Re: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-14 Thread Frantisek Vlcek
Knut wrote: 2) I use an enlarger lens for macrophotography (I found I get best quality this way). With these lenses I cannot measure the correct exposure time with open diaphragm; only my LX is able to get a proper exposure time if diaphragm is set to f16. Why? I mean why can't you

Re: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-09 Thread Jody
and used LX. The price is roughly equal, Im able to live without AF (but sometimes is useful) and durability of LX is fine for my occassional trekking. But buying a LX - isnt it step back? No, definitely not. I consider the LX a step forward from my MZ-30. I love everything about it.

Re: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-09 Thread Alan Chan
it cost here 1.135,-- US dollars, new MZ-5n now cost about 370 US dollars as used LX in Vienna secodhand shop. For the price of an used LX alone, you might just purchase a brand new Z-1p. regards, Alan Chan _ Get your FREE

RE: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-09 Thread Jody
How Is there some kind of adaptor? I've never heard of this before. Sounds interesting. What does best quality mean to you? How are enlarger lenses classified? ie. do they have 50mm and 85mm, etc; or are they all the same focal length? I am thinking now that the Hanimex that I got shown

RE: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-09 Thread Albano_Garcia
Mick wrote (and my answers are in the middle) : Here's a thought... With an LX plus motor drive etc. costing about as much as a new MZ-S is it really worth buying the LX? / Yes, if you want it instead of the MZ S. There's no universal answer to this question. It depends on what of the

RE: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-08 Thread Mick Maguire
| \/ | \ /---+ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MZ5n versus LX LX. It's a experience every photographer should pass by... You can live without AF, spotmeter

RE: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-08 Thread Skofteland, Christian
h, The LX is an amazing piece of work. Do I like if for it's retro feel... I didn't realize it was retro. If you refer to ugly, bloated and ergonomic as modern then yes I do like the classic look and feel of the LX I like it because it offers everything I need in a camera for the work that

RE: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-08 Thread Knut Knut
Two examples where the LX cannot be replaced: 1) Taking a shot of a building across a moderately busy street: I have a black cap in my camerabag, whenever a single or group of cars passes I hold it in front of the lens to avoid white and red light streaks; the LX automatically compensates on

Re: MZ5n versus LX

2001-11-08 Thread David A. Mann
Mike Johnston scribed: Well, the LX is far more popular in Albano's Favorite Body survey. Yeah... far more so than the K2 I voted for :) I found out that the guy I know at work who owns two LXes has once again decided to buy a digital camera so he's likely to sell me an LX :) He knows