Brendan MacRae wrote:
This is a series for a magazine article about Myrna
Galle, a local dance teacher. Myrna is a former
soloist of the NYC Ballet and was a member of the
Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo. She also coregraphed many
Broadway shows and was the lead dancer in the touring
show of The
--- Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More than a few lovely shots in there Brendan. Cool
gig, I'm envious.
Derby
Thanks, Derby. The young ladies were a bit camera shy
but they were all charming.
-Brendan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Brendan,
Very nice job!
I especially liked seeing the faces fo the girls as part of the story.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
This is a series for a magazine article about Myrna
Galle, a local dance teacher. Myrna
Thanks, Bob. That was the idea. Of course, I still
have to get my model releases signed since I forgot to
last week!
-Brendan
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan,
Very nice job!
I especially liked seeing the faces fo the girls as
part of the story.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a series for a magazine article about Myrna
Galle, a local dance teacher. Myrna is a former
soloist of the NYC Ballet and was a member of the
Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo. She also coregraphed many
Broadway shows
Thanks, Frank.
-Brendan
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a series for a magazine article about
Myrna
Galle, a local dance teacher. Myrna is a former
soloist of the NYC Ballet and was a member
Nice series Brendan. Some so-sos, but many good keepers.
Congrats..
Joseph McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 26, 2008, at 21:55 , Brendan MacRae wrote:
This is a series for a magazine article about Myrna
Galle, a local dance teacher. Myrna is a former
soloist of the NYC Ballet and was a
In a message dated 11/26/2008 9:55:49 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
K20, K10, (2x) 540 flashes + boosters, two stands with
umbrellas, DA* 16-50, DA 10-17, A85 1.4, FA 31 ltd.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/the_dancers/index.html
I'm still futzing with these selects
Jerome,
I looked at your initial wedding photos and congratulations on a
successful shoot.
You also teach me why I don't want to do this.
I can't see myself post processing 800 or 1,000+ RAW files onto 400
finished photos!
(Maybe more...?!!)
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:54 AM,
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Shots from 1st wedding
Jerome,
I looked at your initial wedding photos and congratulations on a
successful shoot.
You also teach me why I don't want to do this.
I can't see myself post processing 800 or 1,000+ RAW files onto 400
Jerome: Nice work. I actually like the bws a lot
So do I. Actually, they're not fully BW, as I'm sure the purists on the
list have already sniffed out. I desaturated down to about 90%, and for
some reason I liked the hue it left a lot better than 100% conversion. But
I'll keep playing with it.
To shoot more than that
makes the photographer into a pest,
and removes what little pleasure the
bride and groom can
hope to have during the day.
Then I guess I was one hell of a pest!
But as you alluded to, most of my volume was from two things: shooting
digital and being a novice. Between
You also teach me why I don't want to do this.
I can't see myself post processing 800 or
1,000+ RAW files onto 400
finished photos!
(Maybe more...?!!)
I guess I'm a sick man... I actually enjoy the editing process. Just wish
I had more time to do so. Stupid day job gets in the way every
9esaturating to 80-90% is a trick I often use, especially when
shooting in low-light incandescent situations, you get a really nice
look to shots like that.
-Adam
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerome: Nice work. I actually like the bws a lot
So do I.
- Original Message -
From: Jerome
Subject: Re: Shots from 1st wedding
To shoot more than that
makes the photographer into a pest,
and removes what little pleasure the
bride and groom can
hope to have during the day.
Then I guess I was one hell of a pest!
Sorry, no insult
To shoot more than that
makes the photographer into a pest,
Then I guess I was one hell of a pest!
Sorry, no insult intended.
None taken! I was being funny (well... obviously not) but I guess I forgot
the smiley faces and whatnot to indicate that.
As an example, one of the must
have
It will matter if you miss those shots
entirely, but as long as you have
someting there from that part of the day,
your all god, and you haven't annoyed anyone.
All God? Wow... I never knew wedding photography would elevate me to deity
status. Talk about awesome fringe benefits. (insert
- Original Message -
From: Jerome
Subject: Re: Shots from 1st wedding
Ah, an ADHD photographer
I'm sorry... what where we talking about?
