> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > I'm not a spiritual man,
>
>
> Don't do yourself an injustice. It's different for everyone
> but, from my perspective, you've got it in spades.
>
> mike
Mike,
Some people might read that as an insult...
B
>
> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/09/19 Mon AM 08:17:58 GMT
> To:
> Subject: RE: Re: PAW: Memorial
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > > I'm
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/09/19 Mon AM 09:44:56 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: PAW: Memorial
>
>
>
> >>
> >> > I'm not a spiritual man,
> >>
> >>
> >> Don't do
]>
> Date: 2005/09/21 Wed PM 12:51:42 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: For Cotty
>
> Could you use tinyurl.com for this please? The Post
> web site gives me an error message before I can paste
> in the whole URL.
>
> Rick
>
> --- william sawyer
Wasn't there a "Manual flash for dummies" posted here some time ago?
m
>
> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/09/26 Mon PM 11:10:36 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Flash Question
>
> Good simple explana
Yes - Mafud wrote it. He used about 10,000 words where about 100 would do.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 September 2005 08:54
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Re: Flash Question
>
> W
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: Re: Flash Question
Yes - Mafud wrote it. He used about 10,000 words where about 100 would do.
Some here are more prone to that than others.
William Robb
>
> From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/09/28 Wed PM 12:18:18 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT-- Paranoia
>
> One of those lurking film shooters must have done this to me.
>
> <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_00
>
> From: keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> great pizza joints?
The rich smell of burning oregano and tomato puree. Takes me back to my
student days. The roaches were a bugger to flush, though.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAf
Of course, that's why I'm an agnostic, not an atheist or believer in any God.
I can't know, so I just consider the possibilities, and being outside the
system the design theory seems to have much less success in predicting results
of natural processes than the scientific theory. So, if you are
Of course one should never be too impressed by the sciences ability to explain
natural phenomena. Because science is by definition "after the fact." The rules
of science and math are based on observation of the very things they attempt to
describe. It follows that the pieces would fit together v
Five or more. But the cleverest one has gone to the great liana in the sky.
8-(((
>
> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/11/12 Sun PM 03:35:37 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: list abuse
>
> A chimpanzee is having a concert?
>
Bill Owens wrote:
>Rick Womer wrote:
>Not to rain on any parades, but he's in the "honeymoon
>phase" of the procedure. In a week or so the late
>effects of the chemotherapy will appear (very low
>white blood cell count, mouth sores, fevers), and
>he'll feel like poop again.
>
>Yes Rick, Don's onc
>
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/11/22 Wed PM 12:33:38 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: K10D tomorrow
>
> David Savage wrote:
>
> >At 12:49 PM 22/11/2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >>And crippled whores:-).
On 11/24/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >After properly applying black tape over it, I shot with the K10D
> >today.
>
> You need psychological help mate ;-)
I do, but that's entirely unrelated to the fact that I put tape on my cameras!
It actually looks great with markings covered.
j
--
On 11/24/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A special edition crocodile skin K10D with aperture simulator will be
> > mailed to the person who guesses what car that is :)
>
> A Mercury.
Correct!
You got the crocodile skin K10D. If you mention the model, you'll get
either the apertu
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Re: PESOs: K10D
> On 11/24/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > A special edition crocodile skin K10D with aperture simulator will be
>
I'm not sure if I have or will pass, how long is that period? I'm still one of
the new guys as I've only been here since summer 2003...
DagT
> Fra: "Markus Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I just passed the period of probation :-)
> greetings
> Markus
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Joe,
None of your message replies have "Re:" on them anymore. Recently several
other members have joined the list and their replies do not indicate such on
the subject line either.
While this is not a major issue for me, I do (and I assume some others)
frequently use the "Re
yeah. Thanks. Any tips for rescuing this in PP? I've played with
the curves a bit, but haven't had much luck.
Mike
On 9/17/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Mike this one doesn't do much for me.
> Either a bad title or Ken needs better exposure.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> -
>Any tips for rescuing this in PP?
