On 25 Sep 2005 at 21:41, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I respectfully disagree because a SCAN
is essentially the same a RAW file
out of a DSLR. You record the scan
for maximum fidelity to the neg and archive
the scans. If later you want to do some
post processing to somehow remove artifacts
(like
JCO writes- SEE MY COMMENTS AT BOTTOM THIS POST- I don't agree with
either of your contentions. Please read further below
Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 10:03 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: anybody still
I feel an ill wind blowing. I just hope this thread isn't included in
my promise not to respond to the idiotic threads regarding lens
compatibility any longer or I'll owe Cotty a pint.
Godfrey
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film?
I feel an ill wind blowing. I just hope this thread isn't included in
my promise not to respond to the idiotic threads regarding lens
compatibility any longer or I'll owe Cotty a pint.
I'm
]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 9/25/2005 2:28:29 PM
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film?
On Sep 25, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
... The Minoltas, Nikons, Epson, Canons, and whatnot
that most people use are far from high quality, imo. ...
There I agree with you, and my statements
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film?
OTOH, there are a number of people on this list alone who have the highest
quality Pentax lenses, and some of the most expensive Pentax bodies made,
and do little more with their gear than ...get what
I've got the III and love it for BW work (90% of my film work is BW).
It's decent for Colour as well, but the lack of DigitalICE does show.
-Adam
Tim Sherburne wrote:
Yes, I've been considering that one myself. The folks here seem to have good
things to say about it.
t
On 9/23/05 13:55,
On 23/9/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
XXX
No hugs?
Ack, your sick!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Call me a luddite if you will, but every time I see a bright, sharp set of
Velvia trannys from my LX or 645 I am convinced that as far as image quality
goes, film still rules.
One day perhaps, but for now, I'll stick to film.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Bill D. Casselberry
With MF slides you get more feeling being there when you look at them.
About month ago i shot 5 rolls of Velvia/Astia in French Alps
(Chamonix). In mountain photography film is still my preferred choice.
And i like BW photography, because it is very different. You learn a
lot how to use
This one time, at band camp, Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, the 6x7 is not digital :)
Its all I use for my own photography
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Peter Jordan wrote:
Call me a luddite if you will, but every time I see a bright, sharp set of
Velvia trannys from my LX or 645 I am convinced that as far as image
quality
goes, film still rules.
If you were female I'd marry you.
Tom Reese
Don't let that stop you.
On 9/24/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Jordan wrote:
Call me a luddite if you will,
If you were female I'd marry you.
Tom Reese
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
This one time, at band camp, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you were female I'd marry you.
Prude!
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Hi!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself another 6x7 the 45mm lens and a bunch of E100vs
... a 165mm f2.8, a 300mm f4 and some miscellany are enroute
to the new abodeLet The Real Photography Begin!!!
PS: it'll also do digital via a film scanner, something
Hey, I have some standards. Who do you think I am? Cotty?
Tom Reese
Don't let that stop you.
On 9/24/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Jordan wrote:
Call me a luddite if you will,
If you were female I'd marry you.
Tom Reese
The center is located in NW Portland between NW 19th and 20th Ave. on NW
Lovejoy. I don't have the address memorized. It is open Thursday,
Friday, Saturday, and Sunday from 1 PM to 5 PM. On the first Thursday of
each month it is open from 6 PM to 9 PM. The first Thursday opening is in
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film?
If you were female I'd marry you.
Hell, Tom, if I were single, I'd marry you.
WW
I only shoot film. Pentax has not the digital substitute for my beloved
MZ-S.
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Bill D. Casselberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: sexta-feira, 23 de Setembro de 2005 20:14
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: anybody still shoot film?
Hey kids!
What about my sick, I didn't think I owned one of them...
Cotty wrote:
On 23/9/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
XXX
No hugs?
Ack, your sick!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Of course it does, it film is treated right.
Peter Jordan wrote:
Call me a luddite if you will, but every time I see a bright, sharp
set of Velvia trannys from my LX or 645 I am convinced that as far as
image quality goes, film still rules.
One day perhaps, but for now, I'll stick to film.