HAR!!
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Jerome: Nice work. I actually like the bws a lot, but my overall fav is
9122--the expressions of the flower girls/bridesmaids (?) are great. Really
great there. Congrats on your first wedding shoot. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/22 Fri PM 06:50:48 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
For those of us waiting for a K20D, here's a blog that sent me an
update
From: John Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/22 Fri PM 09:34:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
Being confused is my normal state. Howeveris the worst poosible
refer to an friend of eyore's? And what would a stuffed animal do
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/22 Fri PM 10:05:51 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
Isn't it strange. I'm not tempted
On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
For those of us waiting for a K20D, here's a blog that
sent me an
update today.
Good stuff from one of the featured 'Pentax
Photographers' - Dr Mark
Dimalanta (ala Godfrey DiG.).
Huh? Mark and I are definitely two
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
Oh well.
Each one comes with a latex clad middle aged lady.
Sadly, that is not one of the three things I am waiting for in a Pentax DSLR.
It is about as
likely as two of them, though.
It's
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/23 Sat PM 04:07:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
Oh well.
Each one comes
Quoting mike wilson, who wrote on Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 06:14:30PM + ..
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/23 Sat PM 04:07:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
I can't tell you about the used market, but Circuit City has the Canon
5D for 3.5 K USD. I must say it's a honkin' big camera.
Carlos Royo wrote:
Cotty escribió:
On 22/02/08, Carlos Royo, discombobulated, unleashed:
I understand your feelings, Cotty. I feel the same when I look at
5D's a little bit bigger than the K10D. Wouldn't call it honkin' big. A 1D is.
And Circuit City's pricing is hilarious. With a little hunting I can
get a 5D new for 2.2K CDN. List is $2400 or so. They haven't been
$3500 new in 18 months.
-Adam
On 2/23/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/23/08, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty escribió:
On 22/02/08, Carlos Royo, discombobulated, unleashed:
I understand your feelings, Cotty. I feel the same when I look at
Canon's offerings.
Oh don't get me wrong - I'm not tempted by those either.
The only two
On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
For those of us waiting for a K20D, here's a blog that sent me an
update today.
Good stuff from one of the featured 'Pentax Photographers' - Dr Mark
Dimalanta (ala Godfrey DiG.).
Huh? Mark and I are definitely two separate people ... !??
Godfrey,
I've had the pleasure of meeting you and know you are not surfer Mark.
My reference was to the fact that you are both featured on the Pentax
site as 'Pentax Photographers'.
On the other hand, if you wanted to confuse me with some lean, tanned
surfer dude, I'd be flattered. :-)
On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:32, Bob Sullivan wrote:
For those of us waiting for a K20D, here's a blog that sent me an
update today.
Good stuff from one of the featured 'Pentax Photographers' - Dr Mark
Dimalanta (ala Godfrey DiG.).
Feedback with pictures from an experienced user!
Very
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/
I want this camera in the worst possible way.
Nah, the worst poosible way would be for the salesclerk to stave your head in
with it. I'm
thinking I want one in the best
Ah ... I just didn't understand the use of the (ala Godfrey
DiGiorgi) bit in your comment.
A lean, tanned surfer dude (good) with a new baby (mmm, not my
department) I am not. But I'll take the former as description if you
like. ];-)
G
On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I want one the way Bill wants one.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/
I want this camera
William Robb wrote:
From: Charles Robinson
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/
I want this camera in the worst possible way.
Nah, the worst poosible way would be for the salesclerk to stave your head in
with it. I'm
thinking I want one in the best possible way, which involves naked women and
Robinson
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/
I want this camera in the worst possible way.
Nah, the worst poosible way would be for the salesclerk to stave your head in
with it. I'm
thinking I want one in the best possible way, which involves naked women
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of us waiting for a K20D, here's a blog that sent me an update
today.
Good stuff from one of the featured 'Pentax Photographers' - Dr Mark
Dimalanta (ala Godfrey DiG.).
Feedback with pictures from an
Isn't it strange. I'm not tempted in the slightest.
Oh well.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No one wants this camera more than me. I'd satisfied with K100D Super
expecting the birth of this K20D baby.
