Darren,
Yes, naming of product lines is an interesting issue.
To add to your collection of confusing name conventions, - I'd mention
Ikea's lines of furniture. Besides the difficulty of identifying a
specific piece of furniture, - you are forced to train you memory in
memorizing words that in
John? Thomas Crapper would like that!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Darren Addy
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:04 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).
As someone who has more than a passing interest in "branding"
As someone who has more than a passing interest in "branding" this is
an interesting subject to me. Think of the naming conventions for
automobiles (a subject near and dear to many on this list). Auto
manufacturers take slightly different tacks, but a model name (such as
the Chevrolet "Impala" exis
P.J. Alling wrote:
So now that the K-1 has been announced I figured to hit Google for more
information. What do I get but 99% of the hits are on the K-01
mirrorless. First they name their first production DSLR *ist-D an
unsearchable name, (leave of the * and count the German language sites).
th
P.J. Alling wrote:
I'm driving a "classic" car at the moment. That lens is selling for
about twice what my car is valued at. I find it very hard to justify
buying a lens that's worth more than my vehicle.
I can certainly empathize with that. I do have a "classic" bigma that I
might be able
I'm driving a "classic" car at the moment. That lens is selling for
about twice what my car is valued at. I find it very hard to justify
buying a lens that's worth more than my vehicle.
On 2/9/2016 2:53 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
At B&H
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1117719-REG/pentax_21
Slight correction.
The Amazon link and price are correct, but the seller is not Amazon themselves.
Amazon's actual current price is $1,719.57, however 2 marketplace
sellers have it on Amazon for less than that.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00TGVI4Y8/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&condition=new
When I was processing them, the Nikon files seemed significantly cleaner.
That, of course, was before downsizing and Facebook munging, not to mention
that I'm only displaying the best ones.
It is interesting that in context, the differences may not be glaringly obvious.
On February 7, 2016 12:
I was going to make the same comment. At web sizes there's really no
discernible difference. Heck, I can't find a lot of difference between
finished K20D and K-5II images that are reasonably well exposed within
the limits of their respective ISO ranges, and heck there's a really big
difference
I don't see a significant difference, except that they seem to handle the stage
lighting a bit differently.
Am I missing something?
Rick
On Feb 6, 2016, at 11:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> A couple of weeks ago, I mentioned that I had the chance to shoot with a
> friend's D810. I've finally
What is this word you say... marketing???
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:36 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> So what you're saying is that Ricoh is following the fine tradition of
> Pentax marketing.
>
> On 1/4/2016 11:59 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>> I preface this by saying that
So what you're saying is that Ricoh is following the fine tradition of
Pentax marketing.
On 1/4/2016 11:59 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I preface this by saying that if I had to choose between a company
that had crappy marketing and superb engineering vs a company that had
superb marketing and crappy
On 12/15/2015 8:47 AM, Alan C wrote:
Look what they're asking for older S/H Pentax DSLR's in SA.
There have been a spate of adverts in the last week. I've converted to
US$.With std. lens unless otherwise stated.
K20D 570; K200D 570; K10D (2 lens) 400; K10D 200;
K100D 500 & 280; Kx (2 lens
Darren:
Yes, I realize it is not sold by Amazon, sorry, I wasn't more clear about
it. I actually looked for other sellers, including Amazon itself
yesterday, but somehow I missed those two that you mentioned.
And yes, it probably makes sense that this lens could be released earlier
in Japa
> That listing has an interesting "product highlight":
>"Direct Current AF"...
>Ghm... As opposed to AC-AF? ;-)
Pentax has 3 AF systems. The original gear drive, SDM, and DC.
It's DC as opposed to the other two.
IIRC, they have maintained a single interface to power both DC & SDM -- the
old PZ co
When you say "Amazon has it listed" you have to be careful because
Amazon may (themselves) not be the seller. In this case, the $3880
price is "Ships from and sold by TOKYO CAMERA / WorldWide Shipping."
People can (and do) make up all sorts of prices for items which they
don't have in hand.
