Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-02 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks for the comments and suggestions, Jeffery. Dan On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > I've had a chance to peruse the Diner Blog this weekend. I very much like the > subject matter, and it is nice to be able to click on the images to get them > large on the  monitor. My

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-02 Thread Jeffery Smith
I've had a chance to peruse the Diner Blog this weekend. I very much like the subject matter, and it is nice to be able to click on the images to get them large on the monitor. My only suggestion (and this is very minor and pretty much just my taste) might be to try a thin border around each ph

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-02 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Yes, it is tricky. The trickiest part is not everyone sees what I see! That makes adjustments and corrections quite difficult. Thanks again for you comments and suggestions. On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:14 AM, eckinator wrote: > 2010/5/2 Daniel J. Matyola : >> Thanks, Sasha.  I have been formatti

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-02 Thread eckinator
2010/5/2 Daniel J. Matyola : > Thanks, Sasha.  I have been formatting my emails to Posterous for the > way it looks on my computers.  I probably should stop doing that, and > just type continuous lines of text. Indeed =) Also, if you compose your mails in the web interface of googlemail and have i

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Sasha. I have been formatting my emails to Posterous for the way it looks on my computers. I probably should stop doing that, and just type continuous lines of text. Dan On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 7:10 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > Dan, > > I think what is happening is you have your email set

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread John Sessoms
Dan, I think what is happening is you have your email set to wrap outgoing text at a specific line length. When you email your text to your blog, Posterous just accepts that default line length and confines the text to whatever line length your email is set to. No matter what size window the

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Frank, I really appreciate your comments. Dan On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:29 PM, frank theriault wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Daniel J. Matyola > wrote: >> In an effort to organize my images of diners, as well as my thoughts >> on the subject, I have started a blog devoted to

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread frank theriault
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > In an effort to organize my images of diners, as well as my thoughts > on the subject, I have started a blog devoted to the subject: > > http://dinerdan.posterous.com/ > > Initially, I am posting daily, but I will soon slow down to one a

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
There aren't many banjos in Southern Louisiana, not in the sense you are thinking of. That's Dixieland, Jazz and Zydeco country. Dan On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Bob W wrote: > Ah, the law of the banjo... > >> >> South of New Orleans, human rights tend to be optional. The >> refineries don't

RE: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Bob W
Ah, the law of the banjo... > > South of New Orleans, human rights tend to be optional. The > refineries don't want any negative publicity, and since the > sheriff is an elected position, they do whatever the refineries ask. > > Jeffery > > On May 1, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Bob W wrote: > > >> I w

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Cotty
On 1/5/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: >What are they worried about? Aren't these public places, and don't people >have a right to know about the destruction the oil leak is causing? They'd like to give you a heapin' helpin' of their hos-pee-tal-ee-tee. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Jeffery Smith
South of New Orleans, human rights tend to be optional. The refineries don't want any negative publicity, and since the sheriff is an elected position, they do whatever the refineries ask. Jeffery On May 1, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Bob W wrote: >> I was hoping to drive down to the south shore line to

RE: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Bob W
> I was hoping to drive down to the south shore line to see > what has become of it since the oil spill (which is now the > size of Puerto Rico), but the sheriffs down there don't want > any pictures taken. A fellow biology professor tried two days > ago and they ran her out. They ran me out se

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
I did not see a camera store there. I just missed the trolley back, so I wandered around a bit, and I' sure I would have noticed a camera store. Dan On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > Was there a camera store (Moldaner's) about 100 feet away from Camellia > Grill? That is t

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Jeffery Smith
Was there a camera store (Moldaner's) about 100 feet away from Camellia Grill? That is the only photography shop left in New Orleans (the city of) since the storm. It has since moved closer to Tulane University, replacing Maple Street Camera (the second to last photography shop in the city). I

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
The Camilla Grill was open two years ago when I was down there with my wife, who was attending a science teachers' convention. While she was at a session, I took the St Charles Street trolley out to Camilla for breakfast, The ride through the Garden District was a real joy. Once inside, the Cami

