I suppose I don't count because I am not a gear head. Other than the low ISO I
am so happy with my K10d...
But there is one reason I would want full frame: wide angle would be wide
again. My Zenitar semi-fisheye would be a real 16mm lens again.
That would be cool...
Cheers,
frank
---
On 7/2/13, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Buying the newest Corvette Stingray wouldn't make Paul Stenquist any
more desirable to women, but if he had the money and that's what he
desired, I wouldn't begrudge him the pleasure.
I would!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast,
I think I'd actually be more inclined to buy a Pentax FF DSLR if it were
24mp than 36mp. Especially if Pentax worked the same magic with that
sensor that they have with the 16mp sensor in the K-5. A 300 dpi, image
would be 13 1/3 x 20 in size if you printed the full frame. Assuming a
high
That probably depends upon the woman, but in general, no... unfortunately.
On 2/7/2013 6:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But would a full frame camera make me more desirable?
Paul via phone
On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
John Sessoms wrote: I think the thing that
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:43 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/7/2013 6:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But would a full frame camera make me more desirable?
That probably depends upon the woman, but in general, no... unfortunately.
I've found that a larger camera helps by
Why? The steering wheel's on the wrong side. What good would it do you?
:)
Tom C
From: Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv
On 7/2/13, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Buying the newest Corvette Stingray wouldn't make Paul Stenquist any
more desirable to women, but if he had the money and
On 8/2/13, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Why? The steering wheel's on the wrong side. What good would it do you?
:)
Humour arf arf
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
I think the only thing that would make me buy one is if they stopped tanking
the 16x24 format seriously, and stopped the K-5 type camera. And then I might
as well jump to something else, like Fujifilm X.
The files I get from K-5 are big enough, ISO are good enough, DOF is suffiently
shallow
I think the thing that has been lost is all the discussion is the
simplest reason of all ... Because I want one!
Not need. I do understand the difference. I want one, and I have the
money set aside to buy what I want.
From: Steve Cottrell
I mean, aside from the obvious reasons like, bigger
The natural order of things:
Step 1. Buy it
Step 2. Find the reasons why you needed that.
I think such discussions are premature ;)
Alex
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I think the thing that has been lost is all the discussion is the simplest
reason
On 7/2/13, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think the thing that has been lost is all the discussion is the
simplest reason of all ... Because I want one!
Not need. I do understand the difference. I want one, and I have the
money set aside to buy what I want.
Can't argue with
On 8 February 2013 01:29, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 7/2/13, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think the thing that has been lost is all the discussion is the
simplest reason of all ... Because I want one!
Not need. I do understand the difference. I want one, and I
If I *needed* a full-frame camera I'd have bailed on Pentax a long time
ago. I do understand that this is something I want, rather than need.
But that doesn't make my wanting it any less valid.
You can't please everybody, so you've got to please yourself.
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
The
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
alexandru.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
The natural order of things:
Step 1. Buy it
Step 2. Find the reasons why you needed that.
I'll probably own a D600 before Pentax comes out with thiers.
Dave
I think such discussions are premature ;)
John Sessoms wrote: I think the thing that has been lost is all the discussion
is the
simplest reason of all ... Because I want one!
Not need. I do understand the difference. I want one, and I have the
money set aside to buy what I want.
Of course. This idea that only guys with more
But would a full frame camera make me more desirable?
Paul via phone
On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
John Sessoms wrote: I think the thing that has been lost is all the
discussion is the
simplest reason of all ... Because I want one!
Not need. I do understand
Tom C wrote:
Buying the newest Corvette Stingray wouldn't make Paul Stenquist any more
desirable to women
Make Paul Stenquist *more* desirable to women? Such a thing is
scarcely imaginable.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
My response is interspersed below.
Thu Feb 7 06:28:17 EST 2013
Steve Cottrell wrote:
I mean, aside from the obvious reasons like, bigger sensor, better
image
quality, better use with lenses designed to work with a 36X24mm frame,
better lighting, better heating, better sewer systems, the
I'd probably buy a FF body just because I've been itching to buy a new
Pentax DSLR for a while now
But the rationale really depends on the specifications of a new FF DSLR.
*IF* the sensor resolution / pixel size was comparable to the K-5 and
the image image quality was just as good, then
On 8 February 2013 11:48, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
So -
1. A 36 megapixel FF I'd buy ASAP. It owuld replae my K-5 for virtually all
shooting since I could crop down to K-5 image sizes with the same
resolution.
2. A 24 megapixel FF I'd probably buy, but I'd alternate between the
On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 February 2013 11:48, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
So -
1. A 36 megapixel FF I'd buy ASAP. It owuld replae my K-5 for virtually all
shooting since I could crop down to K-5 image sizes with the same
On Feb 7, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tom C wrote:
Buying the newest Corvette Stingray wouldn't make Paul Stenquist any more
desirable to women
Make Paul Stenquist *more* desirable to women? Such a thing is
scarcely imaginable.
Yeah, just scarcely.
You will give me a shout if you decide to sell your Ricoh stuff,
Godders, won't you?
On 2/7/2013 10:12 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The primary reason I jumped to a full frame body was that I had
acquired a nice set of lenses in M-bayonet mount designed for the
24x36 mm format. They perform
On 2/7/2013 1:28 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
I mean, aside from the obvious reasons like, bigger sensor, better image
quality, better use with lenses designed to work with a 36X24mm frame,
better lighting, better heating, better sewer systems, the roads (yes we
can't forget the roads)
At
On 2/7/2013 5:42 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I think the thing that has been lost is all the discussion is the
simplest reason of all ... Because I want one!
Not need. I do understand the difference. I want one, and I have
the money set aside to buy what I want.
Absolutely. IMO, there are two
25 matches
Mail list logo