William Robb turned my stomach when he replied to me like this:
From: Tom Reese
If you were female I'd marry you.
Hell, Tom, if I were single, I'd marry you.
Jeeezus, I just pictured Robb in a wedding dress. I may never eat again.
Tom Reese
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film?
Jeeezus, I just pictured Robb in a wedding dress. I may never eat again.
I think we should drop this one.
WW
Nah. You've got hair.
On 9/24/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, I have some standards. Who do you think I am? Cotty?
Tom Reese
Don't let that stop you.
On 9/24/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Jordan wrote:
Call me a luddite if you will,
If you
In a message dated 9/24/2005 9:47:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we should drop this one.
WW
=
Yeah, all this male bonding is getting a little revolting.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
If the image is important, it goes on film. If I can get a second chance,
I'll do it digital. If its ultimate destination is digital, i.e. web page,
it will be shot digital.
jm
- Original Message -
From: Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent:
Lets not go there, ever!
Tom Reese wrote:
William Robb turned my stomach when he replied to me like this:
From: Tom Reese
If you were female I'd marry you.
Hell, Tom, if I were single, I'd marry you.
Jeeezus, I just pictured Robb in a wedding dress. I may never eat
Marnie, please adjust your mail filters to forward unwanted mail in
your trash, rather than bouncing it back to me.
Thanks,
Doug
List Guy who gets enough email, thanks.
On Sep 24, 2005, at 1:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/24/2005 9:47:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
I have a 50 roll per year Ektachrome habit, plus a few
dozen rolls of color print film for various specific
shoots. When (if) Pentax makes a full-frame digital
SLR, or when (if) I am able to replace my 17-28 and
24-90 lenses with similar lenses that will work with
an APS-sized sensor, I may stray
oh, and Hello, Bill. Glad to see you again.
Doug
doesn't miss film, except for the smell of a freshly opened roll.
I shoot a variety of film. My two SuperProgram's are using Delta 400
now, my RB67 uses a mix of FP4+ and Delta 100, and for Macro work
(Pentax auto bellows) I'm starting to use Pan F+.
I'm also investing in a film scanner soon, and I don't think I'll ever
go the DSLR route. Why? If I shoot
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Patrick Pritchard wrote:
I'm also investing in a film scanner soon, and I don't think I'll ever go the
DSLR route. Why? If I shoot film today, and scan it in a 2700 DPI scanner,
five years from now when I can afford a 5000 DPI scanner I can *rescan at
5000 DPI*.
I am
On 24/9/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hey, I have some standards. Who do you think I am? Cotty?
My lawyers will be in touch Monday morning!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
anywhere. And the camera battery will last many, many rolls.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Mullan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. september 2005 19:37
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: anybody still shoot film
Assuming that someone still makes a semi-professional/home film scanner,
let alone a commercial grade one.
Patrick Pritchard wrote:
I shoot a variety of film. My two SuperProgram's are using Delta 400
now, my RB67 uses a mix of FP4+ and Delta 100, and for Macro work
(Pentax auto bellows)
Hi all,
I guess I am unusual in that I own a *ist DS but still prefer
film. I have had the digital beasty for a little over a
month and have just taken test shots so far.
Currently shooting Supra in a spotmatic II and having fun
with that.
After that roll is finished, I plan to use an H3V
That may be true, but who'd be afraid of Frank.
Cotty wrote:
On 24/9/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hey, I have some standards. Who do you think I am? Cotty?
My lawyers will be in touch Monday morning!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
In a message dated 9/24/2005 11:15:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie, please adjust your mail filters to forward unwanted mail in
your trash, rather than bouncing it back to me.
Thanks,
Doug
List Guy who gets enough email, thanks.
=
Ooops. You mean,
In a message dated 9/24/2005 2:36:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/24/2005 11:15:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie, please adjust your mail filters to forward unwanted mail in
your trash, rather than bouncing it back to me.
