On 11/19/05, Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Yes, it's a stupid law but the police could have arrested the
photographers instead of just making them delete the images.
I took a picture of the Brooklyn Bridge this
On 11/20/05, Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up to something no good.
She may be a woman, but she's no lady g,dr
-frank (no
At 12:49 PM 11/21/2005, you wrote:
I took a picture of the Brooklyn Bridge this summer.
Shit, I'm in big trouble now!
Not until you hear the knock at the door.
Gary J Sibio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~garysibio
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/19/05, Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Yes, it's a stupid law but the police could have arrested the
photographers instead of just making them delete the images.
I took a
that was
ann
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Sarup
Subject: RE: another harassment by police story
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly
That bridge looks familiar. Am I right in thinking that W E Smith
photographed it quite a lot?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 21:28
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I shot this pano this morning:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/bridge.jpg
That bridge looks familiar. Am I right in thinking that W E Smith
photographed it quite a lot?
I'm not even sure what bridge it is. It's
So Frank's still in trouble.
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/19/05, Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Yes, it's a stupid law but the police could have arrested the
photographers
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Frank's still in trouble.
Yup. What else is new? g
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 11/21/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Frank's still in trouble.
I continue to be amazed that you guys let me cross the border into the US.
-frank (currently applying for a passport - let's see how easy the GFM
crossing is next year, Dave! LOL)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
looks like an interesting place, ever since I
first saw The Deer Hunter.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 22:24
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
Bob W [EMAIL
Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 22:24
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I shot this pano
this morning:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/bridge.jpg
Uhhh.
Are you saying that I could have landed in trouble from taking
pictures like these?
In theory, yes. I know of no case when anyone has been prosecuted
under the law but I have heard of film being confiscated.
Nice shots, BTW.
Gary J Sibio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 01:48 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
There must be some fine print in that law --
certainly covered bridges
and such are much photo'ed
I doubt that the law is enforced very often. I've never heard of
anyone being arrested for taking a photo and I've only heard two or
three accounts of people
At 03:40 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
Sounds like an urban legend to me. I'd be very interested in learning
the statute number.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
I did a little searching on Google and found another comment by the
same lawyear your link goes to but I also found
Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:40 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
Sounds like an urban legend to me. I'd be very interested in learning
the statute number.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
I did a little searching on Google and found another comment by the
same lawyear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 7:54:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't bother with the sleight of hand, just comply and erase the card.
Then before you take any more photos switch cards and use recovery
software on the first card, even a
I've had no problems getting it to recover .pef files in the past Mark.
I though the same as you when I first ran the program. Out of
desperation I had it search for .nef (D1H/D1x) files. It recovered the
files, I then changed the extension to .pef. Works like a charm. All
exif data retained.
I
David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had no problems getting it to recover .pef files in the past Mark.
I though the same as you when I first ran the program. Out of
desperation I had it search for .nef (D1H/D1x) files. It recovered the
files, I then changed the extension to .pef. Works
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Reese) wrote:
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework.
They took a bite out of crime?
I hope everyone who reads this thread braces themselves for more of this
sort of thing...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Sarup
Subject: RE: another harassment by police story
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up to something no good
Ok, Mark...
{myself}
Done.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Reese) wrote:
My dentist was carted
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Sarup
Subject: RE: another harassment by police story
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 7:54:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't bother with the sleight of hand, just comply and erase the card.
Then before you take any more photos switch cards and use recovery
software on the
Well, now you're outed. :)
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 7:53 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From
But it will, tell it the files are TIFF and it finds them just fine...
(At least it finds PEF files just fine, I have no experience with other
manufactures RAW files).
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 7:54:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL
Message -
From: Gautam Sarup
Subject: RE: another harassment by police story
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up to something no good.
Obviously
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
from minutes of a recent NJFCC meeting:
Regarding photographing bridges and buildings - name deleted reported that
Monmouth Camera Club members were harassed by police at the Delaware Water Gap.
They were told to erase their memory cards. A letter was sent to Security in
New York State but no
At 06:48 AM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
from minutes of a recent NJFCC meeting:
Regarding photographing bridges and buildings - name deleted
reported that Monmouth Camera Club members were harassed by police
at the Delaware Water Gap. They were told to erase their memory
cards. A letter was sent
- Original Message -
From: Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Yes, it's a stupid law but the police could have arrested the
photographers instead of just making them delete the images.
Uhhh.