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-05-01 Thread Jeffery Smith
Camillia Grill is famous for their waffles as well as a hamburger with raw meat in it (the cannibal). You hit the nail on the head regarding its appearance. It had closed after Katrina (when we were having to pay $15/hour for dishwashers down here), but I think it's up and running again. Jeffer

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Stan! Dan On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > Never mind about the browser. I just tried again and just got through with no > problem. > I like this series. > > stan > > On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:06 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > >> Great suggestion, Hal. >> >> What brow

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Stan Halpin
Never mind about the browser. I just tried again and just got through with no problem. I like this series. stan On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:06 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > Great suggestion, Hal. > > What browser are you using? > > Dan > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Stan Halpin > wrote:

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Great suggestion, Hal. What browser are you using? Dan On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > Now that you have your blog (which  would like to see if my browser and your > site could agree to agree), for those diners with WiFi, you can carry in a > laptop, show them the proje

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Stan Halpin
Now that you have your blog (which would like to see if my browser and your site could agree to agree), for those diners with WiFi, you can carry in a laptop, show them the project, and have them clamoring to be part of it. Seriously. Even without WiFi, which may be too hoity toity for diners,

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Sam. I have tried to include some stories, where available and appropriate. I have solicited stories and memories from all my friends. Dan On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Sam L wrote: >>On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Christine  Aguila >>wrote: >> Hi Dan:  What a fantastic idea!  

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Jeffery. Are you familiar with the Camillia in New Orleans? From the outside it looks like a miniature southern plantation house. Inside, its pure Jersey diner. It is a well-know institution there, from what I hear. Dan On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > There is

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks for your comments, Rob. It is more difficult to get good inside images. Some diner managers don't permit inside photos, and it can make some customers uncomfortable. So, one must find a friendly place and a time where it is not crowded with people. I even ran into one owner who didn't wa

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Sam L
>On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Christine Aguila >wrote: > Hi Dan:  What a fantastic idea!  Love it.  The pictures of the diners are > great--love the interior shots.  Keep taking them.  The independently owned > Chicago diner has just about gone the way of the dodo bird--we still have > some,

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Stan Halpin
>> "Uh oh, we had an error. >> We've been emailed about this problem and hopefully we'll be able to fix it >> soon. >> Posterous requires cookies, so if you've disabled cookies, you may see this >> error. >> Re-enable cookies and try again. >> If you have questions, you can reach us at h...@poste

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Jeffery Smith
There is an 80-mile stretch of old highway between New Orleans and Baton Rouge that is called Airline Highway. Your photos really remind me of the diners that dotted that pre-freeway stretch of highway, sort of like a shorter Route-66. I'll try to take some time this weekend to go through your d

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Rob Studdert
On 30/04/2010, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > In an effort to organize my images of diners, as well as my thoughts > on the subject, I have started a blog devoted to the subject: > > http://dinerdan.posterous.com/ I was pleased to see inside the diner Dan, it's more interesting to me than the exterio

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Larry! Dan On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > I love the content. Both words and pictures. > > I agree with Sasha on the fixed width.  One whole point of html is allowing > it to format to the current page on whatever size monitor is being used. > > On 4/30/2010 5:34 P

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks, Sasha. I use Posterous, which is an easy and simple blog. I just send the text and attachments by email, and they imput it into their standard format. Because of this, I don't have a lot of control over the blog set-up. A number of others have looked at the blog and commented to me, but

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Larry Colen
I love the content. Both words and pictures. I agree with Sasha on the fixed width. One whole point of html is allowing it to format to the current page on whatever size monitor is being used. On 4/30/2010 5:34 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote: Daniel, sorry I had to be more specific. I use a fairly l

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Sasha Sobol
Daniel, sorry I had to be more specific. I use a fairly large monitor and the blog text has fixed width. So I have a stripe of text and pictures somewhere in the middle of my monitor, surrounded by the grayish background. I use Chrome on Ubuntu if it matters. I do not know if there is a better way

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:58 AM > Subject: Please comment on my Diner Blog > > >> In an effort to organize my images of diners, as well as my thoughts >> on the subject, I have started a blog devoted to the subject:

