Heh!
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 8:33 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
You ain't been here long enough to know what bubbin' over is son...
Gautam
, 2005 8:57 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
The notion of requiring some sort of moral ground for one nation or one
person to object to the brutal actions of another is absurd.
Should you be
burglarized, your kin be brutalized and your neighbor witness
Gautam Sarup wrote:
That's right, I _do_ judge such things. I do my best though I haven't
reached the status of being the VOICE OF REASON.
Well SOMEBODY has to be it. :) I don't agree with Bob on everything and I
suspect that he does not *expect* everyone, or anyone in particular, to
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Bob Blakely wrote:
I think it important to let folks talk as they wish. Otherwise, how would we
know the fools among us. Hell, if they kept their mouths shut, we might think
them wise. Occasional lapses of judgment aside (we all have them) we learn
who is worth listening
In a message dated 8/22/2005 4:02:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense is
to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To assume
that the President of the US, Prime Minister of Briton,
You ain't been here long enough to know what bubbin' over is son...
Gautam Sarup wrote:
Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely.
Brewing nicely? This pot bubbleth over.
Obviously it hasn't been watched very
intently.
Gautam
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 8/22/2005 4:02:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense is
to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To assume
that the President of the US,
Now how did you leap to that!
Most reasonable folks would know that the statement applies to whatever the
subject matter is. We all have different areas of expertise wherein we are
competent. Of course there are those who just love to think the worst of
people and are eager to jump on
At 04:48 PM 8/22/2005, keithw wrote:
Please, the both of you, will you either find something more appropriate
to discuss, or at least take this conversation off the list? Please?
I subscribed to the Pentax Camera list, not the Pentagon Critique list.
;-)
Oddly enough, you get what is out
William Robb wrote:
We in the US had a President some years back by the name of Richard
Nixon. He uttered a line that became somewhat famous: I am not a
crook. My reply was meant to be a play on that old phrase.
Didn't he turn out to be a crook?
They (politicians) are all crooks.
Tom
.
Regards, Bob S.
On 8/22/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Glen
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
I wonder if this thread will ever get back to protecting the rights of
photographers to use their Pentax cameras for whatever peaceful
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Launching a war simply because you want to (maybe just for political reasons)
I think all wars are fought for political reasons.
and convincing others it is a good thing, is certainly different from
responding to an outright attack
All true, except that the Japanese were waging an aggressive war of
imperial expansion on the Chinese mainland, (where the Japanese army
used rape and plague as weapons), and had previously fought a short
undeclared war with the Soviet Union, (in which Marshal Zhukov handed
them their heads),
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking? Interesting
perspective.
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Launching a war simply because you want to (maybe just for
This one time, at band camp, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No, those are your words. I made no point about justification and we
have all seen how Americans
This one time, at band camp, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was probably impossible to
avoid conflict with the Japanese without ceding them hegemony over Asia
and the Western Pacific.
I think you may be right here, the whole mess was believed to have started
with the San Francisco
I attempted to take no high ground, moral or otherwise.
I just responded to your preposterous statement that Pearl Harbour was
the result of failed US foreign policy. The attack was the direct
result of the attempt by the Japanese govenment of that time to gain
miltary control over the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22. august 2005 15:30
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking? Interesting
perspective.
Kevin Waterson wrote
On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Children(addressing all of you). This is not a Pentax or photo related
subject, can you please stop behaving like .
Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely. Don't be such a killjoy. Just needs a
few more days and a couple more ingredients and
On Aug 22, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Cotty wrote:
Children(addressing all of you). This is not a Pentax or photo
related
subject, can you please stop behaving like .
Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely. Don't be such a killjoy. Just
needs a
few more days and a couple more ingredients and it'll
On 22/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
...like a good festering boil, eh?
Yup - just needs a nice white-hot lance to pierce it at just the right
moment LOL
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
)
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22. august 2005 18:29
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Children(addressing all of you). This is not a Pentax or photo related
Kevin, Shut the hell up before you alienate any more people.
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No,
At 09:34 AM 8/22/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No, those are your words. I made no point about
I agree.
