Yes I received it tonight as well.
Jeffery Johnson
Photo Captures by Jeffery http://www.photocapturesbyjeffery.com
http://www.Facebook.com/photocapturesbyjeffery
https://twitter.com/PhotoCaptures
Bringing joy and happiness to lonely and depressed walls across the
nation with wonderful eclectic
Got it.
Paul via phone
On Oct 24, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone else receive this via email tonight?
I got one. Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 24, 2014, at 9:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone else receive this via email tonight?
I got it as well and say good on Ricoh for owning up to minor marketing
goof.
Mark
On 10/24/2014 10:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Did anyone else receive this via email tonight?
I got something from Ricoh but did't open it just sent it to the trash..
I don't remember the subject line - don't think it said Apology from...
ann
On 10/24/2014 23:05, Mark C wrote:
I got it as well and say good on Ricoh for owning up to minor marketing
goof.
Mark
On 10/24/2014 10:39 PM,
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or
the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
Cotty, I always thought of you as more of a
On 1 January 2012 10:00, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Cotty, I always thought of you as more of a rake than a hoe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoPFkjF-Bdo
regards, Anthony
Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight
On 2/1/12, Anthony Farr, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoPFkjF-Bdo
lol
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Considerate, respectful tribute to your love. Beautifully said, Frank.
I'd wager she's proud of you too.
Jack
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 6:40 AM
Subject: Apology
I
On 31/12/11, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Calling her the missus is patronizing and demeaning.
I totally agree mate.
I call mine The Mrs.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Dec 31, 2011, at 6:40 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I was just looking over some older posts and I noticed my PESO, At the
Outlet Mall. I read the thread and I realize that, in my misguided
attempt to be funny I actually insulted my common law wife, Judy.
Frank, anybody that took your
On Dec 31, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 31/12/11, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Calling her the missus is patronizing and demeaning.
I totally agree mate.
I call mine The Mrs.
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the Mrs. I
simply
I don't find the Missus patronizing - I think it is rather nice -
especially if you aren't actually technically married in the eyes of the
law.
although, in the context I think Frank refers to I would have preferred
'My sweetie or my better half
ann
On 12/31/2011 15:40, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On 31/12/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
On Dec 31, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 31/12/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
I thought that was just between
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
I thought that was just between us.
Now both of you boys owe me a monitor cleaning.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
I thought that was just between us.
On 31/12/11, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Now both of you boys owe me a monitor
On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 31/12/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
Cotty, I always thought of you as
On 31/12/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
Cotty, I always thought of you as more of a rake than a hoe.
Cheers mate - another
On Dec 31, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
I would never dream of referring to Marlene as either the missus or the
Mrs. I simply call her my old lady.
Yeah but you don't mind calling me your bitch.
I thought that was just between us.
On 31/12/11, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated,
Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 31, 2011, at 6:40 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I was just looking over some older posts and I noticed my PESO, At the
Outlet Mall. I read the thread and I realize that, in my misguided
attempt to be funny I actually insulted my common law wife, Judy.
Frank, anybody
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was using full size images, fresh from the camera. Smaller ones
would speed up loading for sure. Wonder how the quality fares
when you do that?
It's no alternative for a slide projector...
Just as an aside;
In a local
I don't understand what you mean by - a slide with much higher resolution.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Apology and review (of Sandisk photoviewer).
- Original
what was your procedure for getting accurate color?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Apology and review (of Sandisk photoviewer).
In a local photo club we have done projections
I did a slide show for family at Christmas time via the Sandisk viewer.
Not straight from the camera; rather, I assembled a set of images on
my computer, downloaded to a CF card and went from there.
Some observations:
1. The viewer has a slow processor. Smaller images process faster. Next
time
Stan Halpin wrote:
I did a slide show for family at Christmas time via the Sandisk viewer.
Not straight from the camera; rather, I assembled a set of images on
my computer, downloaded to a CF card and went from there.
