-Apr-22 12:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Are you trying to say I have too many cameras? Well, that could be: when I
tried to count them all, I lost my place at 113 and didn't bother to restart…
G
On Apr 7, 2022, at 10:00
Well, the new OM-1 (which wasn't realeased when I bought my M1X) at
the top-of-the-line point does seem to be about the same price as a K3.
Mind you, although Olympus show the M1X at the full $3000 price point,
there are still a few places (including some Amazon sellers) listing
it at the $1700
I am considering celebrating my new job by getting a u4/3 camera to carry on my
bike, possibly an E-M5. I was poking around last night looking at the current
models and a couple of them are up in the K3iii price range, if not more
expensive, if you buy them new.
I did see a couple of bodies
You guys are crazy. You need a big frame on wheels on which you can
mount them all & then fire them simultaneously with some sort of
automatic device. Then you could spend the next week analysing all the
images so you can rank them in order of sharpness, colour rendition &
whatever else you
Sounds like a hood choice, Enjoy!
Paul
> On Apr 7, 2022, at 12:08 AM, John Francis wrote:
>
>
> As some of you may remember, some five months ago I decided that
> the K3iii, while a nice camera, wasn't tempting enough to get me
> to spend that amount of money on a new APS-C camera body.
> I
As some of you may remember, some five months ago I decided that
the K3iii, while a nice camera, wasn't tempting enough to get me
to spend that amount of money on a new APS-C camera body.
I was already finding that carrying a camera bag with my K5, the
60-250, and a selection of other items
16 matches
Mail list logo