Using CS2, setting white point & using a shadows adjustment will bring out
Ken.
HTH
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: PESO -- Ken
> yeah. Thanks.I've
Hi Dario (and Thibouille),
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:04:19 +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
>I'm planning attending the show for business.
>I'll be there (very busy) for a few days.
>However, if someone will manage a PDML meeting, I might well show up.
Not an organized PDML meet, but I will be there on
Ok Jan, I'll be there too. This is me:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/indexe.htm
See you!
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: JunkEmail:
O.M.G.
What happend to your right eye?
Dave ;-)
On 9/18/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok Jan, I'll be there too. This is me:
> http://www.dariobonazza.com/indexe.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks, Shel, Dave, and Ralf.
Mike
On 9/17/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like this quite a bit, just the way it is. The saturated colors, the
> clutter, the curved look from the fish eye lens all make this look kind of
> avant garde. This is one of the most interesti
I have to check and seeif train us afforable from Brussels, I have no
car (a,d proud of it^^).
I'll be back to tell you what ...
2006/9/18, Jan van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Dario (and Thibouille),
>
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:04:19 +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
>
> >I'm planning attending the sh
On 9/19/06, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Despite that it looks like he has a glass of vine, this is a bit of rock &
> roll. Or perhaps a bit of beat poetic. I don't know. But, I know I like the
> atmosphere in the image. Without the person, I believe it would have been a
> bit spooky. Bu
>
> From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/09/26 Tue AM 11:30:14 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Noise Performance
>
> On 26/09/06, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I managed 22 se
Thanks, Dave,
Coming from you, I consider this a great compliment.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 11:21 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re Field Goal
Good shot with some real action
On 10/1/06, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good shot with some real action motion blurr, Bill
>
> Dave
>
>
> Got this shot last night at a local high school football game. If you look
> closely, you can see the ball in flight. Taken with the *ist D at 1600 ISO
> and 1/60 sec.
>
> http
Thanks, Knarf
Hope to see you at GFM next year
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 1:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Re Field Goal
On 10/1/06, David J Brooks <[EM
On 10/2/06, Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Knarf
>
> Hope to see you at GFM next year
We will see each other, don't you worry!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
On 10/6/06, K.Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I liked about those samples which I suppose were the same as the UK
> ones,
I noticed that UK samples were in jpeg.
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/6/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is only true with transparency film and presupposes that you
> understand how the film and processing work. You have no control
> other than focus and exposure. The film and processing are a constant.
I of course undersstand all that
>
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/15 Wed AM 08:58:29 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Expensive photo
>
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:00:00 -, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
>
>
> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/15 Wed PM 02:26:48 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Expensive photo
>
> Needs sharpening and straightening.
>
> Jack
No, no, it's "hand made".
Even bigger LOL
>
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:54:42 -0800
mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2006/02/15 Wed PM 02:26:48 GMT
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: Expensive photo
> >
> > Needs sharpening and straighten
>
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In 1968 a few of us were bopping down Van Ness Avenue in San Francisco, and
> were along Auto Row. One of the group, "a raggedy looking hippy chick,"
> spied a car that caught her eye, walked into the showroom, and said she
> wanted to buy it. T
I never knew her very well ... we were all just a bunch of hippies hangin'
out at the time. Everyone just happened to be living in the same
neighborhood. I just knew her from the neighborhood, and like neighbors
do, sometimes we'd do things together. After the Airplane moved to 2400
Fulton Stree
>
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/16 Thu PM 02:42:58 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Re: Interesting marketing
>
> I never knew her very well ... we were all just a bunch of hippies hangin'
> out at the
>
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/17 Fri AM 02:53:39 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Interesting marketing
>
> Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On 16/2/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleas
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/17 Fri PM 02:08:54 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: Interesting marketing
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jens Bladt"
> Subject: SV: Interesting marketing
>
>
>
>
> From: Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/24 Fri AM 10:12:24 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: It's here
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
>
> > There have been cases of strange banding--"
>
> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/27 Mon AM 03:51:02 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT: aquariums
>
> mike wilson wrote:
>
> > Gautam Sarup wrote:
> >
> >> I'm planning a trip to the Monterey aqua
>
> From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/27 Mon AM 07:51:39 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT: aquariums
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. Think I get a roll of Provia and K200
> and shoot both at the aquarium in San
>
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/28 Tue AM 11:30:02 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Who Dat?