On 24 Sep 2005 at 14:49, Patrick Pritchard wrote:
I'm also investing in a film scanner soon, and I don't think I'll ever
go the DSLR route. Why? If I shoot film today, and scan it in a 2700
DPI scanner, five years from now when I can afford a 5000 DPI scanner I
can *rescan at 5000 DPI*.
still shoot film?
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Patrick Pritchard wrote:
I'm also investing in a film scanner soon, and I don't think I'll ever
go the
DSLR route. Why? If I shoot film today, and scan it in a 2700 DPI
scanner,
five years from now when I can afford a 5000 DPI scanner I can *rescan
On Sep 24, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Patrick Pritchard wrote:
I'm also investing in a film scanner soon, and I don't think I'll
ever go the DSLR route. Why? If I shoot film today, and scan it in
a 2700 DPI scanner, five years from now when I can
On 24 Sep 2005 at 22:16, Patrick Pritchard wrote:
Not at the same time. I'm simply pointing out a fact: if you buy a
DSLR now, you are locked down to that DPI, regardless of what comes
out in the future.
Besides, what is wrong with scanning twice anyways?
You'll have to forgive us, some
On 24 Sep 2005 at 22:16, Patrick Pritchard wrote:
Not at the same time. I'm simply pointing out a fact: if you buy a
DSLR now, you are locked down to that DPI, regardless of what comes
out in the future.
There comes a point in resolution when scanning film that all you're
doing is
Shoot film? Ofcourse, it's all I shoot.
Mostly B/W.
/Henri
Still shooting some BW in my Ricoh KR-5sv, alongside my digital.
-Adam
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself another 6x7 the 45mm lens and a bunch of E100vs
... a 165mm f2.8, a 300mm f4 and some miscellany are enroute
to the
Hi Bill,
Welcome back. We were wondering where you went. Came up just the other day. I
still have my 6x7 and four lenses, but I haven't shot any film in about a year
and a half. One of these days, perhaps.
Paul
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself another 6x7 the 45mm
Hey Bill,
Glad to hear you are alive and still shootin'. Fill us in on what has
been going on.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, September 23, 2005, 12:14:25 PM, you wrote:
BDC Hey kids!
BDC I'm back ;^)
BDC Got myself another 6x7 the 45mm lens and a bunch of E100vs
BDC
Hey, I've still got the Yashica I bought from you a few years back (speaking
of TLRs), but I've also acquired a 6x7 and a *istDS. The DS is getting most
of my attention these days.
Tim
On 9/23/05 12:14, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself
Adam Maas wrote:
Still shooting some BW in my Ricoh KR-5sv, alongside my digital.
-Adam
Sure! 127 BW in my Yashica 4X4 TLR...
keith whaley
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself another 6x7 the 45mm lens and a bunch of E100vs
... a
Bill! So nice to see you here again. What have you been up to? New
abode? Care to tell us more?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bill D. Casselberry
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Welcome back Bill.
I'm going to have to shoot some film. Just got 2 K mount film cameras.
One with a free role of Kodak Gold 200 included.
Labour Day Sunday bargains were to be had.
Like New - SF7 with F35-70/3.5-4.5 and hard case also LN- $39.55.
ZX-5n with manual - good condition except for
Sure I do. A lot of Ilford B/W, for my kid in color I use Fuji NHP
160 as well. Slides are always around, too. Mostly is MZ-S that gets
out nowadays.
What the heck, I've just acquired a film scanner to get along with
digital age easier. :-)
Matja
--
No virus found in this outgoing
On 23/9/05, Bill D. Casselberry, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm back ;^)
You were gone??
@!
XXX
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 9/23/05 13:11, Matjaz Osojnik wrote:
What the heck, I've just acquired a film scanner to get along with
digital age easier. :-)
So, what did you pick?
t
Of course!
Color with the MX'en, ME Super and Canonet GIII 1.7
BW with the 4x5 Graphic
But I am afraid I have gone digital for snapshots, and occassional
speculative make-a-buck shoot and print shots. psst, hey buddy, want to
buy a framed photo of your car (boat, airplane, store, kid, etc)?
I like TMAX 400 because I finally
figured out a way to get it to work
right and it works great for the speed.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 3:42 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film
Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Woo hoo! Glad to hear it!
