Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh)

2016-02-18 Thread P.J. Alling
The K refers to the mount. I think Sony is worse in that regard, as they have two different lens mounts with the Alpha (a) name even though all their mirrorless cameras use the Sony E mount. On 2/18/2016 12:22 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote: The K-series - K10D to the K-3 II - is synonymous with APSC

Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh)

2016-02-18 Thread Bipin Gupta
The K-series - K10D to the K-3 II - is synonymous with APSC cameras. So the Full Frame would have been better identified by a new naming convention say F-1 as their FF Line. I too got hits on the Mirrorless K-01 when I googled for the K-1. Regards. Bipin Amateurs worry about equipment, professio

Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).

2016-02-18 Thread John
On 2/17/2016 9:59 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: So now that the K-1 has been announced I figured to hit Google for more information. What do I get but 99% of the hits are on the K-01 mirrorless. First they name their first production DSLR *ist-D an unsearchable name, (leave of the * and count the Germ

Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).

2016-02-17 Thread steve harley
On 2016-02-17 19:59 , P.J. Alling wrote: So now that the K-1 has been announced I figured to hit Google for more information. What do I get but 99% of the hits are on the K-01 mirrorless. that is a problem that i believe will quickly "fix itself" -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.ne

Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).

2016-02-17 Thread Igor PDML-StR
Darren, Yes, naming of product lines is an interesting issue. To add to your collection of confusing name conventions, - I'd mention Ikea's lines of furniture. Besides the difficulty of identifying a specific piece of furniture, - you are forced to train you memory in memorizing words that in

Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).

2016-02-17 Thread Alan C
John? Thomas Crapper would like that! Alan C -Original Message- From: Darren Addy Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:04 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh). As someone who has more than a passing interest in "branding"

Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).

2016-02-17 Thread Darren Addy
As someone who has more than a passing interest in "branding" this is an interesting subject to me. Think of the naming conventions for automobiles (a subject near and dear to many on this list). Auto manufacturers take slightly different tacks, but a model name (such as the Chevrolet "Impala" exis

Re: Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).

2016-02-17 Thread Larry Colen
P.J. Alling wrote: So now that the K-1 has been announced I figured to hit Google for more information. What do I get but 99% of the hits are on the K-01 mirrorless. First they name their first production DSLR *ist-D an unsearchable name, (leave of the * and count the German language sites). th

Pentax naming conventions, (Sheesh).

2016-02-17 Thread P.J. Alling
So now that the K-1 has been announced I figured to hit Google for more information. What do I get but 99% of the hits are on the K-01 mirrorless. First they name their first production DSLR *ist-D an unsearchable name, (leave of the * and count the German language sites). then they use the m

Re: Don't check in for a few days and sheesh!

2015-11-30 Thread ann sanfedele
try the delete key ann On 11/30/2015 12:27 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: Currently 500 PDML messages and I have no idea where to start. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above a

Re: Don't check in for a few days and sheesh!

2015-11-30 Thread John
According to Alice, you should "Begin at the beginning, and go on until the end: then stop." On 11/30/2015 12:27 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: Currently 500 PDML messages and I have no idea where to start. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never questio

Re: Don't check in for a few days and sheesh!

2015-11-30 Thread Bob W-PDML
Select All, Delete... > On 30 Nov 2015, at 17:28, P.J. Alling wrote: > > Currently 500 PDML messages and I have no idea where to start. > > -- > I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve > immortality through not dying. > -- Woody Allen > > > -- > PDML Pentax-D

Re: Don't check in for a few days and sheesh!

2015-11-30 Thread Bruce Walker
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > P.J. Alling wrote: >> >> Currently 500 PDML messages and I have no idea where to start. > > Probably with the delete button on any thread that has to do with politics That's easy then: for a week or so that was all of them. -- -bmw -- P

Re: Don't check in for a few days and sheesh!

2015-11-30 Thread Larry Colen
P.J. Alling wrote: Currently 500 PDML messages and I have no idea where to start. Probably with the delete button on any thread that has to do with politics -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listi

Don't check in for a few days and sheesh!