Two ot
Look at the street prices for the Nikon D810 and Nikon D750 and take the
average. So about about $2350.00 but the price will probably fall to
Nikon D610 price levels after about 9 months...
On 11/11/2015 12:58 PM, Gonz wrote:
I'm just wondering how much $$$ it will be for this camera. 4K? 3K
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
>>P.J. Alling wrote:
>>
>>I remember reading someplace recently that Pentax didn't name any lenses
>>"K", that's just what people called them.
>
> Yup. The original K-mount lenses were just "SMC Pentax" lenses. The
> first lenses, actually, to
I'm just wondering how much $$$ it will be for this camera. 4K? 3K?
If it was around 2K I think I might bite, anything much higher and
it'll just be on my wish list for a long time.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:10 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> I can actually see the use for it, though I can't imagine i
I can actually see the use for it, though I can't imagine it being a
high priority. See, my dream would be having a working aperture ring, a
shutter speed wheel, and and a dedicated. (well, programmable, but
that's how I'd set it up), ISO wheel, which would put all the important
exposure contr
Your “selector switch” might be just that. I had taken it to be a release lever
to allow rotation of the selector knob. But the markings you point out make it
seem more like a switch.
But what I totally don’t understand is the purpose of the film winder knob on
the far right of body top. No mar
On 11/6/2015 12:23 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
FF replacement. If you were designing a replacement for the K-3
range, you would surely want to call that a K-1.
I don't think Pentax thinks that far ahead.
Well, Pentax starts a naming convention, follows it
On 11/6/2015 12:14 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
FF replacement. If you were designing a replacement for the K-3
range, you
would surely want to call that a K-1.
Malcolm
I don't think Pentax thinks that far ahead.
Well, Pentax starts a naming convention, follows it for a fe
Larry Colen wrote:
>P.J. Alling wrote:
>
FF replacement. If you were designing a replacement for the K-3
range, you would surely want to call that a K-1.
>>> I don't think Pentax thinks that far ahead.
>>
>> Well, Pentax starts a naming convention, follows it for a few models,
>> th
P.J. Alling wrote:
FF replacement. If you were designing a replacement for the K-3
range, you
would surely want to call that a K-1.
Malcolm
I don't think Pentax thinks that far ahead.
Well, Pentax starts a naming convention, follows it for a few models,
then screws it up, then starts ov
On 11/6/2015 7:15 AM, Bill wrote:
On 11/6/2015 1:19 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
Wow, talk about muddying the waters. What with the MR-52/MZ-D having
been re-branded as the K-1, at least unofficially by someone and
Pentax, and the K-01, I guess there will be some interesting on
On 11/6/2015 1:19 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
Wow, talk about muddying the waters. What with the MR-52/MZ-D having
been re-branded as the K-1, at least unofficially by someone and
Pentax, and the K-01, I guess there will be some interesting on line
conversations.
Interesting c
P.J. Alling wrote:
> Wow, talk about muddying the waters. What with the MR-52/MZ-D having
> been re-branded as the K-1, at least unofficially by someone and
> Pentax, and the K-01, I guess there will be some interesting on line
> conversations.
Interesting choice of name if it is the K-1. From th
It looks like the stills/video selector.
On 11/5/2015 12:05 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Yes, I've been looking at them this morning and noticed something that
I'm not sure we've discussed yet (if it was, I missed it):
Under that selector knob just to the right of the pentaprism is a
selector switch t
Wow, talk about muddying the waters. What with the MR-52/MZ-D having
been re-branded as the K-1, at least unofficially by someone and Pentax,
and the K-01, I guess there will be some interesting on line conversations.
On 11/5/2015 11:38 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
After the "accidental" (cough,
Yes, I've been looking at them this morning and noticed something that
I'm not sure we've discussed yet (if it was, I missed it):
Under that selector knob just to the right of the pentaprism is a
selector switch that seems to have 3 settings.
