Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Hi, frank theriault wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:32:11 -0800, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When the more popular or common browsers don't work with a site, then the site designer has clearly not done his or her job properly. I have probs with IE 6 - what can be more ubiquitous than I

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Tuesday 11 January 2005 12:17, Chan Yong Wei wrote: > Have you tried FreeCiv? > > I use only Linux and Mac OS X... have weaned myself off any need to > use the Windows operating system. I'm still fumbling about with freeciv. as far as I know, recent versions don't have the civ3 ruleset, which

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Have you tried FreeCiv? I use only Linux and Mac OS X... have weaned myself off any need to use the Windows operating system. On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:32:44 -0600, glenn murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mozilla 1.5 on Linux will crash every time if you try to view a Flickr > page. I finally upgr

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sunday 09 January 2005 11:50, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Too much information here, Cowfish Billy ;-)) Some of us just want to see > the photos, not play with new technology - RSS, livejournal, consolidation > of feeds, interlinking websites - from what I can see and understand, none > of that add

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Works fine on Win98se and Win2K though. glenn murphy wrote: Peter J. Alling wrote: frank theriault wrote: most popular browser in the world? It was, although maybe Mr. Gates has done something about that Not for some years now. In fact even most of the fanatical "anything but Microsoft"

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

I do a little business doing free lance support on PCs. The number of people who are using IE only is astounding. Some don't even realize they might have a choice and almost all have little or nothing good to say about Microsoft. Doug Franklin wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:27:39 -0500, Peter J

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Peter J. Alling wrote: frank theriault wrote: most popular browser in the world? It was, although maybe Mr. Gates has done something about that Not for some years now. In fact even most of the fanatical "anything but Microsoft" people, have only IE on their machines. This is truly a sha

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:27:39 -0500, Peter J. Alling wrote: > Not for some years now. In fact even most of the fanatical "anything > but Microsoft" people, have only IE > on their machines. Uhhh, not completely true, Peter. I'm not even of the "fanatical ..." group, but I use Opera primarily an

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

frank theriault wrote: most popular browser in the world? It was, although maybe Mr. Gates has done something about that Not for some years now. In fact even most of the fanatical "anything but Microsoft" people, have only IE on their machines. This is truly a shame now that Thunderbird

Re: Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:32:11 -0800, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When the more popular or common browsers don't work with a site, then the > site designer has clearly not done his or her job properly. I have probs > with IE 6 - what can be more ubiquitous than IE and Netscape? > >

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:37:29 -0500, Peter J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You starting a phone booth, (Ok kiosk), series??? > Not yet. Only two of them (I think). Not enough to call a series yet. But, I have a couple with graffiti, so it could also be part of a burgeoning graffiti serie

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sunday 09 January 2005 11:50, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Too much information here, Cowfish Billy ;-)) Some of us just want to see > the photos, not play with new technology - RSS, livejournal, consolidation > of feeds, interlinking websites - from what I can see and understand, none > of that add

Re: Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

When the more popular or common browsers don't work with a site, then the site designer has clearly not done his or her job properly. I have probs with IE 6 - what can be more ubiquitous than IE and Netscape? Shel > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm using Netscape 7.2 and I get the same problem

Re: Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

> > From: Jon Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Jan 10, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Bob W wrote: > > > Please don't use WebAperture. It resizes the browser window without > > permission, doesn't restore it when you leave the page, and it does it > > in such a way that it takes 2 clicks to restore. I will n

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Jan 10, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Bob W wrote: Please don't use WebAperture. It resizes the browser window without permission, doesn't restore it when you leave the page, and it does it in such a way that it takes 2 clicks to restore. I will no longer look at anything on WebAperture. Now I'm _really_ cu

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Jan 10, 2005, at 4:26 AM, frank theriault wrote: I could get used to gushy comments . But, the problem with Web Aperture is that on my computer (or my browser or whatever) it opens to a small window, that I have to maximize. It doesn't bother me, but I know from reading some other comments tha

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Hi, Sunday, January 9, 2005, 10:24:53 PM, Jon wrote: [...] > Have you looked into WebAperture? Yes, you have to put up with gushy [...] > url: Please don't use WebAperture. It resizes the browser window without permission, doesn't restore it when you leave the page,

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

You starting a phone booth, (Ok kiosk), series??? frank theriault wrote: An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert Your Quarter..." Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3124455/ Comments are

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:24:53 +0100, Jon Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2005, at 3:22 PM, frank theriault wrote: > > LOL! I need to try my hand at this! I bet I can get lower scores! No, > seeing your work, I _know_ I will earn lower scores Well, the thing about some or maybe e