;)
--
K100D Super, DA10-17mm, DA16-45mm, DA50-200mm, Dörr DStudio strobes
roman.blakout.net http://roman.blakout.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The worst way I could imagine receiving it would be in a box full of
product after an elephant swallowed it...
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:32, Bob Sullivan wrote:
For those of us waiting for a K20D, here's a blog that sent me an
update today.
Good stuff from one of
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
Isn't it strange. I'm not tempted in the slightest.
Oh well.
Each one comes with a latex clad middle aged lady.
WW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Very interesting..
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/
Regards, Bob S.
He ~calls~ himself a pro, but we all know he can't be if he shoots
with Pentax...
;-)
I saw a pro with a Pentax last night when I was jogging. There was a
bit of a production number going on by the river,
Cotty escribió:
Isn't it strange. I'm not tempted in the slightest.
Oh well.
I understand your feelings, Cotty. I feel the same when I look at
Canon's offerings.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:12:00PM -, Bob W wrote:
Very interesting..
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/
Regards, Bob S.
He ~calls~ himself a pro, but we all know he can't be if he shoots
with Pentax...
;-)
I saw a pro with a Pentax last night when I was
I don't think he wants any of those either.
Godfrey
On Feb 22, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Carlos Royo wrote:
I understand your feelings, Cotty. I feel the same when I look at
Canon's offerings.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler
Subject: Re: Slide Scanning at Costco
Thanks Bill. I will ask them
I just made some 8.5 x 11's from one of the scans and the same view
that I had scanned before.Their scan is far superior to mine.
Presuming they are running a Noritsu
Cotty wrote:
On 22/02/08, Carlos Royo, discombobulated, unleashed:
I understand your feelings, Cotty. I feel the same when I look at
Canon's offerings.
Oh don't get me wrong - I'm not tempted by those either.
The only two things I could possibly be tempted by are another R-D1, or
a
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Shots from a new K20D
I've been wondering about the upcoming Sigma Sigma DP-1.
Is that anything like Pizza Pizza?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Feb 22, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've been wondering about the upcoming Sigma Sigma DP-1. I'm
anxious to
see image samples when it (finally) comes on the market.
I've given up waiting for it. It will have to be something very very
special to be worth my paying money money
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been wondering about the upcoming Sigma Sigma DP-1. I'm
anxious to
see image samples when it (finally) comes on the market.
I've given up waiting for it. It will have to be something very very
special to
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 22, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've been wondering about the upcoming Sigma Sigma DP-1. I'm
anxious to
see image samples when it (finally) comes on the market.
I've given up waiting for it. It will have to be something very very
special to be
I'm hoping the day will come when I'll decide to get one. I truly hope
it proves its tech ability.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
what were we talking about here? ]'-)
Um, I don't *not* want one, but I'm not desperate for one either.
When the
Cotty escribió:
On 22/02/08, Carlos Royo, discombobulated, unleashed:
I understand your feelings, Cotty. I feel the same when I look at
Canon's offerings.
Oh don't get me wrong - I'm not tempted by those either.
The only two things I could possibly be tempted by are another R-D1, or
a
Well, Chris,
First of all, I like the colour shot more. There's something about the bw
shot that just doesn't look like real bw to me. It just seems too soft
(which the colour doesn't, to me), and it's not really contrasty enough.
I'm not sure what to make of the image in and of itself. It
I think you should extract the musician from the color image, put him in the
BW image and desaturate the color by about 50%.
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
You know, Chris,
If there's one thing I hate, it's someone telling me if you'd have done
this, or gotten that, or changed the angle, or whatever, your shot would be
so much better. My attitude about my shots is, the shot's the shot. Don't
tell me what could have been. It is what you see, so
Now that I know that frank, I'll be careful on how I
critique your photos.
frank theriault wrote:
You know, Chris,
If there's one thing I hate, it's someone telling me if you'd have done
this, or gotten that, or changed the angle, or whatever, your shot would be
so much better. My
the links didn't work for me
Alan
Chris wrote:
Whist these shots were taken with a N***N,*istD unavailable,and they are my
first offering,(God!)I would appreciate some feedback s'il vous plait.
www.pbase.com/image/26052290
www.pbase.com/image/26052996
I can't decide whether I like the Colour or
Oops!