>
> Thanks for the input. Perhaps that kind of crop would work. But I
> wanted to create the idea of the metal dog peeking
>
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/03/08 Wed AM 07:55:39 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: on cameras
>
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Luis Paulo de Sa wrote:
>
> > Will my FTZ500 work with my *ist DS, meaning full TTL a
>
> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/03/16 Thu PM 11:37:00 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Pentax sighting
>
> I myself was wondering how such an obvious rank amateur could get a WBC press
> pass...
>
>
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:27:30AM +, mike wilson wrote:
>
> His UberKamera was in for its 100,000 exposure service.
> Pentax is the equivalent of a courtesy car.
Hardly. The Porsche dealership isn't going to loan you a
Honda 2000 while your Boxster is in for service (yet again);
you might f
>
> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/03/17 Fri PM 06:25:00 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT Film
>
> _Velvia_ 100F is lower saturation?
>
> Not Provia, not Astia -- they are both lower saturation.
>
Apparently, XnView is only good at displaying the preview... It won't
actually decode the RAW information at all. True for both PEFs and DNGs.
Boris Liberman a écrit :
Hi!
I've installed the XNView as one or two list members suggested. It
looks very nice. Potentially I could replace IrfanView
True for almost all thumbnail/previewer/cataloger applications. I
think the only ones that does RAW conversion to render the
thumbnails, as an option only, are ACDSEE and BreezeBrowser.
Adobe's Bridge and Lightroom update the embedded preview JPEG using
the Camera Raw or Lightroom parameter
Hi!
True for almost all thumbnail/previewer/cataloger applications. I think
the only ones that does RAW conversion to render the thumbnails, as an
option only, are ACDSEE and BreezeBrowser.
Adobe's Bridge and Lightroom update the embedded preview JPEG using the
Camera Raw or Lightroom parame
>
> From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/03/31 Fri PM 01:08:32 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: First success
>
> Hi!
>
> > Congrats! That's a great picture... what did you win by the way? I
> > hope something v
Mike,
> > I am told that the price is Pentax Annual 2005-2006, special gift
> > edition. I am going to have a lot of material to contemplate ;-).
> >
> > Boris
>
> You'll just get depressed. At least, I do...
I had a chance to hold Pentax Annuals while visiting Jostein two years
ago. I was r
>
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/03/31 Fri PM 02:00:38 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Re: First success
>
> Mike,
>
> > > I am told that the price is Pentax Annual 2005-2006, special gift
>
>
> From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/07 Fri AM 01:04:52 GMT
> To:
> Subject: RE: 1.7x AF
>
> We may have been jumping to conclusions. A very intelligent question Mike.
> We have a mastermind among us.
> No irony.
You _obviously_ don'
>
> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Snip
> fatslags
>
> (Needs Flash)
8-))
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
PS CS2 is definitely worth the upgrade cost. For Bridge, for Smart
Sharpening, for the far better functionality in Camera Raw v3.x
alone. Never mind all the other stuff it does over CS as well.
Godfrey
just don't speak of
other needs that must be taken care of. Whether camera should do it
all? :-P
--- you wrote --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: DS3?
Shake Reduction ... Shaking dust from the sensor ...
--
>
> From: David Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/18 Tue AM 08:51:22 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: PESO - huntsman
>
> Frank got it in one (-:
Ringflash not on the lens, though? The doughnuts would have been more
"centr
>
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/24 Mon AM 08:15:48 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: *ist D
>
> For my needs (I have a DS) the additional cost of the D wasn't worth it.