Some observations:
1. The viewer has a slow processor. Smaller images process
Hi,
Thursday, July 22, 2004, 6:57:07 AM, Stan wrote:
Bob, On this side of the pond, using what is oxymoronically known as
American English, there is a businesspersons' phrase which is used as
follows: Dear Mr. Jones: In re: your letter of the 5th,... with the
apparent presumption being that
and Question (WAS: RE: Apology
for))
Bob, On this side of the pond, using what is oxymoronically known as
American English, there is a businesspersons' phrase which is used as
follows: Dear Mr. Jones: In re: your letter of the 5th,... with the
apparent presumption being that 're
(WAS: RE-- Apology
for)
No, I like Cats, especially like these:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=121734
Warning: All cats in this photo has been manipulated in a computer... :-)
DagT
Fra: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll agree
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
'in re' is Latin meaning 'in the matter of'. It is a
rather fusty,
legalistic term - it cam into general use from the
law. I personally
would discourage it. It serves no useful purpose and
just sounds archaic
and bureaucratic, if not pompous.
Bob,
?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: PDML Mini FAQ (was Re-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE-- Apology
for)
No, I like Cats, especially like these:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id
, of course...
DagT
Fra: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why would you put a cat in your computer?
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: PDML Mini FAQ (was Re-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE--
Apology
Like I've always said, cats are BAD. Dogs are good!
Peter J. Alling wrote:
In my experience cats don't actually eat bugs, just play with them
and leave parts all over the floor.
I think that would be bad in the computer.
Humm? Seems pretty clear to me.
re (rê) preposition
In reference to; in the case of; concerning.
[Latin rê, ablative of rês, thing.]
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition
copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from
INSO
-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE-- Apology
for)
In my experience cats don't actually eat bugs, just play with them and
leave parts all over the floor.
I think that would be bad in the computer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To eat the bugs, of course...
DagT
Fra: cbwaters
On 20/7/04, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, offered:
If I run across a good deal on eBay that I can't use, I'll share
it with the group because I know someone out there can use it.
Please don't. The list has discussed this at least annually since I
came on board in 1998. Each time the
On 20/7/04, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, offered:
Now the question:
Nowhere can I find any guidelines covering this (eBay Listings), or for FS
items, or what's allowed for OT subjects, or for that matter what AW
stands for!
Yeah, like Doug, get with it man :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Bob, I meant the same figuratively not literally.
Norm
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Nice post Lasse. AW means AntWort in German, same as RE: .
schoolmasterish pendantry
well, not quite. 're' is Latin for 'about' and is a complete word in
its own right. It is not short for 'reply', as some people
I'll agree with your consensus rules, graywolf, except the one about
cat pictures. Let's have not more pictures of cats, only nice dog
pictures!!!
graywolf wrote:
Not rules, Don, just general consensus.
For Sale (and Want To Buy): Pentax stuff anytime. Although many only
want to have to look
(was Re-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE-- Apology
for)
I'll agree with your consensus rules, graywolf, except the one about
cat pictures. Let's have not more pictures of cats, only nice dog
pictures!!!
No, I like Cats, especially like these:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=121734
Warning: All cats in this photo has been manipulated in a computer... :-)
DagT
Fra: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll agree with your consensus rules, graywolf, except the one about
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, William Robb wrote:
Tell you what John, why don't you just tell us your eBay ID, and then
we can watch for items that you are bidding on and broadcast that
information to the list.
Easy on John please William, he was the one who apologised. It's
someone else who claims he
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Apology for
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, William Robb wrote:
Tell you what John, why don't you just tell us your eBay ID, and
then
we can watch for items that you are bidding on and broadcast that
information
OK, how about no photos of pets, kids, flowers, or sunsets. Adelheid needed a
vacation anyway.
No-- just joking, I am not going to put that in the FAQ.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I'll agree with your consensus rules, graywolf, except the one about
cat pictures. Let's have not more pictures of
Well, you could do a British tranlation.
--
Chris Stoddart wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
One note the FAQ might have is: Remember that the people here are
from all over the world.