I still shoot BW (Ilford Pan-F and HP5) in my Pentax 645.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Film is dead.
Welcome back, Oregon Bill
William Robb
On 9/23/05, Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself another 6x7 the 45mm lens and a bunch of E100vs
... a 165mm f2.8, a 300mm f4 and some miscellany are enroute
to the new abodeLet The Real
I went with Minolta Dual Scan IV. I did choose a Minolta over Nikon
because they are supposed to be better with B/W scans. Price was a
deciding factor as well.
So far I am reasonably satisfied with it. Scans are good, but I need
to get on top of color adjustments. So far WB seems pretty
At 4:53 PM -0400 9/23/05, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Woo hoo! Glad to hear it!
I still shoot BW (Ilford Pan-F and HP5) in my Pentax 645.
Sure. I was out shooting Velveeta 50 with my 645 and Superia 400 and
Velveeta
Yes, I've been considering that one myself. The folks here seem to have good
things to say about it.
t
On 9/23/05 13:55, Matjaz Osojnik wrote:
I went with Minolta Dual Scan IV. I did choose a Minolta over Nikon
because they are supposed to be better with B/W scans. Price was a
deciding
Hi Bill and welcome back.
Pretty much all of my 35mm ish colour is done with the istD or D2h or D1, but i
still
shoot my 6x7
with T-max Tri-x or 100vs for fall colours. Cannot beat a good 6x7 slide shot
of fall
colours.g
My IR has fallen off a bit, but i still try to shoot a few rolls every
Bill! Welcome back. I've been gone, so I didn't know you were. What's been
going on with you?
Chris
Good to see you back Bill - you will have noticed you got a mention the
other day in the 10th. Anniversary of PDML thread?
Just finishing a roll of 400BW in my K2: using my older screwmount and
K-mount gear for mainly monochrome nowadays. But I might still go shoot
some E6 slides just for the
Friday, September 23, 2005, 9:14:25 PM, Bill wrote:
BDC Hey kids!
BDC I'm back ;^)
Welcome back!
On the question in the subject:
yes!
(well, both)
Frantisek
Cotty wrote:
On 23/9/05, Bill D. Casselberry, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm back ;^)
You were gone??
@!
XXX
No hugs?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I'm still shootin' film, and nothing but.
Oh I beg to differ Knarf, I personally saw you burn some pixels @ GFM.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film?
On 9/23/05, Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 23 Sep 2005 at 12:14, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself another 6x7 the 45mm lens and a bunch of E100vs
... a 165mm f2.8, a 300mm f4 and some miscellany are enroute
to the new abodeLet The Real Photography Begin!!!
Good to meetcha, Bill. HP5+ in the SLR, FP4+ in the TLR, and Polaroid
in the Crown Graphic when I can afford it. Processing it myself.
Everything is scanned.
Long live film!
On 9/23/05, Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey kids!
I'm back ;^)
Got myself
Hi,
You don't know me. I'm new to the list.a reformed lurker. I remember
you from before though, so I guess I can say welcome back. . As I said
when I introduced myself, to the group, I'm a snap-shot shooter, shoot film
mostly unless I want immediate gratification or to e-mail the
Hello from the Rose City, inland from the Koast.
I still shoot film - Fuji for weddings. APS in my Kodak Advantix Preview.
And slide film for my ancient Stereo Realist. Love Stereo. You all
should visit the 3D Center of Art and Photography in Portland town.
Jim A.
Hey kids!
Bill..welcome back,
While I haven't been your past list pen pal, you're obviously very
welcome back and were missed by a number of folks.
I shoot scenics/landscapes and a bit of wildlife with 35mm (Pentax) and
6x6 (Mamiya 6), using either mostly Provia or Astia 100F.
I've been at it for a good
What's the coordinates for the center, Jim?
Tim
On 9/23/05 20:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello from the Rose City, inland from the Koast.
I still shoot film - Fuji for weddings. APS in my Kodak Advantix Preview.
And slide film for my ancient Stereo Realist. Love Stereo. You all
101 - 175 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