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Thanks for looking and thanks for your comments, Sasha! Your comment on the appearance of the blog puzzles me. I don't see any such line on my monitor, nor do I see what you refer to as "endless gray." If it is on your monitor, it must be on others as well. Since I don't see it, it is hard for

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-30 Thread Christine Aguila
xt to tell that part of the diner story. I think you have a fun project here--keep going!!! Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "Daniel J. Matyola" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:58 AM Subject: Please comment on my

Re: Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-29 Thread Sasha Sobol
Hi Daniel, some nice stuff there. One thing: the blog looks clumsy on my monitor - a thin stripe in the middle surrounded by endless gray. may be it would be nice to have more inside/outside pairs? --Sasha On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > In an effort to organize my i

Please comment on my Diner Blog

2010-04-29 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
In an effort to organize my images of diners, as well as my thoughts on the subject, I have started a blog devoted to the subject: http://dinerdan.posterous.com/ Initially, I am posting daily, but I will soon slow down to one a week or so. I would appreciate comments from those who have more art

Re: updated website, please comment

2005-04-12 Thread Frantisek
pcn> majority of the categories. However,in the section "other work" pcn> there are a few pages that come up completely different and don't pcn> allow backing up to the previous page. These include "Refugee pcn> children..." "Home for the mentally handicapped...," and pcn> "Theater performance in

Re: updated website, please comment

2005-04-11 Thread Rick Womer
Very nice, Fra (though that B&W photo on the first screen is a bit depressing...). It worked fine through 10 minutes of surfing with Safari on a Mac. Rick --- Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, >I have finally finished new design of my website, > redoing most of >the pages to hav

Re: updated website, please comment

2005-04-11 Thread pnstenquist
Hi Frantisek, The site is very attractive and works well with the majority of the categories. However,in the section "other work" there are a few pages that come up completely different and don't allow backing up to the previous page. These include "Refugee children..." "Home for the mentally ha

updated website, please comment

2005-04-11 Thread Frantisek
Hi, I have finally finished new design of my website, redoing most of the pages to have uniform look (before it was every one different , not intentionally! but each was done at a different time with different software, handcoded/...). Not much new photographs yet, but I would like

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-20 Thread Anthony Farr
How about "parking the tiger"? Pardon my lateness, I'm just catching up after a dose of flu. Well, not exactly after but at least after the worst of it, I'm at 12 weeks in and the clock's still running. And yes, the worst of it did involve parking the tiger a couple of times. regards, Anthony F

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-15 Thread Dr E D F Williams
://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: July 31, 2003 - Original Message - From: "Antti-Pekka Virjonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:17 AM Subject: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: p

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread John Coyle
John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Michael Perham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 11:30 AM Subject: RE: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment) > > On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 1

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Michael Perham" Subject: RE: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment) > > On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 10:12 AM, William Robb wrote: > > > > Moose are like Sherman tanks. > > > > William Robb > > My wife wa

RE: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Perham
On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 10:12 AM, William Robb wrote: > > Moose are like Sherman tanks. > > William Robb My wife was driving (my) car back from the cabin one day and had this encounter with a moose, I couldn't believe the damage to my car, or how my wife survived. She is 5'2" and I am

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread arathi-sridhar
hi Frank, thanks for your observations and comments. I hadnt thought of the goat coming in the way... interesting viewpoint. any idea why I am not getting comments from viewers? I guess photo.net works that way... Sridhar - Original Message - From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Wednesday, August 13, 2003, 10:27:59 PM, you wrote: > I wanna play: > Barking at ants (entymological) > Tossing your cookies (Mr. Christie's favourite) > Two way meal ticket (volume discount?) > Hurling (not the game played by Scots) I'm reliably informed that Frenchmen go looking for th

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread Rob Studdert
On 13 Aug 2003 at 20:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > up-chuck > hork > yack > doing the bowl boogie (also used to describe the opposite end activity) > Spew > giving up the guts > re-visiting lunch > Dinner, the sequel One photographers fav that seems to have been missed thus far; The technicolor

Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread brooksdj
> We too have Elk. In fact, I've seen a lot of elk but never a moose. > Cory Waters > Pentax content: I wish I'd have had my Pentax stuff when we used to live up > north where the elk live. Just the opposite.I have seen tons of Mooses but never an Elk.