I didn't start this detour, and I avoided it as long as I could, but
some things just seem to demand answer. I apologize for taking the bait
and engaging in political debate here, where I agree it does not
belong. I know better.
Glen wrote:
At 09:34 AM 8/22/2005, Kevin Waterson
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Launching a war simply because you want to (maybe just for political reasons)
I think all wars are fought for political reasons.
and convincing others it is a good thing, is certainly different from
responding
P. J. Alling wrote:
All true, except that the Japanese were waging an aggressive war of
imperial expansion on the Chinese mainland, (where the Japanese army
used rape and plague as weapons), and had previously fought a short
undeclared war with the Soviet Union, (in which Marshal Zhukov
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking? Interesting
perspective.
Oh, did he say that?
Interesting interpretation of what he said.
keith whaley
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one
Glen wrote:
At 09:34 AM 8/22/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Daniel J. Matyola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No, those are your words. I made no
This one time, at band camp, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest that you read flyboys by James Bradley, especially those
parts that deal with the manner in which the military of Japan dominated
the government and distorted the samurai code of bushido into a a
military
This one time, at band camp, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin, Shut the hell up before you alienate any more people.
I love it when you order me about.
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
This one time, at band camp, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems China might be heading a similar direction with Taiwan...
I sincerely hope not.
I hope not also, I would not know what side to back.
But this would be another whole discussion on its own. Sino-Thaiwanese
relationships are
This one time, at band camp, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup - just needs a nice white-hot lance to pierce it at just the right
moment LOL
Sorry to dissappoint you, I bowwed out :)
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb
On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
I might do something even worse, ignore you.
sorry, who are you again?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 23/8/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry to dissappoint you, I bowwed out :)
That's it? What's this list coming too. Years gone by, you coulda
guaranteed a good thrashing for a while. Now it's apologies and bowing
out. Frankly I'm disgusted. I suppose you'll want to bring
Cotty wrote:
On 23/8/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry to dissappoint you, I bowwed out :)
That's it? What's this list coming too. Years gone by, you coulda
guaranteed a good thrashing for a while. Now it's apologies and bowing
out. Frankly I'm disgusted. I suppose
. august 2005 23:34
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
On 22/8/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
I might do something even worse, ignore you.
sorry, who are you again?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places
On 22/8/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
We should choose someone who sometimes uses Canon or Nikon equipment,
writes to the list prolifically and has been around a long time. Do you
have any suggestions?
H. H.
Nope. Can't think of a single soul.
exuent stage left
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:16:30PM +0100, Cotty wrote:
On 22/8/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
We should choose someone who sometimes uses Canon or Nikon equipment,
writes to the list prolifically and has been around a long time. Do you
have any suggestions?
H. H.
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see no further way
forward for educational purposes,
How does this represent any change from your earlier interpretations?
Lewis
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger!
Regarding Eactivist's post:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense is
to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To assume
that the President of the US, Prime Minister of Briton, Prime Minister of
Australia have such powers. To assert
All this making nicey nicey is pretty sickening. I think we
should roast the living hell out of somebody. I hereby open
nominations for appointment to Official PDML Whipping Person
(we can't limit our options here). Frank has unofficially
served in that capacity for a number of years so
underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23. august 2005 01:16
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights (please behave
I think it important to let folks talk as they wish. Otherwise, how would we
know the fools among us. Hell, if they kept their mouths shut, we might
think them wise. Occasional lapses of judgment aside (we all have them) we
learn who is worth listening to and who is worth dismissing.
Regards,
I'll slap you around too, if you like...
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin, Shut the hell up before you alienate any more people.
I love it when you order me about.
Kevin
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run
Bob Blakely wrote:
Regarding Eactivist's post:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense
is to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To
assume that the President of the US, Prime Minister of Briton, Prime
Minister of Australia have such
From: Bob Blakely wrote:
The United States and the United Kingdom reacted to Japanese military
actions
Those actions as you called them were Imperialism and brutality
on a grand
scale.
On what possible moral ground could the United Kingdom in the 1940's
object to Imperialism and
Aw c'mon, this is brewing nicely.
Brewing nicely? This pot bubbleth over.
Obviously it hasn't been watched very
intently.