Are you saying that I
Gary Sibio wrote:
At 06:48 AM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
from minutes of a recent NJFCC meeting:
Regarding photographing bridges and buildings - name deleted
reported that Monmouth Camera Club members were harassed by police at
the Delaware Water Gap. They were told to erase their memory
Well there was such a law in effect during WWII. Except for war
emergency powers, and taxation, the federal government here can not pass
laws nationwide. The have to use a threat of cutting off federal funding
to extort the states to pass state laws like they did with daylight
savings time.
keith_w wrote:
Gary Sibio wrote:
At 06:48 AM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
from minutes of a recent NJFCC meeting:
Regarding photographing bridges and buildings - name deleted
reported that Monmouth Camera Club members were harassed by police at
the Delaware Water Gap. They were told
keith_w wrote:
Gary Sibio wrote:
At 06:48 AM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
from minutes of a recent NJFCC meeting:
Regarding photographing bridges and buildings - name deleted
reported that Monmouth Camera Club members were harassed by police at
the Delaware Water Gap. They were told
In a message dated 11/19/2005 11:18:31 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Yes, it's a stupid law but the police could have arrested the
photographers instead of just making them delete the images.
Uhhh.
Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Sounds like an urban legend to me. I'd be very interested in learning
the statute number.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Sounds like an urban legend to me. I'd be very interested in learning
the statute number.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
--
Mark
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
At 06:48 AM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
from minutes of a recent NJFCC meeting:
Regarding photographing bridges and buildings - name deleted reported
that Monmouth Camera Club members were harassed by police at the Delaware
Water Gap
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...the police could have arrested the photographers instead of just making
them delete the images.
Perhaps they should have if they were serious.
Deleted images can be recovered, as long as thay haven't been shot over.
LOL. I hadn't even thought of that!
Sorry about that last one. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2005 19:19
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
- Original Message -
From: Gary
annsan, who will trash her photos of Jeff Bridges and the
Golden gate and the bridge at GFM and...
(juut kidding, I wish I had photos of Jeff
Bridges)
Damn, you got there before me
Bob
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework.
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
or Woody Allen for the opening scene of Manhattan. Or Clint Eastwood in
Bridges of Madison County. Or the news teams who covered
On Nov 19, 2005, at 4:08 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Sounds like an urban legend to me. I'd be very interested in learning
the statute number.
I agree. I've photographed bridges all over
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework
I wonder if he can extract himself before they drill him.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: another harassment by police story
My dentist
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework
I wonder if he can extract himself before they drill him.
Very likely. I doubt that law has any teeth to it.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Since my toy camera has two card slots I could just hand them the little
XD card and keep my mouth shut about the CF. GRIN
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 11:18:31 AM
Even when the building is on the historical register like here in Boone?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Bob Shell wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 4:08 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework
I wonder if he can extract himself before they drill him.
Very likely. I doubt that law has any teeth
Let me chew on this for awhile.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework
I
On Nov 19, 2005, at 8:32 PM, graywolf wrote:
Even when the building is on the historical register like here in
Boone?
graywolf
I don't know. Ask your postmaster. It was the postmaster here who
told me and showed me the regulation. However, I doubt that they
would hassle you unless
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework
I wonder if he can extract himself before they drill him.
Very likely. I doubt that law has any teeth to it.
He will certainly be indentured to hiw
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework
I wonder if he can extract himself before they drill him.
Very likely. I doubt that law has any teeth
Just change the subject line.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
Which will certainly gum up the works considerably.
I'm sure this thread is becoming unpalatable to most of the readers.
Shall we be cheeky and continue?
Or should we pay lip service to civility and desist?
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework.
They took a bite out of crime?
Bob W wrote:
annsan, who will trash her photos of Jeff Bridges and the
Golden gate and the bridge at GFM and...
(juut kidding, I wish I had photos of Jeff
Bridges)
Damn, you got there before me
Bob
LOL! so seldom I do :)
ann
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Let me chew on this for awhile.
Kenneth Waller
oooh here we go again...
ann
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dentist was carted
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework
I wonder if he can extract himself before they drill him.
Very likely. I doubt
Don't bother with the sleight of hand, just comply and erase the card.
Then before you take any more photos switch cards and use recovery
software on the first card, even a normal format will leave the data
behind.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 11:18:31 AM Pacific
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
Don't bother with the sleight of hand, just comply and erase the card.
Then before you take any more photos switch cards and use recovery
software on the first card, even a normal format
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
I'll have to crown you for that one
Just don't give me a tongue lashing, okay?
William Robb
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this a post 9/11 law?
As far as I know, yes. A chap I know slightly
was actually arrested in NY for photographing
a bridge. (There have been a lot of white male
bad guys recently, haven't there?)
(just kidding, I wish I had photos of Jeff
In a message dated 11/19/2005 7:54:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't bother with the sleight of hand, just comply and erase the card.
Then before you take any more photos switch cards and use recovery
software on the first card, even a normal format will leave the
Gautam Sarup wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this a post 9/11 law?
As far as I know, yes. A chap I know slightly
was actually arrested in NY for photographing
a bridge. (There have been a lot of white male
bad guys recently, haven't there?)
They never
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up to something no good.
Cheers,
Gautam
On Nov 20, 2005, at 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like it might not be a bad idea to carry a spare dummy card
with one.
And practice a little slight of hand.
One of those Wi-Fi cameras would be good.
- Dave
66 matches
Mail list logo
