Re: Jeffrey Brian Downard
At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14434
Jeff, List,
I had a faint memory of discussing the relation between k-adic and k-tomic with
Tom Gollier in my early days on the Peirce List, and for once my memory serves
me well. I found this link
(The undistorted figure is attached.)
Ben wrote:
(100414-1)
Most generally a triad is a trio. A predicate is called triadic if it is
predicated of three objects like so: Pxyz. In Peirce's system a genuine
triad is one involving irred
Peircers,
The more I pondered the first two quotations from the Syllabus that Frederik
cited in Chapter 3.4, the more I felt compelled to study that part of the text
in detail, and I eventually copied out a longer extract from EP 2, 275–277,
taking that over the comparable but editorially alte
Jon,
I am afraid your answer is as incomprehensible to me as was your original
remark that prompted my question.
With all the best.
Sung
> Thread:
> JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
> JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
> GF:ht
Ben, list,
It is my understanding that the mathematical category is another name for
semiosis. In other words, a category is to mathematicians hat semiosis is
to semioticians.
To quote Peirce from http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM:
A "sign" is anything, A, which,
(1) in
Sung, List,
Maybe it would help if you told me whether you wish to have:
(1) a mathematical discussion about mathematical categories or
(2) a philosophical discussion about mathematical categories.
In Case 1, I can only say what I always say when you bring up
this subject, to wit, that it would
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14313
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14350
JA:http://permalin
Sungchul, list
I know next to nothing about category theory.
Most generally a triad is a trio. A predicate is called triadic if it
is predicated of three objects like so: /Pxyz/. In Peirce's system a
genuine triad is one involving irreducibly triadic action, called
semiosis, among three corr
Jon
"Trying to comprehend triadic relations by
means of their projective trichotomies is a project
ultimately doomed to fail."
A couple of concrete examples would help in understanding what you mean by
the doomed failure you are referring to.
With all the best.
Sung
Peircers,
Another passage from ''Natural Propositions'' that appeared to light up before
my mind's eye — I'm guessing because of all the time I whiled away wrestling
with divergent views of assertion when I first began studying the history of
logic — is this selection from Chapter 3.
3.4.
Theme:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14313
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14350
JA:http://permalink
Jon, List:
It appears to me that your distinction is one that needs to carefully examined.
Please cite the reference texts.
Clearly, the triadic triad is not a mathematical partition. Period. Full Stop.
End of Narrative.
Why anyone would thin so is beyond my comprehension.
Your concerns about
Jeff,
The earliest such discussions go back to the turn of the millennium and the
Texas Tech server and might not be possible to find anymore, but I probably
posted various renditions to other lists and archives that are still around.
Given time and a little thought I could probably reconstruc
e Our Ideas Clear."
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff Downard
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
NAU
(o) 523-8354
________
From: Jon Awbrey [jawb...@att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 7:44 PM
To: Peirce List 1
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions • Selected Passages
-
et]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 7:44 PM
To: Peirce List 1
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions • Selected Passages
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gm
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14313
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14350
JA:http://permalin
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14313
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14350
JA:http://permalin
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14313
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14350
JA:http://permalin
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14313
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14350
JA:http://permalin
box except to take up spacetime.
gary f.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:jawb...@att.net]
Sent: 27-Sep-14 11:09 PM
To: Frederik Stjernfelt
Cc: PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu; Gary Fuhrman; Gary Richmond; Benjamin Udell
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions . Selected Passages
Ga
Gary F, Gary R, List,
It has long been my practice to maintain a separation between original source
texts and their various interpretant texts and I continue to believe that this
is the better practice from the standpoint of both scholarship and encouraging
critical thinking than dicing and sl
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14313
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14350
JA:http://permalin
Peircers,
I think it helps to reflect on the previous excerpt
from "Kaina Stoicheia" in a somewhat larger context:
http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003187.html
o~o~o~o~o~o~o
KS. Note 7
o~o~o~o~o~
Peircers,
A passage from “3.3. Dicisigns: Signs Separately Indicating Their Object”.
True to Peirce's general way of investigating sign types, he describes Dicisigns
compositionally, functionally, and systematically. As Hilpinen (1992) says,
Peirce's recurrent and “standard” definition of D
Jon, I think it would be better if you would combine the quotes from NP and
your comments in a single message. It would also be better if you (and
everyone) would send posts only to the list(s), i.e. delete the addresses of
individuals from your address field before you send, as that would avoid
un
Peircers,
Here is the first passage I wanted to single out for further reflection, from
“3.2. The Extension of the Dicisign Concept”. I have broken out the separate
points of the long paragraph to facilitate study and discussion. As always,
please let me know if you find any typos in my tran
26 matches
Mail list logo