The switch is seen well in this large overhead view:
htt
On 2015-10-24 22:05 , P.J. Alling wrote:
I'm watching the episode of the TV series Bones and guest star Betty White
is using what appears to be a Storm Trooper K-30. Just thought I'd share.
watched this episode on TiVo tonight; since i was forewarned, i phone-cammed
screenshots of the debadge
We don't have cable or broadcast TV (now that it's gone digital our rabbit ears
are gone). I'll take your word for it.
Betty White is still working? That's amazing.
Cheers,
frank
On October 25, 2015 12:05:58 AM EDT, "P.J. Alling"
wrote:
>I'm watching the episode of the TV series Bones and g
saw the episode, but missed that
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:05 AM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
> I'm watching the episode of the TV series Bones and guest star Betty White
> is using what appears to be a Storm Trooper K-30. Just thought I'd share.
>
> --
> I don't want to achieve immortality through my w
Larry,
Some time ago, I was trying to find answers to similar questions.
Unfortunately, Pentax doesn't provide (at least at that point it didn't)
any specs with respect to this.
So, let me share the most essential bits of information that I was able to
find (and still remember).
First, a fe
PentaxPhotoGallery.com is back up.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
> The overly complex user interface has disappeared, but the images have been
> "appropriated" and stored somewhere.
>
> On 7/21/2015 10:14 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>>
>> Glad you alerted the troops, Dan - I h
The overly complex user interface has disappeared, but the images have
been "appropriated" and stored somewhere.
On 7/21/2015 10:14 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Glad you alerted the troops, Dan - I had just sent someone email with
several places to look at my work - one of which was
what I had up
Glad you alerted the troops, Dan - I had just sent someone email with
several places to look at my work - one of which was
what I had up on PPG - because it was a small manageable selection
and here we thought nothing disappeared on the web. apparently true only
of what one wished would disappe
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>While, yes, it would be pointless trying to get pentax.com,
>but I am not quite sure that Ricoh/Pentax has rights to all and any
>derivatives of the word "pentax".
>I suspect, it is a rather gray legal area, especially, if the owner would
>not be using it for commercial or
OOPS!
This was supposed to refer to Darren.
Sorry, Dan and Darren for the confusion. I am just tired today.
Igor
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Dan,
That's sweet of you to do all that "leg work" for Ricoh.
You must feel so [in]vested in PPG to bother with all of that.
(I've dug
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> That's sweet of you to do all that "leg work" for Ricoh.
All I did was try to log on to the PPG. When I got to the GoDaddy
page instead, I clicked on a few things.
I reported back to the list because I know a few people there still
have i
Dan,
That's sweet of you to do all that "leg work" for Ricoh.
You must feel so [in]vested in PPG to bother with all of that.
(I've dug all the whois information before sending my first reply to the
thread, and that's why I wrote what I wrote.)
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pd
Mark,
While, yes, it would be pointless trying to get pentax.com,
but I am not quite sure that Ricoh/Pentax has rights to all and any
derivatives of the word "pentax".
I suspect, it is a rather gray legal area, especially, if the owner would
not be using it for commercial or derogative purpose
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
> Dan, have you tried to follow the link to buy it?
Of course not. It is pretty routine foe Ricoh to renew the
registration, but for someone new to buy it, through GoDaddy or
otherwise, sp,etjong wpould have to be done to resolve Ricoh's
inte
Some years ago I forgot the password to my domain and also failed to
update the contact email. When my then ISP was purchased the email had
changed, with no forwarding. I was unable to take any action with
regards to my domain. While it was inconvenient to get the account email
changed - requir
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>Dan, have you tried to follow the link to buy it?
>It is not straight forward. You cannot just "buy" that domain. You can
>submit an offer to the owner (according to GoDaddy), and that would cost
>$69+commission fee (whatever it is). ... And maybe some more..
It would also
I think the quickest way for the current admin to fix this would be to
tell their email admin to recreate an email account for
khoi.t...@prac.pentax.com and point any mail that goes to that address
to go to the new administrator. That way he can reset the GoDaddy
password, etc. Once he is in, he ca
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I'm sure they will take corrective action, but it is difficult
> when the only two contacts that are associated with the domain are no
> longer with your company.