2015-11-30 Thread P.J. Alling
Currently 500 PDML messages and I have no idea where to start. -- I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE fr

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-17 Thread pdml
on 2012-10-15 23:36 Joseph McAllister wrote Apparently, I've been told, if you are in your car or on horseback and not within 10 miles of a major city, you'd better have Verizon. Everything else is like a dry Texas county. No bars. not necessarily; as Godfrey says, it varies, and boonies are

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-17 Thread John Sessoms
I think Verizon got that when they absorbed Alltel. Alltel had a very good network. My coverage from Alltel was really good; Verizon not so good. I think it's from Verizon eliminating the Alltel towers that duplicated Verizon's existing coverage. Trouble is, I had really good line-of-sight to th

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-16 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I've driven back and forth around the USA with both Verizon and AT&T carrier devices. My best evaluation summary: it's a wash. Verizon is stronger in some place, AT&T is stronger in others. Get out into the real boonies and neither works worth a damn. Same for Sprint and Tmobile. Like a talking do

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-16 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Joseph McAllister wrote: > Apparently, I've been told, if you are in your car or on horseback and not > within 10 miles of a major city, you'd better have Verizon. Everything else > is like a dry Texas county. No bars. When we camped here, at an undeveloped sit

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-16 Thread Joseph McAllister
Apparently, I've been told, if you are in your car or on horseback and not within 10 miles of a major city, you'd better have Verizon. Everything else is like a dry Texas county. No bars. Pardna. Git along. On Sep 29, 2012, at 09:23 , Doug Brewer wrote: > On 9/29/12 11:49 AM, John Sessoms wr

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread John Sessoms
From: Bruce Walker On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 3/10/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: Just a label. Peel the label back and there's a hole underneath it about 3/32"x1/4", 10 little gold dots. Looks like : ... but no card, nothing in the hole.

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread John Sessoms
From: "Steve Cottrell" On 3/10/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: Just a label. Peel the label back and there's a hole underneath it about 3/32"x1/4", 10 little gold dots. Looks like : ... but no card, nothing in the hole. So presumably you've been having lots of conversat

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread Bruce Walker
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 3/10/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Just a label. Peel the label back and there's a hole underneath it about >>3/32"x1/4", >>10 little gold dots. >> >>Looks like >> >>: >> >>... but no card, nothing in the hole. > >

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 3/10/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed: >Just a label. Peel the label back and there's a hole underneath it about >3/32"x1/4", >10 little gold dots. > >Looks like > >: > >... but no card, nothing in the hole. So presumably you've been having lots of conversations with 911 ? -

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread John Sessoms
From: "Bob W" From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms From: mike wilson As we're talking about mobiles... I'm still using the SIM card (as in the actual, physical card) that I got with my first digital (AKA 2G) mobile in about 1994/5. Anyone else this retarded?

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread Bob W
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms > > From: mike wilson > > > As we're talking about mobiles... > > > > I'm still using the SIM card (as in the actual, physical card) that I > > got with my first digital (AKA 2G) mobile in about 1994/5. Anyone > > else this re

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread John Sessoms
From: mike wilson As we're talking about mobiles... I'm still using the SIM card (as in the actual, physical card) that I got with my first digital (AKA 2G) mobile in about 1994/5. Anyone else this retarded? I don't think my phone has a sim card. I looked on the internet and found hundreds

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread Bob W
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of mike wilson > Sent: 03 October 2012 16:05 > > As we're talking about mobiles... > > I'm still using the SIM card (as in the actual, physical card) that I > got with my first digital (AKA 2G) mobile in about 1994/5. Anyone else > this retar

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread Doug Brewer
On 10/3/12 11:04 AM, mike wilson wrote: As we're talking about mobiles... I'm still using the SIM card (as in the actual, physical card) that I got with my first digital (AKA 2G) mobile in about 1994/5. Anyone else this retarded? wow. Not me. I bought a sim card that allows me to use my iPhon

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-03 Thread mike wilson
As we're talking about mobiles... I'm still using the SIM card (as in the actual, physical card) that I got with my first digital (AKA 2G) mobile in about 1994/5. Anyone else this retarded? -- No fixed Adobe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread Doug Brewer
Could be. I saw that coming. Dougbrewer.wordpress.com On Oct 2, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: > Maybe you should wave the dead rubber chicken over your iPhone. > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: >> Hmmm. Looks like I have to ignore when my phone says the server

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread Scott Loveless
Maybe you should wave the dead rubber chicken over your iPhone. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Hmmm. Looks like I have to ignore when my phone says the server rejected the > address...sorry about the repeats. > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > >> Both.