That is what I get for working on this so late at night - and a couple more
pages too.
I will go in and correct at some point.
Thanks,
César
Panama City, Florida
awaiting snow(?) in Dayton, Ohio
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent:
City, Florida
in Dayton, Ohio
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:17 AM
-- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Cc: Dan Scott
-- Subject: Re: Shots of the wear on my Limited lenses.
--
--
--
-- On Wednesday, November 20, 2002
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Doug Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:20 AM
--
-- On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:10:00 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
--
-- http://cesar_abdul.home.mindspring.com/limwear.html
--
-- I think some of your slashes are backwards.
--
-- -Original Message-
-- From: David A. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:41 AM
--
--
-- Doug Franklin wrote:
--
--http://cesar_abdul.home.mindspring.com/limwear.html
--
-- I think some of your slashes are backwards.
--
-- Nope, they're all
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Thanks for the input. I cannot change the site name now, but it is
something I will have to think about.
No problem. Its not your fault... quite a few people seem to be setting
up sites with underscores but the domain name registrars are at fault for
allowing it
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 09:54 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
As promised earlier, if anyone is keeping score, I just put up some
shots
of the battle scars of my Limited lenses.
I was in error earlier. The 31 is still spotless, but its cap isn't.
The
77 though has not been as
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:10:00 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
http://cesar_abdul.home.mindspring.com/limwear.html
I think some of your slashes are backwards.
Nope, they're all correct for a URL. Pretty much only Internet
Exploder will understand using backslash (\) in a URL, and
backslashes aren't
Dan's post is quoted below, and my comment is: The link works fine for me.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 09:54 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
As promised earlier, if anyone is keeping score, I just put up some
shots
of the battle scars of my Limited lenses.
I was in error
Interesting photos. I wonder too about the wear on the engraving, the
aperture ring is metal on the Limiteds? If so, that's a point for the
Limiteds, as I wish my lenses, even the metal ones that are new, have
plastic rings. Hey, wait a second here, what am I doing eh, going from
metal to
Doug Franklin wrote:
http://cesar_abdul.home.mindspring.com/limwear.html
I think some of your slashes are backwards.
Nope, they're all correct for a URL. Pretty much only Internet
Exploder will understand using backslash (\) in a URL, and
backslashes aren't legal within a URL according
I really like the first one, high20.jpg. Something about the tones and
focus, especially around the guitar, is very appealing.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 8/4/2002 8:20:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really like the first one, high20.jpg.
Thanks Steven. That was one of the better shots I got that night.
-Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On 2 Aug 2002 at 18:16, Artur Ledóchowski wrote:
It seems that NGH II 800 nicely compensates for different color temperature of
the available light. It's grain and sharpness seems to be really good, too. I
definitely have to give it a try... I especially like the pic of the woman
looking up.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Shots from tonight
Shot 2 rolls of NHGII 800 with
It seems that NGH II 800 nicely compensates for different color temperature
of the available light. It's grain and sharpness seems to be really good,
too. I definitely
Rob.
I wonder, does your Olympus have slow speed flash sync?
I have found that these smaller gigs with their limited lighting ie no white follow
spots, often benefit from a slow speed with fill approach - around 1/8th or so often
works. I know we are not supposed to use flash but Frits has a
In a message dated 8/2/2002 7:17:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did the old trick of leaving the LX on 1/2000 for half a
roll of Delta 3200 DOH!
UGH! I've done this myself!
Rob, I totally sympathize with your plight here. It's a tricky environment to
shoot
Nice shots Rob, you have to get a film scanner to show us the rest!!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:17 AM
Subject: Shots from tonight
Hi Team,
I was asked to shoot a mates band for some
In a message dated 8/2/2002 3:38:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Nicely done on that tri-x shot, Brendan. Looks like it really captured the
moment well.
Thanks, T. Tri-X is a favorite of mine, it never fails.
-Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cesar
Matamoros II
I finally got around to doing a quick scan of some
images taken during the
get together in May at Roosevelt Island in the Potomac
River. That was
followed by dinner in
78 matches
Mail list logo