I don't know how GoDaddy is, but if it were Network Solutions, I'm
sure they wo
I called and talked with someone in Marketing who thanked me for the info.
Khoi Tran was also formerly associated with this domain:
ricohimagingrewards.com but I see that that has been updated to a new
ricoh-usa.com email address.
So I'm going to send the info to that administrator's email address
Even after the domain expires, there is a period of time that the
original owner can renew the domain, so it is not available to be
picked up by just anybody until that time frame expires. The two email
addresses associated with the domain record are:
carolyn.hass...@prac.pentax.com and khoi.t...@p
Dan, have you tried to follow the link to buy it?
It is not straight forward. You cannot just "buy" that domain. You can
submit an offer to the owner (according to GoDaddy), and that would cost
$69+commission fee (whatever it is). ... And maybe some more..
And no, it wouldn't be sufficient fo
All Ricoh would have to do is to go the the old URL for the Gallery.
That takes one to the GoDaddy page that asks whether you are the
registered user and provides a link for renewing the registration.
That same page is also offering the domain name for sale.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogall
Either Ricoh doesn't want to renew it, or they cannot find the passwords
for access to GoDaddy registration account, as those who had them might be
long gone. In either case, if Ricoh didn't warn PPG users that they are
not going forward with it (I don't know, my notifications are turned off,
Ricoh, can probably afford it, but it just doesn't fulfill their needs.
Perhaps everyone with images posted there should email them and demand
their images back.
On 7/20/2015 9:12 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I tried to log in to the Pentax Photo Gallery this morning. Instead
of the usual lo
Not licensed to drive. Figures.
Rick
On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:57 PM, CollinB wrote:
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Acura_ILX,_rear_view.jpg
>
> Film people will understand. ;-)
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne
Slate has run a couple of pieces on him
http://www.slate.com/blogs/behold/2013/05/14/jeffrey_milstein_flying_looks_at_airports_from_the_air_photos.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/behold/2015/05/19/jeffrey_milstein_photographs_cruise_ships_in_his_series_cruise_ships.html
A couple of days ago in The
I saw that too, and was going to send a link but got distracted by real
life here...
He has extensive and impressive credits.. but when I went to read more
about him I didn't see anything about equipment..
http://jeffreymilstein.com/index/home.html
I see Darrensent the link to the cbs pie
Thanks Darren!
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 7:42 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/topics/evening-news/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Jeffrey Milstein
Video:
http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/topics/evening-news/
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> I caught brief portions of the closing segment of CBS Evening News a few
> minutes ago. The feature was a 72-yr old photographer, retired architect who
> does arial
Yep, Lik is the saturation master, without a doubt. ;)
He well knows the rewards of super saturating nature.
Just not my cup of tea.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Gonz"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:25:42 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax s
I agree Paul. If I only looked at photos as an investment, I would
never buy any photo. If I buy them, its because there is something I
like about it enough to part with my money. And if I really like it,
it might just take up some better real estate on my walls. I wouldn't
mind having this Lik
twork investment.
So I assume if someone were to offer you an ungodly amount for one of
your images you'd refuse !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: Pentax spotted
paul stenquist w
To pick up on Paul’s point, this 2013 article on how Andreas Gursky started
selling big might be of interest to others—it speaks well to Paul’s point of
the role of auction houses, galleries, and art dealers—see 2nd graph and on.
http://gizmodo.com/what-does-it-take-to-sell-the-most-expensive-ph
While future generations and the test of time will have to decide if Mr. Lik’s
work is indeed valuable art, the fact that it sells for big prices now is not a
determining factor in measuring its worth. The world’s greatest art sells for
astronomical sums, in part due to good marketing by auctio
Larry Colen wrote:
> It's not so much that people offer him that sort of money for his
> photos, but that they are told that the photos are a good investment,
> when in reality, they are nearly guaranteed to lose money:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-
> succe
Ken Waller wrote:
However, if one of his shots with the 645Z were to make it into the
PDML annual, I don't think that it would stand out as any better than
most of the other landscape photos.