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread Doug Brewer
Hmmm. Looks like I have to ignore when my phone says the server rejected the address...sorry about the repeats. On Oct 2, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Both. > > Dougbrewer.wordpress.com > > On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Dou

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread Doug Brewer
Both. Dougbrewer.wordpress.com On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: >> On 9/28/12 9:35 AM, Darren Addy wrote: >>> >>> "no amount of chicken waving" >>> >>> It is a common misperception that the QUANTITY of chicken waving that

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread Doug Brewer
On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: >> > > Don't feel bad, Doug. It could very well have been the quality of the > chicken, not the waving. Was it dead, or rubber? > > -- > Scott Loveless > Both. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/lis

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread Scott Loveless
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: > On 9/28/12 9:35 AM, Darren Addy wrote: >> >> "no amount of chicken waving" >> >> It is a common misperception that the QUANTITY of chicken waving that >> is important but, as in most things in life, it is the QUALITY of the >> chicken waving th

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread Bruce Walker
+1. Funny how all those numbers pop up again so easily. :) On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:14 PM, John Francis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:40:29PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote: >> >> It inspired me to take apart, clean, and rebuild my 1974 Pioneer PL-12D >> turntable; > > Aah - the affordable Hi-F

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-02 Thread John Francis
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:40:29PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote: > > It inspired me to take apart, clean, and rebuild my 1974 Pioneer PL-12D > turntable; Aah - the affordable Hi-Fi deck for the masses! The cheap-ass solution was a Garrard SP25, but they were rubbish. If you weren't up for high-end

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-01 Thread Rick Womer
1974; rebuilt woofers in 1990) speakers. Rick   http://photo.net/photos/RickW - Original Message - From: "knarftheria...@gmail.com" To: ""Pentax-Discuss Mail List"" Cc: Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 10:58 PM Subject: RE: iPhone 5--sheesh! Good quali

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-01 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I think it's safe to say that the PDML is not populated with a "Justin Bieber demographic", eh? How many of us are eleven to nineteen year old high school girls? Music is the least important part of his celebrity. ;-) G On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:29 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > Someone took a Biebe

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-01 Thread P. J. Alling
Someone took a Bieber song and slowed it down by some ridiculous factor maybe 100? The result was really quite eerily beautiful, almost like whale song, otherwise he's just Menudo. On 10/1/2012 8:37 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: I used JB as the most popular example; not criticizing. I spent some t

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-01 Thread P. J. Alling
If you've never been exposed to Bieber, you're better off for it. Let's just say that he's the white equivalent of the young, Michael Jackson, except Jackson had talent, and a voice, and leave it at that. On 10/1/2012 7:43 AM, John Sessoms wrote: I should probably look Bieber up on YouTube ju

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-01 Thread Bruce Walker
I used JB as the most popular example; not criticizing. I spent some time listening to Top-40 radio during the spring & summer, just for a musical change and update. To my surprise I found quite a bit I liked. I'm a sucker for smart synth-pop. But I didn't care for JB at all. And what eventually d

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-10-01 Thread John Sessoms
I should probably look Bieber up on YouTube just to know what all the fuss is about. I try to remember how important some trivial things seemed when I was a teen and how it made me feel when my parents dismissed them without ever seeming to give them fair consideration. I don't care for much of t

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-30 Thread David Mann
On Oct 1, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > Average consumer doesn't care though. As long as they can hear the > latest Justin Bieber remix they're okay with it. Bingo. I often see teenagers walking along listening to music through their cellphone. Not with headphones on, they're actual

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-30 Thread Bruce Walker
t; frank > > "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- > Christopher Hitchens > > --- Original Message --- > > From: Bob W > Sent: September 29, 2012 9/29/12 > To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" > Subject: RE: iP

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-30 Thread J.C. O'Connell
l.net Subject: RE: iPhone 5--sheesh! Legacy systems. Hard to find quality audio if you're starting from scratch today. Not impossible if you know what you're doing, but who does? From: "J.C. O'Connell" > not in my household, I have two high quality stereo systems... >