Customs, languages, beliefs, religions, values and most of all their
SENSE OF HUMOR may vary!
And some of us might
Now that is a tale (err... tail).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I like Cats, especially like these:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=121734
Warning: All cats in this photo has been manipulated in a computer... :-)
DagT
Fra: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll agree with
Like I said I apologise for the mistake, just trying to help one particular
person.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:11:49 -0600
Subject: Re: Apology
or Aussie! And don't forget how to spell COLOUR either, ok?!? hehe.
t.
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 1:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDML Mini FAQ (was Re-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE--
Apology
On 21/7/04, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, offered:
I'll agree with your consensus rules, graywolf, except the one about
cat pictures. Let's have not more pictures of cats, only nice dog
pictures!!!
This is a dog:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/nature/images/pic11.html
Really. She barks
Unacceptable!
Cotty wrote:
On 21/7/04, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, offered:
I'll agree with your consensus rules, graywolf, except the one about
cat pictures. Let's have not more pictures of cats, only nice dog
pictures!!!
This is a dog:
This is a dog:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/nature/images/pic11.html
Really. She barks and rolls over on her back and everything.
On 21/7/04, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, offered:
Unacceptable!
You see an unacceptable cat, I see a dog ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
why would you put a cat in your computer?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: PDML Mini FAQ (was Re-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE-- Apology
for)
No, I like Cats, especially like
Bob, On this side of the pond, using what is oxymoronically known as
American English, there is a businesspersons' phrase which is used as
follows: Dear Mr. Jones: In re: your letter of the 5th,... with the
apparent presumption being that 're' is short for 'reference'. I have
never seen/heard
And eBay itself isn't a worldwide list with a searchable interface? Nice
try, Kostas.
On 7/20/04 2:45, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
That's quite different to publicising in a worldwide list
with a searchable interface.
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Tim Sherburne wrote:
And eBay itself isn't a worldwide list with a searchable interface? Nice
try, Kostas.
No, it's only a searchable site. From which you missed the lens you
wanted, as you admit, because it has a lot of noise and quirks.
Kostas
Kostas... The long and short of it is that I think it's okay for people to
post eBay listings. I don't want to put words in John's mouth, but I'm
guessing that he wanted to simply let others on the list know of an
opportunity, which seems neighborly to me. If I run across a good deal on
eBay that
How about sharing the ones you are planing to bid on? Oh That is a different
story, is it?
--
Tim Sherburne wrote:
Kostas... The long and short of it is that I think it's okay for people to
post eBay listings. I don't want to put words in John's mouth, but I'm
guessing that he wanted to
On 20/7/04, graywolf, discombobulated, offered:
How about sharing the ones you are planing to bid on? Oh That is a
different
story, is it?
HAR!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On 19 Jul 2004 at 15:45, Tim Sherburne wrote:
Those of you who feel differently about John's posting need to wake up: The days
of cheap, undiscovered eBay listings on good stuff is ancient history.
I'm sure no one would get upset if the information was shared post auction. You
do have to
On 19 Jul 2004 at 15:45, Tim Sherburne wrote:
Those of you who feel differently about John's posting need to
wake up: The days
of cheap, undiscovered eBay listings on good stuff is ancient history.
I'm not so sure I agree with that, after thinking about this post for a
while I started
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:43:51 -0700, Tim Sherburne wrote:
If I run across a good deal on eBay that I can't use, I'll share
it with the group because I know someone out there can use it.
Please don't. The list has discussed this at least annually since I
came on board in 1998. Each time the
Not rules, Don, just general consensus.
For Sale (and Want To Buy): Pentax stuff anytime. Although many only want to
have to look on Fridays, and prefer For Sale Fridays. Most of us would prefer
that you limit any non-Pentax stuff to Fridays as well.
Ebay: It is all right to mention things YOU
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: Comment and Question (WAS: RE: Apology for)
SO hows about a little FAQ with dos and don'ts and definitions
so us
newbies don't have to rub quite so much fur the wrong way?