The difference is he is a well known name if photographic circles and as
far as I know none on the PD
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: Pentax spotted
paul stenquist wrote:
Oh, so the problem is that Lik makes money. Good for him. I love seeing
photographers achieve financial success by producing something people
want. What a novel idea! I admire Roc
if Lik's message sells photo, then it’s a good one. I sometimes hustle photos
when I shoot cars for publications. The owners will be much more likely to buy
if I praise their car and tell them I’m going to make a print for myself.
“Would you like one as well?” On a $1200 shoot for Mopar Action,
paul stenquist wrote:
Oh, so the problem is that Lik makes money. Good for him. I love seeing
photographers achieve financial success by producing something people want.
What a novel idea! I admire Rockwell’s ability to make a buck, but I consider
him a buffoon. Lik also knows how to make mo
.
>
>
>
>
> On 6/25/2015 8:29 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>> I'd lend you some eye bleach, but, I'm fresh out.
>>
>> So you'd like his work if it was B+W ?
>>
>> Kenneth Waller
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>&g
I resent that remark, the price of Hard Drives has fallen considerably
in the last few years...
On 6/25/2015 7:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
A ridiculous comparison. Like his vision or not, Lik obviously has a
great deal of technical expertise. Rockwell has none.
However,
I donno, I'm sure Kennyboy finds they make fine paperweights and door
stops.
On 6/25/2015 6:09 PM, John wrote:
He does appear to have used the low noise/low light capabilities of the
645D (or 645Z) to good effect in this series.
It's a good example of what Ken Rockwell might be able to do if h
r
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message ----- From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: Pentax spotted
I'd lend you some eye bleach, but, I'm fresh out.
On 6/25/2015 5:01 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I hadn’t thought of that. Now I’m going to have to get
of
digital capture, is that there are so many really good/great images out
there that good marketing will set the difference between what sells and
what doesn't.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "paul stenquist"
ethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: Pentax spotted
Some really interesting things on the site: 1) yes, there was a medium
format Pentax, 2) Rick Wormer should check it out because he loves to
shoot fields of blue bells, and there is a ver
Some really interesting things on the site: 1) yes, there was a medium format
Pentax, 2) Rick Wormer should check it out because he loves to shoot fields of
blue bells, and there is a very nice shot of blue bells in the video, 3) the
gallery of stills shows photographs printed large on canvas
He's like Kinkade in that he's a good businessman, but Kinkade's work was
sophomoric and derivative, while Lik's is somewhat unique and original. Kinkade
is boring; Lik projects energy.
Paul via phone
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 9:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>> John wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
>John wrote:
>> He does appear to have used the low noise/low light capabilities of the
>> 645D (or 645Z) to good effect in this series.
>>
>> It's a good example of what Ken Rockwell might be able to do if he
>> actually used some of the equipment he reviews.
>
>I was just abou
Oh, so the problem is that Lik makes money. Good for him. I love seeing
photographers achieve financial success by producing something people want.
What a novel idea! I admire Rockwell’s ability to make a buck, but I consider
him a buffoon. Lik also knows how to make money, but he does it with
I'd lend you some eye bleach, but, I'm fresh out.
So you'd like his work if it was B+W ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: Pentax spotted
I'd lend you some eye bleach
Paul Stenquist wrote:
A ridiculous comparison. Like his vision or not, Lik obviously has a great deal
of technical expertise. Rockwell has none.
However, they both do a tremendous job of uniting those of us who don't
make enough off our photography each year to pay for the hard drive
stora
A ridiculous comparison. Like his vision or not, Lik obviously has a great deal
of technical expertise. Rockwell has none.
Paul via phone
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 6:11 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> John wrote:
>> He does appear to have used the low noise/low light capabilities of the
>> 645D (
It's not for purists perhaps, but it's colorful, well composed and a unique
vision. For fans of same old, same old, I'm sure it's taboo. It has become
intellectually compulsory to ridicule him, but he's quite the technician and
damn gods at what he does.
Paul via phone
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 5:
Well put, Larry!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> John wrote:
>> He does appear to have used the low noise/low light capabilities of the
>> 645D (or 645Z) to good effect in this series.