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-30 Thread John Sessoms
#x27;Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of knarftheria...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 10:58 PM To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: RE: iPhone 5--sheesh! Good quality home audio

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread John Coyle
nd is clear and quite loud enough. John Coyle Brisbane, Australia -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob W Sent: Sunday, 30 September 2012 5:20 AM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: iPhone 5--sheesh! That seems to b

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
t can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: "J.C. O'Connell" Sent: September 29, 2012 9/29/12 To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" Subject: RE: iPhone 5--sheesh! not in my hous

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread J.C. O'Connell
10:58 PM To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: RE: iPhone 5--sheesh! Good quality home audio is all but a thing of the past. cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Bob W Sent

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
;" Subject: RE: iPhone 5--sheesh! That seems to be generally true of audio things these days - I think they expect people to be permanently wearing headphones, or in the case of TVs to be plugged into some sort of home cinema set up with superoctomegatronic-3D-HDQ- surround-sound Dolby bollocks.

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread steve harley
on 2012-09-29 9:49 John Sessoms wrote Still waiting for an answer which one is better for making telephone calls. i don't think they will differ much, and it would be hard to compare meaningfully without taking two phones around the areas you spend the most time i'm completely happy with the

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread Bob W
; > "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- > Christopher Hitchens > > --- Original Message --- > > From: John Sessoms > Sent: September 29, 2012 9/29/12 > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: Re: iPhone 5--sheesh! > > Still w

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread P. J. Alling
-- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: John Sessoms Sent: September 29, 2012 9/29/12 To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: iPhone 5--sheesh! Still waiting for an answer which one is better for making telephone calls. -- Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and the

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
/29/12 To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: iPhone 5--sheesh! Still waiting for an answer which one is better for making telephone calls. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread Doug Brewer
On 9/29/12 11:49 AM, John Sessoms wrote: Still waiting for an answer which one is better for making telephone calls. I have had phones with all sorts of operating systems--Android, Windows, Blackberry, now iPhone, and most of the other also-rans--and I can't recall a one of them that couldn'

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-29 Thread John Sessoms
Still waiting for an answer which one is better for making telephone calls. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Doug Franklin
On 2012-09-28 23:44, Miserere wrote: It's called Verizon Backup Assistant Plus. Free up to 500MB, beyond that there's a charge. It backs up media files, documents and contacts. Just be aware that Backup Assistant is not equal to Backup Assistant Plus. I've been backing up my contacts and stuf

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Miserere
; > http://photo.net/photos/RickW > > > - Original Message - > From: Miserere > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Cc: > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:36 PM > Subject: Re: iPhone 5--sheesh! > > On 28 September 2012 14:43, Rick Womer wrote: >> Mis, >

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Rick Womer
ubject: Re: iPhone 5--sheesh! On 28 September 2012 14:43, Rick Womer wrote: > Mis, > > I disagree with you re iPhone re Android. > > One can back up an iPhone =completely= (apps, data, the works) via iTunes.  > There is nothing similar for Android.  Having lost a lot of data when m

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Larry Colen
On Sep 28, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Darren Addy wrote: > "no amount of chicken waving" > > It is a common misperception that the QUANTITY of chicken waving that > is important but, as in most things in life, it is the QUALITY of the > chicken waving that makes the difference between success and failure

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Steven Desjardins
"I dunno. It's not like the good old days. Back then, if you needed a doctor you sent Lassie, Rin Tin Tin or Skippy the Bush Kangaroo to fetch one for you." What's the matter, girl? Is it Grampa? Grampa's hard drive crashed?. . . On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Bob W wrote: >> From: pdml-boun

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Miserere
On 28 September 2012 14:43, Rick Womer wrote: > Mis, > > I disagree with you re iPhone re Android. > > One can back up an iPhone =completely= (apps, data, the works) via iTunes. > There is nothing similar for Android. Having lost a lot of data when my > Droid bricked itself in July, this is a

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Rick Womer
- Original Message - From: Miserere To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Cc: Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 1:59 PM Subject: Re: iPhone 5--sheesh! Handled an iPhone 5 yesterday. My HTC Android screen is larger, it does everything the iPhone does, and I've had no problems with it. Android al