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Jan 9, 2005, at 3:22 PM, frank theriault wrote: So, for all those reasons, Flickr is out, Photo.net is back in. Someone here said that if one makes a critique request on a photo, it's not counted towards one's quota, so I've been making requests on every photo I upload there. My "average" has t

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:58:46 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very nice, frank. I prefer your people shots, but as a shot with no people in > it, this one works for me. Good composition -- very Mondrian. Mondrian: He was a painter who did lots of rectangles and stuff. That's a

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

I pay $25 a year, that's fifty cents a week, for PhotoNet. I don't know exactly how much space that buys me, but I have over 200 photos posted there now with plenty of room to spare, so it's all I need. It's fast, easy to work with, and the pages like good. I consider that a bargain. Plus, I do

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

- Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 10:50 AM Subject: RE: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale I thought the idea of web sites was to disseminate information quickly, easily, and d

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

In a message dated 1/8/2005 7:35:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For those of you who don't like Flickr, I've loaded it onto photo.net: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3021005&size=lg cheers, frank = Very nice, frank. I prefer your people shots, bu

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

photo. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Billy Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Date: 1/9/2005 8:09:36 AM > Subject: Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale > > I use flickr, but not as a general presentation site for all the > reasons you men

RE: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Well, good for you. Not everyone has fast connections, so not everyone will have an easy, enjoyable viewing experience using Flickr. I thought the idea of web sites was to disseminate information quickly, easily, and directly. It seems that now one must be technologically savvy, have fast, and s

RE: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 9. januar 2005 16:49 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: RE: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale Hey, Frank I've got a new, Captain Marvel Whiz Bang machine, and Flickr is a PIT

Re: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

I use flickr, but not as a general presentation site for all the reasons you mention. However, it uses RSS to allow people to get feeds of pictures for usage elsewhere - for example I use livejournal to consolidate lots of websites i read on a daily basis (because I forget to read them if they're n

RE: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Hey, Frank I've got a new, Captain Marvel Whiz Bang machine, and Flickr is a PITA for me as well. I'll only put up with it for Juan's photos and yours because I know the results will interest me, but I won't put up with the site in most instances. Shel > [Original Message] > From: frank

OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 07:59:42 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Humm. I opened a Flickr account the other day and seem to have problems > loading and > getting a > working url.I seem to get "page not found" errors everytime i did something. > And than it > worked. The pro

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:28:07 +, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cracking shot Frank, well done. Thanks, Cotty, I must admit to being a teeny bit mystified (but none-the-less grateful) WRT the response to this one. I think it's a good enough shot, but lots of people seem to get more out

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

I have a problem with those URLs when using comcast's web-based e-mail, which i've been using on all but my main machine. When I'm on my home desktop machine, I use the OSX Mail app, and I don't have a problem. But I still find flickr very slow in comparison to photo net. On Jan 9, 2005, at 8:29

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:34:39 -0500, Jeff Tokayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Good shot Frank. I like it. > > Jeff. > Thanks, Jeff. I'll show you the print at the next TOPDML. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 07:59:42 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh well on to the photo.:-) > > I liked the first one you showed a few months ago Frank,and this one i like > even better. > Tonality is good,i'm a sucker for lines(surveyor you know.lol)and they work > ve

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On 9/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: >I've come to ignore flickr images, because I have to append everything >after the @ to see them. Can't just click on the url. And then they take >forever to load. Paul, what email app are you using? Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O)

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On 8/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: >An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert >Your Quarter..." > >Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url: > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3124455/ > >Comments are alway

RE: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Humm. I opened a Flickr account the other day and seem to have problems loading and getting a working url.I seem to get "page not found" errors everytime i did something. And than it worked. Oh well on to the photo.:-) I liked the first one you showed a few months ago Frank,and this one i like

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

frank theriault wrote: An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert Your Quarter..." Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3124455/ Comments are always welcome! thanks, frank Good shot Frank.

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:56:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right, Shel. That is nice. I finally got to see it. I've come to > ignore flickr images, because I have to append everything after the @ to see > them. Can't just click on the url. And then they take forever

Re: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:58:56 -0500, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert > Your Quarter..." > > Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/312

RE: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

You're right, Shel. That is nice. I finally got to see it. I've come to ignore flickr images, because I have to append everything after the @ to see them. Can't just click on the url. And then they take forever to load. But I digress. Great shot Frank. But don't you have a photo.net page? Paul

RE: PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

Frank, that's great - just effin' great! Too bad that stupid flickr site won't allow a bigger image, or, if it does, I've not figured out how to see it. There are a few little things I could nit pick, but they are truly mionr, and may really be of no consequence (or even exist) in the full sized

PAW: A Payphone in Parkdale

An alternate title I was thinking of was, "Please Completely Insert Your Quarter..." Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3124455/ Comments are always welcome! thanks, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."