>>
>> It's a good example of what Ken Rockwell might be ab
Probably due to your living upside down too long.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015, at 04:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Nothing personal certainly, Gonz, but I have seen far too much of MR Lik
>> and have sworn off.
>
>
> Ho
John wrote:
He does appear to have used the low noise/low light capabilities of the
645D (or 645Z) to good effect in this series.
It's a good example of what Ken Rockwell might be able to do if he
actually used some of the equipment he reviews.
I was just about to phrase it as:
Mr. Lik has
He does appear to have used the low noise/low light capabilities of the
645D (or 645Z) to good effect in this series.
It's a good example of what Ken Rockwell might be able to do if he
actually used some of the equipment he reviews.
On 6/25/2015 2:18 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Nothing personal certa
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015, at 04:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Nothing personal certainly, Gonz, but I have seen far too much of MR Lik
> and have sworn off.
How dare you sir! He's one of our National Living Treasures!!
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
I'd lend you some eye bleach, but, I'm fresh out.
On 6/25/2015 5:01 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I hadn’t thought of that. Now I’m going to have to get my brain replaced.
On Jun 25, 2015, at 2:46 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
With a name like Peter Lik, I'd expect his work to be a bit more bizarre, b
I'm a bit surprised, Paul, but as you
wrote, it is subjective.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:59 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
>
> Really? It’s excellent work, IMO. Of course that’s subjective.
>
>
>> On Jun 25, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> Nothing personal certainly
I hadn’t thought of that. Now I’m going to have to get my brain replaced.
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 2:46 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> With a name like Peter Lik, I'd expect his work to be a bit more bizarre, but
> in a different way, just sayin'.
>
> On 6/25/2015 2:07 PM, Gonz wrote:
>> Looks like
Really? It’s excellent work, IMO. Of course that’s subjective.
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Nothing personal certainly, Gonz, but I have seen far too much of MR Lik and
> have sworn off.
>
> J
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gonz"
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Ma
Funny cuz I thought the first posting didnt make it, remembering that
in the past the discussion list needed text only and my email is not
by default.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Gonz wrote:
> Oh yeah, I dont care for the overpriced and overhyped stuff. Just
> care about the use of the med
You may not like him or his marketing but his photography speaks for itself.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: Pentax spotted
Nothing personal certainly, Gonz, but I have seen far too much
Oh yeah, I dont care for the overpriced and overhyped stuff. Just
care about the use of the medium format Pentax shown there.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Nothing personal certainly, Gonz, but I have seen far too much of MR Lik and
> have sworn off.
>
> J
>
> - Orig
With a name like Peter Lik, I'd expect his work to be a bit more
bizarre, but in a different way, just sayin'.
On 6/25/2015 2:07 PM, Gonz wrote:
Looks like a 645 digital in the video?
http://www.europe.lik.com/
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immo
Nothing personal certainly, Gonz, but I have seen far too much of MR Lik and
have sworn off.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Gonz"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 11:07:24 AM
Subject: Pentax spotted
Looks like a 645 digital in the video?
http://www.europe
I use an EF 17-40/4 on the C100 video camera but because it has no
aperture ring, controlling the iris is done by a finger wheel on the
camera. This has 3 settings for control: 1/2 stop increments, 1/3 stop
increments and 'fine'. The 'fine' setting is not quite fine enough and
the step-changes can
I might want it for myself!
> On 11 Jun 2015, at 19:53, mike wilson wrote:
>
> You'll be able to charge Cotty a fortune when the FF comes out.
>
>> On 11 June 2015 at 19:47, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> These are extremely good lenses. I still have one, although I haven't used
>> it for years.
>>
Actually the A,M, and F, 20-35mms referred to should have been 24-35mm,
what can I say except I can't type. Also the M is a different optical
formula than the A and F. Forget about it, it's the internet.
On 6/11/2015 2:40 PM, mike wilson wrote:
M24-35.
On 10 June 2015 at 03:12, P.J. Alling
801 - 900 of 17591 matches
Mail list logo