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread Cotty
>I think most people hate telling others on the list that they don't like >their photos, for whatever reason, technical or otherwise. So they don't >say anything. >I don't know about others, but I was more or less raised with the old >saying that if you can't say something nice, keep it to yourself

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread Jostein
- Original Message - From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'll drink to that! I raise my glass of Wychwood's Fiddler's Elbow to the > list. Hang on! I'll just pop down to the basement and get one too! Jostein

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread Dan Scott
On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 10:12 AM, William Robb wrote: Moose are like Sherman tanks. William Robb But not nearly as friendly. Dan Scott

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread Cotty
>Of course, only a True Critic can respond here. It's so >simple. Cotty's diver has a helmet with a pattern on it >called Lavender Mist #1, and is about to plunge into Le >Reservior, fed by River Dart, in order to hide from the >Constable, who's helmet (can you see the self-referential >helmet is

Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread cbwaters
rsday, August 14, 2003 3:17 AM Subject: Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment) > Translation from the Norwegian forests: > > Calling the elk > > (..or moose if your in the US) > > DagT > > > Fra: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread frank theriault
I wanna play: Barking at ants (entymological) Tossing your cookies (Mr. Christie's favourite) Two way meal ticket (volume discount?) Hurling (not the game played by Scots) cheers, frank Thomas Haller wrote: > Hey Steve! > > > "I've always liked the "blow chunks" euphemism." > > > DATBAR* i

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread Keith Whaley
I think most people hate telling others on the list that they don't like their photos, for whatever reason, technical or otherwise. So they don't say anything. I don't know about others, but I was more or less raised with the old saying that if you can't say something nice, keep it to yourself. Not

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread arathi-sridhar
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha nice one! hope the rest of the day goes this way!! -Sridhar - Original Message - From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:58 AM Subject: Re: please comments > N

Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread Dr E D F Williams
TED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:48 AM Subject: Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment) > > We too have Elk. In fact, I've seen a lot of elk > but never a moose. > > Cory Waters > > Pentax content: I wish I'd

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Desjardins
There is a book in our career services office entitled "Beware Those Who Ask for Feedback". Many subscribe to this theory. In a related note (Cotty) there was a Scientific American article sometime in the last 2-3 years about the work of Jason Pollock. If was written by a Physicist/artist who an

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread Lon Williamson
Of course, only a True Critic can respond here. It's so simple. Cotty's diver has a helmet with a pattern on it called Lavender Mist #1, and is about to plunge into Le Reservior, fed by River Dart, in order to hide from the Constable, who's helmet (can you see the self-referential helmet issue he

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Stoddart
> On 13 Aug 2003 at 20:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > up-chuck > > hork > > yack > > doing the bowl boogie (also used to describe the opposite end activity) > > Spew > > giving up the guts > > re-visiting lunch > > Dinner, the sequel Have we had 'the big spit' yet? And of course the Aussie fa

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread cbwaters
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:32 PM Subject: RE: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment) > Hey Steve! > > > "I've always liked the "blow chunks" euphemism." > > > DATBAR* in PDML tradition, I really get a kick out of ma

Re: please comment

2003-08-14 Thread arathi-sridhar
yes. thats definitely possible and probably the usual reason, now that you point it out. however, it doesnt help the person who is ASKING for it, hoping to improve in some way. Sridhar - Original Message - From: "Keith Whaley" > I think most people hate telling others on the list that th

Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Antti-Pekka Virjonen" Subject: Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment) > At 16:05 14.8.2003 +0300, you wrote: > >On Friday last there was one (Moose) lurking around our garden. It stayed > >for several hours. > > I be

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread frank theriault
Sorry, Rob, Haller had it in his initial post of what has now become a thread to be proud of... cheers, frank Rob Studdert wrote: > One photographers fav that seems to have been missed thus far; > > The technicolor yawn :-P > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(G

Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)

2003-08-14 Thread Mark Roberts
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sorry, Rob, > >Haller had it in his initial post of what has now become a thread to be proud >of... > > > >cheers, >frank > >Rob Studdert wrote: > >> One photographers fav that seems to have been missed thus far; >> >> The technicolor yawn :-P Here's on

Re: please comment

2003-04-01 Thread James Moniz
Done! Check out the page. Jim Moniz -- ___ Get your free Verizonmail at www.verizonmail.com

please comment

2003-03-31 Thread arathi-sridhar
hi. please comment on this flower picture I recently uploaded on photo.net somehow, even after 700+ viewings, no one has taken the time to comment / rate the picture. minor level adjustments made on PS. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1387225 thanks in advance. -Sridhar

Re: please comment

2002-11-18 Thread Alan Chan
I think the composition is ok considered you have to cover what she's drawing on the floor. However, the result could be greatly enchanced if the sharpest was higher. regards, Alan Chan this photo just happened - I looked out of the window and there this girl was, drawing. Im not sure why, but

Re: please comment

2002-11-18 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, It's a nice photo, but I agree about the lower 3rd of the photo. The girl is on the half and I think this would have benefitted if she'd been on a 3rd. Compositionally she is a point on a neutral area, and therefore dominates the image. The eye scans the area and tries to establish the relatio

Re: please comment

2002-11-18 Thread Bill Owens
Comment made. Bill - Original Message - From: "Arathi-Sridhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:39 AM Subject: please comment > Hi. > this photo just happened - I looked out of the window and there this girl >

please comment

2002-11-18 Thread Arathi-Sridhar
Hi. this photo just happened - I looked out of the window and there this girl was, drawing. Im not sure why, but I like it. I would like your comments please http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1115841 I dont think I agree with the crop suggested in the critique, as there would be 'no spa

Re: please comment on this shot

2002-08-04 Thread William Robb
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/03/02 02:57AM >>> > http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=191170 I was finally able to view this page. I like the picture. I downloaded it and desaturated it to see what it looked like in B&W. Personally, I think it looked better. William Robb - This message is from

Re: please comment on this shot

2002-08-04 Thread Steve Desjardins
Very nice. Great color and composition. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/03/02 02:57AM >>> http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=191170 - This message i

Re: please comment on this shot

2002-08-03 Thread Bill Owens
Big mistake! Never put something where you're sure you'll know where to find it the next time you need it. Bill > I know I put my filters in a safe place somewhere. > > Wendy > > --- > Wendy Beard > Ottawa, Canada > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > home page http://www.beard-redfern.com > - >

Re: please comment on this shot

2002-08-03 Thread wendy beard
At 09:37 3-8-2002 -0400, Frank wrote: > It (damn, I can't say "sucks", 'cause Wendy may read this ) isn't very >well designed. Hee hee, and I _was_ reading it too! Been busy moving house over the last month so I could easily have missed it. Off to the badlands and beyond next week so I'll be bus

Re: please comment on this shot

2002-08-03 Thread Bmacrae
Very nice pic. Very good light and nice composition. I'd like to try that lens. -Brendan MacRae - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: please comment on this shot

2002-08-03 Thread Ann Sanfedele
frank theriault wrote: > (snip) > Now this has nothing to do with the shot, but I don't like that site. The image > loads right on top of the technical info, so I can't see what camera/lens > combination was used. Is that just me and my server, or same for everyone > else? It (damn, I can't s

Re: please comment on this shot

2002-08-03 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Nice patterns in the foreground -- looks like some vignetting up top. However, I'd get myself a better place to display it if you can. the site is cluttered and totally distracts from your image. (with NEtscape 4.6 the picture unfolds across a background of writing. annsan newbee wrote: > http:/

Please Comment

2001-05-14 Thread Paul Jones
Hi, I recently broke my arm in a motor cycle accident, so i have been have photography withdrawel. I managed to use my tripod to shoot some leaves. Any way getting to the point i scanned the slides in on our scanner at work a Microtek Scanmaker 4, the images came out soft, i tried to fix this up