On 28/02/2014, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 2014, at 2:14 am, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
It looks like a 3 or 4 color separation offset print so my guess would be
with Paul that it is a photo of an image printed in a magazine.
Is the same pattern visible if you
On 28/02/2014, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
Under a 10x loupe I can only barely make out that there are separated
primary colours so this detail is is incredibly fine. If it is a photo of a
print then it's a really very seriously bloody sharp one.
Or I'll read Steve's post next and
See if anyone here can help:
www.rps.org/special-interest-groups/historical
B
On 28 Feb 2014, at 02:43, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a reply from the camera shop:
---
Our in-store committee thinks it might be a copy-neg/slide from a litho
original, hence seeing all the
It looks like a 3 or 4 color separation offset print so my guess would
be with Paul that it is a photo of an image printed in a magazine.
Is the same pattern visible if you look at the print directly under a
loup? I assume it is there. If not it would probably be a scanning artifact.
Sounds
On Mar 1, 2014, at 2:14 am, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
It looks like a 3 or 4 color separation offset print so my guess would be
with Paul that it is a photo of an image printed in a magazine.
Is the same pattern visible if you look at the print directly under a loup? I
assume it
Might it be a photo of an old picture post card?
For what it's worth, plug this number into Google Maps:
-43.606235,172.645487
... and go to street view, looking SE.
On 2/27/2014 4:57 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I suspect that someone photographed magazine pages. I don’t think the
dot pattern
on 2014-02-28 11:37 David Mann wrote
I took the opportunity to bring the slide along so we could look at it under
the microscope and we managed to get a photo by holding her iPhone up to the
eyepiece. I was skeptical but it came out rather well. This is a crop of the
full-size photo to
On Mar 1, 2014, at 9:18 am, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-02-28 11:37 David Mann wrote
I took the opportunity to bring the slide along so we could look at it under
the microscope and we managed to get a photo by holding her iPhone up to the
eyepiece. I was skeptical but it
on 2014-02-28 14:03 David Mann wrote
I might be getting somewhere...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paget_process
yes, that is close; i found some samples of the Paget pattern, and it appears
somewhat different from your slide, e.g.:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 10:03:06AM +1300, David Mann wrote:
On Mar 1, 2014, at 9:18 am, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-02-28 11:37 David Mann wrote
I might be getting somewhere...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paget_process
...but 1951 seems awfully late for such a
On Mar 1, 2014, at 10:46 am, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-02-28 14:03 David Mann wrote
I might be getting somewhere...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paget_process
yes, that is close; i found some samples of the Paget pattern, and it appears
somewhat different from your
Great sleuthing and an interesting printing process!
Mark
On 2/28/2014 4:46 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2014-02-28 14:03 David Mann wrote
I might be getting somewhere...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paget_process
yes, that is close; i found some samples of the Paget pattern, and it
appears
David Mann wrote:
On Mar 1, 2014, at 10:46 am, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-02-28 14:03 David Mann wrote
I might be getting somewhere...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paget_process
yes, that is close; i found some samples of the Paget pattern, and it
appears somewhat
On Mar 1, 2014, at 1:22 pm, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
This is a really fascinating investigation! Would you like me to call
my friend at the George Eastman House and see if they have any more
information on this?
That'd be great if you could. I thought about sending an
David Mann wrote:
On Mar 1, 2014, at 1:22 pm, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
This is a really fascinating investigation! Would you like me to call
my friend at the George Eastman House and see if they have any more
information on this?
That'd be great if you could. I thought
I suspect that someone photographed magazine pages. I don’t think the dot
pattern is in the film.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2014, at 4:32 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's something the more experienced photographers might be able to help me
with...
Among these old slides I've been
Unless it is Polachrome:
http://blog.timesunion.com/chuckmiller/playing-with-polaroids-polachrome-instant-slide-film/5835/
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Paul Stenquist
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Strange old colour film
I
However, Polachrome was 1983 (I shot a couple rolls back then), not 1951.
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Paul Stenquist
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Strange old colour film
I suspect that someone photographed magazine pages. I
on 2014-02-27 14:32 David Mann wrote
Here's something the more experienced photographers might be able to help me
with...
Among these old slides I've been scanning are a handful of colour ones which
are not part of the Australian stuff. A few of these colour ones (but not all)
appear to
On Feb 28, 2014, at 12:27 pm, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
can you post a snip at 100%?
OK since it's started raining and I have nothing better to do I've rescanned a
section at 4800ppi. It just gets weirder.
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/777/
It's definitely RGB but in a
At first glance I wonder if they were created with some early type of film
recorder.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I had a reply from the camera shop:
---
Our in-store committee thinks it might be a copy-neg/slide from a litho
original, hence seeing all the lines from the pre-press screens used in the
print process.
If not that, then we’re in the dark too.
---
I'm interested to know what others think.
I wonder whether the image is the result of an early scanning process, perhaps
a wirephoto? I don't
think it could be the result of one of the late 19th. early 20th.century colour
film processes, as
the colour bands suggest some sort of mechanical scan, rather than the random
arrangement of
23 matches
Mail list logo
