John Forbes wrote:
"International" is more accurate than "European". :-)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html
I'd been meaning to ask for this link to be posted again -- having long
since lost track of where it was, but knowing somebody had posted it in
the past. Thanks!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 5, 2005, at 2:49 PM, John Forbes wrote:
"International" is more accurate than "European". :-)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html
Only North America still uses non-ISO paper sizes.
It will take decades to change the standards for paper sizing in
Unless forced by Government Fiat it will never happen. What will happen
is that the useful metric sizes will be adopted, and older measures will
be used where appropriate. The real proof that the United States is
more democratic than most other countries is that our government can't
make such
On Nov 5, 2005, at 2:49 PM, John Forbes wrote:
"International" is more accurate than "European". :-)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html
Only North America still uses non-ISO paper sizes.
It will take decades to change the standards for paper sizing in the
USA. There's too muc
"International" is more accurate than "European". :-)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html
Only North America still uses non-ISO paper sizes.
John
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 15:56:26 -, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These are European standard metric paper sizes. A4 is roug
In a message dated 11/5/2005 8:00:07 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html
Google is your friend ;-))
Shel
=
Hehehe. True. But so much easier to ask here.
Marnie aka Doe (The constitutionally lazy.)
In a message dated 11/5/2005 7:57:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These are European standard metric paper sizes. A4 is roughly
8.5"x11", A3 is roughly 13"x19", A2 is roughly 20"x24"
-Adam
=
Aha, of course. I should have remembered that. Thanks. I think because w
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html
Google is your friend ;-))
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not sure what A3 means. What is an A2 and what is an A3? What is the
> difference between the two? (I have read reviews
These are European standard metric paper sizes. A4 is roughly
8.5"x11", A3 is roughly 13"x19", A2 is roughly 20"x24"
-Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure what A3 means. What is an A2 and what is an A3? What is the
difference between the two? (I have read reviews of most of the printers
Not sure what A3 means. What is an A2 and what is an A3? What is the
difference between the two? (I have read reviews of most of the printers
mentioned,
but don't recall the A2/3 stuff).
TIA, Marnie aka Doe
i thought about it but there is no way to put it in my office or anywhere
near. i think the 2400 is on my list to replace my aging 1280.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:16 AM
Subject: RE:
On 4 Nov 2005 at 16:44, Cotty wrote:
> On 5/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Maybe. I'm having big hassles with memory working on large panos at the
> >moment,
> >one project today was comprised of eight 1.2GB files.
>
> You bloody great showoff!!!
Hmm, thinking about 64bi
On 5/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Maybe. I'm having big hassles with memory working on large panos at the
>moment,
>one project today was comprised of eight 1.2GB files.
You bloody great showoff!!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||===
On Nov 3, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
Take a look at the Epson 2400 as well as the 4800 (which is an A2
printer).
I am seriously considering the 4800 as my next printer to replace
my current
2000 with CIS (continuous inking system). A3+ size is a bit too
small at times.
How long did that take?
:-)
Dave
On 11/5/05, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2005 at 13:21, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
>
> > > I've just ordered the R2400 + a new HP computer with 2Gigabyte RAM (is
> > > that
> > > enough?). I hope to get my own web page up soon...
> > >
> >
On 4 Nov 2005 at 13:21, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
> > I've just ordered the R2400 + a new HP computer with 2Gigabyte RAM (is that
> > enough?). I hope to get my own web page up soon...
> >
> > Pål
>
> 2GB will do just fine!
Maybe. I'm having big hassles with memory working on large panos at t
On 4 Nov 2005 at 8:28, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
> Take a look at the Epson 2400 as well as the 4800 (which is an A2 printer). I
> am
> seriously considering the 4800 as my next printer to replace my current 2000
> with CIS (continuous inking system). A3+ size is a bit too small at times.
I sw
Congratulations. You won't regret it. That's a superb printer. Two gigs
of RAM should be plenty for PS work.
Paul
On Nov 4, 2005, at 6:16 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Antti-Pekka Virjonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Take a look at the Epson 2400 as well as the 4800 (whic
"Antti-Pekka Virjonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've just ordered the R2400 + a new HP computer with 2Gigabyte RAM (is that
>> enough?).
>> I hope to get my own web page up soon...
>>
>> Pål
>
>2GB will do just fine!
I believe 2G is all Photoshop is capable of accessing.
--
Mark Robert
>
> From: Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/11/04 Fri AM 11:16:48 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: A3 photo printer
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Antti-Pekka Virjonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Take a look at the Epso
> I've just ordered the R2400 + a new HP computer with 2Gigabyte RAM (is that
> enough?).
> I hope to get my own web page up soon...
>
> Pål
2GB will do just fine!
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy Turku
www.computec.fi
- Original Message -
From: "Antti-Pekka Virjonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Take a look at the Epson 2400 as well as the 4800 (which is an A2 printer).
> I am seriously considering the 4800 as my next printer to replace my current
> 2000 with CIS (continuous inking system). A3+ size is a bit
On 3/11/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Cotty sent me three or four photos which, I assume, were printed on the
>S9000. Maybe it's the skill of the operator, but compared to some prints
>I've seen made on HP and Epson printers, these stood out as being superior.
Why thank you fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:39 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: A3 photo printer
>
> Anyone who can recommend an A3 quality photo printer. A while back an Epson
> model (was it called 7500?) was recomme
Cotty sent me three or four photos which, I assume, were printed on the
S9000. Maybe it's the skill of the operator, but compared to some prints
I've seen made on HP and Epson printers, these stood out as being superior.
Godfrey showed me some prints made, I believe, with his new Epson, and they
On 2/11/05, Pål Jensen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Anyone who can recommend an A3 quality photo printer. A while back an
>Epson model (was it called 7500?) was recommended. Is it still the one to
>have?
I have a Canon S9000 which although now not cutting edge, still provides
amazing quality. Th
On Nov 2, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
Anyone who can recommend an A3 quality photo printer. A while back
an Epson model (was it called 7500?) was recommended. Is it still
the one to have?
I went through this selection process recently, upgrading from an
Epson 1270/MIS Quadtone in
f density and colour balance,
using these to print from within Photoshop.
Cheers
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "DagT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: A3 photo printer
I´ve got Epson 2100 and it is very good, but m
Pål Jensen wrote:
Anyone who can recommend an A3 quality photo printer. A while back an Epson
model (was it called 7500?) was recommended. Is it still the one to have?
Pål
R2400 if you intend to do any B&W printing or use 3rd party papers,
R1800 if you don't.
-Adam
Hi,
Of the Epson models the R2400 seems to be the current must have A3 one.
I've been very pleased with my Epson 2100 though you can get a slight
bronzing of the pigment ink on gloss paper. This issue has been addressed in
the R2400 (&R1800). I'm not sure this is enough to persuade me to upgr
I´ve got Epson 2100 and it is very good, but may be difficult to
calibrate. I had some help by the firm who sold it to me. The newer
2400 is said to be easier.
DagT
Den 2. nov. 2005 kl. 20.39 skrev Pål Jensen:
Anyone who can recommend an A3 quality photo printer. A while back
an Epson mo
31 matches
Mail list logo