Gautam
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights (please behave)
BWYou could try narrowing it down a bit so that it excludes some
people...
This is constructive!
We need a big guy, who enjoys a fight, and can take a lot of whipping.
Get Cakalic a can
In response to
We need a big guy, who enjoys a fight, and can take a lot of whipping.
William Robb wrote:
Get Cakalic a can of Dream Whip and a French Maid's outfit and I expect
he'd be up to it.
WW
Hey don't mention my name in the same sentence as French Maid's outfit!
Tom C.
The notion of requiring some sort of moral ground for one nation or one
person to object to the brutal actions of another is absurd. Should you be
burglarized, your kin be brutalized and your neighbor witness it, perhaps he
should not intervene in as much he's only been out 5 years after a 7
This one time, at band camp, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And by the way, I remember that there were conflicts in Afghanistan,
Angola, Mozambique and Central America in that time frame, but for the
life of me I can't remember any sort of wars in the Caribbean during the
Carter
To add to Peter's list, the President of the Committee of Safety (those were
the guys who started the whole affair) was David Rittenhouse. That is about as far back
as you can go and claim that it had anything to do with the United States.
No, he was not an ancestor of mine, although family
In a message dated 8/20/2005 11:49:46 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
didn't bring up Clinton because, what with Haiti and Somalia, I
thought there might be room for argument.
=
Well, sort of. But as I recall, Clinton didn't START anything. And our
involvement was
The reactionary press at the time...
The War Starts on March 24, 1999! At approximately 1830 UTC the first bombs
were dropped on Kosovo. Mr. Clinton really has no idea of what he is going
to accomplish with this action. All we know is that US lives will probably
be lost in this military
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I see a difference between the U.S. having heavy involvement and light
involvement and a president starting it or not.
I wonder if the families of those killed see the difference.
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a
At 04:52 PM 8/21/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I see a difference between the U.S. having heavy involvement and light
involvement and a president starting it or not.
I wonder if the families of those killed see the difference.
I
I wonder if this thread will ever get back to protecting the rights of
photographers to use their Pentax cameras for whatever peaceful
law-abiding
purpose they see fit? ;-)
The rights of photographers to use all kinds of cameras
without regard to media, colour or national origin. :)
- Original Message -
From: Glen
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
I wonder if this thread will ever get back to protecting the rights of
photographers to use their Pentax cameras for whatever peaceful
law-abiding purpose they see fit? ;-)
So last night, I decided I wanted
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny thing is he probably did more good than any president in US history,
but the only thing he is remembered for is Watergate.
===
Personally, I can think of quite a few presidents
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars, Nixon
seems to have been commited to ending them.
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last president
_NOT_ involved in a
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
president
_NOT_ involved in a military conflict?
Kind regards
Kevin
==
Uh. Taft?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Gerald Ford, (maybe, at least no major conflicts durring his
administration).
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars, Nixon
seems to have been commited to ending them.
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
president
_NOT_ involved in a military conflict?
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars, Nixon
seems to have been commited to ending them.
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last
president
_NOT_ involved in a military conflict?
Kind regards
Kevin
==
Uh. Taft?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and
only lived a month?
you had a month-old president!?
--
Cheers,
Bob
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking of which, who was the first president of the US?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
you had a month-old president!?
GDubya, with a cherry tree instead of a bush, AFAIK.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 7:15 PM
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking
a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
- Socrates
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
In a message dated 8/20/2005 8:02:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I dont know a great deal about
@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking of which, who was the first president of the US?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
you had a month-old president!?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 8:02:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 7:14:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 August 2005 18:15
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking of which, who was the first president of the US?
Shel
Articles of Confederation -- John Hanson
New Federal Constitution -- George Washington
But just in case you were referring to the Continental Congress --
Peyton Randolph
(I had to look that one up).
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes - it was in this country's infancy.
Speaking of which, who was
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny thing is he probably did more good than any president in US history,
but the only thing he is remembered for is Watergate.
