You can be absolutely sure of getting at least 3 extra
shots. It is clearly written on the packaging. And
none of this silly sunny-bright language.
Jody.
> > Of course one could use AGFA's HDC + which gives
> you 3 free exposures on a
> > 24 exposure roll., that means you get 27 exposures
> for
Great film. On a manual wind camera I always got 28-29
frames from a 24+3 film. The autowind cameras seem to
only give 27 though.
--- dick graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course one could use AGFA's HDC + which gives you
> 3 free exposures on a
> 24 exposure roll., that means you get 27 e
By doing this on my ME, Ricoh body, KX, and other manual wind bodies I
usually get about 40 frames on a roll of film.But if you take the film
to a lab, you can't always count on them not exposing or cutting off frames
at the very beginning or end, so don't shoot anything important on them.
My
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Autoloaded to frame 1
> My friend has a Canon Rebel and one downside to the system is that all the
> frames are numbered backwards from a chronology point of view. The
> mini-labs num
- Original Message -
From: "Ayash Kanto Mukherjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Autoloaded to frame 1
>
> Hi all!
>
> In all the MZ/ZX series cameras that PENTAX has manufactured, the
> autoloading facility advances the film to frame1 as soon as the camera
> back is closed. There are two
Hi Patrick!
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Patrick White wrote:
> My PZ-1p, 37, occasionally 38. Wife's Canon, always 36 (they seem to have
> designed the film transport to do that on purpose).
I am surprised.
> My manual load cameras,
> 36-37 full frames and some partials.
> I can see
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>
> > My friend has a Canon Rebel and one downside to the system is that all the
> > frames are numbered backwards from a chronology point of view. The
> > mini-labs number your prints and these number will be in the opposite orde
On Tue, 15 May 2001, aimcompute wrote:
> They were mine.
>
>
> Paul wrote:
>
> >One can only imagine what
> > priceless photos the world has lost because a camera back was prematurely
> > opened.
>
I am very sorry for that. Did you photographed it again?
Just inquisitive.
Cheers,
Ayash Kant
On Tue, 15 May 2001, dick graham wrote:
> Of course one could use AGFA's HDC + which gives you 3 free exposures on a
> 24 exposure roll., that means you get 27 exposures for the price of
> 24. One of our local supermarkets sells AGFA HDC+ 100 for $1.99 USD.
>
> DG
Sorry, I could not get your
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> :^) just another example of over automation and too much
> technical brouhaha. I can load my Spotmatics in a dark room
> and start shooting as soon as the tongue of the film is once
> around the take-up spool! Even back in
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I have mixed feelings about the Canon system. Certainly for those prone to
> open the back instead of wind the film back, it can be useful. I have only
> opened the back accidentally once on my wife's ZX-10 because she told me
> that the film needed ch
On Tue, 15 May 2001, tom wrote:
>
> Huh? You get 37 frames per long roll. I get 38 rarely, every once in a
> while 36.
Hi Tom!
I have never got 38 exposures (you are quite fortunate from that
sense). The maximum that I got is 37 quite often
and sometimes 36 but it surprised me a lot when I got
Hi,
the extent of damage rather depends on how long the back is open. My
experience has been that only about 4 frames were damaged, namely
those in the region of the shutter. The ones wound round the spool
were all ok, as were those that were still in the can of course. This
was with a Contax RX,
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
>In all the MZ/ZX series cameras that PENTAX has manufactured, the
>autoloading facility advances the film to frame1 as soon as the camera
>back is closed. There are two disadvantages with this system.
>1. You loose two to three frames. I have always noticed that.
>2.
Bruce wrote:
> My friend has a Canon Rebel and one downside to the system is that all the
> frames are numbered backwards from a chronology point of view. The
> mini-labs number your prints and these number will be in the opposite order
> of how you actually took them.
See! Technolo
They were mine.
Paul wrote:
>One can only imagine what
> priceless photos the world has lost because a camera back was prematurely
> opened.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pen
Ayash Kanto wrote:
> > In all the MZ/ZX series cameras that PENTAX has manufactured, the
> > autoloading facility advances the film to frame1 as soon as the camera
> > back is closed. There are two disadvantages with this system.
> > 1. You loose two to three frames. I have always noticed tha
Of course one could use AGFA's HDC + which gives you 3 free exposures on a
24 exposure roll., that means you get 27 exposures for the price of
24. One of our local supermarkets sells AGFA HDC+ 100 for $1.99 USD.
DG
At 09:13 PM 5/15/01 +0530, you wrote:
>Hi all!
>
>In all the MZ/ZX series ca
I have mixed feelings about the Canon system. Certainly for those prone to
open the back instead of wind the film back, it can be useful. I have only
opened the back accidentally once on my wife's ZX-10 because she told me
that the film needed changing. I mistakenly thought that she had shot th
19 matches
Mail list logo