> The DS/DS2 has a number of fe
Hi Mike,
IIRC, there's no difference in the bodies of the DS/DS2 and the DL/DL2, so
my comments should be valid (as far as opinions go) for the S and the L
series. I'm open for corrections, of course, since there's no L here with
which to make a direct comparison.
It's been a while since I he
>
> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/26 Wed PM 11:08:04 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: List Question
>
> Well THAT'S STUPID! One would think the software would be smart enough to
> see that the header line had
>
> From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/05/08 Mon PM 09:42:19 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: PESO - Gannet
>
> Well, of course, I didn't get your first post... then some
> commented without
> including link...
>
&
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/05/12 Fri PM 11:39:38 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: film recommendation
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "mike wilson"
> Subject: Re: film recommendation
>
>
>
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/20 Tue AM 06:32:44 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: Photo Submission
>
> Now I know I'm in Shel's killfile - thanked every post but mine.
>
> Excellent.
>
>
> DIS
>
> From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/20 Tue PM 04:06:21 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pentax MZ5
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:32:24AM -0700, Rob Geraghty wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if they got it? I don
>
> From: Keith McGuinness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/22 Thu AM 09:01:03 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PUG POLL?
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> > Is it a coincidence that "forgot" spells DIP?
> >
> > I think not.
&
>
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/22 Thu PM 08:45:44 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PUG Challenge!
>
> Dave Kennedy wrote:
>
> >> >>> On 21/6/06, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >>
>
> From: keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Once in a while, it just seems necessary to get the best there is, doesn't it.
That's a Mark!
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more inf
On 6/23/06, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a Mark!
Speaking of Mark, he might refer to Jens' little collection as
"photographic porn".
That's a nice set there, Jens!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
>
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/27 Tue AM 12:25:15 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Cartoon Effect
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 4:55 PM, David Savage wrote:
>
> > Maybe not as extreme as BC's work, but
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/28 Wed AM 06:52:27 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: Cartoon effect
>
> On 27/6/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >As everyone is posting flower pictures, here's mine
-- Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:13:06 -0600
Von: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: pdml@pdml.net
Betreff: RE: PUG again
> Hi Adelheid,
>
> Respectfully, none of the comments on that topic was ever intended to make
> you a subject of the discussion and I wa
2 cents and now i go back to make the PUG.
> I am quiet now. I have work to do. ;-)
> Best
> Adelheid
>
>
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:13:06 -0600
> Von: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: pdml@pdml.net
> Betreff: RE: PUG a
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:42:22 +0200, AvK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i didn't read your post as that, what i am frustrated about, is the
> fact, that because of this quality discussion, the ones who are not as
> skilled as some of you undoubtedly are, might be discouraged to
> contribute a p
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:35:01 +0200, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh joy, just as I decided to retreat comfortably into PESO's you post
>> this... I see if I can manage to snap some architecture around here. As
>> a
>> concession to Tom, I'll try to make it a good, or at least decent snap
>Oh joy, just as I decided to retreat comfortably into PESO's you post
>this... I see if I can manage to snap some architecture around here. As a
>concession to Tom, I'll try to make it a good, or at least decent snap :o)
>
>Anyway, thanks for maintaining the PUG. I hope it'll stay around for a
>wh
> >
> > Looks over-saturated to me, otherwise, v nice.
> >
>
> There you have it. I metered off the greenery, it was a
> nicely overcast day. All settings in camera and software
> were standard. It just looks wrong. Pretty but wrong.
>
> Not that slide film would have done much better - j
YeUCK
D
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Bob W
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:02 PM
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: Re: Cartoon effect
>
>
> > >
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/28 Wed PM 04:57:11 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: Cartoon effect
>
>
>
> >> Looks over-saturated to me, otherwise, v nice.
>
> On 28/6/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unlea
>
> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/28 Wed PM 10:01:30 GMT
> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
> Subject: RE: Re: Cartoon effect
>
> > >
> > > Looks over-saturated to me, otherwise, v nice.