===
Personally, I can think of quite a few presidents who did more for this
country. But
Oh yea, just forget about the war in Kosovo and throwing missiles arround...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 8:02:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Moro Wars. (Aftermath of the Philippine Insurrection).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message
On 20/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Other than not keeping his you-know-what in his pants, he was a pretty good
president. 8 years of peace and prosperity.
Okay, pardon me but this joke isn't bad and seems like a good place to
chuck it in...
ROTFLMFAO
Dave (wiping tears from his eyes)
On 8/21/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Other than not keeping his you-know-what in his pants, he was a pretty good
president. 8 years of peace and prosperity.
Okay, pardon me but
At 10:12 AM 8/20/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars,
Nixon
seems to have been commited to ending them.
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and
only lived a month?
you had a month-old president!?
He just acts that way.
HAR!!
WW
This one time, at band camp, Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you only counting major wars, or are you including all military actions
abroad?
Any military action is an act of war. This rubbish about police actions and the
like wears a little thin very quickly, especially for those on the
This one time, at band camp, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and only lived a
month? William Henry Harrison. Anybody since him?
As to recent presidents hell-bent on starting wars, I don't recall which
wars Ford and Carter started.
Give that man a Kewpie doll! Very good Peter. Washington was actually the
eighth President of the US.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: P. J. Alling
Articles of Confederation -- John Hanson
New Federal Constitution -- George Washington
But just in case you were referring to the
Hi Bob ... Nope, it's not a trick question. Think about this for a moment:
The country was officially formed on March 1, 1781 with the adoption of The
Articles of Confederation. Washington was inaugurated in April of 1789. We
were not leaderless during those years before Washington became
Why hasn't anybody told the White House?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2005 01:30
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Give that man a Kewpie doll! Very good Peter. Washington
No, Shel, we weren't leaderless. Neither was there a President of the United
States. Rather, there was a President of the Congress of the Confederation
which operated under the Articles of Confederation.
Lewis
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bob ... Nope, it's not a trick
Washington?
And why did George Washington get a state *and* a city named after him, but
Peyton only got a Place?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2005 01:37
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The Photographer's
Well, considering the powers of the presidency under the Articles of
Confederation, maybe we were...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Bob ... Nope, it's not a trick question. Think about this for a moment:
The country was officially formed on March 1, 1781 with the adoption of The
Articles of
Washington?
And why did George Washington get a state *and* a city named after him, but
Peyton only got a Place?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2005 01:37
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about the one who caught cold at his inauguration and only lived a
month? William Henry Harrison. Anybody since him?
As to recent presidents hell-bent on starting wars, I don't recall which
wars
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Washington got a city named after him because he was instrumental in
getting the Federal City built
But why did Peyton only get a Place?
WW
He was the head of a body much like the UN but smaller with less power.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Washington got a city named after him because he was instrumental in
getting the Federal City built
But why
: The Photographer's Rights
Bob Blakely wrote:
Valid and rational conclusion, or not, that IS what happens in
the normal
course of human events. Further, the chicken was absolutely
right - until
it's death. If I'm crapped on continually in ANY situation by people of
some different
In a message dated 8/17/2005 1:00:00 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Left Liberal.
Ditto.
Fred
=
Yeah, yeah. I don't even have to take the test to know that. Ditto, ditto.
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 8/17/2005 3:36:55 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bertrand Russell gave an example to demonstrate the often weak conclusions
you can reach by induction. A chicken woke up every morning and was fed by
the farmer. The chicken concluded that he would be fed
Gautam Sarup wrote:
Unfortunately they come with their own kooks:
I am not a kook.
Denial noted but what is it in reference to?
It was mostly in jest. I am a Libertarian and I strongly believe that we
have far too much government (hmaybe that does make me a kook in
the eyes of a
Sounds like a democracy to me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
So what we've really established in this discussion is: No matter how
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
We in the US had a President some years back by the name of Richard
Nixon. He uttered a line that became somewhat famous: I am not a
crook. My reply was meant to be a play on that old phrase.
Didn't he
Just to clarify. The government outlawed semi automatic firearms. Not all guns.
A friend of mine had a .22 semi-automatic rifle. The government bought
it off him as part of the buy back scheme implemented after the Port
Arthur shooting. He used the money to buy a more powerful .22 magnum
bolt
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