RE: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Bob W
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of > Rick Womer > > The modern hospital-based physician carries a smartphone rather than a > beeper nowadays.   I dunno. It's not like the good old days. Back then, if you needed a doctor you sent Lassie, Rin Tin Tin or Skipp

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Bruce Walker
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Miserere wrote: > > Handled an iPhone 5 yesterday. My HTC Android screen is larger, it > does everything the iPhone does, and I've had no problems with it. > Android also has a larger selection of free apps, which I appreciate. > > I just don't understand the fasci

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Doug Brewer
On 9/28/12 1:59 PM, Miserere wrote: Handled an iPhone 5 yesterday. My HTC Android screen is larger, it does everything the iPhone does, and I've had no problems with it. Android also has a larger selection of free apps, which I appreciate. I just don't understand the fascination with the iPhone

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Miserere
On 28 September 2012 07:58, Rick Womer wrote: > The modern hospital-based physician carries a smartphone rather than a beeper > nowadays. My hospital-issued Droids have provided nothing but malfunction > and frustration for the last few months, and the IS folks put in an advance > order for an

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread John Sessoms
here-ever you are right now? From: "John Mullan" But iPhones are so cool, and iPhone 5 is new, and my iPhone 4s is so uncool and I drank from the Apple kool-aid and I gotta have one... sheesh! is right jm -Original Message- From: Rick Womer Sent: Friday, September 28, 20

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Bruce Walker
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: > On 9/28/12 9:35 AM, Darren Addy wrote: >> >> "no amount of chicken waving" >> >> It is a common misperception that the QUANTITY of chicken waving that >> is important but, as in most things in life, it is the QUALITY of the >> chicken waving th

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Doug Brewer
On 9/28/12 9:35 AM, Darren Addy wrote: "no amount of chicken waving" It is a common misperception that the QUANTITY of chicken waving that is important but, as in most things in life, it is the QUALITY of the chicken waving that makes the difference between success and failure. are you doubti

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Darren Addy
"no amount of chicken waving" It is a common misperception that the QUANTITY of chicken waving that is important but, as in most things in life, it is the QUALITY of the chicken waving that makes the difference between success and failure. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pd

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Bob Sullivan
"no amount of chicken-waving" I haven't heard of trying that before. Always open to new ideas... On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: > On 9/28/12 7:58 AM, Rick Womer wrote: >> >> The modern hospital-based physician carries a smartphone rather than a >> beeper nowadays. My hospit

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Doug Brewer
On 9/28/12 7:58 AM, Rick Womer wrote: The modern hospital-based physician carries a smartphone rather than a beeper nowadays. My hospital-issued Droids have provided nothing but malfunction and frustration for the last few months, and the IS folks put in an advance order for an iPhone 5. It

Re: iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread John Mullan
But iPhones are so cool, and iPhone 5 is new, and my iPhone 4s is so uncool and I drank from the Apple kool-aid and I gotta have one... sheesh! is right jm -Original Message- From: Rick Womer Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 7:58 AM To: Pentax List Subject: iPhone 5--sheesh! The

iPhone 5--sheesh!

2012-09-28 Thread Rick Womer
The modern hospital-based physician carries a smartphone rather than a beeper nowadays.  My hospital-issued Droids have provided nothing but malfunction and frustration for the last few months, and the IS folks put in an advance order for an iPhone 5. It arrived yesterday.  It's sleek, light, f

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-09 Thread Doug Franklin
David J Brooks wrote: > I guess sucking has its advantages You mean it took you until now to figure that out?! There are definitely days when it's better to be at the bottom of the totem pole. :-) ... "the benefits of not being seen". -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-09 Thread 272yb
ll of my photographs must be removed immediately. A copy of this > > > >> notice has > > > >> been sent to my attorneys. > > > >> Thank you for your prompt attention. > > > >> Paul Stenquist > > > >> > > > >> -

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-09 Thread David J Brooks
is > > >> notice has > > >> been sent to my attorneys. > > >> Thank you for your prompt attention. > > >> Paul Stenquist > > >> > > >> -- Original message -- > > >> From: "Willia