> > &g
>
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/29 Thu AM 12:14:00 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Cartoon effect
>
> That is exactly my point. It doesn't have to be digital capture to
> be able to post process and make somethi
>
> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/29 Thu AM 06:27:33 GMT
> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
> Subject: RE: Cartoon effect
>
> they remind me quite a lot of a certain type of poster I've often seen
> on the wa
Is this the one you got?
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonpro1/page3.asp
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Ann Sanfedele
> KEH got my business
> I have my darkside twin to my beloved PRO-1 ordered
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
To bad you felt the Pentax was not for you. I really like mine.
Glad your "back in the saddle"
Dave(only has one wife)Brooks
Quoting Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> KEH got my business
> I have my darkside twin to my beloved PRO-1 ordered
> By chance, I stumbled on it before others d
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Is this the one you got?
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonpro1/page3.asp
>
> Shel
>
>
Yup
It is the one I got and have had for a year
I love love love it
and why they stopped making it I jsut don't know...
The successor to it doesn't have the flip out scre
On Jun 29, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonpro1/page3.asp
>>
> and why they stopped making it I jsut don't know...
Sales of 'prosumer class' fixed lens digital cameras are down quite a
bit since DSLRs approached the $500 price bracket. Kind of a
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> >> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonpro1/page3.asp
> >>
> > and why they stopped making it I jsut don't know...
>
> Sales of 'prosumer class' fixed lens digital cameras are down quite a
> bit since DSLRs appro
> >
> > they remind me quite a lot of a certain type of poster I've
> often seen
> > on the walls of African cafes and bars. I don't know where these
> > posters come from, or how to describe them in such a way that I
can
> > google some examples. But they are composites of somebody's
> fantasy
> >
> > I don't know if this is exactly what you mean, but when I
> opened this
> > webpage and saw the pictures I actually flinched, and I don't
think
> > that's happened to me before looking at photos:
> > http://www.jturnerphotography.com/
> >
> > These seem to me to be at least as devoid of
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
[...]
> a digital SLR in a place that is dusty all the time is also
> an accident waiting to happen
> my windows, even with ac on, are always open and I live in
> Manhattan surrounded by buildings being torn down and put up
>
> anne
Hey Anne, I've an idea!
When your air co
On Jun 29, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>> What I am curious about is that you seem comfortable enough with the
>> LX ... What makes the *ist DS so much more difficult to deal with? Or
>> do you not use the LX very much anymore either?
>
> It's the way the bells and whistles work and th
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
(snip what i had said before )
> Well, different strokes. Personally, I find the Pentax DS very much
> alike to my old Nikon FM/FE2 and use it in much the same way. Of
> course, it has a lot more features which I use when it seems
> appropriate, but overall I just tak
David J Brooks wrote:
>
> To bad you felt the Pentax was not for you. I really like mine.
and you took some great sutff with it but you are big and
strong and can hold it up to your face
for more than a few seconds :)
>
> Glad your "back in the saddle"
>
> Dave(only has one wife)Brooks
in the
keith_w wrote:
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > a digital SLR in a place that is dusty all the time is also
> > an accident waiting to happen
> > my windows, even with ac on, are always open and I live in
> > Manhattan surrounded by buildings being torn down and put up
> >
> > anne
>
>
>> Dave(only has one wife)Brooks
>
> in the style of K w then :)
I've always said if you do it right, you don't need more than one. ;+]
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: phew - re-enabled
> David J Brooks wrote:
> >
> > To bad you felt the Pentax was not for you. I really like mine.
>
> and you took some great sutff with it but you are big and
> strong and can hold it up to your face
> for more than a few seconds :)
You need to find faster
Ann.
I find the menu and setup of the D aLOT easier than its Nikon sisters.
Nikon has a ton of sub and subsub menues.
I still get totally confused when i change something.
Just a FYI
Dave
> On Jun 29, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Ann
Sanfedele wrote:
>
> >> Wha
401 - 500 of 220312 matches
Mail list logo