Rules are for wimps.
I figure if something
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not
rules, Don, just general consensus.
snip, snip, snip
So, if anyone has additions, changes, or corrections
let me know and I will edit
this and put it up somewhere it can be accessed at
anytime.
Don't believe anything frank says.
-frank
=
The
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not
rules, Don, just general consensus.
snip
Ebay: It is all right to mention things YOU have
up for sale. Do not mention
other stuff until it is over. An exception is
obviously funny and BS stuff like
the 11 million dollar Canon 1Ds digitals, or
I think we can generalize that a bit more. Don't trust anybody that looks like
the easter bunny. GRIN!
--
frank theriault wrote:
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not
rules, Don, just general consensus.
snip, snip, snip
So, if anyone has additions, changes, or corrections
let me know and I
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think
we can generalize that a bit more. Don't
trust anybody that looks like
the easter bunny. GRIN!
Actually, Tom,
I prefer to think that the Easter Bunny looks like me;
not the other way around! g
cheers,
frank
=
The optimist thinks this is
]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PDML Mini FAQ (was Re-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE-- Apology
for)
Not rules, Don, just general consensus.
For Sale (and Want To Buy): Pentax stuff anytime. Although many
only want to
have to look on Fridays
John, I for one don't think you should apologize. In fact, I'd like to thank
you since I wouldn't have seen the listing otherwise.
Those of you who feel differently about John's posting need to wake up: The
days of cheap, undiscovered eBay listings on good stuff is ancient history.
t
On
Thanks Tim
Best regards,
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:45:56 -0700
Subject: Re: Apology for
John, I for one don't think you
It's been a while since we've had apologies on this list. Good to see we're
back on the right track ;-)
Regards,
Lukasz
PS. I'm glad the lens turned out OK. At $20 it's a steal.
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, sometimes you like a bit of softness in a lens, you know, for portraits or
whatever... vbg And, even if he ain't the sharpest lens (which is obviously
not true, anyway), he seems to know a sharp one (m50 1.7) when he sees one.
Should I ever bump into your brother, I won't say a thing to
Next time, stick to something less controversial like which flavor of
Christianity is best . . . 8^)
Cotty wrote:
Folks,
I hereby duly apologise. I should know better but I was stupid enough to
hit the send button before my brain engaged and prevented me. Please
accept my humblest sorrow for initiating what must rank as a verbotten
thread.
For the record, I read:
how hard it is
And right you are to apologize, Cotty. I was looking at Macs in Comp USA
down in Charlotte today. Obviously they are pop sculpture, not working
tools. Any worthwhile computer has to be in an ugly black (or at least
beige) box. Good lord, those apple people don't even know what a computer is
Folks, I am extremely sorry - please ignore a previous original post
under this title from me - it was aimed at a different email list, and
failed miserably as you have seen.
My apologies
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL
No worries, Mike. It baffles me why a light hearted thread about the
Croc Hunter and his endorsement of the Pentax brand came to be used as a
soapbox by gun enthusiasts, who believe that our (Australia's)
government oppresses us by prohibiting the unjustified ownership of
killing implements.
Mike Johnston wrote:
[An apology for an allegedly intemperate post, snipped]
Hey, don't sweat it, Mike. After all, when intemperate posts are outlawed,
only outlaws will be making intemperate posts. And THEN what will we all
do? VBG
Bill Peifer
(proud owner of a copy of The Federalist
ROTFL
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
Hey, don't sweat it, Mike. After all, when intemperate posts are
outlawed,
only outlaws will be making intemperate posts.
(snip)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
That's OK Mike. We are all probably just as sorry for bringing it up in the
first place.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apology
Hey
Mike wrote:
Hey everybody,
I apologize for my intemperate post yesterday objecting to the gun thread
and threatening to leave. I should have thought that one over before hitting
Send. Sorry!
Ah - Good :^)
IMHO, it is best to just let those occassional hot threads
81 matches
Mail list logo