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-09 Thread 272yb
raphs must be removed immediately. A copy of this > >> notice has > >> been sent to my attorneys. > >> Thank you for your prompt attention. > >> Paul Stenquist > >> > >> ------ Original message -- > >> From: &q

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-09 Thread Paul Stenquist
hank you for your prompt attention. >> Paul Stenquist >> >> -- Original message -- >> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> S

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-09 Thread 272yb
ur prompt attention. > Paul Stenquist > > -- Original message -- > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > - Original Message - > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Subject: OT:: Sheesh! W

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Adam Maas
On 2/8/08, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam Maas wrote: > > >The scum in question do have their domain registry > > anonimized, but not by GoDaddy. > > Their domain registry is anonymized by Domains by Proxy. > Which is owned by Godaddy.com. > Ah, good to know. GoDaddy used to use th

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Mark Roberts
Adam Maas wrote: >The scum in question do have their domain registry > anonimized, but not by GoDaddy. Their domain registry is anonymized by Domains by Proxy. Which is owned by Godaddy.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSC

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Adam Maas
On 2/8/08, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam Maas wrote: > > On 2/8/08, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Paul Stenquist wrote: > >>> Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? > >>> BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the > >>> feedback forum. The

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Mark Roberts
Adam Maas wrote: > On 2/8/08, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? >>> BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the >>> feedback forum. The playcomet site has other photo.net work as well. >> First find

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Doug Franklin
Adam Maas wrote: > OrgName:GoDaddy.com, Inc. > OrgID: GODAD > Address:14455 N Hayden Road > Address:Suite 226 > City: Scottsdale > StateProv: AZ > PostalCode: 85260 > Country:US Since they're hosted in the US, you can try invoking the DMCA. Google search for "DMCA Ta

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Mark Roberts
Mark Roberts wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: >> Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? >> BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the >> feedback forum. The playcomet site has other photo.net work as well. > > First find out the IP address of the site. A traceroute will

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Adam Maas
They're hosted by GoDaddy.com off qwest by the looks of things. The ip is: White:~% nslookup pic.playcomet.com Server: 192.168.1.4 Address:192.168.1.4#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: pic.playcomet.com Address: 72.167.47.18 ARIN Registry info: White:~% whois -h whois.arin.n

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Adam Maas
On 2/8/08, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? > > BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the > > feedback forum. The playcomet site has other photo.net work as well. > > First find out the IP address

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread pnstenquist
Thanks Mark. That's very helpful. I'm on it! Paul -- Original message -- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? > > BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the > > feedb

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Doug Franklin
Paul Stenquist wrote: > Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? > BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the > feedback forum. The playcomet site has other photo.net work as well. I don't have that URL handy any more since I deleted the earlier emails. But the first

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote: > Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? > BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the > feedback forum. The playcomet site has other photo.net work as well. First find out the IP address of the site. A traceroute will do it. I've done it for you:

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks Doug. How can I determine their ISP? BTW, I've alerted Photo.net management and posted a notice in the feedback forum. The playcomet site has other photo.net work as well. Paul On Feb 8, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I registered a complaint. > > If

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I registered a complaint. If they don't you could try a "Takedown Notice" to their ISP. Across international borders, whether or not the ISP will care is a crap shoot, unless the country is a signatory to the Berne Convention. -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pen

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread John Graves
Paul, The interesting thing is that by the 5th page of a google on Paul Stenquist, I was seeing mostly combinations like.Stench, Paul; Stenguist, Brian. I didn't know you had so many alternative personalitiesand some of them seem to be split. The site is brazen to list the Photo

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread pnstenquist
- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: OT:: Sheesh! What's this? > > > > Does anyone know anything about this Play Comet site? They must have > > pulled some of my pics off Photo.net. Should I care? It looks a bit > > sleazy. > > http://pic.p

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread pnstenquist
Sex ads come up on every page that I looked at. They have some very good photography posted. All without permission, I suspect. Paul -- Original message -- From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I find the adverts quite intriguing, I wonder what it is about th

Re: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?

2008-02-08 Thread pnstenquist
ot;William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: OT:: Sheesh! What's this? > > > > Does anyone know anything about this Play Comet site? They must have > > pulled some of my p

  1   2   >